Enterprise

AMD thinks Xilinx could transform its data-center business. It needs China to sign off.

There’s another big chip deal in regulatory limbo. AMD’s $35 billion bid for Xilinx, which would transform its data-center business, is being held up by China.

A microchip

AMD announced a $35 billion bid to acquire Xilinx more than a year ago.

Photographer: Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg via Getty Images

AMD has spent its entire corporate life as a second-class citizen to Intel. That’s just one reason why CEO Lisa Su seized an opportunity with a $35 billion stock deal to snap up programmable chipmaker Xilinx more than a year ago at one of Intel’s weakest moments in decades.

The full extent of a manufacturing stumble that delayed Intel's next-generation chips six months became apparent in 2020, to Su and AMD's considerable advantage. AMD’s share price soared as it became clear the longtime also-ran stood to gain significant market share, granting Su a considerably more valuable currency for acquisitions such as Xilinx, which makes chips for data center networking, cars, military use and satellites.

When the deal was announced in October 2020 AMD expected it to close by the end of 2021, but late last month AMD pushed the expected close date to by the end of March. It will now have to re-file its regulatory paperwork with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, which has already approved the deal once; China has yet to do so.

For AMD, the purpose of the largest deal in the company’s history is clear: It would immediately add programmable chips to its existing portfolio of graphics and server processors. That’s a potential market of $30 billion, on top of the market of $80 billion in annual sales AMD was already chasing.

Xilinx would also give AMD a significant foothold within a group of products that is essentially controlled by a duopoly — Xilinx and Intel’s Altera — and runs parallel to its other businesses. And, perhaps most importantly, It would make AMD a stronger competitor against Intel for the various pieces of silicon needed to power data centers.

“When you look strategically in the data center, our vision of a very heterogeneous architecture includes a world where you have CPUs, GPUs, FPGAs, ASICs, sort of all connected in the same ecosystem,” CEO Lisa Su said at the JPMorgan Global Technology, Media and Communications Conference last May, according to a transcript from Sentieo. “So bringing that FPGA leadership from Xilinx to the AMD portfolio really gives us a tremendous overall end-to-end portfolio in terms of capability.”

An AMD spokesperson declined to comment on the new timing of the deal, citing the quiet period ahead of earnings.

Bulking up

Absorbing Xilinx would vault AMD into a bigger corporate category, at a moment in the chip industry when size equals survival, because small companies can no longer afford to develop the most advanced chips demanded by the world. Bringing a chip from idea to the point where a manufacturer such as TSMC can produce them at high volume can cost more than $500 million, putting it out of reach for many.

AMD is not in immediate danger; in 2020, the company reported revenue of $3.33 billion for the segment that sells server chips, which includes the chips AMD designs for Sony and Microsoft’s video game systems, and executives have said the company expects overall revenue to rise 65% in 2021. Analysts estimate AMD will record around $16 billion in revenue this year.

Chips, however, are more complicated and expensive to make than ever. And even though Intel is wounded, it is larger by an order of magnitude, and has ways of innovating in its manufacturing operations that are beyond AMD's control as a fabless chip designer. And reinvigorating its manufacturing capabilities are part of Intel’s fresh plan to regain the chipmaking throne; in the past, Intel’s manufacturing prowess allowed it to get away with less-than-perfect designs that still outperformed the competition thanks to its manufacturing leadership.

Intel entered the FPGA business with its acquisition of Xilinx rival Altera for $16.7 billion in 2015, the other competitor in the FPGA duopoly. At the time, the deal’s promise was to contribute FPGAs to Intel’s Xeon server chips, boosting performance. But, Altera hasn’t appeared to help Intel much in the data center market.

According to Mercury Research, as of the third quarter of 2021, AMD’s share gained 3.6 percentage points, which amounted to 10% market share for server chips versus Intel’s 90%. And AMD’s share has been steadily rising for several years.

FPGAs are interesting pieces of hardware. Customers can tweak them as they see fit, which means they are adaptable to new types of computing needs and can receive substantial updates while already deployed in the field. FPGAs also make it faster and cheaper to bring new designs to market compared to other types of processors, which are not easy to program.

What often happens in practice is businesses deploy FPGAs for new computing requirements, and once a design is dialed in — or standards are set — chipmakers will produce application-specific integrated circuits, or ASICs.

FPGAs have downsides, however: Compared with an equivalent ASIC, the programmable processors use considerably more power. And since FGPAs tend to be large, they also need more silicon, which usually makes them more expensive.

“There’s no such thing as a free lunch,” said Stacy Rasgon, an analyst at Bernstein.

Odds of closing

In order to realize Su’s strategy, the deal will have to clear the final regulatory hurdle in China.

Big chip deals that involve China and the U.S. have been tricky for years. Geopolitical tension between the two superpowers can rupture even the most carefully planned acquisitions, such as Qualcomm’s bid for NXP Semiconductors. In China, officials deliberately obfuscate regulatory proceedings, which are complicated by political machinations and strategic calculations beyond what even the most well informed executive or investor is privy to.

As of last week, investors are betting the AMD's bid has roughly a 60% chance of going through, given where the two stocks are trading, according to Roy Behren, chief investment officer of Westchester Capital Management. "A little bit more than a coin toss," he said.

One fear is that the deal may come to resemble Qualcomm’s $44 billion bid for the Dutch auto chipmaker NXP. Qualcomm eventually walked away from the takeover attempt in 2018 after Chinese regulators dragged their feet for years, neither approving nor denying the deal outright. Qualcomm announced the NXP acquisition in 2016, ahead of Donald Trump’s election to the presidency. It likely fell victim to the trade war that followed, though China has denied that was the case.

And the political tension with China hasn’t improved much in the intervening years. VLSIresearch president Risto Puhakka told Protocol it’s unlikely AMD’s bid will be successful, citing that tension.

“They may get lucky if the Olympics go really well and Xi [Jinping] is happy for two days and they are able to squeeze the deal through,” Puhakka said.

Not everyone shares the negative outlook. Behren says AMD’s Xilinx bid is quite a bit different than Qualcomm’s. “The feedback we’re getting is that the process is moving along nicely,” he said, adding that the company has submitted several concessions to China’s State Administration for Market Regulation that were well received.

“From a fundamental perspective it doesn’t appear that there should be an antitrust problem with this transaction,” Behren said.

Still, the process is opaque. Behren pointed to the 18% spread between Xilinx’s stock and the price AMD agreed to pay as evidence that investors were wary that something unexpected could occur and the deal may fall through.

“If you use a February close, it’s over a 180% annualized return, which is ridiculous,” Behren said. “That reflects that the markets are fearful of an unpredictable outcome.”

Fintech

Judge Zia Faruqui is trying to teach you crypto, one ‘SNL’ reference at a time

His decisions on major cryptocurrency cases have quoted "The Big Lebowski," "SNL," and "Dr. Strangelove." That’s because he wants you — yes, you — to read them.

The ways Zia Faruqui (right) has weighed on cases that have come before him can give lawyers clues as to what legal frameworks will pass muster.

Photo: Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images

“Cryptocurrency and related software analytics tools are ‘The wave of the future, Dude. One hundred percent electronic.’”

That’s not a quote from "The Big Lebowski" — at least, not directly. It’s a quote from a Washington, D.C., district court memorandum opinion on the role cryptocurrency analytics tools can play in government investigations. The author is Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui.

Keep Reading Show less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

The financial technology transformation is driving competition, creating consumer choice, and shaping the future of finance. Hear from seven fintech leaders who are reshaping the future of finance, and join the inaugural Financial Technology Association Fintech Summit to learn more.

Keep Reading Show less
FTA
The Financial Technology Association (FTA) represents industry leaders shaping the future of finance. We champion the power of technology-centered financial services and advocate for the modernization of financial regulation to support inclusion and responsible innovation.
Enterprise

AWS CEO: The cloud isn’t just about technology

As AWS preps for its annual re:Invent conference, Adam Selipsky talks product strategy, support for hybrid environments, and the value of the cloud in uncertain economic times.

Photo: Noah Berger/Getty Images for Amazon Web Services

AWS is gearing up for re:Invent, its annual cloud computing conference where announcements this year are expected to focus on its end-to-end data strategy and delivering new industry-specific services.

It will be the second re:Invent with CEO Adam Selipsky as leader of the industry’s largest cloud provider after his return last year to AWS from data visualization company Tableau Software.

Keep Reading Show less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Image: Protocol

We launched Protocol in February 2020 to cover the evolving power center of tech. It is with deep sadness that just under three years later, we are winding down the publication.

As of today, we will not publish any more stories. All of our newsletters, apart from our flagship, Source Code, will no longer be sent. Source Code will be published and sent for the next few weeks, but it will also close down in December.

Keep Reading Show less
Bennett Richardson

Bennett Richardson ( @bennettrich) is the president of Protocol. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, Bennett was executive director of global strategic partnerships at POLITICO, where he led strategic growth efforts including POLITICO's European expansion in Brussels and POLITICO's creative agency POLITICO Focus during his six years with the company. Prior to POLITICO, Bennett was co-founder and CMO of Hinge, the mobile dating company recently acquired by Match Group. Bennett began his career in digital and social brand marketing working with major brands across tech, energy, and health care at leading marketing and communications agencies including Edelman and GMMB. Bennett is originally from Portland, Maine, and received his bachelor's degree from Colgate University.

Enterprise

Why large enterprises struggle to find suitable platforms for MLops

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, and as larger enterprises go from deploying hundreds of models to thousands and even millions of models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

Photo: artpartner-images via Getty Images

On any given day, Lily AI runs hundreds of machine learning models using computer vision and natural language processing that are customized for its retail and ecommerce clients to make website product recommendations, forecast demand, and plan merchandising. But this spring when the company was in the market for a machine learning operations platform to manage its expanding model roster, it wasn’t easy to find a suitable off-the-shelf system that could handle such a large number of models in deployment while also meeting other criteria.

Some MLops platforms are not well-suited for maintaining even more than 10 machine learning models when it comes to keeping track of data, navigating their user interfaces, or reporting capabilities, Matthew Nokleby, machine learning manager for Lily AI’s product intelligence team, told Protocol earlier this year. “The duct tape starts to show,” he said.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories
Bulletins