AMD thinks Xilinx could transform its data-center business. It needs China to sign off.

There’s another big chip deal in regulatory limbo. AMD’s $35 billion bid for Xilinx, which would transform its data-center business, is being held up by China.

A microchip

AMD announced a $35 billion bid to acquire Xilinx more than a year ago.

Photographer: Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg via Getty Images

AMD has spent its entire corporate life as a second-class citizen to Intel. That’s just one reason why CEO Lisa Su seized an opportunity with a $35 billion stock deal to snap up programmable chipmaker Xilinx more than a year ago at one of Intel’s weakest moments in decades.

The full extent of a manufacturing stumble that delayed Intel's next-generation chips six months became apparent in 2020, to Su and AMD's considerable advantage. AMD’s share price soared as it became clear the longtime also-ran stood to gain significant market share, granting Su a considerably more valuable currency for acquisitions such as Xilinx, which makes chips for data center networking, cars, military use and satellites.

When the deal was announced in October 2020 AMD expected it to close by the end of 2021, but late last month AMD pushed the expected close date to by the end of March. It will now have to re-file its regulatory paperwork with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, which has already approved the deal once; China has yet to do so.

For AMD, the purpose of the largest deal in the company’s history is clear: It would immediately add programmable chips to its existing portfolio of graphics and server processors. That’s a potential market of $30 billion, on top of the market of $80 billion in annual sales AMD was already chasing.

Xilinx would also give AMD a significant foothold within a group of products that is essentially controlled by a duopoly — Xilinx and Intel’s Altera — and runs parallel to its other businesses. And, perhaps most importantly, It would make AMD a stronger competitor against Intel for the various pieces of silicon needed to power data centers.

“When you look strategically in the data center, our vision of a very heterogeneous architecture includes a world where you have CPUs, GPUs, FPGAs, ASICs, sort of all connected in the same ecosystem,” CEO Lisa Su said at the JPMorgan Global Technology, Media and Communications Conference last May, according to a transcript from Sentieo. “So bringing that FPGA leadership from Xilinx to the AMD portfolio really gives us a tremendous overall end-to-end portfolio in terms of capability.”

An AMD spokesperson declined to comment on the new timing of the deal, citing the quiet period ahead of earnings.

Bulking up

Absorbing Xilinx would vault AMD into a bigger corporate category, at a moment in the chip industry when size equals survival, because small companies can no longer afford to develop the most advanced chips demanded by the world. Bringing a chip from idea to the point where a manufacturer such as TSMC can produce them at high volume can cost more than $500 million, putting it out of reach for many.

AMD is not in immediate danger; in 2020, the company reported revenue of $3.33 billion for the segment that sells server chips, which includes the chips AMD designs for Sony and Microsoft’s video game systems, and executives have said the company expects overall revenue to rise 65% in 2021. Analysts estimate AMD will record around $16 billion in revenue this year.

Chips, however, are more complicated and expensive to make than ever. And even though Intel is wounded, it is larger by an order of magnitude, and has ways of innovating in its manufacturing operations that are beyond AMD's control as a fabless chip designer. And reinvigorating its manufacturing capabilities are part of Intel’s fresh plan to regain the chipmaking throne; in the past, Intel’s manufacturing prowess allowed it to get away with less-than-perfect designs that still outperformed the competition thanks to its manufacturing leadership.

Intel entered the FPGA business with its acquisition of Xilinx rival Altera for $16.7 billion in 2015, the other competitor in the FPGA duopoly. At the time, the deal’s promise was to contribute FPGAs to Intel’s Xeon server chips, boosting performance. But, Altera hasn’t appeared to help Intel much in the data center market.

According to Mercury Research, as of the third quarter of 2021, AMD’s share gained 3.6 percentage points, which amounted to 10% market share for server chips versus Intel’s 90%. And AMD’s share has been steadily rising for several years.

FPGAs are interesting pieces of hardware. Customers can tweak them as they see fit, which means they are adaptable to new types of computing needs and can receive substantial updates while already deployed in the field. FPGAs also make it faster and cheaper to bring new designs to market compared to other types of processors, which are not easy to program.

What often happens in practice is businesses deploy FPGAs for new computing requirements, and once a design is dialed in — or standards are set — chipmakers will produce application-specific integrated circuits, or ASICs.

FPGAs have downsides, however: Compared with an equivalent ASIC, the programmable processors use considerably more power. And since FGPAs tend to be large, they also need more silicon, which usually makes them more expensive.

“There’s no such thing as a free lunch,” said Stacy Rasgon, an analyst at Bernstein.

Odds of closing

In order to realize Su’s strategy, the deal will have to clear the final regulatory hurdle in China.

Big chip deals that involve China and the U.S. have been tricky for years. Geopolitical tension between the two superpowers can rupture even the most carefully planned acquisitions, such as Qualcomm’s bid for NXP Semiconductors. In China, officials deliberately obfuscate regulatory proceedings, which are complicated by political machinations and strategic calculations beyond what even the most well informed executive or investor is privy to.

As of last week, investors are betting the AMD's bid has roughly a 60% chance of going through, given where the two stocks are trading, according to Roy Behren, chief investment officer of Westchester Capital Management. "A little bit more than a coin toss," he said.

One fear is that the deal may come to resemble Qualcomm’s $44 billion bid for the Dutch auto chipmaker NXP. Qualcomm eventually walked away from the takeover attempt in 2018 after Chinese regulators dragged their feet for years, neither approving nor denying the deal outright. Qualcomm announced the NXP acquisition in 2016, ahead of Donald Trump’s election to the presidency. It likely fell victim to the trade war that followed, though China has denied that was the case.

And the political tension with China hasn’t improved much in the intervening years. VLSIresearch president Risto Puhakka told Protocol it’s unlikely AMD’s bid will be successful, citing that tension.

“They may get lucky if the Olympics go really well and Xi [Jinping] is happy for two days and they are able to squeeze the deal through,” Puhakka said.

Not everyone shares the negative outlook. Behren says AMD’s Xilinx bid is quite a bit different than Qualcomm’s. “The feedback we’re getting is that the process is moving along nicely,” he said, adding that the company has submitted several concessions to China’s State Administration for Market Regulation that were well received.

“From a fundamental perspective it doesn’t appear that there should be an antitrust problem with this transaction,” Behren said.

Still, the process is opaque. Behren pointed to the 18% spread between Xilinx’s stock and the price AMD agreed to pay as evidence that investors were wary that something unexpected could occur and the deal may fall through.

“If you use a February close, it’s over a 180% annualized return, which is ridiculous,” Behren said. “That reflects that the markets are fearful of an unpredictable outcome.”


The minerals we need to save the planet are getting way too expensive

Supply chain problems and rising demand have sent prices spiraling upward for the minerals and metals essential for the clean energy transition.

Critical mineral prices have exploded over the past year.

Photo: Andrey Rudakov/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The newest source of the alarm bells echoing throughout the renewables industry? Spiking critical mineral and metal prices.

According to a new report from the International Energy Agency, a maelstrom of rising demand and tattered supply chains have caused prices for the materials needed for clean energy technologies to soar in the last year. And this increase has only accelerated since 2022 began.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Sponsored Content

Why the digital transformation of industries is creating a more sustainable future

Qualcomm’s chief sustainability officer Angela Baker on how companies can view going “digital” as a way not only toward growth, as laid out in a recent report, but also toward establishing and meeting environmental, social and governance goals.

Three letters dominate business practice at present: ESG, or environmental, social and governance goals. The number of mentions of the environment in financial earnings has doubled in the last five years, according to GlobalData: 600,000 companies mentioned the term in their annual or quarterly results last year.

But meeting those ESG goals can be a challenge — one that businesses can’t and shouldn’t take lightly. Ahead of an exclusive fireside chat at Davos, Angela Baker, chief sustainability officer at Qualcomm, sat down with Protocol to speak about how best to achieve those targets and how Qualcomm thinks about its own sustainability strategy, net zero commitment, other ESG targets and more.

Keep Reading Show less
Chris Stokel-Walker

Chris Stokel-Walker is a freelance technology and culture journalist and author of "YouTubers: How YouTube Shook Up TV and Created a New Generation of Stars." His work has been published in The New York Times, The Guardian and Wired.


The 911 system is outdated. Updating it to the cloud is risky.

Unlike tech companies, emergency services departments can’t afford to make mistakes when migrating to the cloud. Integrating new software in an industry where there’s no margin for error is risky, and sometimes deadly.

In an industry where seconds can mean the difference between life and death, many public safety departments are hesitant to take risks on new cloud-based technologies.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Dialing 911 could be the most important phone call you will ever make. But what happens when the software that’s supposed to deliver that call fails you? It may seem simple, but the technology behind a call for help is complicated, and when it fails, deadly.

The infrastructure supporting emergency contact centers is one of the most critical assets for any city, town or local government. But just as the pandemic exposed the creaky tech infrastructure that runs local governments, in many cases the technology in those call centers is outdated and hasn’t been touched for decades.

Keep Reading Show less
Aisha Counts

Aisha Counts (@aishacounts) is a reporter at Protocol covering enterprise software. Formerly, she was a management consultant for EY. She's based in Los Angeles and can be reached at acounts@protocol.com.


'The Wilds' is a must-watch guilty pleasure and more weekend recs

Don’t know what to do this weekend? We’ve got you covered.

Our favorite things this week.

Illustration: Protocol

The East Coast is getting a little preview of summer this weekend. If you want to stay indoors and beat the heat, we have a few suggestions this week to keep you entertained, like a new season of Amazon Prime’s guilty-pleasure show, “The Wilds,” a new game from Horizon Worlds that’s fun for everyone and a sneak peek from Adam Mosseri into what Instagram is thinking about Web3.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.


Work expands to fill the time – but only if you let it

The former Todoist productivity expert drops time-blocking tips, lofi beats playlists for concentrating and other knowledge bombs.

“I do hope the productivity space as a whole is more intentional about pushing narratives that are about life versus just work.”

Photo: Courtesy of Fadeke Adegbuyi

Fadeke Adegbuyi knows how to dole out productivity advice. When she was a marketing manager at Doist, she taught users via blogs and newsletters about how to better organize their lives. Doist, the company behind to-do-list app Todoist and messaging app Twist, has pushed remote and asynchronous work for years. Adegbuyi’s job was to translate these ideas to the masses.

“We were thinking about asynchronous communication from a work point of view, of like: What is most effective for doing ambitious and awesome work, and also, what is most advantageous for living a life that feels balanced?” Adegbuyi said.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at llawrence@protocol.com.

Latest Stories