Source Code: Your daily look at what matters in tech.

enterpriseenterpriseauthorTom KrazitNoneAre you keeping up with the latest cloud developments? Get Tom Krazit and Joe Williams' newsletter every Monday and Thursday.d3d5b92349
×

Get access to Protocol

Your information will be used in accordance with our Privacy Policy

I’m already a subscriber
Protocol | Enterprise

Why AT&T moved its core tech — but not everything — to Microsoft Azure

Like many telcos building 5G networks, AT&T thinks the cloud is ready to support that challenge. But AT&T's Jeremy Legg thinks the cloud is too expensive for some apps.

​AT&T Chief Technology Officer Jeremy Legg

AT&T Chief Technology Officer Jeremy Legg discusses the move to Microsoft Azure.

Photo: AT&T

Telecommunications companies, traditionally concerned with stability and control, have been slower than companies in other industries to embrace cloud computing. Those days are long gone.

Last week AT&T announced plans to move its 5G network technology to Microsoft Azure. It not only signed a deal with the cloud provider to host its mobile workloads, but also transferred its core Network Cloud technology to Microsoft's budding Azure for Operators division. The two companies have been working together since 2019, but this announcement was the telco equivalent of landing in America and burning your ships: There's no going back once the core intellectual property has left the building.

For AT&T, it was simply time to acknowledge that big cloud providers like Microsoft finally offer the hardware, software and networking expertise required to run their networks, said Jeremy Legg, chief technology officer for AT&T Communications, in an interview with Protocol. That just wasn't the case when mobile carriers started rolling out 4G networks more than a decade ago. And AT&T isn't alone in making this conclusion: Verizon signed a partnership deal with AWS in 2019, and Google Cloud is working with European carriers Orange and Telefónica.

But don't yet consider AT&T a total convert to the cloud. Like a lot of companies of a certain age, AT&T wants to shed two-thirds of its sprawling data-center operation, but it also believes that certain applications with certain performance requirements will always make more sense to run in-house both for cost and performance reasons.

Right before the holiday weekend, Legg talked about the Microsoft deal, AT&T Communications's broader cloud strategy and how the company is applying AI in hopes of making its customer service less painful.

This interview was edited for length and clarity.

Can you tell me a little bit about the Microsoft deal and how it came together?

We've been migrating to [the] cloud for some time, but we originally left a lot of the packet core networking stuff inside of our own data centers. But as you sort of forecast out over time the same macro forces that make it reasonable and cost-effective ... to move IT workloads to the cloud, it increasingly applies to network workloads.

Originally, [the] public cloud wasn't really set up to do network workloads at the level that we're talking about. But now the public cloud is capable of doing those things in combination with central compute as well as edge compute. So as you look at that, and you look at, from a pure cost basis, how much is it going to cost us to expand our on-premises footprints over time, and forecast that model out given the increase in consumption across these platforms, it begins to make sense to move it. And then as you also think about it from a software and software development standpoint, it increasingly makes sense to partner with one of the hyperscalers to make sure that you're innovating at the level that you need to.

The deal that was just announced was a little bit more than a standard moving-the-workloads-over-to-the-cloud deal, in that Microsoft acquired AT&T's network platform technology as well. Can you explain a little bit more about what exactly that means and why that became part of this deal?

The intellectual property aspect of that and the employee aspect of that is actually moving and incorporating parts of our core infrastructure into Azure. They will become responsible for the development and upgrading of our software packet cores and how we move wireless packets around. And we have a lot of packet cores.

They bought Affirmed, which is a packet core provider. We think that, in general, it's a better idea to have a company that wants to build the best possible packet core to serve an industry than us just trying to build one for ourselves.

Where does AT&T see the potential of edge computing? What are the types of things that you think will run best at the edge, both now and in the future?

Well, I think this is going to be a long road, not a short road, as it relates to edge compute. What it really boils down to is products.

Network packet cores have to run closer to the consumer in order to move the packets in the most efficient way possible. But when you begin to also think about the types of applications or services or products that you build at the edge, the architectures change quite a bit from things that were traditionally driven off of central compute, or cloud, or something that's in a traditional on-premises data center.

When you go to the edge, there's a lot of edges. You start talking about hundreds of edges around the country, let alone if you started thinking globally.

We talk about connected cars, well, they're moving; they've got to be able to go from one edge location to another edge location depending on where [they're] going. That architecture is very different from doing something through a central computer.

There are also things from a privacy and security standpoint that I think are important as people are working from home. This gets into things like extending corporate networks into the home, and how do you do that as a network provider, to essentially create a home as an endpoint on a corporate network?

What are your relationships with other cloud providers, and what is your long-term commitment to operating your own data centers?

Historically, AT&T has been a "host it and build it yourself'' company, and we're in the midst of transitioning from that model to a public cloud model. We have [around] 30 physical data centers sprinkled across the company that we're trying to consolidate down to single digits.

That's being done in a number of ways. One is to just simply reduce the number of applications that we have; we have more than 7,000 applications sprinkled across the company and we want to eliminate as many of those as we can, particularly where they're redundant or legacy. And then we want to move certain strategic applications into our own data centers that don't necessarily pencil out to the cloud, but move the bulk of the balance up into the public cloud itself.

We've been doing that with Microsoft for some time. But we also have relationships with Amazon as well as with [Google Cloud Platform], where we use certain sets of capabilities in both of those clouds where it makes sense. So you can think about [machine learning] and AI layers, you can think about specific applications that they built on their service layers that we do take advantage of in addition to Azure.

Then what you also have is an increasing desire on the behalf of AT&T but also [other] companies like us to move some of that central cloud, service layer compute and storage capabilities closer to the edge. Many of these companies have these kinds of models — AWS has had Outposts for some time, for example — and so we're in the midst of crafting the relationship with those providers to have relationships with them at the edge.

This gets into a lot of technology governance, particularly in large organizations, where you really have to control what goes into one cloud versus another cloud, but also recognize that there are certain capabilities in each of these clouds that are best in class; it would be silly of us to not leverage those.

You mentioned a few minutes ago that you are keeping some strategic applications in your own data centers. Can you give me some sense of what you consider strategic, what types of things you really want to make sure are running on infrastructure that you directly control?

We have certain things from the public sector standpoint in our data centers. And then we also have situations where certain types of workloads don't make sense to run in the cloud.

If you're running super-high compute 24/7, it's probably cheaper to run on-premises. The beauty of the cloud is you can spin things up and tear them down, and you're only paying on a consumption basis. But if you're consuming 100% of the time compute and storage and the whole nine yards, there's a cost equation that begins to get into that.

You'd have to run those models and look at certain applications and say, "OK, it doesn't make sense to re-architect this application and move it to the cloud. Do you actually save any money or do you gain capabilities?"

What emerging enterprise technology do you think is the most interesting or exciting? You're not allowed to say edge computing for that category, because we've been talking about edge a lot.

[Laughs.] Well, I'd put ML and AI that leads to automation in there. I mean, it really is becoming real.

The way a customer interacts with a customer service agent, and actually automating that through AI and ML so that they're interacting with a computer, not necessarily a person for certain use cases, and that thing is smart enough to solve that customer problem — that's pretty incredible stuff that, if you think about five years ago being able to do that, not many people would have said you could.

Those things are becoming real, and we've deployed some of this. When you're talking about operating at the scale that we do, finding intelligent solutions that enable automation can be pretty game-changing. When we can serve a customer and keep them off the phone waiting to talk to an agent for five minutes and solve that problem with an AI/ML application, I think our customers are going to be happier.

Power

Google wants to (try to) make Google Glass cool again

Also this week: savvy virtual assistants, surveillance without violating people's privacy, and more patents from Big Tech.

Is making these cool even possible?

Image: Google

This week was so full of fun patent applications that I didn't know where to start. We've got a throwback to 2013, a virtual assistant that knows when I've stopped talking, and headphones that can determine a user's hearing abilities.

But as always, remember that the big tech companies file all kinds of crazy patents for things, and though most never amount to anything, some end up defining the future

Keep Reading Show less
Karyne Levy

Karyne Levy ( @karynelevy) is the West Coast editor at Protocol. Before joining Protocol, Karyne was a senior producer at Scribd, helping to create the original content program. Prior to that she was an assigning editor at NerdWallet, a senior tech editor at Business Insider, and the assistant managing editor at CNET, where she also hosted Rumor Has It for CNET TV. She lives outside San Francisco with her wife, son and lots of pets.

As President of Alibaba Group, I am often asked, "What is Alibaba doing in the U.S.?"

In fact, most people are not aware we have a business in the U.S. because we are not a U.S. consumer-facing service that people use every day – nor do we want to be. Our consumers – nearly 900 million of them – are located in China.

Keep Reading Show less
J. Michael Evans
Michael Evans leads and executes Alibaba Group's international strategy for globalizing the company and expanding its businesses outside of China.

Does Elon Musk make Tesla tech?

Between the massive valuation and the self-driving software, Tesla isn't hard to sell as a tech company. But does that mean that, in 10 years, every car will be tech?

You know what's not tech and is a car company? Volkswagen.

Image: Tesla/Protocol

From disagreements about what "Autopilot" should mean and SolarCity lawsuits to space colonization and Boring Company tunnels, extremely online Tesla CEO Elon Musk and his company stay firmly in the news, giving us all plenty of opportunities to consider whether the company that made electric cars cool counts as tech.

The massive valuation definitely screams tech, as does the company's investment in self-driving software and battery development. But at the end of the day, this might not be enough to convince skeptics that Tesla is anything other than a car company that uses tech. It also raises questions about the role that timeliness plays in calling something tech. In a potential future where EVs are the norm and many run on Tesla's own software — which is well within the realm of possibility — will Tesla lose its claim to a tech pedigree?

Keep Reading Show less
Becca Evans
Becca Evans is a copy editor and producer at Protocol. Previously she edited Carrie Ann Conversations, a wellness and lifestyle publication founded by Carrie Ann Inaba. She's also written for STYLECASTER. Becca lives in Los Angeles.
Protocol | Workplace

Apple isn’t the only tech company spooked by the delta variant

Spooked by rising cases of COVID-19, many tech companies delay their office reopening.

Apple and at least two other Silicon Valley companies have decided to delay their reopenings in response to rising COVID-19 case counts.

Photo: Luis Alvarez via Getty

Apple grabbed headlines this week when it told employees it would delay its office reopening until October or later. But the iPhone maker wasn't alone: At least two other Silicon Valley companies decided to delay their reopenings last week in response to rising COVID-19 case counts.

Both ServiceNow and Pure Storage opted to push back their September return-to-office dates last week, telling employees they can work remotely until at least the end of the year. Other companies may decide to exercise more caution given the current trends.

Keep Reading Show less
Allison Levitsky
Allison Levitsky is a reporter at Protocol covering workplace issues in tech. She previously covered big tech companies and the tech workforce for the Silicon Valley Business Journal. Allison grew up in the Bay Area and graduated from UC Berkeley.
Protocol | Workplace

Half of working parents have felt discriminated against during COVID

A new survey found that working parents at the VP level are more likely to say they've faced discrimination at work than their lower-level counterparts.

A new survey looks at discrimination faced by working parents during the pandemic.

Photo: d3sign/Getty Images

The toll COVID-19 has taken on working parents — particularly working moms — is, by now, well-documented. The impact for parents in low-wage jobs has been particularly devastating.

But a new survey, shared exclusively with Protocol, finds that among parents who kept their jobs through the pandemic, people who hold more senior positions are actually more likely to say they faced discrimination at work than their lower-level colleagues.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Latest Stories