How will this AI critic influence Biden’s policies? The clues are hiding in plain sight.

Two leaders from NYU's AI Now Institute recently joined the Biden administration and have already laid the groundwork for what government AI policy could look like.

​Meredith Whittaker

Meredith Whittaker's track record at AI Now provides some hints about her influence on the Biden administration's AI policy.

Photo: AI Now

The second of two leaders from NYU's AI Now Institute, a small but influential organization researching the social implications of artificial intelligence, just joined the Biden administration to lay the groundwork for government AI policy. Their previous work suggests their presence might encourage the government to require new transparency from tech companies about how their algorithms work.

The Federal Trade Commission earlier this month created an entirely new role for AI Now co-founder Meredith Whittaker, who will serve as senior adviser on AI for an agency where tech staff has been in flux despite a mission to get tougher on tech. AI Now alumna Rashida Richardson — a law professor who served as director of policy research for the group and has a background studying the impact of AI systems like predictive policing tools — joined the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy in July as senior policy adviser for data and democracy.

"[Whittaker's] hiring is just the latest evidence of the FTC's attention on algorithms and algorithmic issues," said Laura Riposo VanDruff, former assistant director in the FTC's privacy and identity protection division and a partner at law firm Kelley Drye & Warren. "How she shapes policy and enforcement could be [FTC] Chairman [Lina] Khan's privacy legacy," she added.

Whittaker, who once led product and engineering teams at Google and founded the company's Open Research Group, made headlines in 2018 for helping guide worker walkouts and fighting use of Google's AI technology by the Pentagon. But it's her work at AI Now crafting practical AI policies intended to prevent encoded bias and discrimination against people that is likely to have the most relevance in her new FTC role.

Merve Hickok, senior research director of the Center for AI and Digital Policy, a group that evaluates national and international policy work on AI, said the inclusion of Whittaker and Richardson in the administration aligns with the mission of OSTP leaders to clarify the rights and freedoms people should be afforded in relation to data-driven technologies. "There has been a trend in both organizations toward fighting [AI] bias," she said.

AI Now and Whittaker declined to comment for this story, but an AI Now spokesperson said Whittaker will remain involved with the organization. Richardson and the OSTP did not respond to request to comment.

A history of AI policy goals

As the administration attempts to keep regulatory pace with a rapidly advancing AI tech industry, it's a little too early to know whether Whittaker and Richardson's policy goals will sync with those of their respective agencies. However, with Whittaker filling an entirely new seat and Richardson working under a director at OSTP whose position has for the first time been elevated to the Cabinet level, their voices could carry.

For one thing, Whittaker's work could bolster the FTC's efforts to intertwine data privacy and antitrust considerations in cases against tech firms. Whittaker has argued that AI advancements have been largely facilitated by a few dominant tech giants that have the resources to suck up massive amounts of data and spin it into algorithmic systems because of ad-driven business models, a common refrain of FTC Chairwoman Lina Khan.

Whittaker told lawmakers at a U.S. House Committee on Science, Space and Technology hearing in 2019 that the massive amounts of data and vast computational resources fueling the AI boom "are assets that only a handful of major tech companies have, and very few others do."

Whittaker and Richardson's work at AI Now proposing policies for regulating algorithmic systems — from commercial voice and facial recognition tech to automated Medicaid benefit allocation tools — offers some big clues for what they might want to push at their respective agencies. In general, they have suggested specific steps they'd like to see implemented by the government that could force more transparency around AI, something many lawmakers demand from big tech firms like Facebook, Google, Amazon and Twitter, as well as smaller companies.

In testimonies given at separate 2019 congressional hearings addressing AI, Whittaker and Richardson called for tech firms to waive trade secrecy claims that block government entities and the public from accessing information about their systems. They also wanted lawmakers to require that companies disclose the names and vendors of AI they use to make decisions that affect people.

At the center of the AI Now proposals highlighted by both Whittaker and Richardson is the algorithmic impact assessment, a framework for evaluating the effects of algorithmic and AI systems. It's a concept that has its foundation in more widely used environmental, human rights and privacy impact assessments.

In fact, AI Now has already said it wants the FTC to use them. The group spotlighted algorithmic impact assessments in comments on "Competition and Consumer Protection in the 21st Century" submitted to the FTC in 2018, noting the evaluation process would "provide essential information for FTC investigations into potential deception, unfair business practices, or other violations of consumer rights."

Squaring Whittaker's policy ambition with FTC authority

VanDruff said we may see Whittaker's influence manifest if she weighs in on new or updated FTC rules or in a case against a company. "How Whittaker can square her ambition with existing legal tools — it will be interesting for us to watch that," she said.

Even before Khan was named chair, the commission had begun taking a more aggressive stance on algorithmic technologies. In separate cases, it forced photo app Everalbum and Cambridge Analytica to destroy data garnered through allegedly deceptive means as well as the algorithms built from that data.

The agency in April reminded observers of its consumer-protection work in the AI arena, including issuing guidance for businesses using automated decision systems to determine credit scoring or home-loan decisions. It pointed to three laws the FTC has authority to enforce in relation to AI: the Federal Trade Commission Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act.

"Section 5 can get to disparate impact, and if it can get to disparate impact, that can have substantial implications for AI," said Justin Brookman, director of Consumer Privacy and Technology Policy for Consumer Reports, who previously served as policy director of the FTC's Office of Technology Research and Investigation. "The FTC has a lot of power in this space."

Whatever exact role Whittaker plays in the FTC's AI efforts, the ripple effect could extend far beyond big tech, said VanDruff.

"Algorithms power the economy," she said. "There's no question about that, so the consequences of action by the FTC as it relates to algorithms could have significant reach."


Musk’s texts reveal what tech’s most powerful people really want

From Jack Dorsey to Joe Rogan, Musk’s texts are chock-full of überpowerful people, bending a knee to Twitter’s once and (still maybe?) future king.

“Maybe Oprah would be interested in joining the Twitter board if my bid succeeds,” one text reads.

Photo illustration: Patrick Pleul/picture alliance via Getty Images; Protocol

Elon Musk’s text inbox is a rarefied space. It’s a place where tech’s wealthiest casually commit to spending billions of dollars with little more than a thumbs-up emoji and trade tips on how to rewrite the rules for how hundreds of millions of people around the world communicate.

Now, Musk’s ongoing legal battle with Twitter is giving the rest of us a fleeting glimpse into that world. The collection of Musk’s private texts that was made public this week is chock-full of tech power brokers. While the messages are meant to reveal something about Musk’s motivations — and they do — they also say a lot about how things get done and deals get made among some of the most powerful people in the world.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Circle’s CEO: This is not the time to ‘go crazy’

Jeremy Allaire is leading the stablecoin powerhouse in a time of heightened regulation.

“It’s a complex environment. So every CEO and every board has to be a little bit cautious, because there’s a lot of uncertainty,” Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire told Protocol at Converge22.

Photo: Circle

Sitting solo on a San Francisco stage, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire asked tennis superstar Serena Williams what it’s like to face “unrelenting skepticism.”

“What do you do when someone says you can’t do this?” Allaire asked the athlete turned VC, who was beaming into Circle’s Converge22 convention by video.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


Is Salesforce still a growth company? Investors are skeptical

Salesforce is betting that customer data platform Genie and new Slack features can push the company to $50 billion in revenue by 2026. But investors are skeptical about the company’s ability to deliver.

Photo: Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Salesforce has long been enterprise tech’s golden child. The company said everything customers wanted to hear and did everything investors wanted to see: It produced robust, consistent growth from groundbreaking products combined with an aggressive M&A strategy and a cherished culture, all operating under the helm of a bombastic, but respected, CEO and team of well-coiffed executives.

Dreamforce is the embodiment of that success. Every year, alongside frustrating San Francisco residents, the over-the-top celebration serves as a battle cry to the enterprise software industry, reminding everyone that Marc Benioff’s mighty fiefdom is poised to expand even deeper into your corporate IT stack.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a writer-at-large at Protocol. He previously covered enterprise software for Protocol, Bloomberg and Business Insider. Joe can be reached at JoeWilliams@Protocol.com. To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or JPW53189@protonmail.com.


The US and EU are splitting on tech policy. That’s putting the web at risk.

A conversation with Cédric O, the former French minister of state for digital.

“With the difficulty of the U.S. in finding political agreement or political basis to legislate more, we are facing a risk of decoupling in the long term between the EU and the U.S.”

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Cédric O, France’s former minister of state for digital, has been an advocate of Europe’s approach to tech and at the forefront of the continent’s relations with U.S. giants. Protocol caught up with O last week at a conference in New York focusing on social media’s negative effects on society and the possibilities of blockchain-based protocols for alternative networks.

O said watching the U.S. lag in tech policy — even as some states pass their own measures and federal bills gain momentum — has made him worry about the EU and U.S. decoupling. While not as drastic as a disentangling of economic fortunes between the West and China, such a divergence, as O describes it, could still make it functionally impossible for companies to serve users on both sides of the Atlantic with the same product.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Latest Stories