Protocol | Enterprise

Box CEO Aaron Levie is in the fight of his life for his cloud company

On Thursday, Box investors will vote on a proposal from Starboard Value to replace three members of the board, including Levie, with individuals hand picked by the activist investor firm.

Aaron Levie, CEO and co-founder of Box, at the BoxWorks 2019 Conference

On Thursday, Box investors will vote on a proposal from Starboard Value to replace three members of the board, including CEO Aaron Levie, with individuals hand picked by the activist investor firm.

Photo: Michael Short/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Box CEO Aaron Levie is about to face a key vote of confidence that could ultimately rip away control of the cloud storage company he co-founded 15 years ago in his college dorm room.

On Thursday, Box investors will vote on a proposal from Starboard Value to replace three members of the board, including noted Twitter enthusiast Levie, with individuals hand picked by the activist investor firm. Among the proposed candidates is Peter Feld, a Starboard partner.

"If Starboard is successful, these world-class executives and leaders would be replaced with Starboard nominees, one of whom we believe would come into the boardroom with a pre-set agenda, and two others who lack the relevant skills required to oversee a public SaaS company," Box wrote in a statement published earlier this month.

Starboard, which has a track record of success in these situations, disclosed its stake in Box in 2019. The firm has amassed an 8.4% stake in the company since last year, according to outside estimates, putting it second only to Vanguard in terms of ownership percentage.

Alongside leadership changes, Starboard has also tried on multiple occasions to get Levie to step down as CEO and urged Box to look for potential buyers. While Levie is, of course, not angling to leave, he has expressed an openness to sell the company.

"As a public company, we always have to consider the best path forward," he told CNBC.

Rumors of interest from stalwarts like Microsoft and Adobe have circulated for years, and private-equity companies have been on the hunt for enterprise SaaS vendors over the last year.

Square peg, round hole?

Central to Starboard's concerns is Box's future growth potential under its existing leadership.

Box provides a central storage service where enterprises can store their "content," whether that's contracts, marketing materials or videos of the CEO speaking. The service enables organizations to layer over access controls and other security classifications.

While Box has generally exceeded analyst expectations when it comes to quarterly results, its stock price has been on a rollercoaster ride the past few years. It dipped to a low in March 2020, a 61% decline from a historical high in May 2018. The share price has yet to return to that peak, trading at around $25.56 in midday activity Wednesday ahead of the shareholder vote.

Part of the stock turmoil is a result of its ongoing drama with the Starboard. Box and the investment firm came to an agreement in March 2020 to appoint three new independent directors to the board, including one picked by Starboard, but the company's December 2020 earnings report and disappointing revenue projections for 2021 reignited the feud.

Box missed out on the initial remote work boom that resulted in surging revenue at other cloud and software providers. But Levie is hoping Box's earnings this year will help persuade investors to keep the existing leadership team in place.

In August, the company reported a 12% growth in sales, results that Levie says is evidence Box can eventually reach revenue growth as high as 16% and push up operating margins to as much as 27%. The company is so confident in the figures that it released earnings two weeks earlier than expected. Among the other promising results is the growth in deal sizes over $100,000, which were up 16% since last year.

"It's clear that enterprises are increasingly making strategic long-term decisions on how to support a remote workforce and digital processes," Levie told investors. "As a result, more customers are turning to the Box content cloud to deliver a secure content management and collaboration built for this new way of working."

But there are some key questions around its future product strategy. In July, for example, Box released an e-signature product after purchasing SignRequest for $55 million, a move that catapulted the company into a potentially $3.8 billion market that is chock-full of larger and more well-known competitors like Adobe and DocuSign.

The service, however, was apparently the "number one requested feature from customers last year," per Levie.

"Initial response from customers has been very positive and we're rolling out Box Sign to all business and enterprise customers throughout this fall with a significant roadmap of innovation ahead," he told investors on the recent earnings call.

Whether the cylinders at Box are firing as strongly as Levie is touting remains to be seen. Meanwhile, prominent advisory firms are lining up on either side of the deal.

Glass Lewis, an advisory firm that provides advice to investors on proxy votes like the upcoming one at Box, urged shareholders to appoint Feld, citing the "puzzling" decision to raise $500 million from private equity firm KKR — a capital infusion that led to Levie stepping down as board chairman. Following that announcement, Starboard accused Box of trying to "buy the vote" with the financing deal.

It's a stinging recommendation, particularly because Feld was the individual that alerted Box of Starboard's desire to have Levie removed as CEO. However, Institutional Shareholder Services, or ISS, the other top proxy advisory firm, suggested that investors back Box's own nominees to the board.

"The current board appears to deserve some additional time to implement the turnaround," ISS wrote in a report viewed by Reuters. "As such, direct support for the dissident nominees does not appear warranted at this time."

Box shareholders are scheduled to vote Thursday, but it's not clear whether the company plans to livestream the event as it has done in the past for key investor events. The meeting is not listed on the company's investor relations web page, and a Box spokesperson did not respond to a request for information on the event.


How the creators of Spligate built gaming’s newest unicorn

1047 Games is now valued at $1.5 billion after three rounds of funding since May.

1047 Games' Splitgate amassed 13 million downloads when its beta launched in July.

Image: 1047 Games

The creators of Splitgate had a problem. Their new free-to-play video game, a take on the legendary arena shooter Halo with a teleportation twist borrowed from Valve's Portal, was gaining steam during its open beta period in July. But it was happening too quickly.

Splitgate was growing so fast and unexpectedly that the entire game was starting to break, as the servers supporting the game began to, figuratively speaking, melt down. The game went from fewer than 1,000 people playing it at any given moment in time to suddenly having tens of thousands of concurrent players. Then it grew to hundreds of thousands of players, all trying to log in and play at once across PlayStation, Xbox and PC.

Keep Reading Show less
Nick Statt
Nick Statt is Protocol's video game reporter. Prior to joining Protocol, he was news editor at The Verge covering the gaming industry, mobile apps and antitrust out of San Francisco, in addition to managing coverage of Silicon Valley tech giants and startups. He now resides in Rochester, New York, home of the garbage plate and, completely coincidentally, the World Video Game Hall of Fame. He can be reached at

While it's easy to get lost in the operational and technical side of a transaction, it's important to remember the third component of a payment. That is, the human behind the screen.

Over the last two years, many retailers have seen the benefit of investing in new, flexible payments. Ones that reflect the changing lifestyles of younger spenders, who are increasingly holding onto their cash — despite reports to the contrary. This means it's more important than ever for merchants to take note of the latest payment innovations so they can tap into the savings of the COVID-19 generation.

Keep Reading Show less
Antoine Nougue,

Antoine Nougue is Head of Europe at He works with ambitious enterprise businesses to help them scale and grow their operations through payment processing services. He is responsible for leading the European sales, customer success, engineering & implementation teams and is based out of London, U.K.

Protocol | Policy

Why Twitch’s 'hate raid' lawsuit isn’t just about Twitch

When is it OK for tech companies to unmask their anonymous users? And when should a violation of terms of service get someone sued?

The case Twitch is bringing against two hate raiders is hardly black and white.

Photo: Caspar Camille Rubin/Unsplash

It isn't hard to figure out who the bad guys are in Twitch's latest lawsuit against two of its users. On one side are two anonymous "hate raiders" who have been allegedly bombarding the gaming platform with abhorrent attacks on Black and LGBTQ+ users, using armies of bots to do it. On the other side is Twitch, a company that, for all the lumps it's taken for ignoring harassment on its platform, is finally standing up to protect its users against persistent violators whom it's been unable to stop any other way.

But the case Twitch is bringing against these hate raiders is hardly black and white. For starters, the plaintiff here isn't an aggrieved user suing another user for defamation on the platform. The plaintiff is the platform itself. Complicating matters more is the fact that, according to a spokesperson, at least part of Twitch's goal in the case is to "shed light on the identity of the individuals behind these attacks," raising complicated questions about when tech companies should be able to use the courts to unmask their own anonymous users and, just as critically, when they should be able to actually sue them for violating their speech policies.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Protocol | Workplace

Remote work is here to stay. Here are the cybersecurity risks.

Phishing and ransomware are on the rise. Is your remote workforce prepared?

Before your company institutes work-from-home-forever plans, you need to ensure that your workforce is prepared to face the cybersecurity implications of long-term remote work.

Photo: Stefan Wermuth/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The delta variant continues to dash or delay return-to-work plans, but before your company institutes work-from-home-forever plans, you need to ensure that your workforce is prepared to face the cybersecurity implications of long-term remote work.

So far in 2021, CrowdStrike has already observed over 1,400 "big game hunting" ransomware incidents and $180 million in ransom demands averaging over $5 million each. That's due in part to the "expanded attack surface that work-from-home creates," according to CTO Michael Sentonas.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma
Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol, where she writes about management, leadership and workplace issues in tech. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at
Protocol | Fintech

When COVID rocked the insurance market, this startup saw opportunity

Ethos has outraised and outmarketed the competition in selling life insurance directly online — but there's still an $887 billion industry to transform.

Life insurance has been slow to change.

Image: courtneyk/Getty Images

Peter Colis cited a striking statistic that he said led him to launch a life insurance startup: One in twenty children will lose a parent before they turn 15.

"No one ever thinks that will happen to them, but that's the statistics," the co-CEO and co-founder of Ethos told Protocol. "If it's a breadwinning parent, the majority of those families will go bankrupt immediately, within three months. Life insurance elegantly solves this problem."

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Signal at (510)731-8429.

Latest Stories