Experts raise eyebrows at claims China has successfully deployed advanced chipmaking technology at scale

There are reasons to be skeptical that China’s homegrown chip manufacturer SMIC has started shipping processors that are two generations ahead of where the industry believed it was.

A Chinese flag near a logo atop the Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp. (SMIC) headquarters in Shanghai, China, on Tuesday, March 23, 2021. SMIC will build a $2.35 billion plant with funding from the government of Shenzhen, the first major project to emerge from Chinas masterplan to match the U.S. in advanced chipmaking. Photographer: Qilai Shen/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The report raises more questions than it answers about China’s current manufacturing capabilities.

Photo: Qilai Shen/Bloomberg via Getty Images

China has long lagged the U.S., Taiwan and South Korea in the development of advanced chip manufacturing technology, despite having committed hundreds of billions of dollars to eliminate the gap. A report last week created substantial buzz among chip watchers that one Chinese manufacturer might have closed that gap, but the report raises more questions than it answers about China’s current manufacturing capabilities.

Bloomberg News reported last week that Chinese SMIC may have managed to move its chip manufacturing tech ahead by two generations, in spite of U.S. sanctions designed to curtail its ability to obtain the advanced technology necessary to do so. Based on an analysis of a MinerVa Bitcoin mining chip, research firm TechInsights concluded China’s largest chip manufacturer had produced a 7-nanometer chip using a manufacturing process that was a reasonable replica of a similar method used by TSMC — albeit several years earlier.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer repeated the claim about China’s chip tech gains on the floor of the upper chamber Thursday during a short speech that discussed a long-delayed $50 billion subsidies package designed to return more semiconductor manufacturing to the U.S.

“Members of both sides know that America's chips crisis is sending shock waves across the economy,” Schumer said. “It is endangering our national security. According to an article by Bloomberg, China's top chips maker has now likely advanced its tech by two generations, threatening U.S. competitiveness.”

It would be big, if it’s true.

But the idea that SMIC had managed to leap ahead two generations of advanced manufacturing tech was met by skepticism in some corners of the chip industry. As with any chip manufacturing technology leap, making a few thousand chips from the new process isn’t worth much — the largest chip manufacturers need to print hundreds of millions of chips to make it a viable business.

“One chip does not make for a [good business] — it’s one thing to make a single chip, but it’s another thing to have yield and volume,” Georgetown Center for Security and Emerging Technology research analyst Will Hunt said. “You need [yield and volume] to be competitive in the market, or to take significant share.”

The SMIC chip itself is also tiny, relatively speaking. Smaller chip designs allow manufacturers to fit larger numbers of individual chips onto each silicon wafer, which means even if the overall yield of working chips is poor compared to high-quality manufacturing processes, it’s likely that there are still many usable pieces of silicon after the wafer is diced up.

But the Bitcoin mining processor taken apart by TechInsights lacked some of the technical elements necessary to make the sorts of chips Huawei — which is on a U.S. export blacklist — needs. Hunt pointed to the lack of static random access memory, or SRAM, that is one of the fundamental components of the most advanced processors made by the likes of Intel and AMD.

Regardless of the concerns, experts contacted by Protocol agreed that the Chinese company’s engineers had marked an achievement of sorts — just by producing prototype 7-nanometer processors with the tools China has access to.

Protocol wasn’t immediately able to verify that SMIC manufactured the MinerVa chips in question. SMIC itself didn’t return a request for comment, and MinerVa CEO Marc Ma said he wasn’t able to disclose his manufacturing partners because of non-disclosure agreements the company had signed.

“I can’t mention the foundry or those kinds of things, because we have an NDA with all the foundries,” he said. “So we’re just using the latest technology to make Bitcoin mining more efficient. We’re trying to cut the cost down, that’s pretty much our goal.”

Ma downplayed the importance of the nanometer number when discussing manufacturing tech, describing it largely as a marketing number. In the past, that number used to refer to the size of specific features, but it doesn’t any longer.

According to filings with the SEC, at least two U.S.-based Bitcoin mining companies haven’t received the full allotment of MinerVa mining machines they had been promised. Stronghold Digital Mining said in a filing it had ordered 15,000 miners for roughly $73 million, but as of March had received about 3,200.

Ma said that’s because of supply chain disruptions and component shortages, and that the company’s original supply chain was highly dependent on China. Ma pointed to pandemic-related lockdowns in China, and vowed the company was moving production to Canada and the U.S.

SMIC’s recent public filings disclosed that most of the company chip output was using far less advanced manufacturing technology. The most advanced manufacturing tech listed in the filing is roughly a decade old and accounted for nearly a quarter of SMIC’s revenue. In the filing from earlier this year, the company didn’t disclose more-advanced process nodes, but the company has said it achieved more-advanced manufacturing tech in 2019.

To achieve the 7-nanometer process, Hunt speculated that SMIC likely retrofitted equipment it already had prior to its addition to the U.S. Entity List in 2020, effectively banning it from buying U.S. chipmaking tools and other equipment.

According to one person familiar with data from the electronics manufacturing and design trade organization Semi, which tracks new factory construction, SMIC has not broken ground on new fabs for 14-nanometer or 7-nanometer production. But it’s possible SMIC could retrofit its current fabs for advanced manufacturing.


Upstart has a new plan to sell Wall Street on its loans

The AI-powered lender will hold some loans on its balance sheet as it seeks partners for long-term capital.

Despite the current struggles, Upstart views the marketplace model as the best way to write to keep its loan business growing.

Photo: Upstart

After a revenue drop its CEO called “unacceptable,” the leadership at fintech lender Upstart is making a bet on the strength of its ability to underwrite loans with AI.

The San Mateo company is planning to leave some loans on its balance sheet that investors do not want to buy, as concerns about the economy shift Wall Street away from backing riskier consumer debt. Rather than pull back on its lending in response, the company said it will hold some loans as it seeks longer-term capital partners.

Keep Reading Show less
Ryan Deffenbaugh
Ryan Deffenbaugh is a reporter at Protocol focused on fintech. Before joining Protocol, he reported on New York's technology industry for Crain's New York Business. He is based in New York and can be reached at rdeffenbaugh@protocol.com.
Sponsored Content

How cybercrime is going small time

Blockbuster hacks are no longer the norm – causing problems for companies trying to track down small-scale crime

Cybercrime is often thought of on a relatively large scale. Massive breaches lead to painful financial losses, bankrupting companies and causing untold embarrassment, splashed across the front pages of news websites worldwide. That’s unsurprising: cyber events typically cost businesses around $200,000, according to cybersecurity firm the Cyentia Institute. One in 10 of those victims suffer losses of more than $20 million, with some reaching $100 million or more.

That’s big money – but there’s plenty of loot out there for cybercriminals willing to aim lower. In 2021, the Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) received 847,376 complaints – reports by cybercrime victims – totaling losses of $6.9 billion. Averaged out, each victim lost $8,143.

Keep Reading Show less
Chris Stokel-Walker

Chris Stokel-Walker is a freelance technology and culture journalist and author of "YouTubers: How YouTube Shook Up TV and Created a New Generation of Stars." His work has been published in The New York Times, The Guardian and Wired.


Does your boss sound a little funny? It might be an audio deepfake

Voice deepfake attacks against enterprises, often aimed at tricking corporate employees into transferring money to the attackers, are on the rise. And at least in some cases, they’re succeeding.

Audio deepfakes are a new spin on the impersonation tactics that have long been used in social engineering and phishing attacks, but most people aren’t trained to disbelieve their ears.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

As a cyberattack investigator, Nick Giacopuzzi’s work now includes responding to growing attacks against businesses that involve deepfaked voices — and has ultimately left him convinced that in today's world, "we need to question everything."

In particular, Giacopuzzi has investigated multiple incidents where an attacker deployed fabricated audio, created with the help of AI, that purported to be an executive or a manager at a company. You can guess how it went: The fake boss asked an employee to urgently transfer funds. And in some cases, it’s worked, he said.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at kalspach@protocol.com.


Binance’s co-founder could remake its crypto deal-making

Yi He is overseeing a $7.5 billion portfolio, with more investments to come, making her one of the most powerful investors in the industry.

Binance co-founder Yi He will oversee $7.5 billion in assets.

Photo: Binance

Binance co-founder Yi He isn’t as well known as the crypto giant’s colorful and controversial CEO, Changpeng “CZ” Zhao.

That could soon change. The 35-year-old executive is taking on a new, higher-profile role at the world’s largest crypto exchange as head of Binance Labs, the company’s venture capital arm. With $7.5 billion in assets to oversee, that instantly makes her one of the most powerful VC investors in crypto.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


Trump ordered social media visa screening. Biden's defending it.

The Knight First Amendment Institute just lost a battle to force the Biden administration to provide a report on the collection of social media handles from millions of visa applicants every year.

Visa applicants have to give up any of their social media handles from the past five years.

Photo: belterz/Getty Images

Would you feel comfortable if a U.S. immigration official reviewed all that you post on Facebook, Reddit, Snapchat, Twitter or even YouTube? Would it change what you decide to post or whom you talk to online? Perhaps you’ve said something critical of the U.S. government. Perhaps you’ve jokingly threatened to whack someone.

If you’ve applied for a U.S. visa, there’s a chance your online missives have been subjected to this kind of scrutiny, all in the name of keeping America safe. But three years after the Trump administration ordered enhanced vetting of visa applications, the Biden White House has not only continued the program, but is defending it — despite refusing to say if it’s had any impact.

Keep Reading Show less
Anna Kramer

Anna Kramer is a reporter at Protocol (Twitter: @ anna_c_kramer, email: akramer@protocol.com), where she writes about labor and workplace issues. Prior to joining the team, she covered tech and small business for the San Francisco Chronicle and privacy for Bloomberg Law. She is a recent graduate of Brown University, where she studied International Relations and Arabic and wrote her senior thesis about surveillance tools and technological development in the Middle East.

Latest Stories