Enterprise

Chip companies spent $100 million lobbying Congress. They’re about to get $52 billion in subsidies.

Chip companies have been expanding their federal lobbying activity over the past four years. Here’s how much they're spending.

Chair Maria Cantwell , D-Wash., holds semiconductor chips while talking with Pat Gelsinger, CEO, of Intel Corporation.

Lawmakers have been debating $52 billion in federal subsidies aimed at bolstering American chip production.

Photo: Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

To make money, you’ve got to spend money. Chip companies have spent $100 million in lobbying expenditures over the last several years in hopes of getting 500 times that back from the federal government in the form of subsidies. That would be a healthy return on an investment.

The chip industry’s spending on lobbying has risen sharply in recent years, as lawmakers have been debating $52 billion in federal subsidies aimed at bolstering American chip production and innovation. To help convince lawmakers to set aside federal dollars for the industry, lobbying expenditures have increased roughly 50% since 2018, jumping to $46.4 million in 2021. Four years ago, chip companies spent $31.7 million in D.C., according to data from the Center for Responsive Politics.

By comparison, the internet industry — which includes tech giants Facebook, Google and Amazon — increased its spending by 18% to $90.2 million during the same period, according to the CRP data. Unlike chip companies, Big Tech has faced rapidly escalating issues in Washington prompting discussion of regulation that threatens to damage profits or break apart businesses.

The chip industry didn’t spend all of its cash lobbying for subsidies, according to disclosure forms reviewed by Protocol. Chip companies have begun to realize that they are increasingly subject to the whims of Washington as their businesses have grown and become a more prominent part of the economy, contributing to a broad swath of industries. The change in thinking has resulted in an overall increase in lobbying efforts over the past four years, including the battle for subsidies.

Some companies, such as Qualcomm and Intel, disclose each specific law their lobbyists are pushing for, while other businesses only report general topic areas such as intellectual property or trade. From the filings, it's not clear exactly how much cash the industry spent directly on lobbying for manufacturing subsidies.

But what is clear is that spending began to ramp up in 2020, reaching $37.7 million as the first subsidy bill was introduced in Congress. At that point, big chip manufacturers such as GlobalFoundries and TSMC, the latter of which had not previously spent money on lobbyists in the U.S., ramped up their efforts. GlobalFoundries has announced factory expansion plans in Malta, New York, and increased its lobbying outlays to $1.7 million in 2021 from $1.4 million in 2020. GlobalFoundries did not respond to a request for comment.



Taiwan’s TSMC spent $2.2 million on lobbying in 2021, up from $2 million the year earlier — the first lobbying outlay from TSMC since 1998, according to CRP data. Disclosure forms from TSMC say the company hired lobbyists to push for versions of the subsidies program and tax-related issues.

TSMC has announced plans to build a $12 billion factory, or fab, in Arizona. Construction began last year and the new site is expected to begin production in two to three years. TSMC did not return a request for comment.

But many smaller amounts of new lobbying dollars also made a significant contribution to the sharp rise in lobbying expenditures. Chip factory tool-maker KLA spent roughly $700,000 in 2021, and about $500,000 the year before, when its recent lobbying outlays were less than $200,000; ASML, which is based in the Netherlands and declined to comment, spent $820,000 in 2021; Taiwan-based chip designer MediaTek spent $650,000, though it doesn’t manufacture chips.

“Like our peers, we’ve expanded our engagement just as we’ve grown every other part of our business,” MediaTek Government Relations Vice President W. Patrick Wilson said in an email.

Even China’s SMIC doled out $180,000 in lobbying expenditures last year, down from $310,000 in 2020. At least some of SMIC’s paid lobbying activity was around “[e]ligibility of [the] company to import U.S.-origin semiconductor-related goods under U.S. export control laws.”

The biggest lobbying spender in the chip industry was Qualcomm, which spent $9.1 million on lobbying last year, up by roughly $1 million from its $8 million expenditures through 2018, according to CRP data. Qualcomm declined to comment.

Intel and rival AMD spent about half of Qualcomm’s total last year. AMD doesn’t manufacture chips, but Intel has announced more than $40 billion in new factory construction in Arizona and Ohio. CEO Pat Gelsinger has said the Ohio plans hinge on federal government support.



One notable outlier in the lobbying expenditure data is graphics and AI chip producer Nvidia hasn’t spent any money on lobbying since 1998, the first year in which records were available.

The $52 billion in funding has received bipartisan support, and a version of the law that includes the subsidies has been passed in the House and Senate. Lawmakers are currently attempting to reconcile the two pieces of legislation before sending legislation to the president’s desk.

The funding is largely popular among lawmakers, but the version of the law under consideration includes a number of provisions around China that contain potentially sensitive partisan issues.

It’s likely President Biden will sign legislation that contains chip subsidies; he discussed the importance of U.S. semiconductor manufacturing during the State of the Union address earlier this year.

Introduced in mid-2020, the Chips for America Act would provide $52 billion in funding to subsidize chip factory construction and fund several research and development initiatives, among other things.

Although the U.S. doesn’t produce many chips itself, American businesses control most of the world’s intellectual property and chip design expertise. The legislation aims to encourage chip companies to build more factories, or fabs, in the U.S. and help rejuvenate domestic production of chips, which are seen as vital for national security.

Additional reporting by Ben Brody.

Fintech

Judge Zia Faruqui is trying to teach you crypto, one ‘SNL’ reference at a time

His decisions on major cryptocurrency cases have quoted "The Big Lebowski," "SNL," and "Dr. Strangelove." That’s because he wants you — yes, you — to read them.

The ways Zia Faruqui (right) has weighed on cases that have come before him can give lawyers clues as to what legal frameworks will pass muster.

Photo: Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images

“Cryptocurrency and related software analytics tools are ‘The wave of the future, Dude. One hundred percent electronic.’”

That’s not a quote from "The Big Lebowski" — at least, not directly. It’s a quote from a Washington, D.C., district court memorandum opinion on the role cryptocurrency analytics tools can play in government investigations. The author is Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui.

Keep Reading Show less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

The financial technology transformation is driving competition, creating consumer choice, and shaping the future of finance. Hear from seven fintech leaders who are reshaping the future of finance, and join the inaugural Financial Technology Association Fintech Summit to learn more.

Keep Reading Show less
FTA
The Financial Technology Association (FTA) represents industry leaders shaping the future of finance. We champion the power of technology-centered financial services and advocate for the modernization of financial regulation to support inclusion and responsible innovation.
Enterprise

AWS CEO: The cloud isn’t just about technology

As AWS preps for its annual re:Invent conference, Adam Selipsky talks product strategy, support for hybrid environments, and the value of the cloud in uncertain economic times.

Photo: Noah Berger/Getty Images for Amazon Web Services

AWS is gearing up for re:Invent, its annual cloud computing conference where announcements this year are expected to focus on its end-to-end data strategy and delivering new industry-specific services.

It will be the second re:Invent with CEO Adam Selipsky as leader of the industry’s largest cloud provider after his return last year to AWS from data visualization company Tableau Software.

Keep Reading Show less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Image: Protocol

We launched Protocol in February 2020 to cover the evolving power center of tech. It is with deep sadness that just under three years later, we are winding down the publication.

As of today, we will not publish any more stories. All of our newsletters, apart from our flagship, Source Code, will no longer be sent. Source Code will be published and sent for the next few weeks, but it will also close down in December.

Keep Reading Show less
Bennett Richardson

Bennett Richardson ( @bennettrich) is the president of Protocol. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, Bennett was executive director of global strategic partnerships at POLITICO, where he led strategic growth efforts including POLITICO's European expansion in Brussels and POLITICO's creative agency POLITICO Focus during his six years with the company. Prior to POLITICO, Bennett was co-founder and CMO of Hinge, the mobile dating company recently acquired by Match Group. Bennett began his career in digital and social brand marketing working with major brands across tech, energy, and health care at leading marketing and communications agencies including Edelman and GMMB. Bennett is originally from Portland, Maine, and received his bachelor's degree from Colgate University.

Enterprise

Why large enterprises struggle to find suitable platforms for MLops

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, and as larger enterprises go from deploying hundreds of models to thousands and even millions of models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

Photo: artpartner-images via Getty Images

On any given day, Lily AI runs hundreds of machine learning models using computer vision and natural language processing that are customized for its retail and ecommerce clients to make website product recommendations, forecast demand, and plan merchandising. But this spring when the company was in the market for a machine learning operations platform to manage its expanding model roster, it wasn’t easy to find a suitable off-the-shelf system that could handle such a large number of models in deployment while also meeting other criteria.

Some MLops platforms are not well-suited for maintaining even more than 10 machine learning models when it comes to keeping track of data, navigating their user interfaces, or reporting capabilities, Matthew Nokleby, machine learning manager for Lily AI’s product intelligence team, told Protocol earlier this year. “The duct tape starts to show,” he said.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories
Bulletins