Enterprise

Chip companies spent $100 million lobbying Congress. They’re about to get $52 billion in subsidies.

Chip companies have been expanding their federal lobbying activity over the past four years. Here’s how much they're spending.

Chair Maria Cantwell , D-Wash., holds semiconductor chips while talking with Pat Gelsinger, CEO, of Intel Corporation.

Lawmakers have been debating $52 billion in federal subsidies aimed at bolstering American chip production.

Photo: Tom Williams/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images

To make money, you’ve got to spend money. Chip companies have spent $100 million in lobbying expenditures over the last several years in hopes of getting 500 times that back from the federal government in the form of subsidies. That would be a healthy return on an investment.

The chip industry’s spending on lobbying has risen sharply in recent years, as lawmakers have been debating $52 billion in federal subsidies aimed at bolstering American chip production and innovation. To help convince lawmakers to set aside federal dollars for the industry, lobbying expenditures have increased roughly 50% since 2018, jumping to $46.4 million in 2021. Four years ago, chip companies spent $31.7 million in D.C., according to data from the Center for Responsive Politics.

By comparison, the internet industry — which includes tech giants Facebook, Google and Amazon — increased its spending by 18% to $90.2 million during the same period, according to the CRP data. Unlike chip companies, Big Tech has faced rapidly escalating issues in Washington prompting discussion of regulation that threatens to damage profits or break apart businesses.

The chip industry didn’t spend all of its cash lobbying for subsidies, according to disclosure forms reviewed by Protocol. Chip companies have begun to realize that they are increasingly subject to the whims of Washington as their businesses have grown and become a more prominent part of the economy, contributing to a broad swath of industries. The change in thinking has resulted in an overall increase in lobbying efforts over the past four years, including the battle for subsidies.

Some companies, such as Qualcomm and Intel, disclose each specific law their lobbyists are pushing for, while other businesses only report general topic areas such as intellectual property or trade. From the filings, it's not clear exactly how much cash the industry spent directly on lobbying for manufacturing subsidies.

But what is clear is that spending began to ramp up in 2020, reaching $37.7 million as the first subsidy bill was introduced in Congress. At that point, big chip manufacturers such as GlobalFoundries and TSMC, the latter of which had not previously spent money on lobbyists in the U.S., ramped up their efforts. GlobalFoundries has announced factory expansion plans in Malta, New York, and increased its lobbying outlays to $1.7 million in 2021 from $1.4 million in 2020. GlobalFoundries did not respond to a request for comment.



Taiwan’s TSMC spent $2.2 million on lobbying in 2021, up from $2 million the year earlier — the first lobbying outlay from TSMC since 1998, according to CRP data. Disclosure forms from TSMC say the company hired lobbyists to push for versions of the subsidies program and tax-related issues.

TSMC has announced plans to build a $12 billion factory, or fab, in Arizona. Construction began last year and the new site is expected to begin production in two to three years. TSMC did not return a request for comment.

But many smaller amounts of new lobbying dollars also made a significant contribution to the sharp rise in lobbying expenditures. Chip factory tool-maker KLA spent roughly $700,000 in 2021, and about $500,000 the year before, when its recent lobbying outlays were less than $200,000; ASML, which is based in the Netherlands and declined to comment, spent $820,000 in 2021; Taiwan-based chip designer MediaTek spent $650,000, though it doesn’t manufacture chips.

“Like our peers, we’ve expanded our engagement just as we’ve grown every other part of our business,” MediaTek Government Relations Vice President W. Patrick Wilson said in an email.

Even China’s SMIC doled out $180,000 in lobbying expenditures last year, down from $310,000 in 2020. At least some of SMIC’s paid lobbying activity was around “[e]ligibility of [the] company to import U.S.-origin semiconductor-related goods under U.S. export control laws.”

The biggest lobbying spender in the chip industry was Qualcomm, which spent $9.1 million on lobbying last year, up by roughly $1 million from its $8 million expenditures through 2018, according to CRP data. Qualcomm declined to comment.

Intel and rival AMD spent about half of Qualcomm’s total last year. AMD doesn’t manufacture chips, but Intel has announced more than $40 billion in new factory construction in Arizona and Ohio. CEO Pat Gelsinger has said the Ohio plans hinge on federal government support.



One notable outlier in the lobbying expenditure data is graphics and AI chip producer Nvidia hasn’t spent any money on lobbying since 1998, the first year in which records were available.

The $52 billion in funding has received bipartisan support, and a version of the law that includes the subsidies has been passed in the House and Senate. Lawmakers are currently attempting to reconcile the two pieces of legislation before sending legislation to the president’s desk.

The funding is largely popular among lawmakers, but the version of the law under consideration includes a number of provisions around China that contain potentially sensitive partisan issues.

It’s likely President Biden will sign legislation that contains chip subsidies; he discussed the importance of U.S. semiconductor manufacturing during the State of the Union address earlier this year.

Introduced in mid-2020, the Chips for America Act would provide $52 billion in funding to subsidize chip factory construction and fund several research and development initiatives, among other things.

Although the U.S. doesn’t produce many chips itself, American businesses control most of the world’s intellectual property and chip design expertise. The legislation aims to encourage chip companies to build more factories, or fabs, in the U.S. and help rejuvenate domestic production of chips, which are seen as vital for national security.

Additional reporting by Ben Brody.

Fintech

Gensler: Bitcoin may be a commodity

The SEC has been vague about crypto. But Gensler said bitcoin is a commodity, “maybe.” It’s the clearest glimpse of his views on digital assets yet.

“Bitcoin — maybe that’s a commodity token. That has a big market value, but that goes over there,” Gensler said, referring to another regulator, the CFTC.

Photoillustration: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images; Protocol

SEC Chair Gary Gensler has long argued that many cryptocurrencies are subject to regulation as securities.

But he recently clarified that this view wouldn’t apply to the best-known cryptocurrency, bitcoin.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Sponsored Content

Why the digital transformation of industries is creating a more sustainable future

Qualcomm’s chief sustainability officer Angela Baker on how companies can view going “digital” as a way not only toward growth, as laid out in a recent report, but also toward establishing and meeting environmental, social and governance goals.

Three letters dominate business practice at present: ESG, or environmental, social and governance goals. The number of mentions of the environment in financial earnings has doubled in the last five years, according to GlobalData: 600,000 companies mentioned the term in their annual or quarterly results last year.

But meeting those ESG goals can be a challenge — one that businesses can’t and shouldn’t take lightly. Ahead of an exclusive fireside chat at Davos, Angela Baker, chief sustainability officer at Qualcomm, sat down with Protocol to speak about how best to achieve those targets and how Qualcomm thinks about its own sustainability strategy, net zero commitment, other ESG targets and more.

Keep Reading Show less
Chris Stokel-Walker

Chris Stokel-Walker is a freelance technology and culture journalist and author of "YouTubers: How YouTube Shook Up TV and Created a New Generation of Stars." His work has been published in The New York Times, The Guardian and Wired.

Workplace

What the economic downturn means for pay packages

The war for talent rages on, but dynamics are shifting back to the employers.

Compensation packages could start to look different as companies reshuffle the balance of cash and equity.

Illustration: Nuthawut Somsuk/Getty Images

The market is turning. Tech stocks are slumping — which is bad news for employees — and even industry powerhouses are slowing hiring and laying people off. Tech talent is still in high demand, but compensation packages could start to look different as companies recruit.

“It’s a little bit like whiplash,” compensation consultant Ashish Raina said of the downturn. Raina, who mainly works with startups that have 200 to 800 employees, previously worked as the director of Talent at Index Ventures and head of Compensation and Talent Analytics at Box. “I do think there’s going to be an interesting reckoning in terms of pay increases going forward, how that pay is delivered.”

Keep Reading Show less
Allison Levitsky
Allison Levitsky is a reporter at Protocol covering workplace issues in tech. She previously covered big tech companies and the tech workforce for the Silicon Valley Business Journal. Allison grew up in the Bay Area and graduated from UC Berkeley.
Policy

How 'Zuck Bucks' saved the 2020 election — and fueled the Big Lie

The true story of how Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan’s $419 million donation became the 2020 election’s most enduring conspiracy theory.

Mark Zuckerberg is smack in the center of one of the 2020 election’s multitudinous conspiracies.

Illustration: Mike McQuade; Photos: Getty Images

If Mark Zuckerberg could have imagined the worst possible outcome of his decision to insert himself into the 2020 election, it might have looked something like the scene that unfolded inside Mar-a-Lago on a steamy evening in early April.

There in a gilded ballroom-turned-theater, MAGA world icons including Kellyanne Conway, Corey Lewandowski, Hope Hicks and former president Donald Trump himself were gathered for the premiere of “Rigged: The Zuckerberg Funded Plot to Defeat Donald Trump.”

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Fintech

From frenzy to fear: Trading apps grapple with anxious investors

After riding the stock-trading wave last year, trading apps like Robinhood have disenchanted customers and jittery investors.

Retail stock trading is still an attractive business, as shown by the news that crypto exchange FTX is dipping its toes in the market by letting some U.S. customers trade stocks.

Photo: Lam Yik/Bloomberg via Getty Images

For a brief moment, last year’s GameStop craze made buying and selling stocks cool, even exciting, for a new generation of young investors. Now, that frenzy has turned to fear.

Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev pointed to “a challenging macro environment” marked by rising prices and interest rates and a slumping market in a call with analysts explaining his company’s lackluster results. The downturn, he said, was something “most of our customers have never experienced in their lifetimes.”

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Latest Stories
Bulletins