Enterprise

Why $50 billion in chip funding has stalled in Congress

Passing the law could help make the U.S. a plausible competitor when companies consider where to build new plants. At the moment, it is not.

The capitol building behind a fence

Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo urged the House of Representatives last week during a stop in Detroit to pass roughly $50 billion worth of chip-making subsidies.

Photo: Ian Hutchinson/Unsplash

Legislation is sort of like fish: If it lies around too long, lawmakers can start to lose interest.

The billions of funding for much-needed semiconductor manufacturing under consideration by Congress hasn’t quite passed any reasonable expiration date. But the package of legislation it’s tied to, called the U.S. Innovation and Competition Act or USICA, remains just an idea nearly a half year after it was passed by the Senate in June.

To resuscitate efforts, Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo urged the House of Representatives last week during a stop in Detroit to pass roughly $50 billion worth of subsidies. Two days later, 59 corporate executives, including Apple CEO Tim Cook, General Motors top boss Mary Barra and Intel chief executive Pat Gelsinger, sent a letter to Congressional leadership with a similar plea: It needs to act—fast—to restore American competitiveness in chip manufacturing.

The $52 billion in funding, known as the Creating Helpful Incentives to Produce Semiconductors, or CHIPS, isn’t controversial in Washington D.C. Most of the money would be earmarked for distribution by the Commerce Department, and it is meant to encourage chip companies to produce more fabrication sites in the U.S. and increase research and development.

As one semiconductor executive put it: Passing the law, coupled with tax incentives tied to fab construction, would help make the U.S. a plausible competitor when companies consider where to build new plants. At the moment, it is not.

“The first thing you have to do is to get someone interested, to entice Samsung, TSMC or Intel to build more foundries here,” Whitman School of Management Professor Patrick Penfield told Protocol. “The ideal situation is to get the really high-end manufacturing of chips here.”

There is broad bipartisan support to pass the legislation, with only a minority in the extreme flank of either party voicing opposition. The supply-chain issues experienced by consumers have presented one compelling reason, as has an increasingly adversarial relationship with China.

“Upping our R&D game to out-innovate China is one of the few truly bipartisan areas of agreement in modern Washington, and I’d expect USICA to pass with full CHIPS funding in the first quarter of 2022,” said Bruce Mehlman, founding partner at Mehlman Castagnetti Rosen & Thomas.

The delay appears to be a matter of priority setting. At the moment lawmakers in Washington are focused on ensuring the government remains funded—the Senate passed a spending bill late Thursday—and the administration’s agenda to help the country recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, in the form of the Build Back Better Act. Funding for semiconductor subsidies is likely now second or third on the agenda after COVID-19 recovery and a defense spending bill.

There have been several reports that China is working to block chip manufacturing subsidies too, which may have further complicated the process. But, two people familiar with lobbying efforts around the bill said such activity was unlikely to persuade lawmakers to slow their efforts. In fact, China’s interest in halting the chip funding would likely only further serve as encouragement.

For House members, there may be an additional policy roadblock. Tucked inside the Innovation and Competition Act alongside the chip subsidy funding is a plan to overhaul how the federal government funds research and development. The bill would increase the funding, but also reorganize the way the cash is doled out and by which agencies, which is a problem for some lawmakers. There is appetite for modernization, but resistance to changing the existing structure.

Part of the objection also lies in the fact that House committee staffers have put a lot of work into their own research and development bills, and don’t want their work to get lost in the Senate’s efforts, according to one person familiar with legislative activity in the House.

It’s possible Congress could broker a deal at the eleventh hour and pass some form of the manufacturing subsidies this calendar year but it appears unlikely, with every day making a last-minute effort even less possible, according to five people familiar with the legislative activity. Those people think passage is more realistic within the first three months of the new year.

But for some people, optimism may be unavoidable. Carl Holshouser, an executive at industry lobby group TechNet, expects that Congress will find a way to squeeze semiconductor manufacturing funding before it returns home for the holidays.

“We have received, in the last week, a high level of confidence and inspiring feedback from the administration and members of Congress on both sides of the aisle that they believe that this will get done, and that it will get done this year,” he said.

Climate

A pro-China disinformation campaign is targeting rare earth miners

It’s uncommon for cyber criminals to target private industry. But a new operation has cast doubt on miners looking to gain a foothold in the West in an apparent attempt to protect China’s upper hand in a market that has become increasingly vital.

It is very uncommon for coordinated disinformation operations to target private industry, rather than governments or civil society, a cybersecurity expert says.

Photo: Goh Seng Chong/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Just when we thought the renewable energy supply chains couldn’t get more fraught, a sophisticated disinformation campaign has taken to social media to further complicate things.

Known as Dragonbridge, the campaign has existed for at least three years, but in the last few months it has shifted its focus to target several mining companies “with negative messaging in response to potential or planned rare earths production activities.” It was initially uncovered by cybersecurity firm Mandiant and peddles narratives in the Chinese interest via its network of thousands of fake social media accounts.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Some of the most astounding tech-enabled advances of the next decade, from cutting-edge medical research to urban traffic control and factory floor optimization, will be enabled by a device often smaller than a thumbnail: the memory chip.

While vast amounts of data are created, stored and processed every moment — by some estimates, 2.5 quintillion bytes daily — the insights in that code are unlocked by the memory chips that hold it and transfer it. “Memory will propel the next 10 years into the most transformative years in human history,” said Sanjay Mehrotra, president and CEO of Micron Technology.

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Fintech

Ripple’s CEO threatens to leave the US if it loses SEC case

CEO Brad Garlinghouse said a few countries have reached out to Ripple about relocating.

"There's no doubt that if the SEC doesn't win their case against us that that is good for crypto in the United States,” Brad Garlinghouse told Protocol.

Photo: Stephen McCarthy/Sportsfile for Collision via Getty Images

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said the crypto company will move to another country if it loses in its legal battle with the SEC.

Garlinghouse said he’s confident that Ripple will prevail against the federal regulator, which accused the company of failing to register roughly $1.4 billion in XRP tokens as securities.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Policy

The Supreme Court’s EPA ruling is bad news for tech regulation, too

The justices just gave themselves a lot of discretion to smack down agency rules.

The ruling could also endanger work on competition issues by the FTC and net neutrality by the FCC.

Photo: Geoff Livingston/Getty Images

The Supreme Court’s decision last week gutting the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions didn’t just signal the conservative justices’ dislike of the Clean Air Act at a moment of climate crisis. It also served as a warning for anyone that would like to see more regulation of Big Tech.

At the heart of Chief Justice John Roberts’ decision in West Virginia v. EPA was a codification of the “major questions doctrine,” which, he wrote, requires “clear congressional authorization” when agencies want to regulate on areas of great “economic and political significance.”

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Enterprise

Microsoft and Google are still using emotion AI, but with limits

Microsoft said accessibility goals overrode problems with emotion recognition and Google offers off-the-shelf emotion recognition technology amid growing concern over the controversial AI.

Emotion recognition is a well-established field of computer vision research; however, AI-based technologies used in an attempt to assess people’s emotional states have moved beyond the research phase.

Photo: Microsoft

Microsoft said last month it would no longer provide general use of an AI-based cloud software feature used to infer people’s emotions. However, despite its own admission that emotion recognition technology creates “risks,” it turns out the company will retain its emotion recognition capability in an app used by people with vision loss.

In fact, amid growing concerns over development and use of controversial emotion recognition in everyday software, both Microsoft and Google continue to incorporate the AI-based features in their products.

“The Seeing AI person channel enables you to recognize people and to get a description of them, including an estimate of their age and also their emotion,” said Saqib Shaikh, a software engineering manager and project lead for Seeing AI at Microsoft who helped build the app, in a tutorial about the product in a 2017 Microsoft video.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories
Bulletins