Enterprise

Consulting firms aren't just recommending software anymore, they're building it

Management consulting firms like McKinsey and Booz Allen are upending the traditional consulting model and building their own software.

Booz Allen Hamilton

Booz Allen is just one of several traditional consulting companies that are increasingly building software for their clients.

Photo: Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images

A cloud-native, consumer-facing digital platform was built from scratch in 15 months using agile software development. The portal runs on AWS and has more than 163 million page views. It wasn't designed by a software company; in fact, it wasn't even designed by a tech company — it was built by a consulting firm.

That portal is recreation.gov, the U.S. government's one-stop shop for public land use across the nation. And it was built by software engineers and cloud architects from the defense contractor and management consulting firm Booz Allen.

Years ago, no one would have believed it if you told them consulting firms were hiring software engineers and beating out tech companies to win development projects. Instead, consulting firms focused mostly on recommending software vendors, or advising clients on technology implementations.

But the traditional model of management consulting is being flipped upside down as every company tries to figure out how to become a software company. Gone are the old days of consulting firms selling people, time and resources; now, consulting firms are selling actual software and products.

Meet the new consulting

Haluk Saker, a senior vice president for Booz Allen from Turkey, is an engineer by both trade and passion. "All I wanted to be was an engineer and stay as an engineer," he told Protocol.

When Saker came to the U.S. after earning his master's in engineering, his objective was to use his skills across multiple products and projects, which led him to Booz Allen. "But then I quickly realized in Booz Allen, OK, you're an engineer, then a tech lead, then an architect and then some sort of manager." Saker wasn't interested in the traditional consulting career path. So even after rising from a software engineer to a partner, he found a way to stay deeply technical by communicating his career ambitions upfront.

Saker's path soon became the model for a new engineering track at Booz Allen. "Booz Allen invented the technical track based on my progression," he said. He's one of the few hands-on technical partners in Booz Allen, and was the driving force behind the recreation.gov proposal and rollout.

Winning that project was an eight-year journey full of hackathons and client presentations. During one of those hackathons, Saker was in the basement of the Department of Labor in Washington, D.C., working with three of his best teams, while the rest of the teams were from the Bay Area.

"People see Booz Allen as a defense contractor — everybody ignored us," Saker said. Everyone except the client; Saker's team of engineers ended up winning the entire hackathon. "The top four companies all were product companies, they had their products or similar jobs. We had just our brainpower," he said.

Saker's journey is representative of a broader shift in the consulting model.

Francisco Caudillo, a solutions leader at McKinsey, a consulting firm that also designs software for clients, believes the industry has come a long way from the stereotype of dumping 100-page strategy documents on clients' desks, leaving them to figure out the implementation on their own.

"I think that's probably a stereotype of, I don't know, maybe the '80s or even '90s? I don't think that is the case anymore," said Caudillo. What consulting firms do now is "start projects and they have some risk involved in the sense of, 'If this works, then we are going to bear part of that risk.'"

Booz Allen also follows a similar approach, which they call a "transaction-based fee model." The model lets both Booz Allen and its government clients make money as the product produces revenue. In the case of recreation.gov, Booz Allen invested in the development of the platform, which then generates income for the firm on a transactional basis.

Soren Kaplan, an affiliate research scientist at the USC Center for Effective Organizations, believes these shifts are occurring in part because the old "billable, time-based business model is not scalable." He thinks consulting firms need to look at how they scale beyond just selling time, because you can't scale people.

"As you look at how to scale a business, and you look at how to scale offerings, if it's people-based, it's not as scalable as if it's software-based," Kaplan said.

The challenge with building software and products, however, is finding the talent to build that software. The "cliche of the MBA graduate coming and going to solve the challenges of clients is definitely something that's going to change," said Caudillo. To him, the future of consulting is one that centers around the nexus of business and technology.

"The main challenge for the consulting world really is going to be: How do you find the talent that is at the intersection of those two points? The business acumen and the technological acumen," he said.

The talent race

Saker is passionate about beating Big Tech when it comes to talent. "I'm not competing with Apple, Google, Netflix by any means for a project, but I compete with them for the talent. So I lose talent to them, I steal talent from them," he said.

So when Booz Allen does beat the Apples, Googles and Amazons of the world in the race for talent, how does it do it?

Saker believes when it comes to winning talent, it's all about culture. "If the person likes you, it's a lot more likely that that person will accept my offer versus Microsoft or what the other companies offer," he said.

At McKinsey, Caudillo says engineers join the consulting firm to work on different products at different companies over the course of their careers. "If you think about companies like Facebook and Google, they are working towards a product," said Caudillo. The difference at McKinsey is, "We're not trying to sell software, we're not trying to sell a product, we are trying to solve a challenge," he said.

Consulting is still not tech

Still, consulting firms aren't tech companies.

"I don't think any of the consulting firms will see themselves as substituting SAP or IBM or those kinds of providers. That's something I don't think is going to happen. It's more a complement than a substitution," Caudillo said. He doesn't think "consulting firms will ever be able to play at the volume and scale of companies that are specialized." Because when it comes to software development, larger consulting firms "lack the skills and capabilities to do that at scale because it's not their core business," he said.

Kaplan agreed that there are some structural barriers preventing consulting firms from innovating and building software.

When a consultant has to bill 40 hours a week, all the innovation has to be accomplished in their spare time. "And it's not going to be valued, because the rewards and recognition are usually set up on billable time," Kaplan said.

Consulting firms do have several strategic and competitive advantages when it comes to selling actual software. "People go to consultants because they need expert knowledge, either content-expert knowledge or process-expert knowledge," said Kaplan. They are also close to their customers, "so if you can find the technology opportunities and partners, and then match them with your existing clients, you can do rapid experiments and prototype," he said.

These advantages have played out well for Saker. And he prefers to show, not tell.

"I'm not a sales engineer," he says. "So they do some magic and they sell. But I do magic by building prototypes." This approach enables Saker to show solution designs to clients in real time, often winning them over.

Ultimately, Kaplan thinks the long-term value of consulting will come from building technology that stays with the client. "You're going to start to see many more product offerings and software, service and subscription business models, and partnerships between the consulting firms and startups as well as big companies like IBM," he said.

That means consulting companies are starting to look a lot more like software companies, just as every company in the world is thinking about how to get better at building and maintaining software. It's a challenge for them, but it will also be a challenge for older enterprise tech companies with longstanding technical relationships with clients, which will now face more competition.

Workplace

An IPO may soon be in Notion’s future

Notion COO Akshay Kothari says there’s room to grow, aided by a new CFO who knows how to take a company public.

Notion has hired its first chief financial officer: Rama Katkar.

Photo: Courtesy of Notion

It’s been a year since Notion’s triumphant $275 million funding round and $10 billion valuation. Since then the landscape for productivity startups trying to make it on their own has completely changed, especially for those pandemic darlings that flourished in the all-remote world.

As recession looms, companies looking to cut costs are less likely to spend money on tools outside of their Microsoft or Google workplace bundles. Enterprise platforms are bulking up and it could spell trouble for the productivity startups trying to unseat them. But Notion COO Akshay Kothari says the company is still aiming to build the next Microsoft, not be the next Microsoft. And in a move signaling a new chapter of maturity, Notion has hired its first chief financial officer: Rama Katkar, Instacart’s former VP of finance.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at llawrence@protocol.com.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Securing the Enterprise

Securing the enterprise

There’s no let-up in the surge of cyberattacks against businesses. But shutting down the hackers will require many enterprises to evolve their strategy.

In today’s enterprise, “identity and security are very merged.”

Illustration: iStock/Getty Images Plus; Protocol
the Protocol team
Protocol focuses on the people, power and politics of tech, with no agenda and just one goal: to arm decision-makers in tech, business and public policy with the unbiased, fact-based news and analysis they need to navigate a world in rapid change.
Fintech

How neobanks are helping consumers game credit scoring

The CFPB says it is closely monitoring secured credit cards offered by neobanks.

Regulators are scrutinizing neobanks' card offerings.

Photo: Oscar Wong/Moment/Getty Images

About one in six Americans has a credit score below 619, according to the CFPB. Another 23% have too thin a credit file to score or no file at all. That puts them in a credit trap: To build credit, these consumers need someone to give them a line of credit with which they can demonstrate good financial habits. But with scores that low, few lenders are prepared to offer them anything.

Neobanks say they can solve the problem through a new twist on secured credit cards. But regulators are already scrutinizing their offerings.

Keep Reading Show less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

Policy

Steel decided World War II. Chips will decide whatever is next.

“Chip War: The Fight for the World’s Most Critical Technology” foreshadows the coming battle between nations over semiconductors.

“Chip War” outlines the nature of the coming battle over semiconductors, showing how the power to produce leading-edge chips fell into the hands of just five companies.

Image: Scribner; Protocol

“World War II was decided by steel and aluminum, and followed shortly thereafter by the Cold War, which was defined by atomic weapons,” Chris Miller, a professor at Tufts University’s Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, writes in the introduction to his latest book. So what’s next? According to Miller, the next era, including the rivalry between the U.S. and China, is all about computing power.

That tech rivalry and the story of how the chip industry got from four to 11.8 billion transistors are all part of Miller’s book, “Chip War: The Fight for the World’s Most Critical Technology,” which comes out Oct. 4. “Chip War” outlines the nature of the coming battle over semiconductors, showing how the power to produce leading-edge chips fell into the hands of just five companies: three from the U.S., one from Japan, and one from the Netherlands.

Keep Reading Show less
Hirsh Chitkara

Hirsh Chitkara ( @HirshChitkara) is a reporter at Protocol focused on the intersection of politics, technology and society. Before joining Protocol, he helped write a daily newsletter at Insider that covered all things Big Tech. He's based in New York and can be reached at hchitkara@protocol.com.

Latest Stories
Bulletins