Enterprise

Consulting firms aren't just recommending software anymore, they're building it

Management consulting firms like McKinsey and Booz Allen are upending the traditional consulting model and building their own software.

Booz Allen Hamilton

Booz Allen is just one of several traditional consulting companies that are increasingly building software for their clients.

Photo: Jim Watson/AFP via Getty Images

A cloud-native, consumer-facing digital platform was built from scratch in 15 months using agile software development. The portal runs on AWS and has more than 163 million page views. It wasn't designed by a software company; in fact, it wasn't even designed by a tech company — it was built by a consulting firm.

That portal is recreation.gov, the U.S. government's one-stop shop for public land use across the nation. And it was built by software engineers and cloud architects from the defense contractor and management consulting firm Booz Allen.

Years ago, no one would have believed it if you told them consulting firms were hiring software engineers and beating out tech companies to win development projects. Instead, consulting firms focused mostly on recommending software vendors, or advising clients on technology implementations.

But the traditional model of management consulting is being flipped upside down as every company tries to figure out how to become a software company. Gone are the old days of consulting firms selling people, time and resources; now, consulting firms are selling actual software and products.

Meet the new consulting

Haluk Saker, a senior vice president for Booz Allen from Turkey, is an engineer by both trade and passion. "All I wanted to be was an engineer and stay as an engineer," he told Protocol.

When Saker came to the U.S. after earning his master's in engineering, his objective was to use his skills across multiple products and projects, which led him to Booz Allen. "But then I quickly realized in Booz Allen, OK, you're an engineer, then a tech lead, then an architect and then some sort of manager." Saker wasn't interested in the traditional consulting career path. So even after rising from a software engineer to a partner, he found a way to stay deeply technical by communicating his career ambitions upfront.

Saker's path soon became the model for a new engineering track at Booz Allen. "Booz Allen invented the technical track based on my progression," he said. He's one of the few hands-on technical partners in Booz Allen, and was the driving force behind the recreation.gov proposal and rollout.

Winning that project was an eight-year journey full of hackathons and client presentations. During one of those hackathons, Saker was in the basement of the Department of Labor in Washington, D.C., working with three of his best teams, while the rest of the teams were from the Bay Area.

"People see Booz Allen as a defense contractor — everybody ignored us," Saker said. Everyone except the client; Saker's team of engineers ended up winning the entire hackathon. "The top four companies all were product companies, they had their products or similar jobs. We had just our brainpower," he said.

Saker's journey is representative of a broader shift in the consulting model.

Francisco Caudillo, a solutions leader at McKinsey, a consulting firm that also designs software for clients, believes the industry has come a long way from the stereotype of dumping 100-page strategy documents on clients' desks, leaving them to figure out the implementation on their own.

"I think that's probably a stereotype of, I don't know, maybe the '80s or even '90s? I don't think that is the case anymore," said Caudillo. What consulting firms do now is "start projects and they have some risk involved in the sense of, 'If this works, then we are going to bear part of that risk.'"

Booz Allen also follows a similar approach, which they call a "transaction-based fee model." The model lets both Booz Allen and its government clients make money as the product produces revenue. In the case of recreation.gov, Booz Allen invested in the development of the platform, which then generates income for the firm on a transactional basis.

Soren Kaplan, an affiliate research scientist at the USC Center for Effective Organizations, believes these shifts are occurring in part because the old "billable, time-based business model is not scalable." He thinks consulting firms need to look at how they scale beyond just selling time, because you can't scale people.

"As you look at how to scale a business, and you look at how to scale offerings, if it's people-based, it's not as scalable as if it's software-based," Kaplan said.

The challenge with building software and products, however, is finding the talent to build that software. The "cliche of the MBA graduate coming and going to solve the challenges of clients is definitely something that's going to change," said Caudillo. To him, the future of consulting is one that centers around the nexus of business and technology.

"The main challenge for the consulting world really is going to be: How do you find the talent that is at the intersection of those two points? The business acumen and the technological acumen," he said.

The talent race

Saker is passionate about beating Big Tech when it comes to talent. "I'm not competing with Apple, Google, Netflix by any means for a project, but I compete with them for the talent. So I lose talent to them, I steal talent from them," he said.

So when Booz Allen does beat the Apples, Googles and Amazons of the world in the race for talent, how does it do it?

Saker believes when it comes to winning talent, it's all about culture. "If the person likes you, it's a lot more likely that that person will accept my offer versus Microsoft or what the other companies offer," he said.

At McKinsey, Caudillo says engineers join the consulting firm to work on different products at different companies over the course of their careers. "If you think about companies like Facebook and Google, they are working towards a product," said Caudillo. The difference at McKinsey is, "We're not trying to sell software, we're not trying to sell a product, we are trying to solve a challenge," he said.

Consulting is still not tech

Still, consulting firms aren't tech companies.

"I don't think any of the consulting firms will see themselves as substituting SAP or IBM or those kinds of providers. That's something I don't think is going to happen. It's more a complement than a substitution," Caudillo said. He doesn't think "consulting firms will ever be able to play at the volume and scale of companies that are specialized." Because when it comes to software development, larger consulting firms "lack the skills and capabilities to do that at scale because it's not their core business," he said.

Kaplan agreed that there are some structural barriers preventing consulting firms from innovating and building software.

When a consultant has to bill 40 hours a week, all the innovation has to be accomplished in their spare time. "And it's not going to be valued, because the rewards and recognition are usually set up on billable time," Kaplan said.

Consulting firms do have several strategic and competitive advantages when it comes to selling actual software. "People go to consultants because they need expert knowledge, either content-expert knowledge or process-expert knowledge," said Kaplan. They are also close to their customers, "so if you can find the technology opportunities and partners, and then match them with your existing clients, you can do rapid experiments and prototype," he said.

These advantages have played out well for Saker. And he prefers to show, not tell.

"I'm not a sales engineer," he says. "So they do some magic and they sell. But I do magic by building prototypes." This approach enables Saker to show solution designs to clients in real time, often winning them over.

Ultimately, Kaplan thinks the long-term value of consulting will come from building technology that stays with the client. "You're going to start to see many more product offerings and software, service and subscription business models, and partnerships between the consulting firms and startups as well as big companies like IBM," he said.

That means consulting companies are starting to look a lot more like software companies, just as every company in the world is thinking about how to get better at building and maintaining software. It's a challenge for them, but it will also be a challenge for older enterprise tech companies with longstanding technical relationships with clients, which will now face more competition.

A 'Soho house for techies': VCs place a bet on community

Contrary is the latest venture firm to experiment with building community spaces instead of offices.

Contrary NYC is meant to re-create being part of a members-only club where engineers and entrepreneurs can hang out together, have a space to work, and host events for people in tech.

Photo: Courtesy of Contrary

In the pre-pandemic times, Contrary’s network of venture scouts, founders, and top technologists reflected the magnetic pull Silicon Valley had on the tech industry. About 80% were based in the Bay Area, with a smattering living elsewhere. Today, when Contrary asked where people in its network were living, the split had changed with 40% in the Bay Area and another 40% living in or planning to move to New York.

It’s totally bifurcated now, said Contrary’s founder Eric Tarczynski.

Keep Reading Show less
Biz Carson

Biz Carson ( @bizcarson) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol, covering Silicon Valley with a focus on startups and venture capital. Previously, she reported for Forbes and was co-editor of Forbes Next Billion-Dollar Startups list. Before that, she worked for Business Insider, Gigaom, and Wired and started her career as a newspaper designer for Gannett.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Fintech

Binance CEO wrestles with the 'Chinese company' label

Changpeng "CZ" Zhao, who leads crypto’s largest marketplace, is pushing back on attempts to link Binance to Beijing.

Despite Binance having to abandon its country of origin shortly after its founding, critics have portrayed the exchange as a tool of the Chinese government.

Photo: Akio Kon/Bloomberg via Getty Images

In crypto, he is known simply as CZ, head of one of the industry’s most dominant players.

It took only five years for Binance CEO and co-founder Changpeng Zhao to build his company, which launched in 2017, into the world’s biggest crypto exchange, with 90 million customers and roughly $76 billion in daily trading volume, outpacing the U.S. crypto powerhouse Coinbase.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Enterprise

How I decided to leave the US and pursue a tech career in Europe

Melissa Di Donato moved to Europe to broaden her technology experience with a different market perspective. She planned to stay two years. Seventeen years later, she remains in London as CEO of Suse.

“It was a hard go for me in the beginning. I was entering inside of a company that had been very traditional in a sense.”

Photo: Suse

Click banner image for more How I decided seriesA native New Yorker, Melissa Di Donato made a life-changing decision back in 2005 when she packed up for Europe to further her career in technology. Then with IBM, she made London her new home base.

Today, Di Donato is CEO of Germany’s Suse, now a 30-year-old, open-source enterprise software company that specializes in Linux operating systems, container management, storage, and edge computing. As the company’s first female leader, she has led Suse through the coronavirus pandemic, a 2021 IPO on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange, and the acquisitions of Kubernetes management startup Rancher Labs and container security company NeuVector.

Keep Reading Show less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Enterprise

UiPath had a rocky few years. Rob Enslin wants to turn it around.

Protocol caught up with Enslin, named earlier this year as UiPath’s co-CEO, to discuss why he left Google Cloud, the untapped potential of robotic-process automation, and how he plans to lead alongside founder Daniel Dines.

Rob Enslin, UiPath's co-CEO, chats with Protocol about the company's future.

Photo: UiPath

UiPath has had a shaky history.

The company, which helps companies automate business processes, went public in 2021 at a valuation of more than $30 billion, but now the company’s market capitalization is only around $7 billion. To add insult to injury, UiPath laid off 5% of its staff in June and then lowered its full-year guidance for fiscal year 2023 just months later, tanking its stock by 15%.

Keep Reading Show less
Aisha Counts

Aisha Counts (@aishacounts) is a reporter at Protocol covering enterprise software. Formerly, she was a management consultant for EY. She's based in Los Angeles and can be reached at acounts@protocol.com.

Latest Stories
Bulletins