Enterprise

What data privacy could look like in the metaverse

Today’s data privacy and management models were born in the dark ages of the web. Government and private sector organizations want an update.

Handshake

Digital experiences have expanded beyond our phones and web interactions.

Illustration: Yevhen Lahunov/iStock /Getty Images Plus

Government and private-sector organizations want to update data privacy and management approaches.

Dense privacy policies and misleading website cookie notices are legacies of a bygone era. Today, data collection is becoming more ambient, often happening in places where there’s no ability to post a notice at all. Instead, digital experiences have expanded beyond our phones and web interactions, and data is collected in virtually augmented environments, whether through IoT devices on city streets or in our homes.

Enter data intermediaries.

These third parties would serve as links between people and entities collecting their data, or between businesses and their partners. They could take on many forms, from digital agents to fiduciaries representing people and their data privacy choices. Or they might be trusts, facilitating collective data negotiations on behalf of individual people or businesses. Data intermediaries could even make automated decisions using artificial intelligence.

The World Economic Forum published a report on Tuesday giving an overview of these approaches as assessed by a data intermediaries task force. “The task force has had as their mission the idea that we would explore various different ways of looking not just at data privacy, but improving data availability,” said Anne Flanagan, project lead of Data Policy at WEF, during an event presenting the “Advancing Digital Agency: The Power of Data Intermediaries” report.

The goal of the report, Flanagan said, is “to improve rights for people, and simultaneously to de-risk and improve certainty for companies and organizations that need access to data; to build innovation and to fuel the world that we all live in today, where we all do business, everything that we're doing online, particularly in a post-pandemic era.”

An AI data agent

One potentially risky scenario floated in the report: the automated digital agent, which would use AI to decide an individual’s data-permission preferences. The goal of this approach would be to remove the burden of having to make case-by-case data decisions by replacing humans with AI that learns from previous data choices and then takes over to automate future decisions.

However, algorithmic models can make flawed decisions if they are trained with inaccurate, incomplete or biased data sets. They are also at risk of drifting from their original state once deployed, and making decisions in ways that were not intended.

“The key to success here lies in the quality of the automated decision-making and the underlying algorithm,” noted the report.

The WEF report follows similar work from the U.N., EU and U.K. In general, all these groups are in evaluation mode, assessing a variety of models for enabling secure and trustworthy data connections and sharing as the digital landscape evolves.

The U.K. Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport published a paper last year focused on the role of data intermediaries such as data trusts, nonprofit or commercial data exchanges and co-ops for purposes such as medical data sharing.

In November, the EU passed the Data Governance Act, which established a framework for data sharing among companies as well as data management and consent controls for people via data intermediation services like data wallets.

Questioning for-profit data intermediaries

Despite a growing collection of research, there are few practical data intermediary approaches in place thus far, but people like Richard Whitt, former Google corporate director of Strategic Initiatives, are ready to take a stab at steering business investment and early development in updated approaches to data stewardship. Whitt, currently president of GLIA Foundation and a member of the task force that spoke at the event, is also founder and CEO of Deeper Edge, a “proof-of-concept” company developing digital fiduciary services.

Digital fiduciaries might resemble doctors, lawyers or financial advisers, professions that are licensed and abide by standard codes of conduct. While digital fiduciaries might “self-certify” by incorporating guarantees in their terms of service or privacy policies, said Whitt during the panel discussion, “those promises may amount to little” without industry standards or uniform codes of conduct that emerge through competition.

“Over time, these collaborations could turn into an actual profession,” said Whitt.

Some privacy advocates — including FTC Chairwoman Lina Khan — have opposed the data fiduciary concept, particularly in relation to digital platforms. Khan argued in a 2019 Harvard Law Review article that the fiduciary framework is not an apt response to “problems associated with outsized market share and business models built on pervasive surveillance” and rather “invites an enervating complacency toward online platforms’ structural power and a premature abandonment of more robust visions of public regulation.”

The WEF, whose task force included academics and representatives of companies including Mastercard and Facebook parent Meta, briefly questioned for-profit and private data intermediary models in its report. Risks and conflicts of interest can emerge even in public sector or nonprofit models, Flanagan suggested, adding, “It’s a more baseline regulatory question around how do we build regulation and what types of checks and balances are put in place.”

However, she continued, “It is likely that a for-profit intermediary might need to have additional checks and balances to prevent corruption. But regulatory capture, or capture by other entities, is possible across all types of regulatory models.”

Climate

This carbon capture startup wants to clean up the worst polluters

The founder and CEO of point-source carbon capture company Carbon Clean discusses what the startup has learned, the future of carbon capture technology, as well as the role of companies like his in battling the climate crisis.

Carbon Clean CEO Aniruddha Sharma told Protocol that fossil fuels are necessary, at least in the near term, to lift the living standards of those who don’t have access to cars and electricity.

Photo: Carbon Clean

Carbon capture and storage has taken on increasing importance as companies with stubborn emissions look for new ways to meet their net zero goals. For hard-to-abate industries like cement and steel production, it’s one of the few options that exist to help them get there.

Yet it’s proven incredibly challenging to scale the technology, which captures carbon pollution at the source. U.K.-based company Carbon Clean is leading the charge to bring down costs. This year, it raised a $150 million series C round, which the startup said is the largest-ever funding round for a point-source carbon capture company.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol covering climate. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Workplace

Why companies cut staff after raising millions

Are tech firms blowing millions in funding just weeks after getting it? Experts say it's more complicated than that.

Bolt, Trade Republic, HomeLight, and Stord all drew attention from funding announcements that happened just weeks or days before layoffs.

Photo: Pulp Photography/Getty Images

Fintech startup Bolt was one of the first tech companies to slash jobs, cutting 250 employees, or a third of its staff, in May. For some workers, the pain of layoffs was a shock not only because they were the first, but also because the cuts came just four months after Bolt had announced a $355 million series E funding round and achieved a peak valuation of $11 billion.

“Bolt employees were blind sided because the CEO was saying just weeks ago how everything is fine,” an anonymous user wrote on the message board Blind. “It has been an extremely rough day for 1/3 of Bolt employees,” another user posted. “Sadly, I was one of them who was let go after getting a pay-raise just a couple of weeks ago.”

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.

Climate

The fight to define the carbon offset market's future

The world’s largest carbon offset issuer is fighting a voluntary effort to standardize the industry. And the fate of the climate could hang in the balance.

It has become increasingly clear that scaling the credit market will first require clear standards and transparency.

Kevin Frayer/Getty Images

There’s a major fight brewing over what kind of standards will govern the carbon offset market.

A group of independent experts looking to clean up the market’s checkered record and the biggest carbon credit issuer on the voluntary market is trying to influence efforts to define what counts as a quality credit. The outcome could make or break an industry increasingly central to tech companies meeting their net zero goals.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Policy

White House AI Bill of Rights lacks specific guidance for AI rules

The document unveiled today by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is long on tech guidance, but short on restrictions for AI.

While the document provides extensive suggestions for how to incorporate AI rights in technical design, it does not include any recommendations for restrictions on the use of controversial forms of AI.

Photo: Ana Lanza/Unsplash

It was a year in the making, but people eagerly anticipating the White House Bill of Rights for AI will have to continue waiting for concrete recommendations for future AI policy or restrictions.

Instead, the document unveiled today by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is legally non-binding and intended to be used as a handbook and a “guide for society” that could someday inform government AI legislation or regulations.

Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights features a list of five guidelines for protecting people in relation to AI use:

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories
Bulletins