Enterprise

How I decided on the right AI auditor for my hiring tech company

Like other recruitment tech companies that use AI-based systems, Hired was in the market earlier this year for an algorithmic bias audit. But its chief technology officer, Dave Walters, didn’t want to merely check the AI fairness compliance box. Here’s how his team chose an auditing partner for the long haul.

Dave Walters headshot

"I would definitely suggest that companies start this process early — now," says Hired chief technology officer Dave Walters.

Photo: Hired

Click banner image for more How I decided series

Automated and algorithmic systems used to decide whether people get loans or jobs have attracted heightened scrutiny, compelling legislators to propose laws requiring audits of those systems. In New York City, there’s already a law requiring companies that provide automated employment decision tools to get their tech inspected, and they have just a few months left to comply before it goes into effect in January 2023.

Hired is one of those companies. Hired’s chief technology officer, Dave Walters, spent the early months of this year evaluating a growing pool of auditing services in the hopes of finding one that would not only help Hired check the AI fairness compliance box, but also offer deeply technical services for a long-term partnership. In the end, Hired chose London-based Holistic AI, which currently is evaluating the machine-learning models Hired uses for matching job seekers with roles that suit their skill sets.

Walters’ story, as told to Protocol, has been edited for clarity and brevity.

We cast a pretty wide net earlier this year, speaking to a number of different companies that were getting into the space. Of course, one of the things we found is generally everybody was getting into the space. This is a new demand, a new area that companies are spinning up to meet. Many of those companies [have come] from academia; they've been in that research area and in that mindset of doing this type of work, but just not necessarily monetizing in this way.

Because of how new it was, there was no single standard approach that every auditor was taking. That is the same with any new paradigm in any industry; there's going to be a certain amount of differential between approaches until some of those approaches get vetted out or rise to the top as the preferred approach.

We spoke with each of them. We started to narrow down that pool. Some of the key metrics we looked at:

  • How new was the company: Did they just spin up this year? Or maybe they've been around for a year or two at least — anticipating some of the early adopters in the industry?
  • What kind of funding did they have … We wanted to make sure that whoever we partnered with was going to have that level of stability.
  • We looked at the auditing, not as a point-in-time audit, [where] we just check this box, go through an audit, then we move on and forget about it. But for us, this is a long-term initiative and partnership.

And as we narrowed down the field to the last couple of potential partners, we also then asked those candidates to provide us with sample reports from audits that they've done previously. We were able to see those public-facing, unredacted reports and see some of the more internal, [redacted] reports to have a better feel for what our end result would be.

There definitely was one that we saw that was not as comprehensive as we would have liked. We had some anticipation that might be the case based on some conversations, but then that helped solidify and crystallize that for us.

Seeing that report and understanding how that's going to translate into your business, and how that's going to benefit you, I think is critical.

Some we did not feel in their proposed approach were going to be digging as deep into the models. We felt very strongly that whoever we partnered with, it was going to be important that they have access to our models and access to our data without creating any security risks, or [personally identifiable information] risks. And so, they are able to fully evaluate the model and the results of the model. We worked with our internal IT group and security teams as well their team. I’ve leveraged some third-party tools to ensure that our working with them is done securely.

The easier path would have been to say, “You know what — we're going to avoid any kind of data and expect that you try to audit us based purely on the models themselves.” But we ultimately felt that was not going to give us the best result.

I would definitely suggest that companies start this process early — now. We’re already halfway through the year, so that is a little bit difficult for companies at this point that haven't started. But maybe for future years, because this will be an annual commitment for New York state to stay current, it’s going to take time to do that research on the possible partners to work with and to vet them out, and to kick off the actual audit and work through that audit.

Fintech

Judge Zia Faruqui is trying to teach you crypto, one ‘SNL’ reference at a time

His decisions on major cryptocurrency cases have quoted "The Big Lebowski," "SNL," and "Dr. Strangelove." That’s because he wants you — yes, you — to read them.

The ways Zia Faruqui (right) has weighed on cases that have come before him can give lawyers clues as to what legal frameworks will pass muster.

Photo: Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images

“Cryptocurrency and related software analytics tools are ‘The wave of the future, Dude. One hundred percent electronic.’”

That’s not a quote from "The Big Lebowski" — at least, not directly. It’s a quote from a Washington, D.C., district court memorandum opinion on the role cryptocurrency analytics tools can play in government investigations. The author is Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui.

Keep Reading Show less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

The financial technology transformation is driving competition, creating consumer choice, and shaping the future of finance. Hear from seven fintech leaders who are reshaping the future of finance, and join the inaugural Financial Technology Association Fintech Summit to learn more.

Keep Reading Show less
FTA
The Financial Technology Association (FTA) represents industry leaders shaping the future of finance. We champion the power of technology-centered financial services and advocate for the modernization of financial regulation to support inclusion and responsible innovation.
Enterprise

AWS CEO: The cloud isn’t just about technology

As AWS preps for its annual re:Invent conference, Adam Selipsky talks product strategy, support for hybrid environments, and the value of the cloud in uncertain economic times.

Photo: Noah Berger/Getty Images for Amazon Web Services

AWS is gearing up for re:Invent, its annual cloud computing conference where announcements this year are expected to focus on its end-to-end data strategy and delivering new industry-specific services.

It will be the second re:Invent with CEO Adam Selipsky as leader of the industry’s largest cloud provider after his return last year to AWS from data visualization company Tableau Software.

Keep Reading Show less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Image: Protocol

We launched Protocol in February 2020 to cover the evolving power center of tech. It is with deep sadness that just under three years later, we are winding down the publication.

As of today, we will not publish any more stories. All of our newsletters, apart from our flagship, Source Code, will no longer be sent. Source Code will be published and sent for the next few weeks, but it will also close down in December.

Keep Reading Show less
Bennett Richardson

Bennett Richardson ( @bennettrich) is the president of Protocol. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, Bennett was executive director of global strategic partnerships at POLITICO, where he led strategic growth efforts including POLITICO's European expansion in Brussels and POLITICO's creative agency POLITICO Focus during his six years with the company. Prior to POLITICO, Bennett was co-founder and CMO of Hinge, the mobile dating company recently acquired by Match Group. Bennett began his career in digital and social brand marketing working with major brands across tech, energy, and health care at leading marketing and communications agencies including Edelman and GMMB. Bennett is originally from Portland, Maine, and received his bachelor's degree from Colgate University.

Enterprise

Why large enterprises struggle to find suitable platforms for MLops

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, and as larger enterprises go from deploying hundreds of models to thousands and even millions of models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

Photo: artpartner-images via Getty Images

On any given day, Lily AI runs hundreds of machine learning models using computer vision and natural language processing that are customized for its retail and ecommerce clients to make website product recommendations, forecast demand, and plan merchandising. But this spring when the company was in the market for a machine learning operations platform to manage its expanding model roster, it wasn’t easy to find a suitable off-the-shelf system that could handle such a large number of models in deployment while also meeting other criteria.

Some MLops platforms are not well-suited for maintaining even more than 10 machine learning models when it comes to keeping track of data, navigating their user interfaces, or reporting capabilities, Matthew Nokleby, machine learning manager for Lily AI’s product intelligence team, told Protocol earlier this year. “The duct tape starts to show,” he said.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories
Bulletins