Enterprise

Intel CTO Greg Lavender’s job is clear: 'How do we get that mojo back?'

Intel is shaking up its management team. Here’s how the company’s new CTO plans to shake up its software business.

Intel CTO Greg Lavender

Former VMware executive Greg Lavender now serves as Intel's CTO.

Photo: Intel

Roughly a year after Intel installed CEO Pat Gelsinger to lead the company’s turnaround, it still has a lot to prove.

Its earnings report last week demonstrated signs of life, yet the company still has a long way to go after a prolonged period of manufacturing weakness. Gelsinger has vowed to regain Intel’s manufacturing leadership, and part of the strategy involves massive capital investments in new factories in Ohio, Arizona and Europe that are taking a toll on profits.

Another equally important task Gelsinger embarked on as part of his effort to reinvigorate the Silicon Valley giant was remaking the company’s executive leadership. Over the summer last year, for example, Intel jettisoned its data center boss, Navin Shenoy, and split the group into two parts. At the same time, Intel named former VMware executive Greg Lavender to the CTO job.

A computer scientist by training, Lavender's career in tech has included a teaching stint at the University of Texas at Austin, a decade at Sun Microsystems and running cloud infrastructure for Citi; most recently, he served as CTO of VMware while Gelsinger was CEO there. In a recent conversation with Protocol, Lavender talked about how he and Gelsinger are redefining the CTO role, the strategy behind Intel’s software efforts and how he approaches managing the thousands of technologists he is responsible for leading.

This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.

Can you tell us a bit about your role as the CTO of a semiconductor company?

As the CTO, you get pulled in a lot of directions. My No. 1 priority is building my leadership team, and I’ve made some changes there and continue to recruit both internally and externally. I like to tell people that I know a little about a lot, or a lot about a little. I balance my time between chief talking officer — which includes doing things like this — and chief technology officer, which is the tech side. I sit on Pat’s staff, and we have a software-first strategy, and I’m co-chair of the AI/ML strategy for the company.

Pat gave me two jobs. I’ve got Intel Labs and a bunch of advanced technology development going on. I created a security group pulling together 1,000 security architects, firmware engineers — systems people — to take a hard, hard run at confidential computing. And then I collected another 5,000 software engineers across the company into the Software Advanced Technology Group, which is everything from BIOS to firmware to compilers, operating systems.

I could spend the rest of the call telling you about all the open-source code that we put out there that most people probably don’t know that we did because the past administration didn’t want people talking about these sorts of things. The world is waking up to our open-source code contributions that are already there.

Why did Pat ask you to join Intel? And why did you take the job?

Pat just said, “You’re the right person, at the right time, for this job.” I had to let that sink in a bit. I have great respect for Pat, I’ve known him for 15 years, since I was at Sun and he was CTO of Intel. Think about it: The first CTO of Intel asked me to be his CTO. It’s a real privilege, I felt very flattered by the opportunity. He and I have not failed yet, and we’re not going to fail at Intel. We’re going to make it great.

What’s your plan to help with Intel’s turnaround? What can the CTO do?

Let me give you some context. The Intel Developer Forum was the premier technical geek-out event. It was the place that all of the coolest technology from Intel, and all of their customers, would end up. And it’s like, Intel somehow lost that mojo. [Editor's note: Intel Developer Forum was shut down in 2017.] So for me, when I came into the door, I wondered: How do we get that mojo back?

The issue is that what we’re doing hasn’t been communicated to the community, and the community, therefore, wasn’t paying attention to all the great things going on. So now, under Pat, we’re much more vocal about all the things we’re doing, particularly in the software area.

I’m trying to create a pull function for software. Right now we push a bunch of software: “Here it is, here it is, hope you use it.” But you’ve got to be in the ecosystems, because for low-code/no-code developers it’s about productivity. They assume the performance will be there by the cloud vendor, or whoever is writing the infrastructure.

So how do you get the software out into the market, in the hands of developers, either without them even knowing it — like putting it into PyTorch or TensorFlow or these other ecosystems — and make it so ubiquitously available in the ecosystem that you’re getting all the benefits? It’s open source or freeware, and it's available to you without having to perform any kind of brain surgery. And you can just get all the benefits on our platforms by picking up these ecosystems.

As a relatively new person at Intel, where staffers can stick around for 10, 15, 20 years, how do you think about running the CTO’s office? Do you have a chief of staff, for example?

I’ve never liked the term chief of staff, because I don’t want some police officer guarding my door. I like to be accessible, and in fact, my staff thinks I’m a little bit too accessible. As a new leader, it’s important to me that people understand who I am, how I communicate. Recently, my big teams had their own internal offsite sync-up meeting, and I came and spoke to them for the first 45 minutes, just to confirm the strategy and how to execute it.

When I worked in banking, I never adapted to the hierarchy [Editor's note: Lavender worked at Citi for six years]. Look: Andy Grove is famous for having the flat organization, that he pioneered that philosophy and theory in Silicon Valley. I’m very used to egalitarian environments.

I want to spend at least 65% of my day, if not more, with the technologists. And the other 25% to 30% of my day, I’m dealing with finance and lawyers. I mean, that’s just part of modern business, right? My philosophy is that if the “tax” on my time is more than 25%, then I’m going to put more structures in place in order to deal with it so it consumes less.

As a computer scientist and not a chip engineer by background, how do you tackle some of the decision-making around the technical complexities of semiconductors?

I’m not a [hardware] engineer by background. I find it fascinating, the material science level. I studied physics in undergrad, so I sort of had to dust off my old textbooks, get the latest editions, to go read more on semiconductor physics. I ask all the right questions because I have a lot of experience. As a professor for 14 years at the University of Texas at Austin, I supervised lots of undergrads, master’s and Ph.D. students, so I’m big on educating people.

When you present some of the more technically complex aspects of the groups you’re responsible for to the board of directors, how do you go about calibrating your explanation? What is different about talking to the board versus someone like Pat?

We send a short white paper that has all the definitions of all the acronyms, so you sort of give them a decoder ring because there are a huge number of acronyms when we start talking about AI or ML, or PyTorch/TensorFlow. It’s just a plethora of technologies — some of the board members are clearly technical. But we always try and give them a pre-read, so they’re briefed. Then they can ask questions before the board.

A lot of what we discuss is confidential, but they’re very engaged, and ask a lot of great questions. But the board is always concerned about the competition, and we feel like we’re going to show up better. My philosophy is that honesty and transparency are the things that you should adhere to in a board meeting: being open about where we are, and what our plans are, and taking on all the questions.

Climate

The minerals we need to save the planet are getting way too expensive

Supply chain problems and rising demand have sent prices spiraling upward for the minerals and metals essential for the clean energy transition.

Critical mineral prices have exploded over the past year.

Photo: Andrey Rudakov/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The newest source of the alarm bells echoing throughout the renewables industry? Spiking critical mineral and metal prices.

According to a new report from the International Energy Agency, a maelstrom of rising demand and tattered supply chains have caused prices for the materials needed for clean energy technologies to soar in the last year. And this increase has only accelerated since 2022 began.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Sponsored Content

Why the digital transformation of industries is creating a more sustainable future

Qualcomm’s chief sustainability officer Angela Baker on how companies can view going “digital” as a way not only toward growth, as laid out in a recent report, but also toward establishing and meeting environmental, social and governance goals.

Three letters dominate business practice at present: ESG, or environmental, social and governance goals. The number of mentions of the environment in financial earnings has doubled in the last five years, according to GlobalData: 600,000 companies mentioned the term in their annual or quarterly results last year.

But meeting those ESG goals can be a challenge — one that businesses can’t and shouldn’t take lightly. Ahead of an exclusive fireside chat at Davos, Angela Baker, chief sustainability officer at Qualcomm, sat down with Protocol to speak about how best to achieve those targets and how Qualcomm thinks about its own sustainability strategy, net zero commitment, other ESG targets and more.

Keep Reading Show less
Chris Stokel-Walker

Chris Stokel-Walker is a freelance technology and culture journalist and author of "YouTubers: How YouTube Shook Up TV and Created a New Generation of Stars." His work has been published in The New York Times, The Guardian and Wired.

Enterprise

The 911 system is outdated. Updating it to the cloud is risky.

Unlike tech companies, emergency services departments can’t afford to make mistakes when migrating to the cloud. Integrating new software in an industry where there’s no margin for error is risky, and sometimes deadly.

In an industry where seconds can mean the difference between life and death, many public safety departments are hesitant to take risks on new cloud-based technologies.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Dialing 911 could be the most important phone call you will ever make. But what happens when the software that’s supposed to deliver that call fails you? It may seem simple, but the technology behind a call for help is complicated, and when it fails, deadly.

The infrastructure supporting emergency contact centers is one of the most critical assets for any city, town or local government. But just as the pandemic exposed the creaky tech infrastructure that runs local governments, in many cases the technology in those call centers is outdated and hasn’t been touched for decades.

Keep Reading Show less
Aisha Counts

Aisha Counts (@aishacounts) is a reporter at Protocol covering enterprise software. Formerly, she was a management consultant for EY. She's based in Los Angeles and can be reached at acounts@protocol.com.

Entertainment

'The Wilds' is a must-watch guilty pleasure and more weekend recs

Don’t know what to do this weekend? We’ve got you covered.

Our favorite things this week.

Illustration: Protocol

The East Coast is getting a little preview of summer this weekend. If you want to stay indoors and beat the heat, we have a few suggestions this week to keep you entertained, like a new season of Amazon Prime’s guilty-pleasure show, “The Wilds,” a new game from Horizon Worlds that’s fun for everyone and a sneak peek from Adam Mosseri into what Instagram is thinking about Web3.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Workplace

Work expands to fill the time – but only if you let it

The former Todoist productivity expert drops time-blocking tips, lofi beats playlists for concentrating and other knowledge bombs.

“I do hope the productivity space as a whole is more intentional about pushing narratives that are about life versus just work.”

Photo: Courtesy of Fadeke Adegbuyi

Fadeke Adegbuyi knows how to dole out productivity advice. When she was a marketing manager at Doist, she taught users via blogs and newsletters about how to better organize their lives. Doist, the company behind to-do-list app Todoist and messaging app Twist, has pushed remote and asynchronous work for years. Adegbuyi’s job was to translate these ideas to the masses.

“We were thinking about asynchronous communication from a work point of view, of like: What is most effective for doing ambitious and awesome work, and also, what is most advantageous for living a life that feels balanced?” Adegbuyi said.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at llawrence@protocol.com.

Latest Stories
Bulletins