Lasers and molten tin: Inside Intel’s plans for the world’s most advanced chip-making process

After years of manufacturing struggles, Intel has gone all in on extreme ultraviolet lithography to make its most advanced chips. The technology is theoretically precise enough to hit your thumb with a laser pointer from the moon.

Intel workers in lab

Intel uses extreme ultraviolet lithography to print transistors and other complex features in some of the most advanced processors in the world.

Photo: Walden Kirsch/Intel Corporation

HILLSBORO, Ore. — To create a beam of ultraviolet radiation precise enough to print the world’s most advanced microchips, one of the most expensive tools in the world sprays microscopic droplets of molten tin across a vacuum chamber. It then shoots those droplets with a 25 kilowatt laser beam: twice.

The first shot, at low energy, evaporates the droplet into a tiny cloud shaped like a pancake. The second full-power shot transforms the cloud into plasma that’s focused down to a beam. The machine bounces the beam off a series of mirrors, and finally points it at a silicon wafer, where it draws the billions of transistors and other features that form the chips that power the world.

This system is called extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography, and it’s theoretically precise enough to hit your thumb with a laser pointer from the moon.

EUV machines are the future of the semiconductor industry, which is operating at a breakneck pace after the pandemic upended the world. Jolted by factory shutdowns and a big shift in demand for consumer goods that all seem to need chips, the businesses that manufacture semiconductors have been furiously growing to satiate the world’s unlimited appetite for computing power. At the same time, Intel has vowed to return its chip-making business to its former leadership position after a prolonged period of dysfunction.

The Ronler Acres facility Intel operates in the Portland suburb of Hillsboro, Oregon, itself is under construction, as part of a massive expansion at the company’s most important manufacturing site. In part, the expanded factory will house the huge machines manufactured by the Dutch company ASML that are required to use EUV technology for chip making.

The Ronler complex has long been where Intel conducts its most advanced research operations, and it is typically where the company finalizes its latest microprocessor designs before they are mass-produced at facilities, known as fabs. After years of manufacturing challenges, CEO Pat Gelsinger has said the company is now all-in on the EUV technology needed to make advanced processors, and designated Oregon as the place to do it.

“As I like to say, it's easier to be No. 2 in the bike race than it is to be No. 1,” Gelsinger said at an Intel event over the summer. “And you're able to just catch up much more quickly by exerting less energy, and we're really leaning on the learnings that we have from ASML and the deepening relationship that we have with them."

Tools of the trade

The EUV tools are exclusively manufactured in the Netherlands by ASML, and arrive at Intel’s chip fabrication facility in the suburbs of Portland in thousands of pieces. Each $180 million machine is roughly 12 feet tall, and weighs about 180 metric tons. The vacuum chamber alone is too big and heavy to fit onto a single airplane — even a 747 can’t manage the load — and it arrives in three pieces, according to Mark Phillips, Intel’s director of Lithography Hardware and Solutions.

On a recent visit by Protocol to Intel’s Ronler Acres complex, Phillips talked about EUV tech and Intel’s factory and tools with apparent pride, boasting with an engineer’s bravado about the prowess necessary to achieve what the company has inside the fab.

“The more I know about what these tools do, the more it just blows me away that we're able to do [this],” he said.

The fab on its Ronler Acres campus itself is a marvel in automation. Containers called FOUPS — front-opening unified pods, which hold multiple silicon wafers that individual chips are printed on — whiz around on robotic tracks attached to the ceiling. A typical wafer requires roughly 1,000 process steps and will travel more than 100 miles inside the factory during the weeks-long manufacturing process.

Striding through Intel’s sprawling factory, bathed in yellow light, Phillips explained the design decisions that went into the building. The ceilings were built high enough to accommodate a future generation of the tools called high-numerical aperture EUV, or high NA, based on the size of the optics necessary. The yellow factory lighting is intentional, designed to not interfere with the light-sensitive photoresist material used to form patterns on the silicon. (Intel does not allow photography inside its most advanced facilities.)

There are no pillars or support columns inside the plant, which leaves more space for the engineers to work around the tools. Custom-made cranes capable of lifting 10 tons each are built into the ceiling. Intel needs those cranes to move the tools into place, and open the machines up if one needs work or an upgrade. One of the ASML systems Phillips stopped by to demonstrate was undergoing an upgrade, exposing a complex system of hoses, wires and chambers.

“Each [crane] beam can lift 10,000 kilograms, and for some of the lifts you have to bring two of the crane beams over to lift the components in the tool,” Phillips said. “That’s needed to both install them and maintain them; if something deep inside really breaks, you’ll have to lift up the top module, set it on a stand out behind or in front of the tool, then the ASML field-service engineers can get to work.”

Below the EUV tools, Intel built a lower level that contains the transformers, power conditioners, racks of vacuum pumps for hydrogen-abatement equipment systems and racks of power supplies that run the CO2 driver laser. The driver laser shoots the microscopic pieces of tin inside the tool at a rate of 50,000 times a second. Originally made by a laser company called Trumpf for metal cutting, the EUV version combines four of its most powerful designs into a single unit for EUV use, Phillips said.

“It’s incredibly difficult to make 13.5 nanometer photons with enough power to make it all the way through the optics and expose the [photo]resist,” or the light-sensitive material used in chip manufacturing, Phillips said. “The source alone delayed its readiness for the whole industry by several years.”

Intel techs Intel techs work inside its fab in Hillsboro, Oregon. Photo: Walden Kirsch/Intel Corporation

EUV technology has been in development for more than 30 years, nearly as long as Phillips has worked at Intel. Once called soft X-ray, development began in the mid-1980s, but only very recently has that work resulted in technology that’s useful for high-volume chip manufacturing.

Part of the difficulty in bringing the technology to market was ensuring it was mature enough to perform well at the high level of reliability chip manufacturers have come to expect. ASML’s Michael Lercel, a senior director of Strategic Marketing, said the company builds the equipment to run over 90% of the time, and is only just now starting to get the EUV tools to that point. It took time for its engineers to figure out how to reach a point where the cost-effectiveness of the machines made sense for customers to bring into high-volume production.

“We just kept an eye on when it's finally, really, really, really, actually, ready,” Intel's co-general manager of Logic Technology Development Sanjay Natarajan told Protocol. “And then we went for it.”

Pulling together EUV tech was a collaborative effort among would-be rivals. Because chip manufacturing is so complex and requires tools, robotics and software made by hundreds of companies, the entire industry tends to line up behind whatever process manufacturing technology is believed by scientists and engineers to be the next new thing.

“The technology is becoming so complex, nobody can do it alone,” said Luc Van den hove, CEO of research and development hub Imec. “And when you make certain choices for a particular technology option, you have to align the entire ecosystem and you have to align suppliers smartly.”

The bumpy ride to EUV

Intel’s journey to EUV technology has not been a smooth one. Prior to its adoption by TSMC, Samsung and Intel, EUV’s evolution was something of an ongoing inside joke among engineers, always on the cusp of being ready for modern chip production but never quite there.

Progress in semiconductor manufacturing is a function of size, as companies spend billions of dollars researching and developing different methods of shrinking a chip’s features and squeezing more transistors onto each piece of silicon. Adding more components onto each chip requires precise, expensive and complex tools and processes to print the tiny, atomic-level features.

Even before Intel attempted to introduce EUV technology into the mix, the company ran into problems with its so-called 10-nanometer process, which it is using to make the most advanced chips you’ll find for sale in PCs today. It has also struggled with the transition to the next-generation tech, which it now calls Intel 4, announcing a further six-month delay over the summer in 2020 that helped open the door for Apple’s game-changing M1 chips, built by TSMC. (A word about manufacturing-process naming conventions: The nanometer number associated with each one used to refer to specific features, but that no longer applies. Today, it’s just marketing terminology.)

An extreme ultraviolet lithography machine An extreme ultraviolet lithography machine made by the Dutch company ASML.Photo: Intel Corporation

Yet despite the chip giant’s manufacturing struggles, it still maintains nearly 90% market share in data-center chips, compared with AMD’s 10%, according to data from Mercury Research. Intel has lost more ground in desktop and laptop computers, holding onto 83% market share and 78% share respectively, with the remainder going mostly to AMD, according to Mercury data.

After years of hearing about these problems, Wall Street had largely written off the company’s manufacturing prowess. Investors expected the company to move to a hybrid approach to chip making, contracting more of its chip manufacturing to TSMC and potentially to Samsung. Some analysts suggested the company go as far as spinning out the manufacturing business, as AMD did with what is now known as GlobalFoundries years ago.

But weeks after Gelsinger took over, he announced that the company planned to double down on its manufacturing business in an effort to return Intel to its roots, including a bid to compete with TSMC as a contract manufacturer. Since his return to Intel after nearly nine years as chief executive of VMware, he has shaken up the company’s executive team. That includes re-hiring several notable Intel staffers, including Natarajan.

This is the way

Masked and seated in a conference room adjacent to one of the sprawling atriums in an office building at the Ronler site, Natarajan talked about the company’s plans for rolling out chips made with EUV tech, occasionally standing to illustrate a concept on one of the whiteboards.

The way Natarajan tells it, Intel’s stumbles were tied to the fact that when the company was ready to move to its 10 nm technology, EUV wasn’t ready.

Defects start to occur more frequently at smaller, atomic-sized technologies in part because of all the techniques necessary to make pre-EUV lithography print smaller and smaller features. The larger-size, pre-EUV beam is too big to easily print transistors and features on the most complex chips. The process requires more manufacturing stages and techniques — tricks, really — to make up for the larger drawing tool, which pushes the boundaries of modern physics.

“Defects start cropping up, your flow gets unworkably long so that it takes months longer for a wafer to get out of the fab. It just [makes] manufacturing challenges left and right,” he said.

Midway through the development of its next-generation Intel 4 manufacturing technology, the company’s engineers determined that EUV had moved to a point where it could be used for production, and Intel “pivoted fairly quickly to redefine that technology node to use quite a bit of EUV to greatly simplify the flow,” Natarajan said. Roughly 30 steps turned into about three, which reduced the number of defects, which the company had said previously was a problem at the beginning of the process.

EUV tech will continue to be on the forefront of chip manufacturing for at least 10 years, according to Natarajan. The wavelength is more precise, and manufacturers haven’t yet needed to roll out most of the tricks they used with older lithography technology.

The first EUV chips that Intel will sell are set to arrive in 2023, and include the Meteor Lake PC processors and Granite Rapids server chips, Natarajan said. Meteor Lake is taped-in, an industry term for the final phase in the design process before it’s made at large scale.

Before Intel can begin high-volume manufacturing, Natarajan said the company’s engineers will optimize the production process to get the desired yield, which means there are a sufficient number of working chips without defects on each 300 millimeter-wide wafer. The company also wants to make sure the chips that come out of the process are reliable and operate properly when installed in computers and data centers.

“Ultimately, we get to a point where we say the process is reliable and things we make on it are going to pass and be healthy in the field,” Natarajan said. “Then it's [the] ongoing work to make the transistors go faster.”


Apple's new payments tech won't kill Square

It could be used in place of the Square dongle, but it's far short of a full-fledged payments service.

The Apple system would reportedly only handle contactless payments.

Photo: Nathan Dumlao/Unsplash

Apple is preparing a product to enable merchants to accept contactless payments via iPhones without additional hardware, according to Bloomberg.

While this may seem like a move to compete with Block and its Square merchant unit in point-of-sale payments, that’s unlikely. The Apple service is using technology from its acquisition of Mobeewave in 2020 that enables contactless payments using NFC technology.

Keep Reading Show less
Tomio Geron

Tomio Geron ( @tomiogeron) is a San Francisco-based reporter covering fintech. He was previously a reporter and editor at The Wall Street Journal, covering venture capital and startups. Before that, he worked as a staff writer at Forbes, covering social media and venture capital, and also edited the Midas List of top tech investors. He has also worked at newspapers covering crime, courts, health and other topics. He can be reached at tgeron@protocol.com or tgeron@protonmail.com.

Sponsored Content

A CCO’s viewpoint on top enterprise priorities in 2022

The 2022 non-predictions guide to what your enterprise is working on starting this week

As Honeywell’s global chief commercial officer, I am privileged to have the vantage point of seeing the demands, challenges and dynamics that customers across the many sectors we cater to are experiencing and sharing.

This past year has brought upon all businesses and enterprises an unparalleled change and challenge. This was the case at Honeywell, for example, a company with a legacy in innovation and technology for over a century. When I joined the company just months before the pandemic hit we were already in the midst of an intense transformation under the leadership of CEO Darius Adamczyk. This transformation spanned our portfolio and business units. We were already actively working on products and solutions in advanced phases of rollouts that the world has shown a need and demand for pre-pandemic. Those included solutions in edge intelligence, remote operations, quantum computing, warehouse automation, building technologies, safety and health monitoring and of course ESG and climate tech which was based on our exceptional success over the previous decade.

Keep Reading Show less
Jeff Kimbell
Jeff Kimbell is Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer at Honeywell. In this role, he has broad responsibilities to drive organic growth by enhancing global sales and marketing capabilities. Jeff has nearly three decades of leadership experience. Prior to joining Honeywell in 2019, Jeff served as a Partner in the Transformation Practice at McKinsey & Company, where he worked with companies facing operational and financial challenges and undergoing “good to great” transformations. Before that, he was an Operating Partner at Silver Lake Partners, a global leader in technology and held a similar position at Cerberus Capital LP. Jeff started his career as a Manufacturing Team Manager and Engineering Project Manager at Procter & Gamble before becoming a strategy consultant at Bain & Company and holding executive roles at Dell EMC and Transamerica Corporation. Jeff earned a B.S. in electrical engineering at Kansas State University and an M.B.A. at Dartmouth College.

Why does China's '996' overtime culture persist?

A Tencent worker’s open criticism shows why this work schedule is hard to change in Chinese tech.

Excessive overtime is one of the plights Chinese workers are grappling with across sectors.

Photo: VCG/VCG via Getty Images

Workers were skeptical when Chinese Big Tech called off its notorious and prevalent overtime policy: “996,” a 12-hour, six-day work schedule. They were right to be: A recent incident at gaming and social media giant Tencent proves that a deep-rooted overtime culture is hard to change, new policy or not.

Defiant Tencent worker Zhang Yifei, who openly challenged the company’s overtime culture, reignited wide discussion of the touchy topic this week. What triggered Zhang's criticism, according to his own account, was his team’s positive attitude toward overtime. His team, which falls under WeCom — a business communication and office collaboration tool similar to Slack — announced its in-house Breakthrough Awards. The judges’ comments to one winner highly praised them for logging “over 20 hours of intense work nonstop,” to help meet the deadline for launching a marketing page.

Keep Reading Show less
Shen Lu

Shen Lu covers China's tech industry.

Boost 2

Can Matt Mullenweg save the internet?

He's turning Automattic into a different kind of tech giant. But can he take on the trillion-dollar walled gardens and give the internet back to the people?

Matt Mullenweg, CEO of Automattic and founder of WordPress, poses for Protocol at his home in Houston, Texas.
Photo: Arturo Olmos for Protocol

In the early days of the pandemic, Matt Mullenweg didn't move to a compound in Hawaii, bug out to a bunker in New Zealand or head to Miami and start shilling for crypto. No, in the early days of the pandemic, Mullenweg bought an RV. He drove it all over the country, bouncing between Houston and San Francisco and Jackson Hole with plenty of stops in national parks. In between, he started doing some tinkering.

The tinkering is a part-time gig: Most of Mullenweg’s time is spent as CEO of Automattic, one of the web’s largest platforms. It’s best known as the company that runs WordPress.com, the hosted version of the blogging platform that powers about 43% of the websites on the internet. Since WordPress is open-source software, no company technically owns it, but Automattic provides tools and services and oversees most of the WordPress-powered internet. It’s also the owner of the booming ecommerce platform WooCommerce, Day One, the analytics tool Parse.ly and the podcast app Pocket Casts. Oh, and Tumblr. And Simplenote. And many others. That makes Mullenweg one of the most powerful CEOs in tech, and one of the most important voices in the debate over the future of the internet.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.


Spoiler alert: We’re already in the beta-metaverse

300 million people use metaverse-like platforms — Fortnite, Roblox and Minecraft — every month. That equals the total user base of the internet in 1999.

A lot of us are using platforms that can be considered metaverse prototypes.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

What does it take to build the metaverse? What building blocks do we need, how can companies ensure that the metaverse is going to be inclusive, and how do we know that we have arrived in the 'verse?

This week, we convened a panel of experts for Protocol Entertainment’s first virtual live event, including Epic Games Unreal Engine VP and GM Marc Petit, Oasis Consortium co-founder and President Tiffany Xingyu Wang and Emerge co-founder and CEO Sly Lee.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.


Lyin’ AI: OpenAI launches new language model despite toxic tendencies

Research company OpenAI says this year’s language model is less toxic than GPT-3. But the new default, InstructGPT, still has tendencies to make discriminatory comments and generate false information.

The new default, called InstructGPT, still has tendencies to make discriminatory comments and generate false information.

Illustration: Pixabay; Protocol

OpenAI knows its text generators have had their fair share of problems. Now the research company has shifted to a new deep-learning model it says works better to produce “fewer toxic outputs” than GPT-3, its flawed but widely-used system.

Starting Thursday, a new model called InstructGPT will be the default technology served up through OpenAI’s API, which delivers foundational AI into all sorts of chatbots, automatic writing tools and other text-based applications. Consider the new system, which has been in beta testing for the past year, to be a work in progress toward an automatic text generator that OpenAI hopes is closer to what humans actually want.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories