Enterprise

Intel had a major shareholder meeting. It did not go smoothly.

The company said at its annual shareholder meeting in San Francisco that it won’t be able to make chips in the future without assistance from the U.S. and EU.

Patrick Gelsinger, chief executive officer of Intel Corp., right, speaks with U.S. President Joe Biden

“The Intel turnaround train is leaving the station, and I hope you all get on board," Intel CEO Pat Gelsinger said.

Photo: Yuri Gripas/Abaca/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Intel’s been struggling to right its business for years, but you would never know that from its shareholder meeting.

Lattes with its corporate logo stenciled into the foam were available to order, and executives finished the day with investors on the 39th floor of a posh downtown San Francisco hotel with expansive views of the Bay Bridge.

On stage and in small rooms crowded by shareholders and financial analysts, Intel executives outlined the company’s strategy for the foreseeable future: to double down on its manufacturing business, which now includes the $5.4 billion acquisition of Tower Semiconductor; to remake its chips to once again become dominant; and to enter new markets for graphics processors and other chips that are currently ruled by Nvidia and AMD.

“I want to double the earnings of this company and double the multiple of this company as you build confidence in what we're doing,” CEO Pat Gelsinger said Thursday. “The Intel turnaround train is leaving the station, and I hope you all get on board. It's an ambitious goal, but I am confident Intel's best days are in front of us.”

But the actual train tracks ahead are still being built, and the company could be in for a rough ride at times. After Intel outlined its strategy for the next five years, the company disclosed that it was delaying the first server chip it planned to make with its most advanced manufacturing process, which it has struggled with for years.

An Intel Sapphire Rapids wafer on display. An Intel Sapphire Rapids wafer on display. Photo: Max A. Cherney/Protocol

Intel is running up against another problem, too: Chip manufacturing is measured in sums of cash numbering in the hundreds of billions of dollars. According to a lesser-known observation from Intel co-founder Gordon Moore, the company — and every other chip manufacturer on the planet — will be unable to afford the equipment needed to make chips, as the costs increase exponentially above revenue. Moore didn’t outline a time frame for it to occur back in 1995 when he first made the observation, but the equipment is steadily getting pricier.

The plans Intel outlined at the shareholder meeting are going to cost $85 billion over the next three years, according to Jefferies chip analyst Mark Lipacis. That sum is the equivalent cost of constructing roughly half of the NFL’s 32 teams a brand-new stadium, like the one recently built in Los Angeles for the Rams and Chargers. Beyond that impressive amount of cash, Intel did not offer up a forecast for its spending plans beyond this year, saying only that its profit will be hurt in the short term as a part of its effort to return to its past glory. But even at that level, Intel said it can’t afford to spend all the money itself: It has enlisted the help of the U.S. and EU, as well as Brookfield, one of the largest asset managers in the world, for the real estate.

At the investor conference, Intel said that roughly 10% of the projected spending will come from outside sources. And in the future, the company said it will rely on governments to make up for the rising cost of chipmaking tools.

More than two-thirds of Intel’s bill for expanding its manufacturing capacity is from buying the thousands of complex tools needed to print chips. The marquee item is an order of machines exclusively made by the Dutch corporation ASML that are used for lithography, the step in the manufacturing process where beams of light draw the features onto silicon wafers. The current generation of extreme ultraviolet lithography tools cost roughly $180 million per machine. The next generation of high-numerical aperture EUV machines cost double the amount.

Each factory requires several EUV machines, depending on how big a manufacturing facility is. Typically lithography tools are the bottleneck for manufacturing capacity, since the hundreds of other machines needed are less costly and easier to build.

“This is where governments are stepping in,” Intel Chief Global Operations Officer Keyvan Esfarjani said. “It’s not just grants, it's the infrastructure … To preserve the industry, we need to make sure this goes beyond just Intel.”

Esfarjani said that the cost of accomplishing what Intel and other chipmakers have planned is understood at the highest levels of governments in the U.S. and Europe. The recognition has arrived largely because of geopolitical concerns coupled with the possibility that chip manufacturers will continue to expand their operations in jurisdictions in Asia and elsewhere that offer subsidies and other incentives for companies to construct facilities.

“The economics [are] going to force this whole industry to Asia and other places where they do give those kinds of offsets,” Esfarjani said. “This isn’t just, ‘Let’s subsidize this.’ Nobody has $20 billion to just go: next one, next one, next one.”

Fintech

Judge Zia Faruqui is trying to teach you crypto, one ‘SNL’ reference at a time

His decisions on major cryptocurrency cases have quoted "The Big Lebowski," "SNL," and "Dr. Strangelove." That’s because he wants you — yes, you — to read them.

The ways Zia Faruqui (right) has weighed on cases that have come before him can give lawyers clues as to what legal frameworks will pass muster.

Photo: Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images

“Cryptocurrency and related software analytics tools are ‘The wave of the future, Dude. One hundred percent electronic.’”

That’s not a quote from "The Big Lebowski" — at least, not directly. It’s a quote from a Washington, D.C., district court memorandum opinion on the role cryptocurrency analytics tools can play in government investigations. The author is Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui.

Keep Reading Show less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

The financial technology transformation is driving competition, creating consumer choice, and shaping the future of finance. Hear from seven fintech leaders who are reshaping the future of finance, and join the inaugural Financial Technology Association Fintech Summit to learn more.

Keep Reading Show less
FTA
The Financial Technology Association (FTA) represents industry leaders shaping the future of finance. We champion the power of technology-centered financial services and advocate for the modernization of financial regulation to support inclusion and responsible innovation.
Enterprise

AWS CEO: The cloud isn’t just about technology

As AWS preps for its annual re:Invent conference, Adam Selipsky talks product strategy, support for hybrid environments, and the value of the cloud in uncertain economic times.

Photo: Noah Berger/Getty Images for Amazon Web Services

AWS is gearing up for re:Invent, its annual cloud computing conference where announcements this year are expected to focus on its end-to-end data strategy and delivering new industry-specific services.

It will be the second re:Invent with CEO Adam Selipsky as leader of the industry’s largest cloud provider after his return last year to AWS from data visualization company Tableau Software.

Keep Reading Show less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Image: Protocol

We launched Protocol in February 2020 to cover the evolving power center of tech. It is with deep sadness that just under three years later, we are winding down the publication.

As of today, we will not publish any more stories. All of our newsletters, apart from our flagship, Source Code, will no longer be sent. Source Code will be published and sent for the next few weeks, but it will also close down in December.

Keep Reading Show less
Bennett Richardson

Bennett Richardson ( @bennettrich) is the president of Protocol. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, Bennett was executive director of global strategic partnerships at POLITICO, where he led strategic growth efforts including POLITICO's European expansion in Brussels and POLITICO's creative agency POLITICO Focus during his six years with the company. Prior to POLITICO, Bennett was co-founder and CMO of Hinge, the mobile dating company recently acquired by Match Group. Bennett began his career in digital and social brand marketing working with major brands across tech, energy, and health care at leading marketing and communications agencies including Edelman and GMMB. Bennett is originally from Portland, Maine, and received his bachelor's degree from Colgate University.

Enterprise

Why large enterprises struggle to find suitable platforms for MLops

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, and as larger enterprises go from deploying hundreds of models to thousands and even millions of models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

Photo: artpartner-images via Getty Images

On any given day, Lily AI runs hundreds of machine learning models using computer vision and natural language processing that are customized for its retail and ecommerce clients to make website product recommendations, forecast demand, and plan merchandising. But this spring when the company was in the market for a machine learning operations platform to manage its expanding model roster, it wasn’t easy to find a suitable off-the-shelf system that could handle such a large number of models in deployment while also meeting other criteria.

Some MLops platforms are not well-suited for maintaining even more than 10 machine learning models when it comes to keeping track of data, navigating their user interfaces, or reporting capabilities, Matthew Nokleby, machine learning manager for Lily AI’s product intelligence team, told Protocol earlier this year. “The duct tape starts to show,” he said.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories
Bulletins