Moore’s Law is all but dead. This new transistor design could keep it alive and reshuffle the industry.

Intel, Samsung and TSMC are racing to achieve a generational leap in transistor technology. It might reshuffle the industry pecking order.

Video: Intel via YouTube

A once-in-a-decade shift is underway involving one of the most elemental building blocks of computer chips, and it has the potential to reshuffle the pecking order of chip giants for years to come.

Intel, Samsung and TSMC are racing to achieve a generational leap in transistor technology. This leap must occur to realize anything close to the computing requirements demanded by the ideas behind the metaverse, to produce AI that isn’t a joke, to make truly self-driving cars or even make apps load faster.

This next-generation design is called “gate-all-around.” With new materials, and redesigned manufacturing tools that cost tens of millions each, the new gates accomplish one thing: They more tightly control the flow of electricity received by each transistor. Modern chips can have upwards of 30 billion transistors on a single device, and in some cases tens of billions more. In 2025, Gartner expects chip manufacturers to generate roughly $5 billion in revenue from the new technology, up from nothing last year.

Chip companies must deliver substantially more computing horsepower every year to get to a version of the future that’s been promised by the tech titans. Doing so requires some of the most complex, expensive manufacturing equipment on the planet, and the development of even more creative ways to improve fundamental aspects of chip construction. That means making already atomic-sized features even smaller. This process, loosely described as Moore’s law, has kept the chip industry humming for a half-century, but it’s getting harder.

“The rate at which we're shrinking is for sure slowing down, big time,” Applied Materials Vice President Kevin Moraes said.

Chip manufacturers improve high-volume production and performance with a combination of advanced tools such as extreme ultraviolet lithography machines and techniques that help squeeze more features onto each piece of silicon. Typically manufacturers tout improvements to their techniques and technologies as process nodes that use smaller and smaller nanometer numbers.

But another way to tackle the increasingly difficult problem is to further refine the fundamental building block of each chip: the transistor.

“Process nodes are just one measure of the progress,” Jack Gold, principal analyst at J.Gold Associates, said. “I’d argue that even more important is the design of the transistors themselves, and not just the process node. To that end, Intel and others have been advancing the design of the transistors, particularly in the way the gates are designed.”

Better gates, faster chips

A gate is the tiny portion on each transistor that controls whether a transistor receives electricity — kind of like using your foot on a garden hose to turn water on or off — in order to represent the zeros and ones that make up bits of data. But gates, like hoses, can be imperfect, and some of the electricity can slip through even with the most advanced designs.

“As you start making things smaller, you learn that there are some electrical characteristics with smaller elements that didn’t work as well as they did when they were bigger,” FeibusTech analyst Mike Feibus said. “There’s a rule of thumb that the smaller you get, the more current leakage you’re going to get, which is more heat.”

Because chipmakers know some electricity will evade the gate, it’s becoming harder to continue to shrink features to achieve the power consumption and performance expected of new designs. And to build more efficient gates and transistors that generate less power, chipmakers spend billions of dollars inventing the next, better way to develop them.

“Gate-all-around-based designs will have significantly better performance and efficiency than [existing] designs, potentially shifting the competitive position for many high-performance products,” MLCommons Executive Director David Kanter said.

Surrounding all four sides of a part of the transistor with material instead of the current three-sided design allows the gate to better regulate the flow of electricity. At the atomic scale chips operate at, having better control over the flow of electricity gives designers new options: most importantly, making them even smaller.

Smaller transistors allow designers to squeeze more of them onto a single chip and adding more of these tiny features roughly translates to an improvement in the chip’s ability to perform calculations.

“With better heat and power characteristics, that means you can turn up the juice — with all else being equal — you will have higher clock rates and you won’t need as exotic cooling for high-performance designs, so that can cut costs,” Feibus said.

The manufacturer that successfully deploys the new generation of gate tech in high-volume production will be able to manufacture chips with a leap in computing horsepower that’s impossible with the current process technology.

Fastest out of the gate

All three of the largest chip manufacturers are trying to figure out how to take advantage of this promising technology. This issue isn’t producing one batch of chips with the new feature; it's producing hundreds of thousands, or millions of chips, at the scale at which the most advanced technologies are needed.

Samsung may have a leg up. One of the company’s executives, Kinam Kim, co-authored an early technical paper about the new gate technology nearly 20 years ago. The company was one of the earliest to commit to producing next-generation gates, discussing its path to move to the tech in 2017. In April, Samsung said the company was on track to produce chips at high volume with the new gates this year.

However, there is reason to be skeptical of its progress. Samsung, which did not return a request for comment, has had widely reported problems with ensuring its latest manufacturing process can produce a sufficient number of working chips and has pushed back its planned launch date for the new gates several times, according to Gartner chips analyst Gaurav Gupta.

So even if the company does roll out the new design on certain chips, it might not be a viable option for its high-volume customers who demand reliability — a six-month delay to a new iPhone launch would be disastrous to Apple’s business, for example.

“Samsung has always been saying they will be the first to the gate-all-around at three nanometers,” Gupta said. “And they have been pushing it — next six months, [another] six months more, [another] six months. They’re saying now they are expecting it by the end of the year.”

Intel says that its current plans call for the technology to roll out in 2024 for high-volume customers. There is reason for skepticism with Intel’s efforts too; the company went through years of delays on the last several generations of manufacturing improvements. It was also the last to adopt the EUV lithography tech that is widely viewed as necessary for future improvements. An Intel spokesperson said the company remained on track to hit its roadmap goals.

But Intel was the first company to successfully make chips at high volume with the current generation of gates, which suggests that it has the technical institutional knowledge to do it again. Under CEO Pat Gelsinger, the business has a far clearer direction than the years of dysfunction that preceded him. Still, Intel has a lot to prove, and part of Gelsinger’s plan includes what Gupta described as a “very aggressive” strategy to regain its manufacturing leadership.

As it now stands, TSMC will be the last major manufacturer to move to new gate technology. Executives are tight-lipped, and the company didn’t respond to a request for comment, but TSMC has disclosed that it plans to roll it out sometime in 2025. People familiar with the company’s operations said that, overall, TSMC is a conservatively run business that prefers to avoid risks, if at all possible, and moving to a new, unproven gate technology is a big risk.

But the new gates may matter less to TSMC than its rivals. The majority of its customers buy smartphone chips, and the company has proven that it can make them with the EUV tools that Intel and Samsung have struggled to deploy. As a result, TSMC may be able to use other techniques for the time being to eke out more performance from its silicon until it can ship the new gate designs.

“The thing is, it's all about power and performance, and you see 90%-plus of customers at advanced nodes in the foundry business are with TSMC,” Gupta said, adding that if TSMC’s manufacturing using existing gate technology is superior to Samsung’s, TSMC won’t lose customers.

Sticking with the current generation of transistors has its advantages for chip designers too. New gates require some aspects of chip designs to get scrapped, and industry analysts said that the road to make a chip with new gates could easily exceed two or three years. So if a chipmaker such as Qualcomm, AMD or Nvidia were to make a bet that the new gates can be made this year, and that doesn’t happen, they could be badly hurt.

“They call it bleeding edge for a reason,” Feibus said. “Sometimes you get cut up.”


Niantic’s future hinges on mapping the metaverse

The maker of Pokémon Go is hoping the metaverse will deliver its next big break.

Niantic's new standalone messaging and social app, Campfire, is a way to get players organizing and meeting up in the real world. It launches today for select Pokémon Go players.

Image: Niantic

Pokémon Go sent Niantic to the moon. But now the San Francisco-based augmented reality developer has returned to earth, and it’s been trying to chart its way back to the stars ever since. The company yesterday announced layoffs of about 8% of its workforce (about 85 to 90 people) and canceled four projects, Bloomberg reported, signaling another disappointment for the studio that still generates about $1 billion in revenue per year from Pokémon Go.

Finding its next big hit has been Niantic’s priority for years, and the company has been coming up short. For much of the past year or so, Niantic has turned its attention to the metaverse, with hopes that its location-based mobile games, AR tech and company philosophy around fostering physical connection and outdoor exploration can help it build what it now calls the “real world metaverse.”

Keep Reading Show less
Nick Statt

Nick Statt is Protocol's video game reporter. Prior to joining Protocol, he was news editor at The Verge covering the gaming industry, mobile apps and antitrust out of San Francisco, in addition to managing coverage of Silicon Valley tech giants and startups. He now resides in Rochester, New York, home of the garbage plate and, completely coincidentally, the World Video Game Hall of Fame. He can be reached at nstatt@protocol.com.

Every day, millions of us press the “order” button on our favorite coffee store's mobile application: Our chosen brew will be on the counter when we arrive. It’s a personalized, seamless experience that we have all come to expect. What we don’t know is what’s happening behind the scenes. The mobile application is sourcing data from a database that stores information about each customer and what their favorite coffee drinks are. It is also leveraging event-streaming data in real time to ensure the ingredients for your personal coffee are in supply at your local store.

Applications like this power our daily lives, and if they can’t access massive amounts of data stored in a database as well as stream data “in motion” instantaneously, you — and millions of customers — won’t have these in-the-moment experiences.

Keep Reading Show less
Jennifer Goforth Gregory
Jennifer Goforth Gregory has worked in the B2B technology industry for over 20 years. As a freelance writer she writes for top technology brands, including IBM, HPE, Adobe, AT&T, Verizon, Epson, Oracle, Intel and Square. She specializes in a wide range of technology, such as AI, IoT, cloud, cybersecurity, and CX. Jennifer also wrote a bestselling book The Freelance Content Marketing Writer to help other writers launch a high earning freelance business.

Supreme Court takes a sledgehammer to greenhouse gas regulations

The court ruled 6-3 that the EPA cannot use the Clean Air Act to regulate power plant greenhouse gas emissions. That leaves a patchwork of policies from states, utilities and, increasingly, tech companies to pick up the slack.

The Supreme Court struck a major blow to the federal government's ability to regulate greenhouse gases.

Eric Lee/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Striking down the right to abortion may be the Supreme Court's highest-profile decision this term. But on Thursday, the court handed down an equally massive verdict on the federal government's ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. In the case of West Virginia v. EPA, the court decided that the agency has no ability to regulate greenhouse gas pollution under the Clean Air Act. Weakening the federal government's powers leaves a patchwork of states, utilities and, increasingly, tech companies to pick up the slack in reducing carbon pollution.

Keep Reading Show less
Brian Kahn

Brian ( @blkahn) is Protocol's climate editor. Previously, he was the managing editor and founding senior writer at Earther, Gizmodo's climate site, where he covered everything from the weather to Big Oil's influence on politics. He also reported for Climate Central and the Wall Street Journal. In the even more distant past, he led sleigh rides to visit a herd of 7,000 elk and boat tours on the deepest lake in the U.S.


Can crypto regulate itself? The Lummis-Gillibrand bill hopes so.

Creating the equivalent of the stock markets’ FINRA for crypto is the ideal, but experts doubt that it will be easy.

The idea of creating a government-sanctioned private regulatory association has been drawing more attention in the debate over how to rein in a fast-growing industry whose technological quirks have baffled policymakers.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Regulating crypto is complicated. That’s why Sens. Cynthia Lummis and Kirsten Gillibrand want to explore the creation of a private sector group to help federal regulators do their job.

The bipartisan bill introduced by Lummis and Gillibrand would require the CFTC and the SEC to work with the crypto industry to look into setting up a self-regulatory organization to “facilitate innovative, efficient and orderly markets for digital assets.”

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


Alperovitch: Cybersecurity defenders can’t be on high alert every day

With the continued threat of Russian cyber escalation, cybersecurity and geopolitics expert Dmitri Alperovitch says it’s not ideal for the U.S. to oscillate between moments of high alert and lesser states of cyber readiness.

Dmitri Alperovitch (the co-founder and former CTO of CrowdStrike) speaks at RSA Conference 2022.

Photo: RSA Conference

When it comes to cybersecurity vigilance, Dmitri Alperovitch wants to see more focus on resiliency of IT systems — and less on doing "surges" around particular dates or events.

For instance, whatever Russia is doing at the moment.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at kalspach@protocol.com.

Latest Stories