LaunchDarkly CEO Edith Harbaugh: Ship software fast, but at a 'palatable and realistic' cadence

Modern software developers release updates much more quickly than in the past, which is great for security and adding new capabilities. But Edith Harbaugh thinks business leaders need a little control of that schedule.

LaunchDarkly CEO Edith Harbaugh

LaunchDarkly was founded in 2014 to help companies manage the software release cycle.

Photo: LaunchDarkly

Gone are the days of quarterly or monthly software update release cycles; today’s software development organizations release updates and fixes on a much more frequent basis. Edith Harbaugh just wants to give business leaders a modicum of control over the process.

The CEO of LaunchDarkly, which was founded in 2014 to help companies manage the software release cycle, is trying to reach customers who want to move fast but understand that moving fast and breaking things won’t work for them. Companies that specialize in continuous integration and continuous delivery services have thrived over the last few years as customers look for help shipping at speed, and LaunchDarkly extends those capabilities to smaller features of existing software.

“What we like to think is that we make continuous deployment palatable and realistic for business in terms of fitting back into their own processes,” Harbaugh said in a recent interview with Protocol. The company calls it “feature management,” and customers and investors seem impressed: LaunchDarkly raised $200 million in new funding last August that valued the startup at $3 billion.

During our conversation, Harbaugh discussed LaunchDarkly’s IPO ambitions, how feature management grew out of a media campaign and how it balances operating on the cloud while facing potential competition from those same cloud vendors.

This interview has been condensed and edited.

You’ve been raising a lot of money this year. Where does that put you right now, and where does it take the company over the next few years?

I co-founded the company seven years ago; well, it's eight now, in 2014. And it was a very new market back then. Nobody was offering, really, a commercial solution for what we were doing for feature management.

What's happened over the last few years is just incredible momentum. We have over 2,000 customers worldwide; we have marquee customers, like IBM and Atlassian, who rely on us. And we have 22 of the Fortune 100.

In terms of the public markets over the next year, is that something that’s on your radar?

We brag about having 2,000-plus customers, but Atlassian has 50,000-plus. So I think there is still a lot of growth for us.

I think an IPO at some point is on our radar: It's not imminent, for lack of a better word. And also, my co-founder came out of Atlassian. And it's funny, because their market cap is like, 10x since when they went public. We look at it as just a step, not a final destination.

How hard has it been to get companies to change the way they think about deploying software? The big tech companies, the big software companies got religion on releasing smaller changes as quickly as you possibly can. I'd imagine that's a little bit of a harder story to tell outside of the core Silicon Valley companies.

We try to meet people where they are. It's terrifying if you're a traditional company, and you're like, I'm gonna go from a quarterly release to [a release] every hour. And [maybe] I don't actually want to do that with my business, I might be in a regulated industry, I might have a union where they need to get advance notice of a release.

We help them on that journey by saying, "You can release when you want, and that's what we'll help you with. You can release when you want, and then put it out to your customers at a timetable to make sense for you."

So a real win is if you're a bank, you can say, "Hey, I'm gonna push this major update," and have it out. But then maybe just turn it on to branches in New Jersey and make sure that it works before I push it out to the entire New York metro region. That’s a really classic use case there. What we like to think is that we make continuous deployment palatable and realistic for business in terms of fitting back into their own processes.

I was actually wondering if you consider yourself a continuous-delivery company, because it almost sounds a little bit different.

What we do is we empower developers to build features, and then we empower the business to release them when they want. I have been working in software for 20 years, and I get so excited about all the use cases we help with.

I used to be a product director at TripIt, and a classic problem we would have is when we wanted to do a big press launch. And then we would have to time the deployment of a feature with the press launch. What you can do with LaunchDarkly is you can push stuff out, and it's ready to go. And then you just flip a switch, and it's live, which is incredibly powerful. And it's continuous delivery in that developers have that power, but it's also at the pace that the business needs it to be at.

Is there any kind of a pushback brewing in terms of a slow software movement? There were lots of good security and feature reasons to accelerate software release schedules, but I sort of wonder, everything tends to move in cycles, right?

Something that we talk to our customers a lot about is that we work at the pace that you want to work at. For example, we have airlines that want to do a release at a scheduled time, around when it makes sense for them and to also roll out training to maybe thousands of people. What they like about LaunchDarkly is that they can then bundle together various features, and have them ready to go again, and then just flip them live, instead of that nerve-racking thing of, “We're going to push out all these changes at once without anybody ever having seen them.”

It's also a really common use case we see with educational software. It's extremely disruptive if you're a teacher to suddenly have everything changed on you when you're trying to teach a class. So they really like LaunchDarkly, because they can give it to a couple teachers at a time that they know about and get some feedback. And once it's really solid, push it out to the rest of the teachers with a timetable that they're aware of.

I really want to emphasize that it's when you want to. Not do this artificial timeframe of, you know, YOLO, and just push garbage.

One thing I always ask folks like you who are running companies that depend on cloud services is how you think about the potential competition from cloud services. A lot of them are looking at offering services like this to their own developer communities, which are obviously pretty massive.

Both Amazon and Microsoft have been very good partners. We actually have a really successful partnership with Amazon right now where people can use their AWS credits to buy LaunchDarkly. It's gone very well so far, I think of them as just somebody who's helping the ecosystem. Same with Microsoft.

Amazon actually announced a competitor, it's funny, during re:Invent. It just doesn't seem to have gotten much traction.


Judge Zia Faruqui is trying to teach you crypto, one ‘SNL’ reference at a time

His decisions on major cryptocurrency cases have quoted "The Big Lebowski," "SNL," and "Dr. Strangelove." That’s because he wants you — yes, you — to read them.

The ways Zia Faruqui (right) has weighed on cases that have come before him can give lawyers clues as to what legal frameworks will pass muster.

Photo: Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images

“Cryptocurrency and related software analytics tools are ‘The wave of the future, Dude. One hundred percent electronic.’”

That’s not a quote from "The Big Lebowski" — at least, not directly. It’s a quote from a Washington, D.C., district court memorandum opinion on the role cryptocurrency analytics tools can play in government investigations. The author is Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui.

Keep ReadingShow less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

The financial technology transformation is driving competition, creating consumer choice, and shaping the future of finance. Hear from seven fintech leaders who are reshaping the future of finance, and join the inaugural Financial Technology Association Fintech Summit to learn more.

Keep ReadingShow less
The Financial Technology Association (FTA) represents industry leaders shaping the future of finance. We champion the power of technology-centered financial services and advocate for the modernization of financial regulation to support inclusion and responsible innovation.

AWS CEO: The cloud isn’t just about technology

As AWS preps for its annual re:Invent conference, Adam Selipsky talks product strategy, support for hybrid environments, and the value of the cloud in uncertain economic times.

Photo: Noah Berger/Getty Images for Amazon Web Services

AWS is gearing up for re:Invent, its annual cloud computing conference where announcements this year are expected to focus on its end-to-end data strategy and delivering new industry-specific services.

It will be the second re:Invent with CEO Adam Selipsky as leader of the industry’s largest cloud provider after his return last year to AWS from data visualization company Tableau Software.

Keep ReadingShow less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Image: Protocol

We launched Protocol in February 2020 to cover the evolving power center of tech. It is with deep sadness that just under three years later, we are winding down the publication.

As of today, we will not publish any more stories. All of our newsletters, apart from our flagship, Source Code, will no longer be sent. Source Code will be published and sent for the next few weeks, but it will also close down in December.

Keep ReadingShow less
Bennett Richardson

Bennett Richardson ( @bennettrich) is the president of Protocol. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, Bennett was executive director of global strategic partnerships at POLITICO, where he led strategic growth efforts including POLITICO's European expansion in Brussels and POLITICO's creative agency POLITICO Focus during his six years with the company. Prior to POLITICO, Bennett was co-founder and CMO of Hinge, the mobile dating company recently acquired by Match Group. Bennett began his career in digital and social brand marketing working with major brands across tech, energy, and health care at leading marketing and communications agencies including Edelman and GMMB. Bennett is originally from Portland, Maine, and received his bachelor's degree from Colgate University.


Why large enterprises struggle to find suitable platforms for MLops

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, and as larger enterprises go from deploying hundreds of models to thousands and even millions of models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

Photo: artpartner-images via Getty Images

On any given day, Lily AI runs hundreds of machine learning models using computer vision and natural language processing that are customized for its retail and ecommerce clients to make website product recommendations, forecast demand, and plan merchandising. But this spring when the company was in the market for a machine learning operations platform to manage its expanding model roster, it wasn’t easy to find a suitable off-the-shelf system that could handle such a large number of models in deployment while also meeting other criteria.

Some MLops platforms are not well-suited for maintaining even more than 10 machine learning models when it comes to keeping track of data, navigating their user interfaces, or reporting capabilities, Matthew Nokleby, machine learning manager for Lily AI’s product intelligence team, told Protocol earlier this year. “The duct tape starts to show,” he said.

Keep ReadingShow less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories