VCs aren’t paying attention to nonprofit tech. They should be.

The need for tech in nonprofits is great. The need for investment in startups that serve them is greater.

Line art of hands giving hears and coins.

As more nonprofit organizations adopt technology, investment in the sector will likely increase.

Image: cnythzl via Getty Images

The odds were stacked against Sevetri Wilson when she set out to raise funding for her startup Resilia. She was living more than 2,000 miles away from Silicon Valley in New Orleans. As a Black woman, she's part of a demographic that's consistently underfunded.

And there was another obstacle in her way: Wilson's target customers for Resilia's software were nonprofits, a category that sent VCs running. Most investors, she said, had the mindset of: "Nonprofits? We don't want to fund anything in that sector."

But recently, that's begun to change. In 2020, Wilson raised $8 million from Cultivation Capital and others. She's since also raised funding from SoftBank, tripled the size of her startup and is now serving organizations including Oxfam America and the Silicon Valley Community Foundation.

Wilson's not the only one. According to Pitchbook data, venture funding in the nonprofit sector is more than double what it was five years ago. Nonprofit-focused tech still only fetched about $189 million compared to the $85.5 billion deployed in mega-rounds alone this year. But there are signs investors are beginning to notice this often overlooked but significant segment of the economy. Classy, another software platform for fundraising that services nonprofits, recently raised $118 million in venture funding.

Chris Himes, the CEO of Classy, who started off as an investor in the company himself, said that with their latest round of funding, investors finally started to understand the opportunity. "I think they also kind of saw it," Himes said. "Wait a minute – this is the largest multibillion dollar vertical without a strong leader."

Before founding Resilia, Wilson worked as a consultant helping nonprofits solve their organizational challenges. For a typical project, they were "paying us anywhere from $10,000 to upwards of $50,000 per organization," said Wilson. This approach worked for larger, well-funded organizations, but not for family foundations or other nonprofits less flush with cash. Wilson wondered if she could build a software product that would offer nonprofits those same services for less money. Now, Resilia charges about $2,000 per organization for its software, which helps nonprofits with legal filings and tracking funders.

Sevetri Wilson, CEO of Resilia Sevetri Wilson is CEO of Resilia, a startup that serves non-profits and recently raised $8 million from Cultivation Capital and others.Photo: Resilia

But even with traction, revenue and customers, raising money wasn't easy for Wilson. "When people talk about networks and relationships, I found out firsthand how important those were," she said. "Here I was, this Black female founder from New Orleans no one had ever heard of."

Then, in 2020, Wilson was introduced to Cultivation Capital, a venture firm that focuses on overlooked communities. "She was passionate about helping the organizations that she serves," said Cliff Holekamp, the firm's co-founder and managing partner. "We wanted to help the undercapitalized and underserved entrepreneurs in the middle of the country."

The attention from Cultivation also coincided with the launch of Softbank's Opportunity Fund, a fund directed at Black, Latinx and Native American founders. Like Cultivation Capital, the Opportunity Fund was formed to prove that investors can yield outsized returns "if you go to places everyone else ignores," said Dami Osunsanya, a vice president at SoftBank.

To Holekamp lagging investments in tech companies that serve nonprofits are a missed opportunity, given the size of the industry. In 2017, over 12 million individuals were employed in the nonprofit sector, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which was just over 8% of the total workforce at that time. If you consider organizations that fund nonprofits, a group which includes corporations, donor-advised funds and even municipalities and cities, there's an even bigger market. In fact, according to a report by the Giving USA Foundation, Americans gave $471 billion to charitable organizations last year alone.

Given the size of the nonprofit industry, you would think investment activity would be high, "but it wasn't really obvious to Silicon Valley until very recently," Classy CEO Himes said.

For Classy, the road to a $118 million round took more than 10 years. "It was like building blocks with moving up the VC food chain," said Himes. "Classy took a really long-term approach. Each time it would move deeper into the heart of Silicon Valley and raise more money, but it took a while."

There are, of course, some good reasons for investors' historical wariness around the nonprofit sector. The truth is, while many nonprofit organizations recognize the need for new technology, they face barriers when it comes to purchasing, implementing and sustaining that tech. While some nonprofits have more freedom and unrestricted funding, there are others tied to budgets that don't include overhead or administrative needs like technology. "If I have to choose between paying my people and getting this brand new database, I'm going to choose my people," said Sherreta Harrison, who oversees partnerships and programs at MetroMorphosis, a Louisiana-based nonprofit that uses Resilia's platform.

Nonprofits like MetroMorphosis also often lack IT teams capable of implementing new tools. "Each one of us wears multiple hats, and that's standard for nonprofits," said Terina Washington, the nonprofit's de-facto IT department. Still, MetroMorphosis recognizes the necessity of investing in new technology, and makes room in their annual budget to do so.

Holekamp suspects other nonprofits are beginning to do the same. "I think that the industry is ready," he said. "I think we're at the point now where they're ready to adopt technology." And as more nonprofit organizations do, investment in the sector will likely increase.

Wilson, for one, doesn't seem fazed by the challenges of working in an underinvested sector, and instead focuses on the opportunities. "I always say, 10-plus years ago we couldn't be doing what we're doing," she said. "The market wouldn't have responded to it."


This carbon capture startup wants to clean up the worst polluters

The founder and CEO of point-source carbon capture company Carbon Clean discusses what the startup has learned, the future of carbon capture technology, as well as the role of companies like his in battling the climate crisis.

Carbon Clean CEO Aniruddha Sharma told Protocol that fossil fuels are necessary, at least in the near term, to lift the living standards of those who don’t have access to cars and electricity.

Photo: Carbon Clean

Carbon capture and storage has taken on increasing importance as companies with stubborn emissions look for new ways to meet their net zero goals. For hard-to-abate industries like cement and steel production, it’s one of the few options that exist to help them get there.

Yet it’s proven incredibly challenging to scale the technology, which captures carbon pollution at the source. U.K.-based company Carbon Clean is leading the charge to bring down costs. This year, it raised a $150 million series C round, which the startup said is the largest-ever funding round for a point-source carbon capture company.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol covering climate. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Why companies cut staff after raising millions

Are tech firms blowing millions in funding just weeks after getting it? Experts say it's more complicated than that.

Bolt, Trade Republic, HomeLight, and Stord all drew attention from funding announcements that happened just weeks or days before layoffs.

Photo: Pulp Photography/Getty Images

Fintech startup Bolt was one of the first tech companies to slash jobs, cutting 250 employees, or a third of its staff, in May. For some workers, the pain of layoffs was a shock not only because they were the first, but also because the cuts came just four months after Bolt had announced a $355 million series E funding round and achieved a peak valuation of $11 billion.

“Bolt employees were blind sided because the CEO was saying just weeks ago how everything is fine,” an anonymous user wrote on the message board Blind. “It has been an extremely rough day for 1/3 of Bolt employees,” another user posted. “Sadly, I was one of them who was let go after getting a pay-raise just a couple of weeks ago.”

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.


The fight to define the carbon offset market's future

The world’s largest carbon offset issuer is fighting a voluntary effort to standardize the industry. And the fate of the climate could hang in the balance.

It has become increasingly clear that scaling the credit market will first require clear standards and transparency.

Kevin Frayer/Getty Images

There’s a major fight brewing over what kind of standards will govern the carbon offset market.

A group of independent experts looking to clean up the market’s checkered record and the biggest carbon credit issuer on the voluntary market is trying to influence efforts to define what counts as a quality credit. The outcome could make or break an industry increasingly central to tech companies meeting their net zero goals.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).


White House AI Bill of Rights lacks specific guidance for AI rules

The document unveiled today by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is long on tech guidance, but short on restrictions for AI.

While the document provides extensive suggestions for how to incorporate AI rights in technical design, it does not include any recommendations for restrictions on the use of controversial forms of AI.

Photo: Ana Lanza/Unsplash

It was a year in the making, but people eagerly anticipating the White House Bill of Rights for AI will have to continue waiting for concrete recommendations for future AI policy or restrictions.

Instead, the document unveiled today by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is legally non-binding and intended to be used as a handbook and a “guide for society” that could someday inform government AI legislation or regulations.

Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights features a list of five guidelines for protecting people in relation to AI use:

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories