Enterprise

Nvidia’s bold bid for Arm is in big trouble

Nvidia's Jensen Huang wanted to upend the chip industry with its Arm bid. Regulators think it's too much.

Nvidia and Arm getting glued together

Nvidia's $40 billion bid to acquire Arm faces regulatory challenges.

Image: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Nvidia's Jensen Huang and Arm's Simon Segars — two of the most important CEOs in the chip industry — are a study in contrasts.

The British-born Segars exudes a "can-I-hold-the-door-for-you" politeness. Huang is audacious, known for sporting a trademark leather jacket at public events and forging Nvidia's play-to-win culture.

Huang's bold vision for Nvidia's future centers on absorbing Segars' diplomatic strategy for Arm through a $40 billion bid to acquire the chip designer. It's a transformative deal for both companies that would reshape the semiconductor industry: not just in terms of what it would mean for Nvidia, but also in the implications for the thousands of businesses around the world that rely on Arm's technologies to make chips.

For Nvidia, the ambition is clear. If the deal closes, the company aims to sell Nvidia's technology through Arm's network of partners, create a full data-center platform that combines ARM server chip tech with Nvidia's own data-center products and participate in "inventing the future" of cloud-to-edge computing, Huang said last year in an investor conference call.

"We've invested so much across all of these different areas that we felt that we really had to take the opportunity to own the company and collaborate deeply as we invent the future," Huang said.

But more than a year after Nvidia announced the acquisition, the deal remains mired in regulatory limbo. And on Wednesday, Nvidia received some unwelcome news.

The European Commission said that it plans to initiate an in-depth probe of the deal's implications that could last months. Other competition authorities in the U.S., U.K. and China are still chewing over the potential drawbacks and benefits of putting Arm's valuable chip designs in Nvidia's hands.

A Nvidia spokesman said that regulatory processes are confidential but that the deal will boost competition and innovation, and transform Arm. They also said Nvidia plans to work with EU regulators to address the specific concerns raised Wednesday.

Those discussions with regulators are evidently not going as well as executives had hoped: Nvidia has had to push back its early 2022 timeline for the deal closing, and if the deal doesn't close by September 2022, SoftBank gets to keep a $1.3 billion breakup fee. Nvidia CFO Colette Kress has said before that the deal would be delayed, but hasn't issued a fresh estimate.

An arm and a leg

Attempting to secure the blessing of four governments sometimes at odds with one another was always going to be a tough fight.

The issues that Europe's competition regulator articulated echo what industry insiders have said publicly and privately about the potential pitfalls of giving Huang and Nvidia control over the Arm designs. Those designs power billions of mobile devices, autos, laptops, data centers, video game consoles and the dozens of other products that now rely on chips.

The major fear is that should the deal close, Nvidia would have the theoretical ability to raise the prices of Arm's core designs, or choke off access for Nvidia's competitors to Arm's tech altogether.

"It represents a huge transfer of intellectual property," VLSI Research's Risto Puhakka told Protocol. "The reason is that the Arm intellectual property is used by every company in every industry. Any piece of electronics you pick uses Arm."

Concerns over Arm's independence — historically one of the selling points of the company's technology — are also shared by big tech companies based in the U.S. Cristiano Amon of Qualcomm, which has designed chips based on Arm's technology used in many popular smartphones, has opposed the deal. Alphabet and Microsoft, both of which also license Arm designs, have voiced opposition too, among others.

Big Tech companies take issue with Nvidia's ownership because it would theoretically get a first look at whatever technology Arm develops, giving it an edge over the competition, Bernstein chips analyst Stacy Rasgon told Protocol. Nvidia would also theoretically have a much better idea of the future plans of many of its competitors that also use Arm's technology.

"So what you have is a lot of global licensees who would not be terribly thrilled to see Nvidia, or, frankly, any current licensee buy it," Rasgon said. "[Arm] is valuable because it is independent."

'An era of techno-nationalism'

The deal does have some supporters among big companies: Infrastructure chip makers Broadcom and Marvell Technology have come out in favor, as has smart home device company MediaTek. But those companies are clearly outnumbered by the deal's detractors.

Beyond corporate interests, the EU also said it is concerned with whether a Nvidia-owned Arm would alter its research and development focus toward whatever is most profitable for Nvidia, leaving Arm's ecosystem by the wayside.

The U.K. has raised a separate set of concerns. Former digital secretary Oliver Dowden is worried about national security — a consistent refrain when discussing chips amid global buyers of semiconductors, whose demand vastly outnumbers the available chip supply. The U.K.'s Competition and Markets Authority has also said it wants an in-depth probe of the deal.

Several industry watchers have pointed out, however, that national security concerns don't necessarily make sense because Japan-based SoftBank already owns Arm.

"Having them in separate countries is a good thing when people are anxious about the idea that countries actually might restrict access to technology as a part of this big geopolitical concept of having them under control," said Steven Weber, a professor at UC Berkeley. Arm is one of the tech giants of the U.K., and he thinks it is unlikely that the country would be willing to let an American business buy it because "we're living in an era of techno-nationalism."

Should Huang and Nvidia find a way to get the deal over the finish line, it would transform the company from one that generates $17 billion a year in revenue into a business that could challenge Intel's $78 billion in annual sales.

The combination of its graphics processors (increasingly used in artificial intelligence applications), Arm's central processor designs and the company's recent acquisition of the Mellanox networking business would give it the tech needed to challenge Intel. Combine that intellectual property with the manufacturing prowess of key partner TSMC and Intel's recent struggles, and Huang's bold bet is at least within the realm of possibility.

But according to Rasgon and several other industry experts interviewed by Protocol, the deal isn't plausible.

Nvidia needs to overcome too many interests working against it to realize the changes it wants to see in the semiconductor industry. And should the U.K., EU and the U.S. regulators all somehow sign off on the transaction, the deal would still need approval in China as well. There, geopolitical interests could trump concerns over business, and a yet unresolved conflict with former Arm China CEO Allen Wu may throw a wrench into its plans. Wu didn't respond to a request for comment.

"I don't think it closes," Rasgon said. "I don't think anybody really believes they're going to close it."

Fintech

Judge Zia Faruqui is trying to teach you crypto, one ‘SNL’ reference at a time

His decisions on major cryptocurrency cases have quoted "The Big Lebowski," "SNL," and "Dr. Strangelove." That’s because he wants you — yes, you — to read them.

The ways Zia Faruqui (right) has weighed on cases that have come before him can give lawyers clues as to what legal frameworks will pass muster.

Photo: Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post via Getty Images

“Cryptocurrency and related software analytics tools are ‘The wave of the future, Dude. One hundred percent electronic.’”

That’s not a quote from "The Big Lebowski" — at least, not directly. It’s a quote from a Washington, D.C., district court memorandum opinion on the role cryptocurrency analytics tools can play in government investigations. The author is Magistrate Judge Zia Faruqui.

Keep Reading Show less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

The financial technology transformation is driving competition, creating consumer choice, and shaping the future of finance. Hear from seven fintech leaders who are reshaping the future of finance, and join the inaugural Financial Technology Association Fintech Summit to learn more.

Keep Reading Show less
FTA
The Financial Technology Association (FTA) represents industry leaders shaping the future of finance. We champion the power of technology-centered financial services and advocate for the modernization of financial regulation to support inclusion and responsible innovation.
Enterprise

AWS CEO: The cloud isn’t just about technology

As AWS preps for its annual re:Invent conference, Adam Selipsky talks product strategy, support for hybrid environments, and the value of the cloud in uncertain economic times.

Photo: Noah Berger/Getty Images for Amazon Web Services

AWS is gearing up for re:Invent, its annual cloud computing conference where announcements this year are expected to focus on its end-to-end data strategy and delivering new industry-specific services.

It will be the second re:Invent with CEO Adam Selipsky as leader of the industry’s largest cloud provider after his return last year to AWS from data visualization company Tableau Software.

Keep Reading Show less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Image: Protocol

We launched Protocol in February 2020 to cover the evolving power center of tech. It is with deep sadness that just under three years later, we are winding down the publication.

As of today, we will not publish any more stories. All of our newsletters, apart from our flagship, Source Code, will no longer be sent. Source Code will be published and sent for the next few weeks, but it will also close down in December.

Keep Reading Show less
Bennett Richardson

Bennett Richardson ( @bennettrich) is the president of Protocol. Prior to joining Protocol in 2019, Bennett was executive director of global strategic partnerships at POLITICO, where he led strategic growth efforts including POLITICO's European expansion in Brussels and POLITICO's creative agency POLITICO Focus during his six years with the company. Prior to POLITICO, Bennett was co-founder and CMO of Hinge, the mobile dating company recently acquired by Match Group. Bennett began his career in digital and social brand marketing working with major brands across tech, energy, and health care at leading marketing and communications agencies including Edelman and GMMB. Bennett is originally from Portland, Maine, and received his bachelor's degree from Colgate University.

Enterprise

Why large enterprises struggle to find suitable platforms for MLops

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, and as larger enterprises go from deploying hundreds of models to thousands and even millions of models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

As companies expand their use of AI beyond running just a few machine learning models, ML practitioners say that they have yet to find what they need from prepackaged MLops systems.

Photo: artpartner-images via Getty Images

On any given day, Lily AI runs hundreds of machine learning models using computer vision and natural language processing that are customized for its retail and ecommerce clients to make website product recommendations, forecast demand, and plan merchandising. But this spring when the company was in the market for a machine learning operations platform to manage its expanding model roster, it wasn’t easy to find a suitable off-the-shelf system that could handle such a large number of models in deployment while also meeting other criteria.

Some MLops platforms are not well-suited for maintaining even more than 10 machine learning models when it comes to keeping track of data, navigating their user interfaces, or reporting capabilities, Matthew Nokleby, machine learning manager for Lily AI’s product intelligence team, told Protocol earlier this year. “The duct tape starts to show,” he said.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories
Bulletins