Four things to consider as the U.S. imposes chip sanctions on Russia

The U.S. announced chip sanctions against Russia Thursday in response to its invasion of Ukraine. Here’s what it means for the sector, which has already endured two years of supply problems.

Russia's Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin visits the Semiconductor Device Plant.

Russia's Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin (left, front) visits a chip facility.

Photo: Dmitry Astakhov\TASS via Getty Images

The White House said Thursday that it planned to choke off Russian access to a range of U.S. tech, including semiconductors, as part of the economic sanctions package proposed in response to the invasion of Ukraine.

“We’re going to impact their ability to compete in the 21st century economy,” President Joe Biden said Thursday at a White House press conference, explaining the sanctions.

We’ve seen a blueprint of how the U.S. might implement such sanctions with the Trump administration's efforts to thwart Huawei and other Chinese tech companies. But the U.S. had more to lose in dealing with China, and its aggressive batch of fresh economic punishments against Russia cover financial systems and the country’s access to tech.

So how will today’s announcement impact Russia? And how will the sanctions play out across a semiconductor sector still reeling from supply chain shocks? We’ve compiled answers to some of the most pressing questions surrounding this ban.

How would the chip sanctions work?

The U.S. Department of Commerce elected to follow a playbook similar to how it handled Huawei in 2019, and implemented a foreign direct product rule that bans shipping a range of U.S. tech products, or those made with U.S. equipment, software and blueprints, to Russia. Commerce said the EU, Japan, Australia, U.K., Canada and New Zealand are expected to implement similar restrictions.

The sanctions have the potential to severely damage Russia’s ability to get its hands on the most advanced chips made around the world. Even though the U.S. doesn’t fabricate as many chips as it once did, American chip businesses have most of the world’s semiconductor design expertise and intellectual property. Choking off access to American tech cost Huawei billions in lost revenue, and forced it to turn to alternative chip suppliers that don’t have the tech needed to make the most advanced chips.

According to a Commerce Department fact sheet, there are a number of uses that are exempt from sanctions, such as telecom infrastructure and a “range of consumer items used by the Russian people” — referring to devices such as smartphones, among other things.

Will a chip ban be effective?

Despite the growing need for chips around the world, Russia isn’t a primary market for chipmakers.

The country accounted for less than 0.1% of global chip purchases, according to the Semiconductor Industry Association. “Russia is not a significant direct consumer of semiconductors,” SIA CEO John Neuffer said. Even the country’s overall spending on tech is relatively limited, according to research firm IDC, which estimates the market at roughly $50 billion, compared with a global market that measures about $4.5 trillion.

Even though Russia doesn’t buy large numbers of chips directly, the U.S. may have trouble implementing a severe form of sanctions, according to professor Bhaskar Chakravorti. Chakravorti told Protocol that a large number of businesses involved in various stages of chipmaking aren’t worried about being placed on a U.S. blacklist at the moment — demand for chips continues to outstrip supply, and the U.S. would be loath to worsen the problem. The issue is compounded by the fact that the administration has little visibility into the semiconductor supply chain, which makes it harder for officials to catch companies violating sanctions.

“I think many players are going to continue to do whatever they’re doing, and hope they aren’t going to be found out,” he said.

The most significant negative consequence for the U.S. could be increased cooperation between China and Russia. At the moment, Russia already purchases about 70% of its chips from China, a number that is only likely to increase if the sanctions are implemented.

“China is keen to move up the semiconductor food chain, so this is an opportunity for these two to get together,” Chakravorti said. “Putin goes to Xi and says, ‘Hey, I need chips, you know how to get chips for me — I can get you engineers, I can get you money, I can get you technology.’”

How would chip sanctions against Russia impact China?

The sanctions will push Russia further towards China as a trading partner for semiconductors. The problem is that for the short- to medium-term, China is struggling with foundry capacity and the ability to manufacture the most-advanced chips. And in the long term, Russia will not want to be so reliant on China for access to a foundational technology — right now, it just doesn’t have any viable alternatives.

SMIC is central to China’s ambitions to grow its capacity. The chipmaker — which is still subject to U.S. sanctions from the Trump era — has reserved $5 billion for capital expenditures this year. It has plans to open up a foundry in Shenzhen in the coming months, and is in the process of building another facility in Shanghai that would begin production in 2024. SMIC reportedly expects its 2022 expenditures to boost production capacity from 20,000 8-inch wafers to 150,000.

Aside from supply constraints, however, there’s the problem of access to advanced chips. SMIC isn’t yet able to produce the most-advanced chips that Samsung and TSMC are able to make.

U.S. sanctions have limited the ability of SMIC and other China-based chipmakers to purchase specialized extreme ultraviolet lithography equipment from the Dutch company ASML. Without that access, SMIC and others are having to make their own alternatives that could take several years to develop. The advanced chips are important for making more efficient chipsets that can be used in cloud computing, AI and graphics processing.

There are two important considerations for Russia. First, Russia and China have come closer together over recent years, but Russia ultimately wants to retain its sovereignty rather than rely so extensively on China.

The other problem has to do with the possibility of further U.S. sanctions against SMIC, which the Biden administration reportedly considered at the end last year. This could disrupt China’s ability to expand capacity to such an extent that it would be able to meet domestic demand while still exporting to key trade partners, like Russia.

Would the chip sanctions ease semiconductor supply constraints for everyone else?

For the chip industry — and the ongoing global shortage — the paramount concern appears to be the raw materials necessary for chip production. Earlier this month, the White House warned the chip industry about potential shortages of neon and palladium, which are made or refined in Russia and Ukraine.

The raw material gathering the most attention is neon, which is used in a part of chip fabrication called lithography, where a tool uses a narrow beam of light to draw features onto silicon wafers. The market for neon is tough to get information on, according to Bernstein chip analyst Stacy Rasgon, but it's relatively small, roughly several hundred million dollars, or about 600 million liters of material. According to a report from Techcet, Russia produces neon as a byproduct of steel manufacturing that is then refined by a specialized Ukrainian company.

Chip manufacturing uses about 75% of the world’s supply of neon, according to Rasgon’s research, and the last crisis in Ukraine prompted as much as a sevenfold increase in the price.

“We don't think the prospect for higher prices is really an issue (even at 10x neon costs are a tiny fraction of the industry's cost structure) though it may favor larger players over smaller ones in terms of getting supply,” Rasgon wrote. “But potentially putting a significant fraction of purification capacity at risk sounds somewhat ominous for an industry already struggling with shortages."

SIA downplayed the effect of any shortages, saying in a statement that the industry has a “diverse set of suppliers of key materials and gases” that the conflict between Russia and Ukraine won’t immediately disrupt. Evercore analyst C.J. Muse wrote in a research note that his checks revealed there will be enough neon in the chip industry for as long as the next year.


Gensler: Bitcoin may be a commodity

The SEC has been vague about crypto. But Gensler said bitcoin is a commodity, “maybe.” It’s the clearest glimpse of his views on digital assets yet.

“Bitcoin — maybe that’s a commodity token. That has a big market value, but that goes over there,” Gensler said, referring to another regulator, the CFTC.

Photoillustration: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images; Protocol

SEC Chair Gary Gensler has long argued that many cryptocurrencies are subject to regulation as securities.

But he recently clarified that this view wouldn’t apply to the best-known cryptocurrency, bitcoin.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Sponsored Content

Why the digital transformation of industries is creating a more sustainable future

Qualcomm’s chief sustainability officer Angela Baker on how companies can view going “digital” as a way not only toward growth, as laid out in a recent report, but also toward establishing and meeting environmental, social and governance goals.

Three letters dominate business practice at present: ESG, or environmental, social and governance goals. The number of mentions of the environment in financial earnings has doubled in the last five years, according to GlobalData: 600,000 companies mentioned the term in their annual or quarterly results last year.

But meeting those ESG goals can be a challenge — one that businesses can’t and shouldn’t take lightly. Ahead of an exclusive fireside chat at Davos, Angela Baker, chief sustainability officer at Qualcomm, sat down with Protocol to speak about how best to achieve those targets and how Qualcomm thinks about its own sustainability strategy, net zero commitment, other ESG targets and more.

Keep Reading Show less
Chris Stokel-Walker

Chris Stokel-Walker is a freelance technology and culture journalist and author of "YouTubers: How YouTube Shook Up TV and Created a New Generation of Stars." His work has been published in The New York Times, The Guardian and Wired.


What the economic downturn means for pay packages

The war for talent rages on, but dynamics are shifting back to the employers.

Compensation packages could start to look different as companies reshuffle the balance of cash and equity.

Illustration: Nuthawut Somsuk/Getty Images

The market is turning. Tech stocks are slumping — which is bad news for employees — and even industry powerhouses are slowing hiring and laying people off. Tech talent is still in high demand, but compensation packages could start to look different as companies recruit.

“It’s a little bit like whiplash,” compensation consultant Ashish Raina said of the downturn. Raina, who mainly works with startups that have 200 to 800 employees, previously worked as the director of Talent at Index Ventures and head of Compensation and Talent Analytics at Box. “I do think there’s going to be an interesting reckoning in terms of pay increases going forward, how that pay is delivered.”

Keep Reading Show less
Allison Levitsky
Allison Levitsky is a reporter at Protocol covering workplace issues in tech. She previously covered big tech companies and the tech workforce for the Silicon Valley Business Journal. Allison grew up in the Bay Area and graduated from UC Berkeley.

How 'Zuck Bucks' saved the 2020 election — and fueled the Big Lie

The true story of how Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan’s $419 million donation became the 2020 election’s most enduring conspiracy theory.

Mark Zuckerberg is smack in the center of one of the 2020 election’s multitudinous conspiracies.

Illustration: Mike McQuade; Photos: Getty Images

If Mark Zuckerberg could have imagined the worst possible outcome of his decision to insert himself into the 2020 election, it might have looked something like the scene that unfolded inside Mar-a-Lago on a steamy evening in early April.

There in a gilded ballroom-turned-theater, MAGA world icons including Kellyanne Conway, Corey Lewandowski, Hope Hicks and former president Donald Trump himself were gathered for the premiere of “Rigged: The Zuckerberg Funded Plot to Defeat Donald Trump.”

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.


From frenzy to fear: Trading apps grapple with anxious investors

After riding the stock-trading wave last year, trading apps like Robinhood have disenchanted customers and jittery investors.

Retail stock trading is still an attractive business, as shown by the news that crypto exchange FTX is dipping its toes in the market by letting some U.S. customers trade stocks.

Photo: Lam Yik/Bloomberg via Getty Images

For a brief moment, last year’s GameStop craze made buying and selling stocks cool, even exciting, for a new generation of young investors. Now, that frenzy has turned to fear.

Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev pointed to “a challenging macro environment” marked by rising prices and interest rates and a slumping market in a call with analysts explaining his company’s lackluster results. The downturn, he said, was something “most of our customers have never experienced in their lifetimes.”

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Latest Stories