Enterprise

Trying to stand out in enterprise tech? Create a new software category.

Over 20 years ago, Salesforce created the software-as-a-service market. Now, a legion of fresh entrants are trying to build their own new software categories.

One man with balloons flies above men in hats

A new crop of providers is emerging that wants to create entirely new software categories.

Image: eelnosiva/Getty Images

It was a much different world when Salesforce was trying to establish software-as-a-service as the next frontier in enterprise technology in the early 2000s.

The company made success look easy. It took in just $65 million in outside funding, went public a little more than four years after it launched in 1999 and relied on marketing gimmicks like a fake protest of an Siebel Systems conference to spread the word that web browsers and internet speeds could now handle the demands of enterprise customers.

Two decades later, SaaS is a $158 billion industry with thousands of vendors. Private upstarts are raising single rounds valued in the hundreds of millions, if not billions of dollars per round. The rush of new options means SaaS newcomers must compete on the strength of their products, and not viral marketing campaigns, to convince end customers outside the IT department to adopt their software.

But a new crop of providers is emerging that wants to create entirely new software categories around the maturing needs of cloud converts and innovations in areas like data management — and hopefully become the next Salesforce along the way.

Databricks is a pioneer in creating the data lakehouse architecture. Confluent and Amplitude are early leaders in the emerging real-time analytics market. Celonis claims it's building the "execution management" category. Canva touts the creation of the "visual economy" market. Those companies and others face much different hurdles now than Marc Benioff and his executive team did two decades ago.

"It's a big challenge if you are trying to do something that's genuinely new. A lot of people who are doing category creation, it's not really new. It's just a rebranding," Confluent CEO Jay Kreps told Protocol. "It's a powerful thing when you do it. There's a lot of advantages to companies that are first in a new category. But it's a big hill to climb."

Even a vendor like Snowflake, which was taking an existing concept and moving it to the cloud, found success by touting the product as the launch of a new category.

"It was a big, massive existing market. People understand what data warehouses are all about. Our differentiation is the fact that we were built for the cloud," said marketing chief Denise Persson. The company debated other categories, did "extensive focus groups … and tested all these different concepts with prospects that had never heard about Snowflake" before committing to the "cloud-based data warehouse" branding, she added.

Benefitting from SaaS complexity

When trying to establish nascent software categories, new products are often labeled as "first of their kind," helping to create a sense of intrigue and buzz. As a result, those companies can claim to be the only ones solving an enterprise's most pressing IT problems.

That can become a virtuous cycle, if you're an enterprise tech founder or investor: As more SaaS startups try to tackle newer market opportunities, others emerge that help solve problems created by those applications.

"There's more systems, there's more SaaS layers, there's more databases," said Kreps. "What we benefit from the most is the explosion of complexity in the landscape."

Trying to pioneer a new market has its downsides. Thanks to advantages like easier access to financing and an influx in cloud-based programs that can help reduce operational costs, it's easier than ever to launch a business these days, founders say, which is forcing the buzzy upstarts to scale very quickly. That wasn't the case with Salesforce, which was largely just trying to upstage PeopleSoft — albeit a difficult task in its own right.

But that pressure comes from more than one direction. Many are also challenging the dominance of cloud providers like AWS and Microsoft, which can dangle huge compensation packages in front of new recruits and invest billions in research and development.

Those more-intense capital needs are one reason why enterprise software fundraising has gotten so out of control: Databricks has raised $3.5 billion, Amplitude raised around $337 million before it went public in September, Confluent raised $456 million before an IPO in June, Celonis has taken in $1.3 billion and Canva has raised $587 million.

"Lots of other vendors are going to jump in and claim to be the real lakehouse. It's already happening, so execution will matter a lot," said Databricks CEO Ali Ghodsi. "Creating a new category is going to take a lot of investment, especially on the R&D side. Getting that talent is expensive. When we're hiring engineers, the competition is Google. And we're not talking about junior engineers … it's top level," he added.

However, launching a company now — or in the past few years, at least — does give founders some advantages over legacy providers and big cloud companies. For example, companies like Adobe still have to deal with a customer base split between those who store their data fully on-premises, those who have fully embraced the cloud and those who have a hybrid structure.

That's a challenge that newer vendors like design software provider Figma aren't grappling with at the same level.

"We are standing on the shoulders of giants" like Adobe, said Figma CEO Dylan Field. But "having to build up from an offline world is really hard. We're in that unique advantage where we can build everything from a cloud environment."

Growth at all costs

Overall, it's a much different landscape for software startups than it was in the early 2000s, which is allowing those aspiring vendors to pursue a much different — and much quicker — growth trajectory, according to industry experts.

Some startups "are growing faster than any other prior business has," LSVP partner Arsham Memarzadeh told Protocol. "It's no longer the old 'triple-triple-double-double-double' from a revenue standpoint, but 6x this year, 5x next year."

One only has to look to industry leaders like Atlassian to understand just how noteworthy this shift has been. The company began in 2002, as Silicon Valley was still reeling from the burst of the dot-com bubble. Throw in the fact that Atlassian is based in Australia and fundraising was a more difficult endeavor at the time compared to the environment today.

"To say that it's a different situation [now] than when Atlassian started would be the understatement of all understatements," said Chief Revenue Officer Cameron Deatsch, who joined the company in 2012. "The amount of capital, time and investment required to actually just build a new solution that is [enterprise]-ready and then deliver that effectively to customers is way less than it was 20 years ago."

As a result, its growth trajectory was smaller and not focused on "triple-digit growth in the first year," according to Deatsch. And instead of focusing on the CIO — who, at that time, controlled most tech spending — Atlassian targeted developers and made it easy for them to independently sign up for the product. But even that was more difficult, as there weren't as many ways to market to that audience.

Now, other startups are doubling down on that strategy as more IT departments enable line of business leaders to purchase the software that works best for their teams.

For example, Amplitude is focusing its sales efforts on the chief product officer. But the company has tackled just 1% of the universe of CPOs, per CEO Spenser Skates, and increasing that number requires a major change in mindset among the user base.

"We're the first company to go out that's really dedicated to serving that person," Skates said. But "it's not a given that they are going to use data to run product teams. That's a shift that's just been happening."

As more startups take advantage of an explosion of SaaS and look to piece together different functions or fill in gaps they see in the tech stack, expect to hear even more founders claim to be building a new category.

However, the challenge will increasingly become convincing end users they offer a service that solves something unique compared to their already sprawling IT suite.

"You have to create more education in the market, you have to put more resources behind marketing, because it's not just displacing an existing vendor," said Memarzadeh.

Clarification: This story was updated to clarify the nature of Snowflake's early product strategy.

Workplace

Slack’s rallying cry at Dreamforce: No more meetings

It’s not all cartoon bears and therapy pigs — work conferences are a good place to talk about the future of work.

“We want people to be able to work in whatever way works for them with flexible schedules, in meetings and out of meetings,” Slack chief product officer Tamar Yehoshua told Protocol at Dreamforce 2022.

Photo: Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Dreamforce is primarily Salesforce’s show. But Slack wasn’t to be left out, especially as the primary connector between Salesforce and the mainstream working world.

The average knowledge worker spends more time using a communication tool like Slack than a CRM like Salesforce, positioning it as the best Salesforce product to concern itself with the future of work. In between meeting a therapy pig and meditating by the Dreamforce waterfall, Protocol sat down with several Slack execs and conference-goers to chat about the shifting future.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at llawrence@protocol.com.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

LA is a growing tech hub. But not everyone may fit.

LA has a housing crisis similar to Silicon Valley’s. And single-family-zoning laws are mostly to blame.

As the number of tech companies in the region grows, so does the number of tech workers, whose high salaries put them at an advantage in both LA's renting and buying markets.

Photo: Nat Rubio-Licht/Protocol

LA’s tech scene is on the rise. The number of unicorn companies in Los Angeles is growing, and the city has become the third-largest startup ecosystem nationally behind the Bay Area and New York with more than 4,000 VC-backed startups in industries ranging from aerospace to creators. As the number of tech companies in the region grows, so does the number of tech workers. The city is quickly becoming more and more like Silicon Valley — a new startup and a dozen tech workers on every corner and companies like Google, Netflix, and Twitter setting up offices there.

But with growth comes growing pains. Los Angeles, especially the burgeoning Silicon Beach area — which includes Santa Monica, Venice, and Marina del Rey — shares something in common with its namesake Silicon Valley: a severe lack of housing.

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.

Policy

SFPD can now surveil a private camera network funded by Ripple chair

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors approved a policy that the ACLU and EFF argue will further criminalize marginalized groups.

SFPD will be able to temporarily tap into private surveillance networks in certain circumstances.

Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Ripple chairman and co-founder Chris Larsen has been funding a network of security cameras throughout San Francisco for a decade. Now, the city has given its police department the green light to monitor the feeds from those cameras — and any other private surveillance devices in the city — in real time, whether or not a crime has been committed.

This week, San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors approved a controversial plan to allow SFPD to temporarily tap into private surveillance networks during life-threatening emergencies, large events, and in the course of criminal investigations, including investigations of misdemeanors. The decision came despite fervent opposition from groups, including the ACLU of Northern California and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which say the police department’s new authority will be misused against protesters and marginalized groups in a city that has been a bastion for both.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Enterprise

These two AWS vets think they can finally solve enterprise blockchain

Vendia, founded by Tim Wagner and Shruthi Rao, wants to help companies build real-time, decentralized data applications. Its product allows enterprises to more easily share code and data across clouds, regions, companies, accounts, and technology stacks.

“We have this thesis here: Cloud was always the missing ingredient in blockchain, and Vendia added it in,” Wagner (right) told Protocol of his and Shruthi Rao's company.

Photo: Vendia

The promise of an enterprise blockchain was not lost on CIOs — the idea that a database or an API could keep corporate data consistent with their business partners, be it their upstream supply chains, downstream logistics, or financial partners.

But while it was one of the most anticipated and hyped technologies in recent memory, blockchain also has been one of the most failed technologies in terms of enterprise pilots and implementations, according to Vendia CEO Tim Wagner.

Keep Reading Show less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Latest Stories
Bulletins