Enterprise

The next big AI startup IPO? Why Samsara’s data really is the new oil

Samsara is going toe-to-toe with software and cloud giants in the increasingly competitive world of industrial IoT. Ahead of an expected IPO, its CEO explains its plan to win.

Picture of Samsara office

Samsara's IoT sensors help companies manage industrial equipment with better data.

Photo: Samsara

Samsara entered last year as one of the world's most valuable artificial intelligence startups. But for a minute, the pandemic threatened to change its trajectory.

In May 2020, in the midst of COVID-19's rapid spread across the globe, the Andreessen Horowitz-backed company closed a $400 million down-round that valued the company at a reported $5.4 billion and laid off 300 employees — amounting to 18% of the staff. It remained one of the world's more prominent AI upstarts, but it was a hiccup in an otherwise impressive growth trajectory.

Little did CEO Sanjit Biswas know that, in a few short months, AI startups like Samsara would be battling back investors who wanted to pour seemingly limitless cash into their operations.

"If anyone had a crystal ball and you knew how this pandemic would turn out, they probably wouldn't make the same decisions as what we did back then," he told Protocol.

Samsara turns data from internet-enabled sensors into operational insights. It gained prominence helping organizations and governments manage fleets of commercial vehicles, promising enhanced safety and sustainability. But now, the company is trying to expand deeper into the industrial segment, working with customers to help predict machine maintenance and monitor operations remotely, among other applications.

It is hiring again and preparing to go public as it looks to grow in a market that is chock-full of competitors, from cloud giants and software titans to standalone vendors and fast-growing startups.

"We just haven't seen them train specific models the same way we have," Biswas said of potential rivals like Microsoft, Bosch and others. "Our biggest differentiation is we provide that out-of-the-box experience for these customers."

In a recent interview, Biswas told Protocol about the company's growth and how it differentiates itself from larger competitors.

This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.

IoT got a lot of buzz. And then it seemed like it went through a cycle where companies couldn't really figure out the applications, there was confusion about the tech, some of it might have been overhyped. What has changed in the last couple of years to change that perception?

It's gone from being a raw technology, or potential technology, to being something very practical and very useful. We work with a lot of waste management companies, who you wouldn't think of as big technology adopters, but they found that putting our sensors on their trucks could decrease their speeding by 58%. It's turning it from technology into an application that has business value.

How do you begin to put parameters around what the future of the business is going to look like?

There is a broad, vast opportunity because there's so much that can be done. That's an opportunity for Samsara, but also a bunch of other companies. So I don't think it'll just be Samsara.

We ended up with an interesting advantage. Because we had the sensors, you could get real-time GPS locations, we could see traffic patterns because we drive 99% of the roads in the US every single day. And as a result, you could be much smarter about how you plan routes, in a way that standalone software just didn't have enough clean data to work on.

That was something that was driven based on customer feedback. It's much more [that] we have this kind of active conversation and the customers show us where the opportunities are.

When you're looking to the future of industrial IoT, what do you see as the most impactful application for end customers?

There's three pillars we're focused on. On the safety side, a lot of these industrial environments — whether they're in the field or in a factory or warehouse — are pretty hazardous. If you can use AI and sensor data to help keep people safe, that adds tremendous value.

On the other side, it would be efficiency and sustainability. A lot of these industries use a tremendous amount of energy to get their jobs done. There's this big push on the [environmental, social and governance] front, and sustainability in general, to improve and cut carbon emissions. But you can't improve what you can't measure. And so for us, we feel really good about providing tools for these customers to get that data and then figure out how they can make their operations more efficient.

Samsara CEO Sanjit Biswas Samsara CEO Sanjit BiswasPhoto: Samsara

Last year, Samsara did a down funding round. Would you still do that given the capital that's available right now?

If anyone had a crystal ball and you knew how this pandemic would turn out, they probably wouldn't make the same decisions as what we did back then. We used the best information we had at the time.

In our previous company, we lived through the global financial crisis. It's just important for companies to be well capitalized so they can continue to serve their customers. And for us, it was less about valuation and more about just making sure the company is in a strong position to keep operating and keep serving customers and scaling and growing.

Knowing where markets have turned out and the enormous amount of economic stimulus, I'm pretty sure the round would be a pretty significant up at this point.

Since the layoffs, how many individuals have you hired?

We have hired about 300 people in the past year and we're continuing to hire.

Are you going to pursue another funding round?

The company is well capitalized, we have a clear path to break even and so we don't need any additional venture capital funding. We're just focused on building products and serving customers.

When you look at what the large cloud providers are trying to do in this space, how do you see it as different from what you're doing? And where are the areas that you might see yourself competing with a company like Microsoft?

Overall, it's been a big tailwind for us, because they provide a lot of great infrastructure. So we don't need to think about scaling databases, for example. Those companies are very ambitious, they're continuing to expand. And, like all big platforms, in some places you partner [and] in some places you compete.

We don't tend to compete directly. We've never, for example, been competing for a deal against Microsoft or Amazon. So that just hasn't come up practically speaking, because we provide a solution that works out of the box, as opposed to a toolkit that their IT team would put together.

Those companies and others are investing pretty heavily in AI and analytics as well. Is there a unique challenge when it comes to running AI on top of this IoT data that would give you an advantage?

We are focused on a few specific applications. So driver safety is a great example. If someone is tailgating or their following distance isn't safe enough, we will beep in the cab. And that involves running an AI model at the edge. If you're Amazon or Azure, you're trying to be broad. You're not just thinking about cameras on roads. We just haven't seen them train specific models the same way we have. And that is about data and being specifically focused on a couple of applications.

When you look at industrial IoT companies like what Bosch might be doing or Honeywell, do you intend to take a more narrow approach than those providers?

We actually use Honeywell and Bosch components in our products. So in some sense, they also enable our technology. It's a little bit more of selling the solution and the application than the raw technology pieces. Our biggest differentiation is we provide that out-of-the-box experience for these customers.

There's quite a large number of IoT startups out there. Are you expecting to see any kind of major wave of consolidation within the sector?

This is a very large market opportunity. In terms of digitization, we're at that 1% mark. There's room for a lot of companies to grow here. We do see consolidation occurring because being a single-purpose company is pretty tough. I see an opportunity for consolidation just in terms of providing more to the customers — like putting everything together in one platform, where you get safety, efficiency, sustainability, all in a single set of dashboards. That makes a lot of sense for the customer.

Do you have partnerships with some of the software providers within this industrial digital twin space like Siemens or PTC? And if not, is that something that you'll have to look to in the future?

Siemens and PTC are not official partners today. We have integrators who could take our APIs and push that data into a PTC receiving system. That's the simplest way to do the integration. But over time, we do want to do more partnerships. If you were to talk to us three, five years from now, you'll probably see we have several 100 partners. And I would expect that we would have had time to stand up the Siemens partnership or the PTC partnership the way we did Salesforce and SAP.

Fintech

Election markets are far from a sure bet

Kalshi has big-name backing for its plan to offer futures contracts tied to election results. Will that win over a long-skeptical regulator?

Whether Kalshi’s election contracts could be considered gaming or whether they serve a true risk-hedging purpose is one of the top questions the CFTC is weighing in its review.

Photo illustration: Getty Images; Protocol

Crypto isn’t the only emerging issue on the CFTC’s plate. The futures regulator is also weighing a fintech sector that has similarly tricky political implications: election bets.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has set Oct. 28 as a date by which it hopes to decide whether the New York-based startup Kalshi can offer a form of wagering up to $25,000 on which party will control the House of Representatives and Senate after the midterms. PredictIt, another online market for election trading, has also sued the regulator over its decision to cancel a no-action letter.

Keep Reading Show less
Ryan Deffenbaugh
Ryan Deffenbaugh is a reporter at Protocol focused on fintech. Before joining Protocol, he reported on New York's technology industry for Crain's New York Business. He is based in New York and can be reached at rdeffenbaugh@protocol.com.
Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Enterprise

The Uber verdict shows why mandatory disclosure isn't such a bad idea

The conviction of Uber's former chief security officer, Joe Sullivan, seems likely to change some minds in the debate over proposed cyber incident reporting regulations.

Executives and boards will now be "a whole lot less likely to cover things up," said one information security veteran.

Photo: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images

If nothing else, the guilty verdict delivered Wednesday in a case involving Uber's former security head will have this effect on how breaches are handled in the future: Executives and boards, according to information security veteran Michael Hamilton, will be "a whole lot less likely to cover things up."

Following the conviction of former Uber chief security officer Joe Sullivan, "we likely will get better voluntary reporting" of cyber incidents, said Hamilton, formerly the chief information security officer of the City of Seattle, and currently the founder and CISO at cybersecurity vendor Critical Insight.

Keep Reading Show less
Kyle Alspach

Kyle Alspach ( @KyleAlspach) is a senior reporter at Protocol, focused on cybersecurity. He has covered the tech industry since 2010 for outlets including VentureBeat, CRN and the Boston Globe. He lives in Portland, Oregon, and can be reached at kalspach@protocol.com.

Climate

Delta and MIT are running flight tests to fix contrails

The research team and airline are running flight tests to determine if it’s possible to avoid the climate-warming effects of contrails.

Delta and MIT just announced a partnership to test how to mitigate persistent contrails.

Photo: Gabriela Natiello/Unsplash

Contrails could be responsible for up to 2% of all global warming, and yet how they’re formed and how to mitigate them is barely understood by major airlines.

That may be changing.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol covering climate. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.

Entertainment

Inside Amazon’s free video strategy

Amazon has been doubling down on original content for Freevee, its ad-supported video service, which has seen a lot of growth thanks to a deep integration with other Amazon properties.

Freevee’s investment into original programming like 'Bosch: Legacy' has increased by 70%.

Photo: Tyler Golden/Amazon Freevee

Amazon’s streaming efforts have long been all about Prime Video. So the company caught pundits by surprise when, in early 2019, it launched a stand-alone ad-supported streaming service called IMDb Freedive, with Techcrunch calling the move “a bit odd.”

Nearly four years and two rebrandings later, Amazon’s ad-supported video efforts appear to be flourishing. Viewership of the service grew by 138% from 2020 to 2021, according to Amazon. The company declined to share any updated performance data on the service, which is now called Freevee, but a spokesperson told Protocol the performance of originals in particular “exceeded expectations,” leading Amazon to increase investments into original content by 70% year-over-year.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Latest Stories
Bulletins