Cybersecurity is a data problem. Snowflake wants to be part of the answer.

The company — and a growing number of customers — believe that Snowflake’s cloud data platform is ideal for helping address data-centric cybersecurity challenges.

Snowflake logo

Snowflake's emphasis in the cybersecurity space comes amid intensifying cyberthreats facing enterprises.

Image: Protocol

For a startup in hyper-growth mode like Figma, scaling up its cybersecurity defenses as fast as the rest of the company has been a top concern.

To pull off that feat, the company has come to rely on Snowflake, a company well known for its cloud data lake and data warehouse technology, but much less so for what it brings to the table for cybersecurity. As it turns out, though, "the same reason everyone else is using Snowflake and finds its capabilities so powerful also applies to security," said Devdatta Akhawe, head of security at Figma.

Snowflake’s technology is primarily used for cloud-based data analytics and data science, but it is now looking to prove it has a lot to offer when it comes to cybersecurity, which is increasingly being recognized as a data problem at its core.

Figma — which offers browser-based, collaboration-oriented design software, and is on tap to be acquired by Adobe for $20 billion — believes Snowflake has already arrived in the cybersecurity market given its unique ability to combine security feeds with data from the rest of the business. Having a single data lake for the whole company has allowed for analysis of cybersecurity data in a broader context, enabling a better understanding of security risks, according to Akhawe.

"Being able to correlate across a large number of disparate data sources is what makes a strong security program," he said.

Snowflake executives told Protocol that while cybersecurity is just one of the cloud data opportunities the company is pursuing right now, it's clearly among the biggest. The company's emphasis in the space comes amid intensifying cyberthreats facing enterprises and a growing priority placed on cybersecurity in the C-suite and boardroom.

The relevance of Snowflake for security teams is "the best-kept secret in cybersecurity," said Omer Singer, the company’s head of cybersecurity strategy.

Many of the initial customers using Snowflake for cybersecurity — which include Dropbox, DoorDash, TripActions, and CSAA Insurance Group — have been "using Snowflake for a long time, but the cybersecurity team wasn't," Singer said. "What's changed is, now the cybersecurity team is using it as part of their overall strategy."

Correlating threats

Founded in 2012 by two veterans of Oracle — Benoit Dageville (now president of product) and Thierry Cruanes (now CTO) — Snowflake has homed in on cybersecurity in the three years since Frank Slootman joined as CEO, said Christian Kleinerman, senior vice president of product at Snowflake.

Early on at Snowflake, Slootman, who was formerly the CEO of ServiceNow, had a decisive meeting with a customer, according to Kleinerman. "The customer was telling him, 'We are doing cybersecurity with Snowflake — why are you guys not pitching it as such?'"

In June, Snowflake announced its new cybersecurity category, aiming to offer an easier way for customers to combine their security data with other business and contextual data.

Doing so can enable better-informed threat detections and breach investigations, according to Snowflake executives. For instance, correlating human resources data with email-forwarding events to outside parties could help detect if an employee is trying to leak sensitive information.

The more signals you have, the more patterns you can find.

Meanwhile, combining data feeds from code repository GitHub and identity platform Okta could provide a view into who's logging into privileged accounts, what they're doing, and whether permissions violations are taking place, according to Snowflake executives. Typically, however, suspicious developer behavior would be missed, because GitHub data isn't usually leveraged by security operations tools or staff members.

"The more signals you have, the more patterns you can find," Kleinerman said.

That's not something you can easily do with traditional data warehousing technology, however. For one thing, cybersecurity is different from other parts of a business in that it generates way more data — a nonstop stream of logs and events. For customers, storing security data for any period of time has often been costly and required tough choices about what to keep.

Snowflake's separation of pricing between storage and compute, however, "works very well for security," said Uri May, co-founder and CEO of cybersecurity vendor Hunters. In security, you want to store a lot of data for potential review later on, he said, but you probably won't need to have access to all of your data all of the time.

Using Snowflake, though, an organization only pays for compute time on its security data when an incident has actually occurred and the stored data needs to be queried, May said. The rest of the time, you're just paying the "relatively low" price for the storage itself.

By contrast, customers that try to store security data using a system that predated the cloud — which doesn't separate storage from compute, and doesn't leverage cloud-native storage architecture — will be forced to get choosy about what data they collect and how long they keep it, Singer said.

That's not great for security, said Figma's Akhawe. As occurred with the widely felt SolarWinds attack, many high-impact breaches are only discovered nine months to a year after they first began, he said.

Deleting security data after a few months "is just illogical. You're flying blind when the actual breach is disclosed," Akhawe said. Snowflake, on the other hand, "gives us the ability to scale to gigantic amounts of [security] data."

Bringing apps to the data

Snowflake executives said that the company is encouraging third-party software vendors to provide the security features around its data platform. "Instead of taking the data to applications, let's bring the applications to the data," Kleinerman said.

Vendor partners include Hunters, which provides security analytics and correlation for data in Snowflake; Immuta, which offers access control and privacy management; and Lacework, which focuses on enabling threat detection, investigations and measurement of security, and compliance posture.

Providing customers with a way to have all of their data in one place "gives them a holistic view of what's happening in their business, with security becoming more and more important to every business," said David Hatfield, co-CEO at Lacework, which has received an investment from Snowflake and was incubated at the same private equity firm, Sutter Hill Ventures.

In the case of Dropbox, the company has transitioned from using a traditional platform for security information and event management to using a cloud-native SIEM from Panther Labs. "They have completely decommissioned their traditional SIEM," Singer said.

The use of Snowflake for cybersecurity is just starting to move from early adopters to more mainstream usage, executives said. Cybersecurity is one of the eight categories currently being promoted for the platform, but it is the first to target a specific audience within an enterprise.

Two other new categories, planned to be announced in 2023, will similarly target a more specific audience, though details aren't being disclosed for now, Singer said. Previously, Snowflake categories have been more general in nature, targeting uses such as data science and data engineering.

‘Massive opportunity’

In terms of the cybersecurity push, "I think our opportunity to do something meaningful in this space is massive," Kleinerman said.

Snowflake's emerging focus on security comes up in his discussions with customers on a weekly basis, he said. "I can tell you, it's a conversation changer."

Without a doubt, it's easier for younger companies that can start fresh with their data architecture, like Figma, to adopt Snowflake for their cybersecurity needs, Akhawe said.

"I think for a lot of other companies that have legacy architecture, it is harder to migrate," he said.

But while it will take time for companies to make the shift, Akhawe believes that 10 years from now, most will have transitioned to this type of architecture for their security data.

"We know attacks are getting more sophisticated and more complicated. And very often, they take longer than three or four months to detect," he said. As a result, using a large-scale, cloud-based data lake "where you don't have to worry about deleting data — I do think this will become the default."


This carbon capture startup wants to clean up the worst polluters

The founder and CEO of point-source carbon capture company Carbon Clean discusses what the startup has learned, the future of carbon capture technology, as well as the role of companies like his in battling the climate crisis.

Carbon Clean CEO Aniruddha Sharma told Protocol that fossil fuels are necessary, at least in the near term, to lift the living standards of those who don’t have access to cars and electricity.

Photo: Carbon Clean

Carbon capture and storage has taken on increasing importance as companies with stubborn emissions look for new ways to meet their net zero goals. For hard-to-abate industries like cement and steel production, it’s one of the few options that exist to help them get there.

Yet it’s proven incredibly challenging to scale the technology, which captures carbon pollution at the source. U.K.-based company Carbon Clean is leading the charge to bring down costs. This year, it raised a $150 million series C round, which the startup said is the largest-ever funding round for a point-source carbon capture company.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol covering climate. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Why companies cut staff after raising millions

Are tech firms blowing millions in funding just weeks after getting it? Experts say it's more complicated than that.

Bolt, Trade Republic, HomeLight, and Stord all drew attention from funding announcements that happened just weeks or days before layoffs.

Photo: Pulp Photography/Getty Images

Fintech startup Bolt was one of the first tech companies to slash jobs, cutting 250 employees, or a third of its staff, in May. For some workers, the pain of layoffs was a shock not only because they were the first, but also because the cuts came just four months after Bolt had announced a $355 million series E funding round and achieved a peak valuation of $11 billion.

“Bolt employees were blind sided because the CEO was saying just weeks ago how everything is fine,” an anonymous user wrote on the message board Blind. “It has been an extremely rough day for 1/3 of Bolt employees,” another user posted. “Sadly, I was one of them who was let go after getting a pay-raise just a couple of weeks ago.”

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.


The fight to define the carbon offset market's future

The world’s largest carbon offset issuer is fighting a voluntary effort to standardize the industry. And the fate of the climate could hang in the balance.

It has become increasingly clear that scaling the credit market will first require clear standards and transparency.

Kevin Frayer/Getty Images

There’s a major fight brewing over what kind of standards will govern the carbon offset market.

A group of independent experts looking to clean up the market’s checkered record and the biggest carbon credit issuer on the voluntary market is trying to influence efforts to define what counts as a quality credit. The outcome could make or break an industry increasingly central to tech companies meeting their net zero goals.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).


White House AI Bill of Rights lacks specific guidance for AI rules

The document unveiled today by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is long on tech guidance, but short on restrictions for AI.

While the document provides extensive suggestions for how to incorporate AI rights in technical design, it does not include any recommendations for restrictions on the use of controversial forms of AI.

Photo: Ana Lanza/Unsplash

It was a year in the making, but people eagerly anticipating the White House Bill of Rights for AI will have to continue waiting for concrete recommendations for future AI policy or restrictions.

Instead, the document unveiled today by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is legally non-binding and intended to be used as a handbook and a “guide for society” that could someday inform government AI legislation or regulations.

Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights features a list of five guidelines for protecting people in relation to AI use:

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories