Taylor Swift tickets are hard to get. Edge computing could fix that.

The CEO of StackPath thinks it will be a few years before decentralized edge computing makes sense for more applications, but there are a few in-demand services that could benefit from that approach today.

A Taylor Swift concert in 2015

After pandemic restrictions lift, Taylor Swift concerts could be hard to get into. Might edge computing be just the ticket?

Photo: Chaz McGregor/Unsplash

StackPath CEO Kip Turco has an easy reference when asked about the potential benefits of edge computing platforms: Taylor Swift.

Whenever Swift returns to live performances as the pandemic abates, demand for tickets to her shows could be unprecedented. Hundreds of thousands of people will be competing for seats against bots and professional ticket buying operations sure to swarm Ticketmaster's services, some of which run in AWS regional data centers.

"Milliseconds matter," Turco told Protocol, when it comes to a situation like the release of Taylor Swift tickets. A fan request to purchase tickets will have to travel to that regional data center and back, and even the smartest minds in enterprise tech haven't figured out how to increase the speed of light.

But edge computing, or decentralized computing, could change the way businesses offering time-sensitive services build and deploy those apps. By moving a modest amount of computing power closer to end users and connecting it with a super-efficient network, Turco thinks StackPath's services could help level the playing field, especially as the underwhelming rollout of 5G wireless networks really starts to gain traction.

StackPath, which has raised nearly $400 million since it was founded in 2015 to build out its content-delivery network, thinks it will be a few years before the market is ready for this technology. But lots of companies are planning for a world in which computing resources start to move away from centralized cloud data centers and closer to the edge of the network, and Turco shared his thoughts on how this market will evolve in a recent interview.

This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.

StackPath CEO Kip Turco. StackPath CEO Kip Turco sees edge computing as the future.Photo: StackPath

What's the most clear example of why edge computing is needed today?

We tend to agree that the potential from an edge compute marketplace, we really view as kind of like a 2024, '25, '26, '27 evolution. Some of that is associated with the timeline of things that we're doing internally, but more of it I think is based on the marketplace.
The drivers that will open up that marketplace are things like 5G; as you know, everyone's advertising 5G, but you know as well as I do [that] the train has left the station, but it's not even halfway there. So it's the evolution of 5G, it's the continued development of IoT products, and associated AI with those IoT products closer to the end user.

And then fourth, the only thing that I think really helped accelerate it this year, COVID; not COVID itself, but creating that diverse work environment, which has changed how everyone's thinking about applications in the network and their proximity to the end users.

What kind of computing resources can you expect at the edge?

We think about it in terms of, generally speaking, data in motion or data at rest. If you think of data at rest, that's like a typical primary [server], whether it's in a hyperscaler like Google, Microsoft, or Amazon, or your own core data center. That's where you're keeping critical company data.

Processing and storing the data in motion, which I believe is what we're helping to solve for our edge use case, is the data that needs to be quickly accessed, stored and analyzed and then dumped, that you don't need to send back.

Here in Brookline near Boston, there's not a straight street in the whole damn town. And you have all the weather conditions, you have all the different traffic that changes on an hourly basis, and then you roll something forward like an autonomous car. To drive around and make a determination like "Hey, there's an accident up here," or "Hey, it's gonna start to snow, we need to go left or right," applications like that for an autonomous car to get a reliable, millisecond-quick decision are the data sets that we see moving towards [the edge].

It sounds like most of those are not going to be sort of your typical corporate applications.

From my perspective, the main corporate applications that would need to reside out there are ones that are time- or latency-sensitive. So for example, one of the applications that we're working on to be deployed at the edge is a VDI [virtual desktop infrastructure] solution. And this company made a VDI investment, but has struggled having their employees use it. Now, we've taken that VDI and they've rewritten that application so it's a bit lighter. And we're deploying that application closer to their employees or end users, and to marketplaces, to see if it works better for them.

What kind of network infrastructure investment do you need to have in order to really support this?

I believe when you roll it all forward, the more critical component of it will be network than actual processing or storage. We were initially a network-driven CDN company, so for us, connectivity was the star in the choosing point for all our locations.
The hyperscalers are attacking edge compute going out from their huge centralized clouds closer to their end users. I feel like someone like us or Fastly are doing the same thing, but we're starting by virtue of what we did with CDN out of the internet edge. We're attacking the edge compute market from different directions.

We're not trying to be everywhere on the globe, we're trying to be where we think are the 50, to top 100 places that you need to be to have a premier global network. And from there, we'll distribute to the edge as our customers need us to or as they would want us to, instead of trying to build out 3,000 POPs [points of presence] globally all over the place and throw dots all over a map and hope we're in the right place.

So certainly you know the hyperscalers have invested a lot in networking capabilities. When you think about their private transit networks, they're some of the best in the world. That would appear to give them a fair amount of capacity and capability to be able to extend these types of services and ideas pretty far out onto the edge as well.

There's no doubt that they have expansive networking capabilities. But at a high level, I think a majority of those are from those hyperscaler pods to other massive [internet exchanges] or data centers. Where the network that we've built or someone like Fastly is built, our networks are more expansive from the end user: that TV sitting in the house, a mobile phone in your hand or the car that you're driving around out towards the internet edge.

I'm not trying to compete with Google, Amazon, or Microsoft. I am trying to coexist to make sure that our platform or edge POPs are interoperable with all of those different providers or possible competitors.

From an application architectural standpoint, is there a lot of work that needs to be done to sort of make those applications edge-sensitive?

I'd say it's a fair amount of work. A majority of the work revolves around decoupling all of their applications to really be written in environments where you have data at rest, like in a large mammoth centralized data center, to a lighter-weight version of that as data in motion that is pushed out from the centralized location, and just gradually updates the core app. I don't think it's super easy, but I don't think it's super complex.

I'm thinking about the companies who are rewriting applications now for cloud, so if you make that effort to do that for cloud, then you have to make an additional effort to do it for edge...

I don't think it's going to be nearly as hard as writing an application to the cloud.

What are people overlooking about edge and decentralized computing?

To me, it's like we're back 15 years ago doing the whole cloud thing, where it's moved to the market and it's about how we get there and when we get there. I think it's going to be similar in that we have an evolution in technology, which is going to enable folks to think about their applications differently, and run them more efficiently in the future.

Even something crazy simple; my son, who was huge into baseball. I remember [a few years ago], we'd be coming back from baseball practice and I'd be like, "Let's get McDonald's on the way home," which when I was a kid that's like, hands down, yes, I'm all over it. And he's like, "No, we've got to go home."

He's looking to jump on the Xbox to play Fortnite. The reason none of these kids play something like Fortnite on the mobile phone is because the experience sucks because the throughput is bad. As 5G opens up, that's going to push companies to rethink their delivery model differently for the economic benefit from it.

Two years ago, my daughters were like, "Taylor Swift is coming to Gillette [Stadium], we're going to all stay up and we need everyone's device in the home, you can't go out of the home because it's not quick enough to sign up to get Taylor Swift tickets at 12:01 a.m." And I'm sitting there thinking to myself we've got zero chance, because they're all being served out of the Amazon data center probably on the East Coast, either in New York or in Montreal, and the people with the lowest ping time — milliseconds matter — are going to be able to get it.

Unless you're sitting right next to that data center, you're not getting something like edge delivery for both of those scenarios. You actually could create a fair marketplace where when people put something out that is either super expensive or super scarce, they can run that auction and a set point in time on my infrastructure or infrastructure like mine, where all the locations are out at the edge. That would provide a much more equal playing field for people.


The (gaming) clones never stopped attacking

Clones keep getting through app review despite App Store rules about copying. It's a sign of the weaknesses in mobile app stores — and the weakness in Big Tech’s after-the-fact moderation approach.

Clones aren't always illegal, but they are widely despised.

Image: Disney

Two of the most fundamental tenets of the mobile gaming market:

  1. Free always wins.
  2. No good gaming idea is safe from copycats.

In combination, these two rules help produce what the industry calls a clone. Most often, clones are low-effort, ripped-off versions of popular games that monetize in not-so-savory fashion while drawing in players with a price tag of zero.

Keep Reading Show less
Nick Statt
Nick Statt is Protocol's video game reporter. Prior to joining Protocol, he was news editor at The Verge covering the gaming industry, mobile apps and antitrust out of San Francisco, in addition to managing coverage of Silicon Valley tech giants and startups. He now resides in Rochester, New York, home of the garbage plate and, completely coincidentally, the World Video Game Hall of Fame. He can be reached at nstatt@protocol.com.
Sponsored Content

A CCO’s viewpoint on top enterprise priorities in 2022

The 2022 non-predictions guide to what your enterprise is working on starting this week

As Honeywell’s global chief commercial officer, I am privileged to have the vantage point of seeing the demands, challenges and dynamics that customers across the many sectors we cater to are experiencing and sharing.

This past year has brought upon all businesses and enterprises an unparalleled change and challenge. This was the case at Honeywell, for example, a company with a legacy in innovation and technology for over a century. When I joined the company just months before the pandemic hit we were already in the midst of an intense transformation under the leadership of CEO Darius Adamczyk. This transformation spanned our portfolio and business units. We were already actively working on products and solutions in advanced phases of rollouts that the world has shown a need and demand for pre-pandemic. Those included solutions in edge intelligence, remote operations, quantum computing, warehouse automation, building technologies, safety and health monitoring and of course ESG and climate tech which was based on our exceptional success over the previous decade.

Keep Reading Show less
Jeff Kimbell
Jeff Kimbell is Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer at Honeywell. In this role, he has broad responsibilities to drive organic growth by enhancing global sales and marketing capabilities. Jeff has nearly three decades of leadership experience. Prior to joining Honeywell in 2019, Jeff served as a Partner in the Transformation Practice at McKinsey & Company, where he worked with companies facing operational and financial challenges and undergoing “good to great” transformations. Before that, he was an Operating Partner at Silver Lake Partners, a global leader in technology and held a similar position at Cerberus Capital LP. Jeff started his career as a Manufacturing Team Manager and Engineering Project Manager at Procter & Gamble before becoming a strategy consultant at Bain & Company and holding executive roles at Dell EMC and Transamerica Corporation. Jeff earned a B.S. in electrical engineering at Kansas State University and an M.B.A. at Dartmouth College.

Beat Saber, Bored Apes and more: What to do this weekend

Don't know what to do this weekend? We've got you covered.

Images: Ross Belot/Flickr; IGBD; BAYC

This week we’re listening to “Harvest Moon” on repeat; burning some calories playing Beat Saber; and learning all about the artist behind the goofy ape pics that everyone (including Gwyneth Paltrow?) is talking about.

Neil Young: Off Spotify? No problem.

Neil Young removed his music from Spotify this week, but countless recordings are still available on YouTube, including this 1971 video of him performing “Heart of Gold” in front of a live studio audience, complete with some charming impromptu banter. And while you’re there, scroll down and read a few of the top-rated comments. I promise you won’t be disappointed.

'Archive 81': Not based on a book, but on a podcast!

Netflix’s latest hit show is a supernatural mystery horror mini-series, and I have to admit that I was on the fence about it many times, in part because the plot just often didn’t add up. But then the main character, Dan the film buff and archivist, would put on his gloves, get in the zone, and meticulously restore a severely damaged, decades old video tape, and proceed to look for some meaning beyond the images. That ritual, and the sentiment that we produce, consume and collect media for something more than meets the eye, ultimately saved the show, despite some shortcomings.

'Secrets of Sulphur Springs': Season 2 is out now

If you’re looking for a mystery that's a little more family-friendly, give this show about a haunted hotel, time travel, and kids growing up in a world that their parents don’t fully understand a try. Season 2 dropped on Disney+ this month, and it not only includes a lot more time travel mysteries, but even uses the show’s time machine to tackle subjects as serious as reparations.

The artist behind those Bored Apes

Remember how NFTs are supposed to generate royalties with every resale, and thus support artists better than any of their existing revenue streams? Seneca, the artist who was instrumental in creating those iconic apes for the Bored Ape Yacht Club, wasn’t able to share details about her compensation in this Rolling Stone profile, but it sure sounds like she is not getting her fair share.

Beat Saber: Update incoming

Years later, Beat Saber remains my favorite VR game, which is why I was very excited to see a teaser video for cascading blocks, which could be arriving any day now. Time to bust out the Quest for some practice time this weekend!

Correction: Story has been updated to correct the spelling of Gwyneth Paltrow's name. This story was updated Jan. 28, 2022.

Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Boost 2

Can Matt Mullenweg save the internet?

He's turning Automattic into a different kind of tech giant. But can he take on the trillion-dollar walled gardens and give the internet back to the people?

Matt Mullenweg, CEO of Automattic and founder of WordPress, poses for Protocol at his home in Houston, Texas.
Photo: Arturo Olmos for Protocol

In the early days of the pandemic, Matt Mullenweg didn't move to a compound in Hawaii, bug out to a bunker in New Zealand or head to Miami and start shilling for crypto. No, in the early days of the pandemic, Mullenweg bought an RV. He drove it all over the country, bouncing between Houston and San Francisco and Jackson Hole with plenty of stops in national parks. In between, he started doing some tinkering.

The tinkering is a part-time gig: Most of Mullenweg’s time is spent as CEO of Automattic, one of the web’s largest platforms. It’s best known as the company that runs WordPress.com, the hosted version of the blogging platform that powers about 43% of the websites on the internet. Since WordPress is open-source software, no company technically owns it, but Automattic provides tools and services and oversees most of the WordPress-powered internet. It’s also the owner of the booming ecommerce platform WooCommerce, Day One, the analytics tool Parse.ly and the podcast app Pocket Casts. Oh, and Tumblr. And Simplenote. And many others. That makes Mullenweg one of the most powerful CEOs in tech, and one of the most important voices in the debate over the future of the internet.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.


Mental health at work is still taboo. Here's how to make it easier.

Tech leaders, HR experts and organizational psychologists share tips for how to destigmatize mental health at work.

How to de-stigmatize mental health at work, according to experts.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

When the pandemic started, HR software startup Phenom knew that its employees were going to need mental health support. So it started offering a meditation program, as well as a counselor available for therapy sessions.

To Chief People Officer Brad Goldoor’s surprise, utilization of these benefits was very low, starting at about a 10% take rate and eventually weaning off. His diagnosis: People still aren’t fully comfortable opening up about mental health, and they’re especially not comfortable engaging with their employer on the topic.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol, where she writes about management, leadership and workplace issues in tech. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.


Robinhood's regulatory troubles are just the tip of the iceberg

It’s easiest to blame Robinhood’s troubles on regulatory fallout, but its those troubles have obscured the larger issue: The company lacks an enduring competitive edge.

A crypto comeback might go a long way to help Robinhood’s revenue

Image: Olena Panasovska / Alex Muravev / Protocol

It’s been a full year since Robinhood weathered the memestock storm, and the company is now in much worse shape than many of us would have guessed back in January 2021. After announcing its Q4 earnings last night, Robinhood’s stock plunged into the single digits — just below $10 — down from a recent high of $70 in August 2021. That means Robinhood’s valuation dropped more than 84% in less than six months.

Investor confidence won’t be bolstered much by yesterday’s earnings results. Total net revenues dropped to $363 million from $365 million in the preceding quarter. In the quarter before that, Robinhood reported a much better $565 million in net revenue. Net losses were bad but not quite as bad as before: Robinhood reported a $423 million net loss in Q4, an improvement from the $1.3 billion net loss in Q3 2021. One of the most shocking data points: Average revenue per user dropped to $64, down from a recent high of $137 in Q1 2021. At the same time, Robinhood actually reported a decrease in monthly active users, from 18.9 million in Q3 2021 to 17.3 million in Q4 2021.

Keep Reading Show less
Hirsh Chitkara

Hirsh Chitkara ( @HirshChitkara) is a is a reporter at Protocol focused on the intersection of politics, technology and society. Before joining Protocol, he helped write a daily newsletter at Insider that covered all things Big Tech. He's based in New York and can be reached at hchitkara@protocol.com.

Latest Stories