Why the supply chain crisis was so impossible to predict

A persistent lack of data about customer demand has made the supply chain feel like a guessing game. Startups and incumbents alike are trying to fix that.

Store aisle with empty shelves

A persistent lack of data about customer demand has made the supply chain feel like a guessing game.

Photo: Smith Collection/Gado/Getty Images

Click banner image for more Shopping Week coverage

Online retail during the upcoming holiday season is expected to be unprecedented, with consumers spending an estimated $200 billion, according to a forecast by Adobe. But supply chains were already cracking under the pressure of elevated demand long before the airwaves were blanketed in Black Friday ads.

Bolstered by stimulus checks, consumers who tightened their belts during the early days of the pandemic have been plowing their money into buying stuff like never before. This level of demand is undoubtedly a huge contributor to the current supply-chain crisis. But experts say that even without COVID-19, supply chains would still be struggling.

A persistent lack of data about customer demand has made the supply chain feel like a guessing game — a problem technologists and supply chain incumbents alike are racing to solve.

The market for supply-chain tech is booming. According to PitchBook, supply-chain tech startups raised $15 billion in funding just halfway through this year. By comparison, in 2020 it took the entire year to raise a similar amount. This need has helped startups like fulfillment solution company ShipBob, delivery platform Bringg and freight forwarder Sennder raise hundreds of millions to digitize the supply chain.

Amar Hanspal, founder and CEO of supply-chain automation company Bright Machines, is also passionate about taking the tech-resistant manufacturing sector into the 21st century. He wants to help the industry move beyond what he calls the "industrial revolution way," where manufacturers would build "100,000 of something, put it on a container ship, have it come over and then somebody says, 'I don't need 100,000, I only need 80,000, so chuck 20,000 in the landfill.'"

Because manufacturing has traditionally lacked data, matching supply and demand has mostly been asynchronous, Hanspal said. Manufacturing doesn't have the same real-time visibility as, say, ride-hailing apps. "They know the demand. They know the supply. They know where all the taxis are. They know where all the customers are, and they can do a perfect job of matching that," he said. In the manufacturing world, manufacturers often don't know what the demand is, so it's difficult to know if they have too much or too little supply.

By providing real-time data on the production process, Bright Machines aims to provide manufacturers with the visibility and transparency they typically lack. By embedding software into the assembly line, Bright Machines can track each product as it's being built, providing information on how much supply there is at any one moment and also how long it would take to build more. Hanspal describes this as the "Domino's Pizza Tracker" of manufacturing.

But getting better data about supply is only half of the equation. Predicting demand is the much harder part.

Retailers and wholesalers in the apparel industry, for example, saw a huge whipsaw in demand pre- and post-COVID, said Jason Miller, an associate supply-chain professor at Michigan State University. Before the pandemic, there was only a "couple percent growth every year in clothing and clothing demand," Miller said. Then, during the beginning of the pandemic, demand virtually disappeared. But recently, sales have rebounded to "about 15% above where they were in 2019," he said. "You went from basically selling nothing to, now, you're selling more than you've ever sold before."

Because retailers and wholesalers had to drop their inventory at the start of the pandemic, many of them were already running lean. But the volatility of the market has made them hesitant to add excess inventory. "Retailers and wholesalers are dealing with so much uncertainty right now about what demand is going to be in several months that it makes it very difficult to want to be aggressive when it comes to ordering large quantities of inventory because they don't want to be stuck with it," Miller said.

Blue Yonder, a supply-chain management company that builds demand-forecasting software, is one of the companies trying to change this. Shri Hariharan, a vice president at Blue Yonder, thinks there needs to be a shift in how supply-chain companies are trying to balance supply and demand.

Traditionally, historical purchasing data was used to anticipate what customer demand would be like in the future. "But now, that's all been upended," he said. History is no longer representative of what today and tomorrow will look like. That, Hariharan said, means companies need to stop being overly reliant on predictions that assume there's a "very linear [and] very static supply chain."

Since the majority of business is transacted digitally, there's also more data than ever, "whether it's at the point of manufacturing or within a warehouse or at a retail store or a stadium or a hospitality location," Hariharan said. Blue Yonder uses machine learning to mine hundreds of those data points to provide its demand projections. The software combines historical purchasing data with variables like interest rates, weather patterns, seasonality and more to predict customer demand for a given time period.

Hariharan said these forecasting models are helping customers "understand that there's a new normal of demand."

The question is: Could more data and better prediction software have prevented the supply-chain crisis? It might have helped, but Miller thinks the supply chain still wouldn't have been ready for the pandemic. "People have to understand that for the most part, no system could have been built to take the shocks of the pandemic, and [...] run profitably before the pandemic," he said. Supply chains are designed to be lean and efficient, not to have extra capacity that can accommodate large shocks.

The hope though, is that as technology progresses companies can at least anticipate the next disruption — and better equip the supply chain to respond.


No code, lots of rules: Why 'citizen data scientists' need guardrails

For all the talk of giving “citizen data scientists” new AI power, no-code AI tools have lots of limitations. And that’s by design.

The limitations imposed on no-code AI tools are about more than just limiting algorithm and coding options.

Image: Boris SV/Moment/Getty Images

When software providers talk about the technologies they say “democratize” AI, they also talk a lot about “guardrails.” That’s because the rapidly evolving world of AI tools is still more like a republic governed by the machine-learning elite.

Although no-code and low-code AI tools promise to give everyone a chance to build business analytics models or simple applications that use AI to complete tedious tasks, the amateurs whom no-code AI companies refer to as “citizen data scientists” are often required to play with the bumper rails up. That’s because toolmakers and management are worried about the risks inherent in allowing just anyone to create sophisticated AI systems.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

COVID-19 accelerated what many CEOs and CTOs have struggled to do for the past decade: It forced organizations to be agile and adjust quickly to change. For all the talk about digital transformation over the past decade, when push came to shove, many organizations realized they had made far less progress than they thought.

Now with the genie of rapid change out of the bottle, we will never go back to accepting slow and steady progress from our organizations. To survive and thrive in times of disruption, you need to build a resilient, adaptable business with systems and processes that will keep you nimble for years to come. An essential part of business agility is responding to change by quickly developing new applications and adapting old ones. IT faces an unprecedented demand for new applications. According to IDC, by 2023, more than 500 million digital applications and services will be developed and deployed — the same number of apps that were developed in the last 40 years.[1]

Keep Reading Show less
Denise Broady, CMO, Appian
Denise oversees the Marketing and Communications organization where she is responsible for accelerating the marketing strategy and brand recognition across the globe. Denise has over 24+ years of experience as a change agent scaling businesses from startups, turnarounds and complex software companies. Prior to Appian, Denise worked at SAP, WorkForce Software, TopTier and Clarkston Group. She is also a two-time published author of “GRC for Dummies” and “Driven to Perform.” Denise holds a double degree in marketing and production and operations from Virginia Tech.

The bitcoin crash has people talking about another crypto winter

Volatile crypto prices have scared consumers and companies away from the sector before — sometimes for extended periods.

“Crypto winter” is a prolonged period of flat trading following a price crash.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

The sharp drop in cryptocurrency prices has spurred fears that the notoriously volatile industry is about to go through another prolonged slump.

The market cycle has become such a predictable pattern — a steep decline in coin prices followed by a prolonged period of flat trading — that it even has a catchy name: crypto winter.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Signal at (510)731-8429.

Boost 2

Can Matt Mullenweg save the internet?

He's turning Automattic into a different kind of tech giant. But can he take on the trillion-dollar walled gardens and give the internet back to the people?

Matt Mullenweg, CEO of Automattic and founder of WordPress, poses for Protocol at his home in Houston, Texas.
Photo: Arturo Olmos for Protocol

In the early days of the pandemic, Matt Mullenweg didn't move to a compound in Hawaii, bug out to a bunker in New Zealand or head to Miami and start shilling for crypto. No, in the early days of the pandemic, Mullenweg bought an RV. He drove it all over the country, bouncing between Houston and San Francisco and Jackson Hole with plenty of stops in national parks. In between, he started doing some tinkering.

The tinkering is a part-time gig: Most of Mullenweg’s time is spent as CEO of Automattic, one of the web’s largest platforms. It’s best known as the company that runs WordPress.com, the hosted version of the blogging platform that powers about 43% of the websites on the internet. Since WordPress is open-source software, no company technically owns it, but Automattic provides tools and services and oversees most of the WordPress-powered internet. It’s also the owner of the booming ecommerce platform WooCommerce, Day One, the analytics tool Parse.ly and the podcast app Pocket Casts. Oh, and Tumblr. And Simplenote. And many others. That makes Mullenweg one of the most powerful CEOs in tech, and one of the most important voices in the debate over the future of the internet.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.


FAQ: Making sense of the fight over 5G

A two-year saga following telecom providers’ 5G technology came to a head the last two weeks. Let’s get caught up.

Airlines say 5G technology could interfere with a sensor used to detect a plane’s distance from the ground or other objects.

Image: Namthip Muanthongthae/Getty Images

The long awaited C-Band 5G rollout has been off to a rocky start.

The deployment of C-Band spectrum, which wireless carriers have praised as the key to wider 5G accessibility and faster network speeds, has been marred by controversy over safety concerns and delays. Telecom companies and aviation experts are still butting heads over whether the latest flavor of 5G and air travel can safely co-exist, a fight which has grounded flights and inevitably pissed off airlines.

Keep Reading Show less
Hirsh Chitkara

Hirsh Chitkara ( @HirshChitkara) is a is a reporter at Protocol focused on the intersection of politics, technology and society. Before joining Protocol, he helped write a daily newsletter at Insider that covered all things Big Tech. He's based in New York and can be reached at hchitkara@protocol.com.


Google is developing a low-end Chromecast with Google TV

The new dongle will run the Google TV interface, but it won’t support 4K streaming.

The Chromecast with Google TV dongle combined 4K streaming with the company’s Google TV interface. Now, Google is looking to launch a cheaper version.

Photo: Google

Google is working on a new streaming device that caters to people with older TV sets: The next Chromecast streaming dongle will run its Google TV interface and ship with a remote control, but it won’t support 4K streaming. The device will instead max out at a resolution of 1080p, Protocol has learned from a source with close knowledge of the company’s plans.

A Google spokesperson declined to comment.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Latest Stories