Troops, a 'Slackbot for Salesforce,' is cozying up to Microsoft

Slack and Salesforce helped Troops get off the ground, but the sales-automation startup is helping Microsoft build up the ecosystem of bots for Teams.

Microsoft Teams is getting a new partner.

Microsoft Teams is getting a new partner.

Photo: Mika Baumeister/Unsplash

For Microsoft Teams, the challenge is no longer getting partners to build integrations. Instead, the next hurdle is deepening those links to capture more of the daily work within an organization.

That's evident in the announcement by Microsoft on Tuesday that Troops.ai would join its startup program. The six-year-old company specializes in helping application providers connect into both Teams and Slack, as well as to other third-party software, tapping into a booming demand from enterprises to enable their employees to quickly build applications that begin to automate common business processes.

Troops is a relatively small startup, but the symbolic shift is clear. Troops was one of the earliest investments by the Slack Fund, and it called itself a "Slackbot for Salesforce." With Salesforce in the process of buying Slack, Microsoft is cozying up to a key partner that's delivering on some of the integration the merging companies are promising their deal will deliver.

Microsoft is not taking an equity stake in Troops, but the product teams will work closely together, indicating that Troops.ai's technology could play a bigger role in Microsoft's offerings in the future. Troops.ai will also migrate to Azure, which will plunge the company much deeper into the Microsoft universe. Despite that, Troops.ai CEO Dan Reich says the partnership with Slack (and by proxy, Salesforce) will be unchanged.

"We're going to continue to work with our customers, Slack included, and we're continuing to invest in the Slack ecosystem," he told Protocol.

This isn't the first time Microsoft has targeted a close Slack partner. In 2018, for example, the company acquired Slack-backed XOXCO, which developed the Botkit framework highlighted at the Slack Platform launch. Slack is just as close with Troops.ai; in addition to being one of the company's first startup investments, it's also a customer.

But while it could bruise some egos, Troops.ai joining Microsoft's startup program is not a huge blow to Slack or Salesforce. Its tech isn't revolutionary and functions similarly to an iPaaS vendor. Even Reich admits that others, including Microsoft, could duplicate it with enough engineering prowess. Troops' differentiator, he says, comes from doubling down on Slack and Teams and enabling customers to build applications on those platforms in drag-and-drop fashion.

"If you look at these ecosystems, what's happened is every different app or company tries to build their integration in a very, very different way," said Reich, which ultimately doesn't solve the problem of workers having to hop from application to application. "It's not about integration, it's much more about how they will run their most important business processes because that is where their people are living," he added.

Salesforce, of course, bought MuleSoft for this very reason. The strength of that pairing was evident in Salesforce's latest product offering, which will allow customers to pull in data from a variety of sources to one platform.

For Microsoft, Troops.ai helps to solve a key hurdle for the company, which is users leaving Teams to work within the native applications. The partnership appears to be a recognition that Microsoft can't just simply rush to increase the number of application providers that integrate into the platform. Instead, those links need to be deeper in order to deliver value for customers. And that requires courting vendors to invest the resources into making that possible.

"If you want to keep chasing $10,000 [small business] deals the rest of your life, then stay on Slack," said Jeff Ma, the vice president of Microsoft's startup program. "But if you really want to build for the enterprise and get million-dollar deals, the enterprise is on Teams."


A pro-China disinformation campaign is targeting rare earth miners

It’s uncommon for cyber criminals to target private industry. But a new operation has cast doubt on miners looking to gain a foothold in the West in an apparent attempt to protect China’s upper hand in a market that has become increasingly vital.

It is very uncommon for coordinated disinformation operations to target private industry, rather than governments or civil society, a cybersecurity expert says.

Photo: Goh Seng Chong/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Just when we thought the renewable energy supply chains couldn’t get more fraught, a sophisticated disinformation campaign has taken to social media to further complicate things.

Known as Dragonbridge, the campaign has existed for at least three years, but in the last few months it has shifted its focus to target several mining companies “with negative messaging in response to potential or planned rare earths production activities.” It was initially uncovered by cybersecurity firm Mandiant and peddles narratives in the Chinese interest via its network of thousands of fake social media accounts.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Some of the most astounding tech-enabled advances of the next decade, from cutting-edge medical research to urban traffic control and factory floor optimization, will be enabled by a device often smaller than a thumbnail: the memory chip.

While vast amounts of data are created, stored and processed every moment — by some estimates, 2.5 quintillion bytes daily — the insights in that code are unlocked by the memory chips that hold it and transfer it. “Memory will propel the next 10 years into the most transformative years in human history,” said Sanjay Mehrotra, president and CEO of Micron Technology.

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Ripple’s CEO threatens to leave the US if it loses SEC case

CEO Brad Garlinghouse said a few countries have reached out to Ripple about relocating.

"There's no doubt that if the SEC doesn't win their case against us that that is good for crypto in the United States,” Brad Garlinghouse told Protocol.

Photo: Stephen McCarthy/Sportsfile for Collision via Getty Images

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said the crypto company will move to another country if it loses in its legal battle with the SEC.

Garlinghouse said he’s confident that Ripple will prevail against the federal regulator, which accused the company of failing to register roughly $1.4 billion in XRP tokens as securities.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


The Supreme Court’s EPA ruling is bad news for tech regulation, too

The justices just gave themselves a lot of discretion to smack down agency rules.

The ruling could also endanger work on competition issues by the FTC and net neutrality by the FCC.

Photo: Geoff Livingston/Getty Images

The Supreme Court’s decision last week gutting the Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to regulate greenhouse gas emissions didn’t just signal the conservative justices’ dislike of the Clean Air Act at a moment of climate crisis. It also served as a warning for anyone that would like to see more regulation of Big Tech.

At the heart of Chief Justice John Roberts’ decision in West Virginia v. EPA was a codification of the “major questions doctrine,” which, he wrote, requires “clear congressional authorization” when agencies want to regulate on areas of great “economic and political significance.”

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.


Microsoft and Google are still using emotion AI, but with limits

Microsoft said accessibility goals overrode problems with emotion recognition and Google offers off-the-shelf emotion recognition technology amid growing concern over the controversial AI.

Emotion recognition is a well-established field of computer vision research; however, AI-based technologies used in an attempt to assess people’s emotional states have moved beyond the research phase.

Photo: Microsoft

Microsoft said last month it would no longer provide general use of an AI-based cloud software feature used to infer people’s emotions. However, despite its own admission that emotion recognition technology creates “risks,” it turns out the company will retain its emotion recognition capability in an app used by people with vision loss.

In fact, amid growing concerns over development and use of controversial emotion recognition in everyday software, both Microsoft and Google continue to incorporate the AI-based features in their products.

“The Seeing AI person channel enables you to recognize people and to get a description of them, including an estimate of their age and also their emotion,” said Saqib Shaikh, a software engineering manager and project lead for Seeing AI at Microsoft who helped build the app, in a tutorial about the product in a 2017 Microsoft video.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories