Apple has turned its walled garden into a labyrinth

At stake are its App Store revenues, which mostly come from games.

Apple has turned its walled garden into a labyrinth

And it may drag out its App Store fight for years to come.

Image: Apple

Apple has been waging a policy war against regulators around the globe to defend the App Store’s 30% commission, and last week it took a particularly ugly turn in the Netherlands. It was Apple’s most brazen attempt to defend against an anticompetition challenge to the App Store to date, and it illustrates the extensive lengths to which the company will go to defend the iPhone’s walled garden.

This fight is about dating apps, but the implications are universal. After the Dutch competition regulator, the Authority for Consumers and Markets, began slapping Apple with weekly 5 million-euro fines for its failure to comply with a new law that allows in-app payment alternatives for dating apps, the iPhone-maker proposed a new solution.

  • Instead of a 30% commission, Apple would take one that’s 27%, but it would make the process of qualifying and implementing that lower commission so onerous that it would effectively cost an app-maker the same, if not more, than sticking with Apple’s built-in option.
  • “You can just feel how much they despise having to do any of this. They’re making non-App-Store payments as painful, expensive, and clunky as the regulators will tolerate,” wrote app developer Marco Arment, who said Apple’s solution here provides a roadmap to how it will likely try to skirt similar regulations in other markets for more than just dating apps.
  • Outspoken Apple critic and developer Steve Troughton-Smith called it “absolutely vile,” adding, “Everybody on their executive team should be ashamed, and some of them should not be here when it’s all over. We all see you.”

Dating apps are lucrative, but mobile games are the gold mine. Apple has steadfastly defended its App Store policies and restrictions for years, and it’s done so more publicly of late in the antitrust lawsuit from Epic Games and in the many small concessions it has made to keep regulators at bay in the months since the Fortnite trial last May. At stake are its App Store revenues, which mostly come from games.

  • Apple paid out roughly $60 billion to developers last year after taking somewhere between 15% to 30% of all in-app spending on digital goods. According to Sensor Tower, mobile gaming makes up roughly 67% of all in-app spending, with Apple generating close to double what Google does in store revenue.
  • Apple has cited security concerns and privacy risks for its rules against sideloading and its restrictions on allowing alternative payment options. But Tim Cook, during his testimony in the Fortnite trial, also characterized Apple’s approach as a way to recoup R&D investment and help it maintain control over the iOS app ecosystem.
  • Although Apple largely won its case against Epic, the company proceeded to successfully fight a court order that would force it to loosen restrictions on alternative payment systems. The order is now on hold pending ongoing appeals.

Apple may drag out App Store fights for years. The Netherlands and South Korea have so far attempted the most direct strikes against the App Store model to date, and Apple has responded by trying to circumvent regulations and make the lives of developers more difficult.

  • South Korea is still awaiting a proposed solution from Apple, and Dutch regulators said they were “disappointed in Apple’s behavior and actions.” The ACM will continue to fine the company weekly until it comes up with a solution it deems compliant. (Meanwhile, Apple is appealing the ACM’s decision.)
  • The U.S. is trying its own form of app store regulation with the Open App Markets Act and the American Innovation and Choice Online Act, both of which seek to limit Apple and Google’s power over in-app purchasing and other restrictions on third-party developers.
  • Apple responded to the Open App Markets Act by sending a letter last week to the Senate Judiciary Committee saying the bill, which would permit sideloading, would allow social media companies to violate user privacy and security.

You may be wondering why a company that earned almost $100 billion in profit last year is fighting so vigorously for what is one of the smaller parts of its business. But as the Fortnite trial made clear, Apple sees the App Store and its control over the iOS app ecosystem as paramount to the iPhone experience and a vital sector of its services business, which has become one of Apple’s fastest-growing and most profitable divisions. Central to those healthy margins is the Apple Tax, which the company seems more determined than ever to defend to the death.

A version of this story also appeared in today’s Entertainment newsletter; subscribe here.


Inside Amazon’s free video strategy

Amazon has been doubling down on original content for Freevee, its ad-supported video service, which has seen a lot of growth thanks to a deep integration with other Amazon properties.

Freevee’s investment into original programming like 'Bosch: Legacy' has increased by 70%.

Photo: Tyler Golden/Amazon Freevee

Amazon’s streaming efforts have long been all about Prime Video. So the company caught pundits by surprise when, in early 2019, it launched a stand-alone ad-supported streaming service called IMDb Freedive, with Techcrunch calling the move “a bit odd.”

Nearly four years and two rebrandings later, Amazon’s ad-supported video efforts appear to be flourishing. Viewership of the service grew by 138% from 2020 to 2021, according to Amazon. The company declined to share any updated performance data on the service, which is now called Freevee, but a spokesperson told Protocol the performance of originals in particular “exceeded expectations,” leading Amazon to increase investments into original content by 70% year-over-year.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Wall Street is warming up to crypto

Secure, well-regulated technology infrastructure could draw more large banks to crypto.

Technology infrastructure for crypto has begun to mature.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Despite a downturn in crypto markets, more large institutional investors are seeking to invest in crypto.

One factor holding them back is a lack of infrastructure for large institutions compared to what exists in the traditional, regulated capital markets.

Keep Reading Show less
Tomio Geron

Tomio Geron ( @tomiogeron) is a San Francisco-based reporter covering fintech. He was previously a reporter and editor at The Wall Street Journal, covering venture capital and startups. Before that, he worked as a staff writer at Forbes, covering social media and venture capital, and also edited the Midas List of top tech investors. He has also worked at newspapers covering crime, courts, health and other topics. He can be reached at tgeron@protocol.com or tgeron@protonmail.com.


How I decided to go all-in on a federal contract — before assignment

Amanda Renteria knew Code for America could help facilitate access to expanded child tax credits. She also knew there was no guarantee her proof of concept would convince others — but tried anyway.

Code for America CEO Amanda Renteria explained how it's helped people claim the Child Tax Credit.

Photo: Code for America

Click banner image for more How I decided series

After the American Rescue Plan Act passed in March 2021, the U.S. government expanded child tax credits to provide relief for American families during the pandemic. The legislation allowed some families to nearly double their tax benefits per child, which was especially critical for low-income families, who disproportionately bore the financial brunt of the pandemic.

Keep Reading Show less
Hirsh Chitkara

Hirsh Chitkara ( @HirshChitkara) is a reporter at Protocol focused on the intersection of politics, technology and society. Before joining Protocol, he helped write a daily newsletter at Insider that covered all things Big Tech. He's based in New York and can be reached at hchitkara@protocol.com.


This carbon capture startup wants to clean up the worst polluters

The founder and CEO of point-source carbon capture company Carbon Clean discusses what the startup has learned, the future of carbon capture technology, as well as the role of companies like his in battling the climate crisis.

Carbon Clean CEO Aniruddha Sharma told Protocol that fossil fuels are necessary, at least in the near term, to lift the living standards of those who don’t have access to cars and electricity.

Photo: Carbon Clean

Carbon capture and storage has taken on increasing importance as companies with stubborn emissions look for new ways to meet their net zero goals. For hard-to-abate industries like cement and steel production, it’s one of the few options that exist to help them get there.

Yet it’s proven incredibly challenging to scale the technology, which captures carbon pollution at the source. U.K.-based company Carbon Clean is leading the charge to bring down costs. This year, it raised a $150 million series C round, which the startup said is the largest-ever funding round for a point-source carbon capture company.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol covering climate. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.

Latest Stories