Entertainment

The (gaming) clones never stopped attacking

Clones keep getting through app review despite App Store rules about copying. It's a sign of the weaknesses in mobile app stores — and the weakness in Big Tech’s after-the-fact moderation approach.

Screenshot from Star Wars Episode II of thousands of clones in an army

Clones aren't always illegal, but they are widely despised.

Image: Disney

Two of the most fundamental tenets of the mobile gaming market:

  1. Free always wins.
  2. No good gaming idea is safe from copycats.

In combination, these two rules help produce what the industry calls a clone. Most often, clones are low-effort, ripped-off versions of popular games that monetize in not-so-savory fashion while drawing in players with a price tag of zero.

Cloning has been around since the days of Atari’s Pong, but the concept took on new life in the mobile market and, more recently, reared its ugly head after two high-profile clones went viral on Apple’s App Store and Google Play: one of popular daily word game Wordle, and the other of the zen organization hit Unpacking. Each of these episodes speaks to the state of mobile gaming and app store moderation in unique ways, and illustrates just how hard it is today to protect a good idea from the wrong hands.

Clones are not always illegal, but they are widely despised. Mobile app stores are full of games that borrow popular Nintendo characters or try to swindle unsuspecting consumers into buying overpriced garbage.

  • These apps are easier to produce than a full-blown console or PC game, and they typically don’t survive long on app stores or ever go viral. Clones, however, are trickier, because they are in some cases well-made and savvily produced copycats that walk the fine line between inspiration and ripoff.
  • In the case of Wordle, a game that itself is based on many prior word games, a developer unaffiliated with creator Josh Wardle openly touted his clone as the official Wordle app, using the name (though it was not trademarked) and hawking a $30 per year subscription. For many, this crossed the line, even if Wardle had no intention of going after the developer.
  • The case of Unpacking was equally egregious, but in a different way. Indie studio Witch Beam’s hit game is available on game consoles and computers, but not smartphones. The lack of mobile port inspired game publisher SayGames to launch Unpacking Master, a shameless copy of Witch Beam’s creation though with its own art style.
  • Both games were eventually removed by Apple. In the case of Unpacking Master, SayGames voluntarily removed its Android version and apologized, too. But this was only after scores of other clones began populating both stores and developers and fans made a lot of noise on Twitter and elsewhere. Witch Beam in particular brought attention to its clone with a viral Twitter thread.

Video games are built on borrowing. Generally speaking, copyright law covers the expression of an idea, but not the idea itself. That’s why you can play a new game today that, for instance, looks and feels like Super Mario or The Legend of Zelda or Grand Theft Auto but qualifies as an all-new creation. The line is hazy, however, and there is inconsistent legal precedent that defines what is and isn’t permitted in the realm of game design.

  • Game developers large and small often iterate on existing ideas, from an interesting macro game design concept to a specific application of a rule that governs how a game is played. And it’s not always clear what legal recourse a developer has available to them, or under what circumstances it’s even warranted.
  • Additionally, it’s often costly and potentially fruitless to take another game-maker to court over cloning unless someone has in some obvious way infringed on a copyright or trademark, like direct reproduction of code, art assets and music, or reuse of trademarked character names and titles. Witch Beam may have had a strong case with Unpacking Master, but it would have cost it to find out.
  • “We're a tiny indie team, and even with the success we have achieved, we still don't have the resources to pursue companies trying to use our game's distinct look and feel to make a quick buck. We have to rely on storefronts like the App Store to better curate their content,” the studio explained.

Apple and Google keep slipping up. App stores have rules around copying other apps and media, and Apple in particular has for years cracked down on viral clones when they earn media attention. (Remember Flappy Bird?) But clones keep getting through app review, exposing the weaknesses in mobile app stores and Big Tech’s after-the-fact moderation approach.

  • The App Store and Google Play have long been breeding grounds for all kinds of fraud, scams and other security and privacy risks. Mobile gaming provides an easy avenue for all three, often wrapped up in a free-to-play disguise and easily hidden from reviewers, who now check thousands of apps submitted per day to each platform.
  • A cornerstone of Epic’s legal argument in the Fortnite antitrust trial was casting Apple’s moderation and store policies as haphazard and inconsistent. And despite its victory in the case, Apple’s iron grip on the App Store has weakened in the months since the trial through regulatory concessions, though it has so far managed to keep the hugely lucrative mobile gaming category on a tight leash.
  • Both Apple and Google benefit by collecting commissions from apps, including cloned games and especially those with exploitative monetization. So long as it doesn’t pose a public relations problem (or a legal risk), tech companies tend not to overcorrect on moderating such content or feel any incentive to address the core problem.

Stopping clones may seem like an impossible task. So long as it remains relatively cost-effective to produce and self-publish a quick mobile app and there continues to be little risk to copying someone else’s game idea, the industry will continue fighting this practice.

Console and PC gaming may be somewhat insulated here due to the cost and difficulty of big-budget game development. Yet that still doesn’t stop a good idea from turning into an industry gold mine; just look at battle royale progenitor PUBG, the owners of which are now suing a rival (and Apple and Google) over alleged copyright infringement.

Right now, the path of least resistance and, unfortunately, the best chance of success is to be angry on Twitter and hope someone at a tech company takes notice. But there should be a better way to protect creators and crack down on clones. Because they won’t stop coming until there is.

A version of this story also appeared in today's Protocol Entertainment newsletter; subscribe here.

LA is a growing tech hub. But not everyone may fit.

LA has a housing crisis similar to Silicon Valley’s. And single-family-zoning laws are mostly to blame.

As the number of tech companies in the region grows, so does the number of tech workers, whose high salaries put them at an advantage in both LA's renting and buying markets.

Photo: Nat Rubio-Licht/Protocol

LA’s tech scene is on the rise. The number of unicorn companies in Los Angeles is growing, and the city has become the third-largest startup ecosystem nationally behind the Bay Area and New York with more than 4,000 VC-backed startups in industries ranging from aerospace to creators. As the number of tech companies in the region grows, so does the number of tech workers. The city is quickly becoming more and more like Silicon Valley — a new startup and a dozen tech workers on every corner and companies like Google, Netflix, and Twitter setting up offices there.

But with growth comes growing pains. Los Angeles, especially the burgeoning Silicon Beach area — which includes Santa Monica, Venice, and Marina del Rey — shares something in common with its namesake Silicon Valley: a severe lack of housing.

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.

While there remains debate among economists about whether we are officially in a full-blown recession, the signs are certainly there. Like most executives right now, the outlook concerns me.

In any case, businesses aren’t waiting for the official pronouncement. They’re already bracing for impact as U.S. inflation and interest rates soar. Inflation peaked at 9.1% in June 2022 — the highest increase since November 1981 — and the Federal Reserve is targeting an interest rate of 3% by the end of this year.

Keep Reading Show less
Nancy Sansom

Nancy Sansom is the Chief Marketing Officer for Versapay, the leader in Collaborative AR. In this role, she leads marketing, demand generation, product marketing, partner marketing, events, brand, content marketing and communications. She has more than 20 years of experience running successful product and marketing organizations in high-growth software companies focused on HCM and financial technology. Prior to joining Versapay, Nancy served on the senior leadership teams at PlanSource, Benefitfocus and PeopleMatter.

Policy

SFPD can now surveil a private camera network funded by Ripple chair

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors approved a policy that the ACLU and EFF argue will further criminalize marginalized groups.

SFPD will be able to temporarily tap into private surveillance networks in certain circumstances.

Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Ripple chairman and co-founder Chris Larsen has been funding a network of security cameras throughout San Francisco for a decade. Now, the city has given its police department the green light to monitor the feeds from those cameras — and any other private surveillance devices in the city — in real time, whether or not a crime has been committed.

This week, San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors approved a controversial plan to allow SFPD to temporarily tap into private surveillance networks during life-threatening emergencies, large events, and in the course of criminal investigations, including investigations of misdemeanors. The decision came despite fervent opposition from groups, including the ACLU of Northern California and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which say the police department’s new authority will be misused against protesters and marginalized groups in a city that has been a bastion for both.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Enterprise

These two AWS vets think they can finally solve enterprise blockchain

Vendia, founded by Tim Wagner and Shruthi Rao, wants to help companies build real-time, decentralized data applications. Its product allows enterprises to more easily share code and data across clouds, regions, companies, accounts, and technology stacks.

“We have this thesis here: Cloud was always the missing ingredient in blockchain, and Vendia added it in,” Wagner (right) told Protocol of his and Shruthi Rao's company.

Photo: Vendia

The promise of an enterprise blockchain was not lost on CIOs — the idea that a database or an API could keep corporate data consistent with their business partners, be it their upstream supply chains, downstream logistics, or financial partners.

But while it was one of the most anticipated and hyped technologies in recent memory, blockchain also has been one of the most failed technologies in terms of enterprise pilots and implementations, according to Vendia CEO Tim Wagner.

Keep Reading Show less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.

Fintech

Kraken's CEO got tired of being in finance

Jesse Powell tells Protocol the bureaucratic obligations of running a financial services business contributed to his decision to step back from his role as CEO of one of the world’s largest crypto exchanges.

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Kraken is going through a major leadership change after what has been a tough year for the crypto powerhouse, and for departing CEO Jesse Powell.

The crypto market is still struggling to recover from a major crash, although Kraken appears to have navigated the crisis better than other rivals. Despite his exchange’s apparent success, Powell found himself in the hot seat over allegations published in The New York Times that he made insensitive comments on gender and race that sparked heated conversations within the company.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Latest Stories
Bulletins