Google's big audio investments hint at ambitious plans for headphones

The company has acquired at least four startups and teams in the space over the past 15 months.

Woman wearing Google earbuds

There are a number of reasons why Google may purchase companies and their IP in the audio field.

Photo: Google

Google has been on an audio startup buying spree: It’s undertaken four separate transactions over the past 15 months, spending tens of millions of dollars to acquire IP, tech and talent in the field of audio hardware. These acquisitions could help the company beef up its wireless earbuds, and possibly defend itself against future patent litigation.

A Google spokesperson declined to comment.

Google kicked off its audio hardware-buying binge in December 2020, when it inked a deal with longtime partner Synaptics to take over parts of the company’s audio hardware business. The deal, which hasn’t been previously reported, totaled $35 million, according to regulatory filings. In exchange, Google got its hands on audio hardware parents and patent applications covering things like “Balanced stereo headphones” and “Active Noise Canceling Earbuds.”

Google also took over some Synaptics staff, including VP and GM of Audio Trausti Thormundsson, who previously served as CTO of Conexant, an audio hardware company that itself was acquired by Synaptics in 2017 and was key to the company’s audio hardware efforts. As for what the team is now working on at Google, one of Thormundsson’s co-workers summed it up this way on LinkedIn: “Silicon - Audio - Power - Wearables.”

The same month, Google also acquired 3D audio startup Dysonics for an undisclosed amount. The deal, which was first reported by Protocol last year, included both patents and talent; Dysonics had previously developed 3D audio authoring software and motion-tracking hardware for headphones. The technology developed by Dysonics could help Google add spatial audio to future headphone projects, among other things.

Google’s spending spree continued in 2021, when it acquired the IP of RevX Technologies, a defunct Austin-based startup that had built a small portable device to optimize in-ear monitors for performing musicians. The gadget gained praise from artists including Black Eyed Peas rapper Taboo, jazz musician Cindy Blackman and former Guns N’ Roses drummer Matt Sorum.

As part of the deal, which hasn’t been previously reported, RevX CTO Dennis Rauschmayer took a gig at Google, where he now works as an “algorithm architect,” according to his LinkedIn profile. Patents included in the deal cover noise-cancellation approaches for headphones through in-ear microphones, among other things.

Finally, Google acquired French audio wearables startup Tempow in May 2021 for a reported purchase price of $17.4 million. Tempow had been developing what it called “the first OS for true wireless earbuds” and had commercial relationships with Android handset makers like Motorola and TCL.

Some of the patents and patent applications included in that acquisition deal with “Switching between multiple earbud architectures” and “low latency Bluetooth earbuds,” among other things. In addition to the IP, it appears that the majority of Tempow’s 21 employees also found their way to Google.

There are a number of reasons why Google may purchase companies and their IP in this field. The acquisitions could be defensive, with Google looking to bolster its patent portfolio against any future lawsuits. The company is currently embroiled in a legal fight with Sonos over alleged patent infringement; it recently had to disable some features to avoid an import ban for its devices.

However, the fact that Google has also hired entire teams as part of these deals suggests that it is looking to use the companies to improve its own audio products. And it’s been staffing up further: Google hired longtime Bose engineer Peter Liu in early 2021. Liu was a member of the board of directors of the Bluetooth SIG for multiple years and participated in developing the Bluetooth LE Audio standard, which will play a key role in next-generation audio wearables.

Job listings also show that Google is looking to run an experimental acoustics lab for audio technology innovations in Irvine, California, where most of the former Synaptics employees are working. And the company is hiring for multiple positions to develop custom audio silicon “that brings to life key features that distinguish our first-party devices."

Taken together, the acquisitions, hires and related moves suggest that Google is working on substantially expanding its audio hardware business, with wearables being a key focus. The company first entered the earbud market with the Pixel Buds in 2017; it has since released two additional iterations. Google stopped selling the second-generation Pixel Buds sometime last summer, suggesting that a refresh may be on the way.


Why Microsoft needs to drag Call of Duty into the future

Microsoft’s biggest challenge with Call of Duty has nothing to do with Sony. It’s about modernizing the franchise for a cross-platform and subscription future.

Microsoft’s potential ownership of the series presents a particularly thorny set of problems for Sony.

Photo: Jerod Harris/Getty Images for Activision

Microsoft and Sony have been waging an increasingly bitter battle over Call of Duty. Over the past two weeks, the feud has spilled out into the public through regulatory filings in countries like Brazil and New Zealand, which, unlike the U.S., publish such documents for all to see.

Microsoft’s goal is to convince regulators worldwide that its landmark acquisition of Call of Duty parent Activision Blizzard for close to $70 billion should get the greenlight. Sony's goal, on the other hand, is to raise the alarm about its primary gaming rival owning one of its biggest cash cows, and whether the PlayStation playbook of platform exclusivity might be turned against Sony if Microsoft decides to make Call of Duty exclusive in some way to Xbox or its Game Pass subscription service.

Keep Reading Show less
Nick Statt

Nick Statt is Protocol's video game reporter. Prior to joining Protocol, he was news editor at The Verge covering the gaming industry, mobile apps and antitrust out of San Francisco, in addition to managing coverage of Silicon Valley tech giants and startups. He now resides in Rochester, New York, home of the garbage plate and, completely coincidentally, the World Video Game Hall of Fame. He can be reached at nstatt@protocol.com.

Sponsored Content

How cybercrime is going small time

Blockbuster hacks are no longer the norm – causing problems for companies trying to track down small-scale crime

Cybercrime is often thought of on a relatively large scale. Massive breaches lead to painful financial losses, bankrupting companies and causing untold embarrassment, splashed across the front pages of news websites worldwide. That’s unsurprising: cyber events typically cost businesses around $200,000, according to cybersecurity firm the Cyentia Institute. One in 10 of those victims suffer losses of more than $20 million, with some reaching $100 million or more.

That’s big money – but there’s plenty of loot out there for cybercriminals willing to aim lower. In 2021, the Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) received 847,376 complaints – reports by cybercrime victims – totaling losses of $6.9 billion. Averaged out, each victim lost $8,143.

Keep Reading Show less
Chris Stokel-Walker

Chris Stokel-Walker is a freelance technology and culture journalist and author of "YouTubers: How YouTube Shook Up TV and Created a New Generation of Stars." His work has been published in The New York Times, The Guardian and Wired.


'Never Have I Ever' is back for season 3, and more weekend recs

Don’t know what to do this weekend? We’ve got you covered.

Image: Netflix; FitXR; Knopf

This week is all about magic: “Light & Magic” on Disney+ takes us behind the scenes of Disney’s special effects unit; “The Swimmers” reminds us how magical life can be; and “Never Have I Ever,” Mindy Kaling’s Netflix comedy, invokes the magic of “Gilmore Girls,” but for Gen Z.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.


CJ Moses is CISO at AWS, but service leaders own their own security

Moses, a former FBI tech leader and one-time AWS customer, thinks Amazon’s culture of ownership helps him secure AWS because executives are taught that they are directly responsible for the security of their services.

"That mental model, that starting from scratch building and continuing to do so and never wavering … that model is why we are the most secure."

Photo: AWS

AWS customers are used to hearing about the cloud provider’s “shared responsibility” model when it comes to security, which means that while AWS promises customers it won’t allow its servers and networks to be compromised, customers still have to do the work of securing their own applications. Inside the company, however, the buck stops with the head of each service offered by AWS.

“Service leaders are responsible for the profit/loss, success/failure and, most of all, the security,” said CJ Moses, AWS’ chief information security officer (CISO) since January. “There are no excuses or finger pointing, so leaders don’t leave security success to chance, but rather actively own it.”

Keep Reading Show less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.


A shake-up could be coming for banks working with crypto

The OCC is facing calls to pull guidance allowing banks to conduct some crypto-related business.

Lawmakers including Sens. Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders fear crypto could introduce systemic risk to banking without strict guardrails.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

As efforts to pass federal crypto legislation are maybe, finally picking up steam in Washington, so, too, is the debate about how traditional banks should approach the sector.

A group of progressive senators including Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders are calling on a federal banking regulator to pull Trump-era guidance that gives banks limited clearance to engage in crypto-related business.

Keep Reading Show less
Ryan Deffenbaugh
Ryan Deffenbaugh is a reporter at Protocol focused on fintech. Before joining Protocol, he reported on New York's technology industry for Crain's New York Business. He is based in New York and can be reached at rdeffenbaugh@protocol.com.
Latest Stories