Magic Leap doubled the field of view in Magic Leap 2. For Magic Leap 3, it wants to double it again.

It also switched its OS to Android, a big step toward an enterprise-ready AR solution.

Magic Leap headset

Magic Leap CEO Peggy Johnson attributed her company’s success in the space to its choice of display technology.

Photo: Magic Leap

Magic Leap 2, which is going to be publicly released in Q3 of this year, will include tech that doubles the field of view, an issue that Magic Leap CEO Peggy Johnson said is “the hardest problem to solve” for the still-nascent AR hardware industry. Now, the company is looking to double the field of view again for a future Magic Leap 3 device. “The engineers think they can do it again,” Johnson told Protocol.

Johnson attributed her company’s success in the space to its choice of display technology. Johnson and newly appointed CTO Julie Larson-Green also touted the company’s decision to switch to an Android operating system as a big step toward an enterprise-ready AR solution.

The Magic Leap 2 headset uses liquid crystal on silicon displays with a 70-degree diagonal field of view. The company specifically increased the vertical field of view, meaning that people wearing the headset won’t have to move their head up and down as much to look at bigger AR objects.

The device has a new dimming feature that allows wearers to darken the background almost entirely for a more VR-like experience. During a demo in San Francisco this week, the company showed off both global dimming, which darkened the entire screen, as well as local dimming, which was used to selectively darken the background behind an AR object.

Magic Leap began making the second-generation headset available to select partners at the end of last year. The company is now working on finalizing software that helps enterprises use the product and is looking to make it more widely available to developers in June. By the end of September, the device should be available via retail enterprise channels for a price “not far above” the $2,295 the company charged for its predecessor, according to Johnson.

The new headset will once again ship with an external compute unit. “At this point, the state of the technology for fully immersive AR is such that we still don't think that you want the weight or the thermal built into the headset,” Johnson said. The company will also make an external battery pack available, which allows frontline workers to use it all day, she said.

Magic Leap 2 will come with an external controller that can be used in addition to hand gestures. However, Magic Leap changed the tracking technology in the controller, replacing magnetic tracking with a combination of LEDs and two inside-out cameras integrated directly into the controller. This should improve the controller’s accuracy in a variety of scenarios, including without line-of-sight from the headset itself.

Another big change for the company was a switch to an AOSP-based version of Android. Magic Leap 1 used a custom OS called Lumin with some Android roots. “We've been enjoying the flexibility of moving to Android because it opens up the developer ecosystem,” Johnson said.

“It was super validating when Meta made the same choice,” Larson-Green added, referring to reports that Meta recently halted efforts to build its own proprietary operating system for its upcoming AR glasses. Switching to Android also means that legacy apps developed for Magic Leap 1 won’t work on the new headset out of the box, but Larson-Green said that porting wouldn’t be too difficult.

Asked about reported challenges at Microsoft’s HoloLens division and their implications for the broader AR market, Johnson acknowledged that making AR hardware is “really, really hard.” However, she argued that Magic Leap’s experience in the space, and its vertically integrated manufacturing, give the company a competitive advantage as it prepares to target enterprise customers in health care, defense and manufacturing. Magic Leap produces optical components in its own factory in South Florida and assembles the headset in Mexico, insulating it from some of the supply chain issues the industry has been struggling with.

Having direct access to the factory also helped the company optimize manufacturing itself, Johnson said. “Our yield rates on the eyepieces are 92%,” she said. Competitors have in the past struggled with high failure rates of optical components, which at times has led to delayed device launches.

Johnson said that although Magic Leap is already working on a next-generation headset, the company wants to learn from how customers will use Magic Leap 2. But don’t expect a smartphone-like release cycle anytime soon: Johnson said that the industry will likely move at a slower pace for the time being. “As the silicon starts to integrate and we are able to take out componentry, that'll drive a faster cadence,” she said.


This carbon capture startup wants to clean up the worst polluters

The founder and CEO of point-source carbon capture company Carbon Clean discusses what the startup has learned, the future of carbon capture technology, as well as the role of companies like his in battling the climate crisis.

Carbon Clean CEO Aniruddha Sharma told Protocol that fossil fuels are necessary, at least in the near term, to lift the living standards of those who don’t have access to cars and electricity.

Photo: Carbon Clean

Carbon capture and storage has taken on increasing importance as companies with stubborn emissions look for new ways to meet their net zero goals. For hard-to-abate industries like cement and steel production, it’s one of the few options that exist to help them get there.

Yet it’s proven incredibly challenging to scale the technology, which captures carbon pollution at the source. U.K.-based company Carbon Clean is leading the charge to bring down costs. This year, it raised a $150 million series C round, which the startup said is the largest-ever funding round for a point-source carbon capture company.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol covering climate. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Why companies cut staff after raising millions

Are tech firms blowing millions in funding just weeks after getting it? Experts say it's more complicated than that.

Bolt, Trade Republic, HomeLight, and Stord all drew attention from funding announcements that happened just weeks or days before layoffs.

Photo: Pulp Photography/Getty Images

Fintech startup Bolt was one of the first tech companies to slash jobs, cutting 250 employees, or a third of its staff, in May. For some workers, the pain of layoffs was a shock not only because they were the first, but also because the cuts came just four months after Bolt had announced a $355 million series E funding round and achieved a peak valuation of $11 billion.

“Bolt employees were blind sided because the CEO was saying just weeks ago how everything is fine,” an anonymous user wrote on the message board Blind. “It has been an extremely rough day for 1/3 of Bolt employees,” another user posted. “Sadly, I was one of them who was let go after getting a pay-raise just a couple of weeks ago.”

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.


The fight to define the carbon offset market's future

The world’s largest carbon offset issuer is fighting a voluntary effort to standardize the industry. And the fate of the climate could hang in the balance.

It has become increasingly clear that scaling the credit market will first require clear standards and transparency.

Kevin Frayer/Getty Images

There’s a major fight brewing over what kind of standards will govern the carbon offset market.

A group of independent experts looking to clean up the market’s checkered record and the biggest carbon credit issuer on the voluntary market is trying to influence efforts to define what counts as a quality credit. The outcome could make or break an industry increasingly central to tech companies meeting their net zero goals.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).


White House AI Bill of Rights lacks specific guidance for AI rules

The document unveiled today by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is long on tech guidance, but short on restrictions for AI.

While the document provides extensive suggestions for how to incorporate AI rights in technical design, it does not include any recommendations for restrictions on the use of controversial forms of AI.

Photo: Ana Lanza/Unsplash

It was a year in the making, but people eagerly anticipating the White House Bill of Rights for AI will have to continue waiting for concrete recommendations for future AI policy or restrictions.

Instead, the document unveiled today by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is legally non-binding and intended to be used as a handbook and a “guide for society” that could someday inform government AI legislation or regulations.

Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights features a list of five guidelines for protecting people in relation to AI use:

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories