Entertainment

Mark Zuckerberg on his big metaverse bet: 'I feel a responsibility to go for it.'

In an interview with Protocol, the Meta CEO explains why he's committed to the metaverse and able to take shots that others won’t.

Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg

"I want to live in a world where big companies use their resources to take big shots."

Photo: Eliot Blondet/Abaca/Sipa via AP Images

Calling Meta’s metaverse push ambitious is a massive understatement: The company is spending billions of dollars a year on the development of next-generation augmented and virtual reality devices and the software that will run on them, as well as all-new social VR platforms like Horizon to rival gaming giants and Web3 startups.

If you ask Mark Zuckerberg, it’s all worth it. “I want to live in a world where big companies use their resources to take big shots,” the Meta chief executive told Protocol this week.

Zuckerberg sat down with Protocol for an exclusive conversation about the company’s investments in the metaverse, how it compares to Facebook’s transition to mobile a decade and a half ago, why Meta’s social VR world Horizon is a walled garden for the time being and how he eventually wants to open the doors to those platforms over time.

Check out our stories about Meta’s upcoming Cambria VR headset and Zuckerberg’s take on the importance of mixed reality experiences, and read on for his views on building the metaverse.

This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity and brevity.

It’s been about seven months since Facebook changed its name to Meta. How often do you still have to explain that move, and what the metaverse even is all about?

You know, I'd actually say that this is going a lot better than I thought it would. There is definitely [the fact that] we are describing this future experience that's hard to really wrap your head around until you've used some of these devices. But there's been a lot more interest and excitement about the idea than expected when we put our flag in the ground and [said]: This is what we are going to work on for the next 20 years.

When I talk to friends who are running other companies in the industry, it spurred a lot of them to think about how their companies are going to want to exist in the metaverse, and contribute to building it. This isn't a thing that any one company is going to build. I view our role in accelerating some of the fundamental technology, building out the social platforms around it and working out some of the creator pieces. But there's clearly all these other things that have to happen; we can't build the whole thing.

Some critics have said that the Meta branding itself signals a desire to monopolize the metaverse. It’s as if Facebook had called itself The Internet.

Oh, but it’s not! By doing this, and choosing that name, we were pretty clear about what we wanted the focus of the company to be. But it's not like we're the only company working on this today. You have Nvidia building the chips, Unity and Unreal building a lot of the software infrastructure, as well as companies like Roblox building early versions of some of these experiences that could be open platforms over time. Satya at Microsoft talks about building an enterprise version of the metaverse.

The question is: How do we get these things to be as interoperable as possible? We want as much of the software as possible to run on our systems. We want avatars and commerce to build to [be interoperable].

I want to make sure that we use the other things that we're building to help develop some of these ecosystems. You saw the NFT announcement that we made on Instagram. At the end of the day, I don't think the most exciting thing to do with NFTs is to display a few things in your Instagram profile. But I view that as a starting point. It's not that far-fetched to imagine how being able to display some digital collectibles in your Instagram profile is a precursor to being able to have a shirt from your favorite brand that you can take from Horizon to then wear in Fortnite.

Right now, Horizon, Roblox and Fortnite are still essentially walled gardens. How do you build bridges between these different universes?

There is often a trade-off in the early days between making something that is a tightly optimized product experience and building an open protocol. For Horizon, it's early, and we need to right now focus on making sure that we get all the foundations of the product in place, and get some of the technical challenges sorted out.

That’s partially why I want us to do this NFT work with Instagram. With Horizon today, the team needs to be fully focused on just getting the product dialed before we work on open platforms. But that doesn't mean that somewhere else in the company we shouldn't be working on the open platform side of it. If you don't do that work, then you just wake up one day, and you built this closed thing, and it's like super hard to back out of that.

Does your investment in VR give you an advantage over platforms like Roblox and Fortnite, or do you need to play catch-up to their mobile experiences?

They've been doing some of this for longer, so they have some advantages there. But we also have a lot of people using our social platforms, and a good base to build on. And we are a company that can afford a big R&D effort, so we can work on a lot of different things at once. There are areas that look like we are pretty early, in terms of graphics or the quality of different things, where over the next 12 to 24 months, we're going to just make very dramatic progress.

For Horizon, making it so that you can create a world and share it on Facebook or Instagram, and people can just jump into it from there — that's going to be pretty valuable. For the foreseeable future, there are going to be a lot more people with phones than with VR. However, the experience that you can deliver with these new platforms is so much better. We need to be careful about not making it primarily a mobile experience. Balancing that is going to be pretty important.

It’s similar to when we transitioned to mobile. Our desktop use case was a lot bigger, and [we optimized] mobile for the same desktop technologies. We did this whole Faceweb thing [a mobile version of the Facebook website], and it didn't end up building the best experience we needed.

That’s an interesting analogy. At the time, the number of mobile users grew pretty quickly, but monetization lagged, and you had to convince people that this was where you needed to invest most of your energy, most of your money. Right now, you're spending pretty significant amounts of money on the metaverse, but the users are not quite there yet, and the monetization definitely isn’t there yet. How hard is it to make that case, and is it getting harder with the stock market being as rocky as it is right now?

I think there were few things as dramatic in our history as the shift to mobile. At the time, we had one app that was the whole business, and we were not wildly profitable. So it felt more like an existential question for the company.

With Reality Labs, [we are] making a bet of spending $10 billion or $15 billion a year trying to help invent the next set of platforms. Some people might think it's a good bet, some people might think it's a bad bet. But at the end of the day, I don't think that many people think we're at risk of going out of business because of it.

I want to live in a world where big companies use their resources to take big shots. Obviously, if people invest in our company, we want to be profitable for them. If employees join our company, I want to make sure that ends up being a good financial decision for them, too. But I also feel a responsibility to go for it. Use the position that we're in to make some bets, and try to push forward in a way that other people might not.

We're also not a typical company. It's a controlled company, so I can make more of these decisions than most companies would. That gives us even more responsibility to push for it and do things that other people might not be able to do.

We've gone through a bunch of content transitions at this point. When I started, it was primarily text. Then we got phones with cameras and photos, and mobile networks got better. Now, the Facebook app is half video. The time that people spend on Reels is more than 20% of the time that people are spending on Instagram.

But that's just not the end of the line. You're going to keep on getting more immersive. Whether it looks like a big bet today or not, I just think it's inevitable that something like this needs to get invented. And I want to just make sure that we can help make that possible.

Every day, millions of us press the “order” button on our favorite coffee store's mobile application: Our chosen brew will be on the counter when we arrive. It’s a personalized, seamless experience that we have all come to expect. What we don’t know is what’s happening behind the scenes. The mobile application is sourcing data from a database that stores information about each customer and what their favorite coffee drinks are. It is also leveraging event-streaming data in real time to ensure the ingredients for your personal coffee are in supply at your local store.

Applications like this power our daily lives, and if they can’t access massive amounts of data stored in a database as well as stream data “in motion” instantaneously, you — and millions of customers — won’t have these in-the-moment experiences.

Keep Reading Show less
Jennifer Goforth Gregory
Jennifer Goforth Gregory has worked in the B2B technology industry for over 20 years. As a freelance writer she writes for top technology brands, including IBM, HPE, Adobe, AT&T, Verizon, Epson, Oracle, Intel and Square. She specializes in a wide range of technology, such as AI, IoT, cloud, cybersecurity, and CX. Jennifer also wrote a bestselling book The Freelance Content Marketing Writer to help other writers launch a high earning freelance business.
Policy

How the internet got privatized and how the government could fix it

Author Ben Tarnoff discusses municipal broadband, Web3 and why closing the “digital divide” isn’t enough.

The Biden administration’s Internet for All initiative, which kicked off in May, will roll out grant programs to expand and improve broadband infrastructure, teach digital skills and improve internet access for “everyone in America by the end of the decade.”

Decisions about who is eligible for these grants will be made based on the Federal Communications Commission’s broken, outdated and incorrect broadband maps — maps the FCC plans to update only after funding has been allocated. Inaccurate broadband maps are just one of many barriers to getting everyone in the country successfully online. Internet service providers that use government funds to connect rural and low-income areas have historically provided those regions with slow speeds and poor service, forcing community residents to find reliable internet outside of their homes.

Keep Reading Show less
Aditi Mukund
Aditi Mukund is Protocol’s Data Analyst. Prior to joining Protocol, she was an analyst at The Daily Beast and NPR where she wrangled data into actionable insights for editorial, audience, commerce, subscription, and product teams. She holds a B.S in Cognitive Science, Human Computer Interaction from The University of California, San Diego.
Fintech

How I decided to exit my startup’s original business

Bluevine got its start in factoring invoices for small businesses. CEO Eyal Lifshitz explains why it dropped that business in favor of “end-to-end banking.”

"[I]t was a realization that we can't be successful at both at the same time: You've got to choose."

Photo: Bluevine

Click banner image for more How I decided series

Bluevine got its start in fintech by offering a modern version of invoice factoring, the centuries-old practice where businesses sell off their accounts receivable for up-front cash. It’s raised $240 million in venture capital and about $700 million in total financing since its founding in 2013 by serving small businesses. But along the way, it realized it was better to focus on the checking accounts and lines of credit it provided customers than its original product. It now manages some $500 million in checking-account deposits.

Keep Reading Show less
Ryan Deffenbaugh
Ryan Deffenbaugh is a reporter at Protocol focused on fintech. Before joining Protocol, he reported on New York's technology industry for Crain's New York Business. He is based in New York and can be reached at rdeffenbaugh@protocol.com.
Enterprise

The Roe decision could change how advertisers use location data

Over the years, the digital ad industry has been resistant to restricting use of location data. But that may be changing.

Over the years, the digital ad industry has been resistant to restrictions on the use of location data. But that may be changing.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade on Friday, the likelihood for location data to be used against people suddenly shifted from a mostly hypothetical scenario to a realistic threat. Although location data has a variety of purposes — from helping municipalities assess how people move around cities to giving reliable driving directions — it’s the voracious appetite of digital advertisers for location information that has fueled the creation and growth of a sector selling data showing who visited specific points on the map, when, what places they came from and where they went afterwards.

Over the years, the digital ad industry has been resistant to restrictions on the use of location data. But that may be changing. The overturning of Roe not only puts the wide availability of location data for advertising in the spotlight, it could serve as a turning point compelling the digital ad industry to take action to limit data associated with sensitive places before the government does.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories
Bulletins