Big Tech wants to buy Peloton. Here’s who should do it.

Peloton makes good hardware and immersive content, and it desperately needs help managing it all.

A Peloton

Lots of people own Peloton products. But who will own Peloton?

Photo: Peloton

More than one company is reportedly interested in buying Peloton. Is Peloton actually for sale? That’s not yet clear. But this much is: Peloton’s stock is down more than 80% over the last year, it has run into a series of problems with its products and it seems to be a company in disarray. It was a $50 billion company a couple of years ago, and its market cap has dropped to about $7.5 billion. And that’s after a big jump that came from the acquisition rumors.

Blackwells Capital, a large shareholder in Peloton, sent the company a scathing letter a couple of weeks ago detailing what the firm sees as Peloton’s major recent missteps. “With the stock now trading below the IPO price,” Blackwells wrote, “and down more than 80% from its high, it is clear that the Company, the executives and the Board have squandered this opportunity.”

Among the accusations levied at Peloton:

  • Bad leadership from CEO John Foley, who sold a lot of his shares in the company and seemingly couldn’t make up his mind about the company’s direction.
  • Mismanaging its supply chain, such that it ended up with products needing to be recalled and then a huge glut of inventory.
  • Overpaying for a huge New York City office.

Blackwells included a list of companies — Apple, Disney, Sony, Nike, plus “any number of technology, streaming, metaverse and sportswear companies” — that might be better stewards of Peloton than Peloton. And it gave the company a bit of a backhanded compliment: “Despite the incontrovertible mismanagement of the Company, Peloton has a large and loyal customer base, skilled employees, great technology and content, and a respected brand.”

Again, it’s not yet clear that Peloton is for sale. But it looks like Blackwells is going to get one of its primary demands: Foley is planning to step down, The Wall Street Journal reported, to be replaced by former Spotify and Netflix exec Barry McCarthy. Without Foley in the picture, a sale of the company could happen more easily.

Amazon and Nike are both reportedly interested, and Apple and others have been named as possible suitors as well. Each of those companies makes sense as a possible acquirer, though not always for the same reasons.

Here’s what Peloton could bring to some of its potential suitors, and what those companies might get for their billions. Let’s start with the three names seemingly on everyone’s mind.

If Amazon buys Peloton

What Amazon gets: A flagship product for its growing health ecosystem, which currently includes products like the Halo wristband and projects like Amazon Care, its telehealth system. Peloton is a longtime high-profile AWS customer, and could be a way for Amazon to show off more of its cloud-computing capabilities. Could a Peloton subscription be a benefit for Prime subscribers, even the ones who don’t own a bike or treadmill?

What Peloton gets: Access to Amazon’s unparalleled logistics network, which could make delivery and maintenance of those huge treadmills and bikes a lot easier. Lots of access to AWS, Alexa and other Amazon projects you could imagine Peloton might use. An owner with limitless resources and a solid reputation for helping its portfolio succeed.

Our take: Amazon stands to gain a lot here, including a huge stationary device and large screen in millions of homes that could run Alexa. It would also get a fitness brand, and provider of health data, that Halo isn’t likely to achieve anytime soon. The upsides are less enticing for Peloton, except that Amazon does have a good reputation for bringing companies in — like Ring and Eero — and helping them succeed.

If Apple buys Peloton

What Apple gets: Tight integration with Peloton instantly becomes a selling point for the Apple Watch and the Fitness+ platform. Lots of data for Apple Health and its other health initiatives. A new line of high-end hardware.

What Peloton gets: Bikes and treadmills in prominent places in one of the best retail ecosystems in the world. Access to the industry’s best supply chain, Apple’s impressive chip business and all the data-privacy features Apple’s been building in recent years.

Our take: This one’s probably better for Peloton than Apple. An Apple acquisition would give Peloton a boost in almost every way, but it’s not clear that Apple needs more access to high-end users or a quick bounce in subscriber numbers. And it definitely doesn’t need the branding win.

If Nike buys Peloton

What Nike gets: The kind of hardware prowess it has repeatedly tried and failed to build internally. (Remember the FuelBand?) Products that could make the Nike Training Club ecosystem more useful and powerful. Lots of captivated, wealthy customers to buy Nike-branded fitness gear.

What Peloton gets: Access to Nike-sponsored athletes, its legendary marketing machine and high-end fitness brand. Nike could help Peloton go from “bike company” to lifestyle brand, which it clearly wants to be.

Our take: This one makes the most sense for all sides. Nike needs a hardware player, especially as its competitors build out ecosystems like Lululemon did by buying Mirror and Apple launching Fitness+. And the overlap of “people who own Pelotons” and “people who buy expensive Nike gear” is practically a single circle.

What about the metaverse?

Blackwells’ ideas for possible Peloton suitors mostly make a certain amount of obvious sense. It’s fairly easy to imagine how any apparel maker, content company or general tech giant might make use of Peloton’s brand, content and technology.

But the mention of metaverse companies, and the inclusion of Disney and Sony as possible buyers, is an interesting one. You could make the case that Peloton is, in some ways, ahead of the metaverse curve: It uses a combination of hardware and software to build experiences that are both personalized and collaborative. Add a camera into the mix — like the one Peloton is already working on — and give users headsets, and every rider could be a digital avatar in a virtual Peloton studio.

Of course, “metaverse” is the buzziest of buzzwords right now, and Blackwells could be hoping for the company to get a bit of a metaverse boost. But Peloton is already an immersive content company, maybe even more than it is a maker of bikes and treadmills. And that could make it enticing to far more buyers going forward.

Does anybody need Peloton?

That’s the real question. Peloton may have been early to the connected fitness game, and remains the industry’s biggest name, but competitors are hitting it from all sides. Tonal, Hydrow and others are building their own in-home exercise systems, while Apple, Nike and others are building their own libraries of exercise content. Meanwhile, people are going back to the gym, and some gyms are investing in their own apps and at-home workout experiences. There’s not much about Peloton that is utterly unique anymore — unless you count Cody, anyway.

The question for Amazon, Apple, Nike and others will be whether they feel they can beat Peloton at its own game, or if it’s worth $10 billion or so to take a shortcut to the top of the market. If Peloton can turn its fortunes around, it might even have a chance to compete on its own. But it won’t have that chance for long.

Update: This story was updated to include Peloton CEO John Foley's plan to step down. Updated Feb. 8.


UiPath had a rocky few years. Rob Enslin wants to turn it around.

Protocol caught up with Enslin, named earlier this year as UiPath’s co-CEO, to discuss why he left Google Cloud, the untapped potential of robotic-process automation, and how he plans to lead alongside founder Daniel Dines.

Rob Enslin, UiPath's co-CEO, chats with Protocol about the company's future.

Photo: UiPath

UiPath has had a shaky history.

The company, which helps companies automate business processes, went public in 2021 at a valuation of more than $30 billion, but now the company’s market capitalization is only around $7 billion. To add insult to injury, UiPath laid off 5% of its staff in June and then lowered its full-year guidance for fiscal year 2023 just months later, tanking its stock by 15%.

Keep Reading Show less
Aisha Counts

Aisha Counts (@aishacounts) is a reporter at Protocol covering enterprise software. Formerly, she was a management consultant for EY. She's based in Los Angeles and can be reached at acounts@protocol.com.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Figma’s chief product officer: We can do more with Adobe

Yuhki Yamashita thinks Figma might tackle video or 3D objects someday.

Figman CPO Yuhki Yamashita told Protocol about Adobe's acquisition of the company.

Photo: Figma

Figma CPO Yuhki Yamashita’s first design gig was at The Harvard Crimson, waiting for writers to file their stories so he could lay them out in Adobe InDesign. Given his interest in computer science, pursuing UX design became the clear move. He worked on Outlook at Microsoft, YouTube at Google, and user experience at Uber, where he was a very early user of Figma. In 2019, he became a VP of product at Figma; this past June, he became CPO.

“Design has been really near and dear to my heart, which is why when this opportunity came along to join Figma and rethink design, it was such an obvious opportunity,” Yamashita said.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at llawrence@protocol.com.


Microsoft lays out its climate advocacy goals

The tech giant has staked out exactly what kind of policies it will support to decarbonize the world and clean up the grid.

On Sept. 22, Microsoft — seen here, CEO Satya Nadella — published two briefs explaining what new climate policies it will advocate for.

Photo: Simon Dawson/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The tech industry has no shortage of climate goals, but they’ll be very hard to achieve without the help of sound public policy.

Microsoft published two new briefs on Sept. 22 explaining what policies it will advocate for in the realm of reducing carbon and cleaning up the grid. With policymakers in the U.S. and around the world beginning to weigh more stringent climate policies (or in the U.S.’s case, any serious climate policies at all), the briefs will offer a measuring stick for whether Microsoft is living up to its ideals.

Keep Reading Show less
Brian Kahn

Brian ( @blkahn) is Protocol's climate editor. Previously, he was the managing editor and founding senior writer at Earther, Gizmodo's climate site, where he covered everything from the weather to Big Oil's influence on politics. He also reported for Climate Central and the Wall Street Journal. In the even more distant past, he led sleigh rides to visit a herd of 7,000 elk and boat tours on the deepest lake in the U.S.


The next generation of refrigerants is on the way

It’s never been cooler to reconsider the substances that keep us cool. Here’s what could replace super-polluting greenhouse gases in refrigerators and air conditioners.

It’s incumbent on refrigeration tech companies to not repeat past mistakes.

Photo: VCG via Getty Images

In a rare display of bipartisan climate action, the Senate ratified the Kigali Amendment last week. The U.S. joins 137 other nations in the global effort to curb the use of hydrofluorocarbons, or HFCs. Now the race is on to replace them for climate tech startups and traditional HVAC and refrigeration companies alike.

Most HFCs have a global warming potential (GWP) more than 1,000 times that of carbon dioxide — though some are as much as 14,800 times more potent — which makes reducing them a high priority to protect the climate. The treaty mandates that the U.S. and other industrialized nations decrease their use of HFCs to roughly 15% of 2012 levels by 2036.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Latest Stories