Sony’s revamped PlayStation Plus has a pipeline problem

PS Plus is great for newcomers, but it needs a lot of work, especially when compared to Game Pass.

Sony’s revamped PlayStation Plus has a pipeline problem

Sony’s biggest issue is its messaging.

Image: Sony

Microsoft’s push into subscription gaming has become too big for its prime competitor to ignore. And last week, Sony finally answered with the launch of its revamped PlayStation Plus platform in the U.S., which now includes three tiers, hundreds of games and a suite of other perks designed to appeal to those who want more bang for their buck.

I’ve been using the platform’s Extra and Premium tiers for the last week, perusing the collection and making sense of how much value Sony has packed into them. It’s clear there are enough high-quality games to justify at least a few months to maybe as long as a year of the new PS Plus. But a confusing tier system, poor marketing and the lack of a concrete road map of new additions makes this more of a Game Pass lite than a true subscription competitor.

PS Plus is great for newcomers. If you’re not a diehard Sony fan or have only just gotten your hands on a new PlayStation 5, then the revamped PS Plus’ middle tier, called Extra, is a solid deal. (The standard version of PS Plus, now called PS Plus Essential, remains unchanged, and I see no reason to ever pay for it again.)

  • Extra includes some of the platform’s best games of the last decade, like 2015’s Bloodborne, 2018’s God of War and Red Dead Redemption 2, and 2020’s Ghost of Tsushima. It also has two of the best indie games ever made: Team Cherry’s Hollow Knight and Maddy Thorson’s Celeste.
  • For PS5 owners, the subscription also includes expensive PlayStation exclusives you no longer have to buy, which is an especially sweet perk considering Sony’s resistance to discounting digital games. That includes Death Stranding Director’s Cut, the Demon’s Souls remake, Returnal and Marvel’s Spider-Man: Miles Morales.
  • For the very generous annual price of $100, the Extra tier is a solid Game Pass competitor that justifies its cost for at least the next 12 months, given that it’s $14.99 when billed monthly.
  • But it’s hard to recommend Extra on a monthly basis because Sony hasn’t talked too much about how often games might leave the service or what might be added in the future.
  • Unless you’ve already played most of the service’s biggest games, you’re better off 12 months at a discount, getting your money’s worth and reevaluating next year.

The Premium tier needs a lot of work. Instead of creating just two tiers, Sony opted for three. And that’s where PS Plus starts to run into trouble, which is only made worse by the company’s poor marketing efforts.

  • The Premium tier includes everything the Extra tier does, but also tosses in cloud gaming via its PlayStation Now service and a new assortment of more than 350 classic games.
  • To the casual observer, however, differentiating between the tiers is a confusing mess, especially when trying to figure out what exactly you’re getting for your money. Some games can only be streamed while others have to be downloaded, and Sony has a number of other restrictions on which platforms and hardware these games can be accessed through.
  • The classic games collection feels random and shallow, and I can’t imagine anyone outside the most dedicated Sony enthusiast wanting to go back and play some of these titles on a regular enough basis to justify paying a higher monthly fee.
  • It’s not clear why Premium needs to exist right now. Sure, it gives Sony something to point to when comparing its offerings to Game Pass, and lets it conveniently pivot the PS Now service into something more immediately useful to its business.
  • But for an extra $36 a year (or $20, when billed annually) on top of the already-pricey Extra tier, PS Plus Premium doesn’t do enough to justify the cost.

PlayStation Plus has a pipeline problem. Much of PS Plus is composed of older games, many of which longtime Sony customers have likely already bought and played.

  • I already own and have played to completion all of the top 10 highest-reviewed games on PS Extra/Premium, according to Metacritic.
  • I would subscribe only to this service for a month or two, specifically to play Death Stranding and perhaps one or two games on my must-play list. That’s a problem for Sony: There are plenty of PlayStation owners just like me who don’t see a lot of value right now.
  • The bigger issue: We don’t know at what clip Sony will add classic games to Premium, or how many first-party and third-party games will be added to Extra.
  • Sony has already said it has no intention of adding new first-party releases to the service at launch. Instead, we’ll have to wait an undetermined amount of time (likely around a year or longer) for newer games to be added.
  • Microsoft, on the other hand, has dozens of new releases over the next 12 months, all of which are confirmed to be arriving on Game Pass.

Sony’s biggest issue is its messaging. When talking to an assortment of my gaming friends about the new PS Plus, a few of them had no idea it existed, and those who did had little idea of what it included. Many of them have let their PS Plus subscriptions lapse months or even years ago because so few games require it to use online multiplayer anymore due to the rise of free-to-play.

Sony made the choice not to rebrand PS Plus, and that may have been a smart move considering the lack of faith PlayStation’s top exec Jim Ryan has expressed toward subscription gaming. But if the company wants to turn the platform into something that can sign up and retain subscribers for the long term, it may need to do a better job communicating with casual consumers. It doesn't need to go toe to toe with Game Pass, but it would help if Sony would open up about its plans to add more value over time.


Why foundation models in AI need to be released responsibly

Foundation models like GPT-3 and DALL-E are changing AI forever. We urgently need to develop community norms that guarantee research access and help guide the future of AI responsibly.

Releasing new foundation models doesn’t have to be an all or nothing proposition.

Illustration: sorbetto/DigitalVision Vectors

Percy Liang is director of the Center for Research on Foundation Models, a faculty affiliate at the Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI and an associate professor of Computer Science at Stanford University.

Humans are not very good at forecasting the future, especially when it comes to technology.

Keep Reading Show less
Percy Liang
Percy Liang is Director of the Center for Research on Foundation Models, a Faculty Affiliate at the Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI, and an Associate Professor of Computer Science at Stanford University.

Every day, millions of us press the “order” button on our favorite coffee store's mobile application: Our chosen brew will be on the counter when we arrive. It’s a personalized, seamless experience that we have all come to expect. What we don’t know is what’s happening behind the scenes. The mobile application is sourcing data from a database that stores information about each customer and what their favorite coffee drinks are. It is also leveraging event-streaming data in real time to ensure the ingredients for your personal coffee are in supply at your local store.

Applications like this power our daily lives, and if they can’t access massive amounts of data stored in a database as well as stream data “in motion” instantaneously, you — and millions of customers — won’t have these in-the-moment experiences.

Keep Reading Show less
Jennifer Goforth Gregory
Jennifer Goforth Gregory has worked in the B2B technology industry for over 20 years. As a freelance writer she writes for top technology brands, including IBM, HPE, Adobe, AT&T, Verizon, Epson, Oracle, Intel and Square. She specializes in a wide range of technology, such as AI, IoT, cloud, cybersecurity, and CX. Jennifer also wrote a bestselling book The Freelance Content Marketing Writer to help other writers launch a high earning freelance business.

The West’s drought could bring about a data center reckoning

When it comes to water use, data centers are the tech industry’s secret water hogs — and they could soon come under increased scrutiny.

Lake Mead, North America's largest artificial reservoir, has dropped to about 1,052 feet above sea level, the lowest it's been since being filled in 1937.

Photo: Mario Tama/Getty Images

The West is parched, and getting more so by the day. Lake Mead — the country’s largest reservoir — is nearing “dead pool” levels, meaning it may soon be too low to flow downstream. The entirety of the Four Corners plus California is mired in megadrought.

Amid this desiccation, hundreds of the country’s data centers use vast amounts of water to hum along. Dozens cluster around major metro centers, including those with mandatory or voluntary water restrictions in place to curtail residential and agricultural use.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).


Indeed is hiring 4,000 workers despite industry layoffs

Indeed’s new CPO, Priscilla Koranteng, spoke to Protocol about her first 100 days in the role and the changing nature of HR.

"[Y]ou are serving the people. And everything that's happening around us in the world is … impacting their professional lives."

Image: Protocol

Priscilla Koranteng's plans are ambitious. Koranteng, who was appointed chief people officer of Indeed in June, has already enhanced the company’s abortion travel policies and reinforced its goal to hire 4,000 people in 2022.

She’s joined the HR tech company in a time when many other tech companies are enacting layoffs and cutbacks, but said she sees this precarious time as an opportunity for growth companies to really get ahead. Koranteng, who comes from an HR and diversity VP role at Kellogg, is working on embedding her hybrid set of expertise in her new role at Indeed.

Keep Reading Show less
Amber Burton

Amber Burton (@amberbburton) is a reporter at Protocol. Previously, she covered personal finance and diversity in business at The Wall Street Journal. She earned an M.S. in Strategic Communications from Columbia University and B.A. in English and Journalism from Wake Forest University. She lives in North Carolina.


New Jersey could become an ocean energy hub

A first-in-the-nation bill would support wave and tidal energy as a way to meet the Garden State's climate goals.

Technological challenges mean wave and tidal power remain generally more expensive than their other renewable counterparts. But government support could help spur more innovation that brings down cost.

Photo: Jeremy Bishop via Unsplash

Move over, solar and wind. There’s a new kid on the renewable energy block: waves and tides.

Harnessing the ocean’s power is still in its early stages, but the industry is poised for a big legislative boost, with the potential for real investment down the line.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Latest Stories