People

How to get the first COVID-19 vaccines to people who need it most

Whenever a vaccine is ready, mapping software will be crucial to helping states distribute it.

How to get the first COVID-19 vaccines to people who need it most

Esri wants to help governments route the first batch of vaccines to wherever they're needed most.

Photo: National Cancer Institute

Not everyone will be able to get the COVID-19 vaccine when it's ready. So even as companies like Pfizer and Moderna race to complete their clinical trials, governments are beginning to strategize how to distribute that very limited supply once it's ready. Este Geraghty, chief medical officer of the mapping software giant Esri, thinks her company's technology can help.

Before she joined the company, Geraghty specialized in informatics and statistics at the California Department of Health. That experience has come in handy these last seven months, as Esri has worked with state and local governments across the country to map the spread of COVID-19.

It's Esri's software that forms the backbone of Johns Hopkins University's vital COVID-19 dashboard and Esri's surveys that cities across the country have been using to map out the results of their contact tracing efforts.

Now, the 51-year-old company is looking ahead and helping governments think through how to ensure the people who need the vaccine the most will be able to receive it first. Geraghty spoke with Protocol about how Esri hopes to help.

This interview has been edited for clarity and brevity.

Why is mapping important to vaccine distribution?

We won't have all the vaccines ready at the same time with the ability to distribute it to everybody immediately. Given the manufacturing constraints and the differences in the vaccines that we think are going to be the ones to come out first, they require different kinds of facilities to administer them.

We think that the two furthest along are the Pfizer and the Moderna vaccines. The Pfizer vaccine requires storage at -70 degrees Celsius. That has significant implications for how you can transport it and where it can be stored. Probably only the largest hospitals and the larger pharmacies [can do it], but not everybody can store it at that level of cold storage. The Moderna on the other hand needs -20 degrees Celsius. That's really easy for just about anybody to create storage.

Now you have two different facilities with different capabilities. How do we get the two vaccines from these manufacturers to the different locations where they'll be distributed? With the Pfizer vaccine, you need to go straight to the point of dispensing, whether it's a hospital or pharmacy. It starts to get very geographic in the way you make these decisions.

When we get to state health departments working with the [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention], how do we make sure the vaccine goes to the right place in each state and locality? It gets back to identifying the right facilities capable of storing and distributing the two different kinds of vaccines. The next thing you want to do is identify and prioritize the clinical population. You've got to take care of healthcare workers first and other workers who are more exposed than the average population. These are the people who are most exposed coming into contact with a patient. If we don't take care of them and they become sick, then we lose our capacity, which is another issue. After that you get into populations that are more likely to have disease and die from the virus. Then there are things like congregate housing where people are living in nursing homes or prisons or university dormitories.

If we do this in a logical order, we have the best chance.

So a state or local government could use Esri to triangulate facilities that can store this thing and are closest to the highest density of congregate housing and health care workers?

You're getting the idea. You have a number of candidate facilities. Then the health department should be able to, with our software, evaluate the potential capacity of those sites and estimate a travel distance for the different phases of vaccination. When you get to a more general population, you're going to want 15- to 30-minute drive-times at the most to get to a vaccination venue.

It sounds like this would be pretty sparsely spread out throughout the country, not like going to your doctor's office and getting a shot in the arm.

That's right for the early phases. In those early phases, you'll pick the venues that can serve the largest part of your critical population. As we move toward broader vaccination, you can start to identify gaps where you have people who are a prioritized population and don't have a facility that's lined up or ready to distribute. That's where you can figure out where to put facilities to serve the largest population. You can also formulate other distribution methods. You can't put a facility in every place. A lot of people live way out in rural places, but still need vaccines. We've seen mobile vaccination teams go out. We can help route your mobile team so they can serve the biggest population efficiently.

Are you working with any of your government clients yet on this type of planning?

I'm not going to mention names, but I will tell you, it's a focus. We're dealing with a number of states, at least one city, and we've been having conversations at the national level as well. Every week it seems to get a little more in the forebrain of consciousness.

Whose decision will it ultimately be to figure out where the facilities should be located?

The decision is going to be somewhat joint as I understand it. The CDC is relying on the state public health department to come up with a plan. There's recognition that states across the country work in different ways with their local health authorities. If the health department wants a certain number of vaccines and has a distribution plan, it's expected the CDC will approve that plan, but they could override it.

Are there any other ways Esri plans to play a role in the vaccination distribution process?

Our software could be used to help with vaccine inventory and management. You need to be able to read the bar codes on the vaccines and keep track of your inventory and expiration dates and who got which vaccines. They both take two doses. If I got the first dose of the Pfizer vaccine, I cannot get the second dose of the Moderna vaccine. I need the same one. So we can help with that vaccine management system.

The other thing we're recommending to health departments is providing transparency and accurate communications. I think this whole process is complicated. I think people are going to want to know: When's it my turn? Where should I go to get a vaccine? And why is my turn not right now? You need to provide the information to help people understand the health departments are doing the right thing.

I shouldn't be conspiratorial, but it sounds like you'll have a window not just into where there are gaps, but whether there's corruption going on and are there vaccines being routed where there's not the most need. Will you have that kind of insight?

I think the system is set up pretty well so that shouldn't happen. What I fear more, and excuse my bias, is if people don't take a really geospatial approach to this, then they may end up not doing the prioritization in the most effective way. It may not be for lack of effort, but potentially lack of insight.

Climate

This carbon capture startup wants to clean up the worst polluters

The founder and CEO of point-source carbon capture company Carbon Clean discusses what the startup has learned, the future of carbon capture technology, as well as the role of companies like his in battling the climate crisis.

Carbon Clean CEO Aniruddha Sharma told Protocol that fossil fuels are necessary, at least in the near term, to lift the living standards of those who don’t have access to cars and electricity.

Photo: Carbon Clean

Carbon capture and storage has taken on increasing importance as companies with stubborn emissions look for new ways to meet their net zero goals. For hard-to-abate industries like cement and steel production, it’s one of the few options that exist to help them get there.

Yet it’s proven incredibly challenging to scale the technology, which captures carbon pollution at the source. U.K.-based company Carbon Clean is leading the charge to bring down costs. This year, it raised a $150 million series C round, which the startup said is the largest-ever funding round for a point-source carbon capture company.

Keep Reading Show less
Michelle Ma

Michelle Ma (@himichellema) is a reporter at Protocol covering climate. Previously, she was a news editor of live journalism and special coverage for The Wall Street Journal. Prior to that, she worked as a staff writer at Wirecutter. She can be reached at mma@protocol.com.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Workplace

Why companies cut staff after raising millions

Are tech firms blowing millions in funding just weeks after getting it? Experts say it's more complicated than that.

Bolt, Trade Republic, HomeLight, and Stord all drew attention from funding announcements that happened just weeks or days before layoffs.

Photo: Pulp Photography/Getty Images

Fintech startup Bolt was one of the first tech companies to slash jobs, cutting 250 employees, or a third of its staff, in May. For some workers, the pain of layoffs was a shock not only because they were the first, but also because the cuts came just four months after Bolt had announced a $355 million series E funding round and achieved a peak valuation of $11 billion.

“Bolt employees were blind sided because the CEO was saying just weeks ago how everything is fine,” an anonymous user wrote on the message board Blind. “It has been an extremely rough day for 1/3 of Bolt employees,” another user posted. “Sadly, I was one of them who was let go after getting a pay-raise just a couple of weeks ago.”

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.

Climate

The fight to define the carbon offset market's future

The world’s largest carbon offset issuer is fighting a voluntary effort to standardize the industry. And the fate of the climate could hang in the balance.

It has become increasingly clear that scaling the credit market will first require clear standards and transparency.

Kevin Frayer/Getty Images

There’s a major fight brewing over what kind of standards will govern the carbon offset market.

A group of independent experts looking to clean up the market’s checkered record and the biggest carbon credit issuer on the voluntary market is trying to influence efforts to define what counts as a quality credit. The outcome could make or break an industry increasingly central to tech companies meeting their net zero goals.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (ljenkins@protocol.com).

Policy

White House AI Bill of Rights lacks specific guidance for AI rules

The document unveiled today by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is long on tech guidance, but short on restrictions for AI.

While the document provides extensive suggestions for how to incorporate AI rights in technical design, it does not include any recommendations for restrictions on the use of controversial forms of AI.

Photo: Ana Lanza/Unsplash

It was a year in the making, but people eagerly anticipating the White House Bill of Rights for AI will have to continue waiting for concrete recommendations for future AI policy or restrictions.

Instead, the document unveiled today by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy is legally non-binding and intended to be used as a handbook and a “guide for society” that could someday inform government AI legislation or regulations.

Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights features a list of five guidelines for protecting people in relation to AI use:

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of RedTailMedia.org and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories
Bulletins