Facebook is sharing data to prove it’s not a political hellhole

The company published a report on the most-viewed content on the site, which executives say "most accurately" represents what people see on Facebook.

Facebook is sharing data to prove it’s not a political hellhole

Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg

Image: Facebook

A video of two cats walking, tails intertwined, looking like the best of friends. A resource site for Green Bay Packers alumni. Two different UNICEF links related to COVID-19, and an ecommerce shop called Repp'n for Christ that sells Gospel-themed t-shirts.

These were just a few of the most-viewed links on Facebook last quarter, according to a new dataset of the most widely viewed content on Facebook the company released Wednesday.

This is the first time Facebook is releasing this type of data, which includes the most-viewed domains, links, posts and pages from the second quarter of 2021. Facebook framed the report as an extension of its ongoing transparency efforts. But the information contained in it also serves another purpose: countering the idea that far-right pages and accounts dominate the site in the U.S.

Facebook executives have been frustrated for some time by the way journalists and researchers have interpreted data from its CrowdTangle tool. As The New York Times' Kevin Roose shows through the Facebook's Top 10 Twitter account, posts from conservative personalities like Ben Shapiro and Dan Bongino receive by far the most daily engagement on posts with links in them.

In the face of criticism, Facebook contends that posts with links represent a vanishingly small percentage of content on the site and that reach, not engagement, is a better measure of how widespread content actually is. Executives have strategized internally about how to address this issue, according to reporting by Roose. While Facebook executives stopped short of saying it outright on a call with reporters Wednesday, sharing this data seems to be part of that plan.

"There's a few gaps in the data that's been used to date, and the narrative that's emerged is quite simply wrong," said Guy Rosen, Facebook's vice president of integrity, in response to a question about whether this is Facebook's way of pushing back on the narrative about far-right dominance on the platform. "CrowdTangle is focused on interactions. CrowdTangle only has a limited set of a certain Pages and Groups. We are creating a report that provides a broad view."

According to the report, some 87% of content on News Feed doesn't include a link, meaning it wouldn't be represented in the Facebook top 10 list. Even the most-viewed posts that Facebook is now sharing also only accounted for .1% of all posts viewed in people's News Feeds in the U.S. last quarter. That's because, Facebook wrote, "most of what people see on Facebook is personalized for them specifically," and wouldn't likely be viewed by many other users.

And it's true, these datasets tell a much different story than the one that comes through looking at engagement data. Instead of links from Newsmax and Fox News, the top 20 list of most-viewed links includes mostly benign and at-times obscure links — a YouTube channel on building outdoor aquariums and a CBD shop among them.

Far from barn-burners, the most-viewed posts Facebook shared from last quarter are similarly anodyne. The most viewed of all was a word-scramble that predicts: "The first three words u see are your reality." Another top-viewed post asks: "Please Settle This Debate Does Sugar Go In Spaghetti." Only two of the top 20 posts could be considered remotely political: One from Joe Biden boasts, "Only 100 days in — and America is getting back on track." The other asks whether Facebook users are "ditching the mask" based on CDC guidance.

While Shapiro and Bongino regularly top the U.S. list of pages sharing posts with links on Facebook, they're nowhere to be found in Facebook's own list of most-viewed pages in the U.S. last quarter. That list includes instead pages like Kitchen Fun With My 3 Sons, The Dodo and LADBible. It also includes pages for UNICEF and the World Health Organization, which Facebook has been promoting to counter COVID-19 misinformation.

These are the posts and pages that Facebook executives would prefer the public and the media pay attention to. But it's worth wondering why Facebook believes views — scrolling past a post in your News Feed — are as relevant as likes, comments and shares, which are all indicators of how actively people engage with a given bit of information.

On the press call Wednesday, Facebook director of product management Anna Stepanov said the report was "not so much about the value of the view or whether we value engagement or how we value engagement."

"But it is a way to most accurately, in a sense, represent the actual experiences people have," Stepanov said. "It is what people are seeing as they engage with and view News Feed and the app."

While the new dataset of most-viewed content may shed light on a different side of Facebook, it doesn't negate the fact that the other side — the side the engagement data reveals — exists too. After all, as Facebook's own data in this report shows, even the most-viewed content represents only a tiny slice of all content on Facebook. Neither engagement nor views alone tell the whole story.

Facebook said on Wednesday that it is also making progress on fighting hate speech and other banned forms of content on the platform. According to its latest content enforcement report, Facebook now removes 15 times as much hate speech content as it did when it first began reporting on hate speech in 2018. The prevalence of hate speech on the platform — that is, what proportion of all views on Facebook include hate speech — has declined three quarters in a row.

Facebook said that this report is the first in a series and that it will continue reporting on most-viewed content quarterly in the future.

A visitor plays a game using Microsoft's Xbox controller at a flagship store of SK Telecom in Seoul on November 10, 2020. (Photo by Jung Yeon-je / AFP) (Photo by JUNG YEON-JE/AFP via Getty Images)

On this episode of the Source Code podcast: Nick Statt joins the show to discuss Microsoft’s $68.7 billion acquisition of Activision Blizzard, and what it means for the tech and game industries. Then, Issie Lapowsky talks about a big week in antitrust reform, and whether real progress is being made in the U.S. Finally, Hirsh Chitkara explains why AT&T, Verizon, the FAA and airlines have been fighting for months about 5G coverage.

For more on the topics in this episode:

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.

COVID-19 accelerated what many CEOs and CTOs have struggled to do for the past decade: It forced organizations to be agile and adjust quickly to change. For all the talk about digital transformation over the past decade, when push came to shove, many organizations realized they had made far less progress than they thought.

Now with the genie of rapid change out of the bottle, we will never go back to accepting slow and steady progress from our organizations. To survive and thrive in times of disruption, you need to build a resilient, adaptable business with systems and processes that will keep you nimble for years to come. An essential part of business agility is responding to change by quickly developing new applications and adapting old ones. IT faces an unprecedented demand for new applications. According to IDC, by 2023, more than 500 million digital applications and services will be developed and deployed — the same number of apps that were developed in the last 40 years.[1]

Keep Reading Show less
Denise Broady, CMO, Appian
Denise oversees the Marketing and Communications organization where she is responsible for accelerating the marketing strategy and brand recognition across the globe. Denise has over 24+ years of experience as a change agent scaling businesses from startups, turnarounds and complex software companies. Prior to Appian, Denise worked at SAP, WorkForce Software, TopTier and Clarkston Group. She is also a two-time published author of “GRC for Dummies” and “Driven to Perform.” Denise holds a double degree in marketing and production and operations from Virginia Tech.

Congress’ antitrust push has a hate speech problem

Sen. Klobuchar’s antitrust bill is supposed to promote competition. So why are advocates afraid it could also promote extremists?

The bill as written could make it a lot riskier for large tech companies to deplatform or demote companies that violate their rules.

Photo: Photo by Elizabeth Frantz-Pool/Getty Images

The antitrust bill that passed the Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday and is now headed to the Senate floor is, at its core, an attempt to prevent the likes of Apple, Amazon and Google from boosting their own products and services on the marketplaces and platforms they own.

But upon closer inspection, some experts say, the bill as written could make it a lot riskier for large tech companies to deplatform or demote companies that violate their rules.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Boost 2

Can Matt Mullenweg save the internet?

He's turning Automattic into a different kind of tech giant. But can he take on the trillion-dollar walled gardens and give the internet back to the people?

Matt Mullenweg, CEO of Automattic and founder of WordPress, poses for Protocol at his home in Houston, Texas.
Photo: Arturo Olmos for Protocol

In the early days of the pandemic, Matt Mullenweg didn't move to a compound in Hawaii, bug out to a bunker in New Zealand or head to Miami and start shilling for crypto. No, in the early days of the pandemic, Mullenweg bought an RV. He drove it all over the country, bouncing between Houston and San Francisco and Jackson Hole with plenty of stops in national parks. In between, he started doing some tinkering.

The tinkering is a part-time gig: Most of Mullenweg’s time is spent as CEO of Automattic, one of the web’s largest platforms. It’s best known as the company that runs WordPress.com, the hosted version of the blogging platform that powers about 43% of the websites on the internet. Since WordPress is open-source software, no company technically owns it, but Automattic provides tools and services and oversees most of the WordPress-powered internet. It’s also the owner of the booming ecommerce platform WooCommerce, Day One, the analytics tool Parse.ly and the podcast app Pocket Casts. Oh, and Tumblr. And Simplenote. And many others. That makes Mullenweg one of the most powerful CEOs in tech, and one of the most important voices in the debate over the future of the internet.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.


Ask a tech worker: How many of your colleagues have caught omicron?

Millions of workers called in sick in recent weeks. How is tech handling it?

A record number of Americans called in sick with COVID-19 in recent weeks. Even with high vaccination rates, tech companies aren’t immune.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Welcome back to Ask a Tech Worker! For this recurring feature, I’ve been roaming downtown San Francisco at lunchtime to ask tech employees about how the workplace is changing. This week, I caught up with tech workers about what their companies are doing to avoid omicron outbreaks, and whether many of their colleagues had been out sick lately. Got an idea for a future topic? Email me.

Omicron stops for no one, it seems. Between Dec. 29 and Jan. 10, 8.8 million Americans missed work to either recover from COVID-19 or care for someone who was recovering, according to the Census Bureau. That number crushed the previous record of 6.6 million from last January, and tripled the numbers from early last month.

Keep Reading Show less
Allison Levitsky
Allison Levitsky is a reporter at Protocol covering workplace issues in tech. She previously covered big tech companies and the tech workforce for the Silicon Valley Business Journal. Allison grew up in the Bay Area and graduated from UC Berkeley.

The fast-growing paychecks of Big Tech’s biggest names

Tech giants had a huge pandemic, and their execs are getting paid.

TIm Cook received $82 million in stock awards on top of his $3 million salary as Apple's CEO.

Photo: Mario Tama/Getty Images

Tech leaders are making more than ever.

As tech giants thrive amid the pandemic, companies like Meta, Alphabet and Microsoft have continued to pay their leaders accordingly: Big Tech CEO pay is higher than ever. In the coming months, we’ll begin seeing a lot of companies release their executive compensation from the past year as fiscal 2022 begins.

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht
Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.
Latest Stories