Protocol | Fintech

Affirm takes 'buy now, pay later' public today. Investors may balk at the risk.

The San Francisco startup's rise highlights the rapid growth of payment and lending platforms, especially among millennials.

Affirm takes 'buy now, pay later' public today. Investors may balk at the risk.

Affirm CEO Max Levchin will take the company public.

Photo: Affirm

Affirm, the "buy now, pay later" startup, is going public on Wednesday in one of the most anticipated IPOs this year.

Affirm's IPO, which could value the company at a reported $10 billion, highlights the rapid growth of ecommerce and related payment and lending platforms amid the pandemic, as well as new ways that consumers, particularly younger ones, seek to make purchases: Many are eschewing credit cards to avoid going into debt.

Still, the San Francisco fintech company's debut also turns the spotlight on a trend that one analyst likens to payday loans, a system that makes it easier for consumers to make purchases instantly, but which has also sparked concerns about growing consumer debt in a wobbly economy.

"They don't like to call it a payday loan, but essentially, that's what it is," IDC analyst Jerry Silva told Protocol. "The trend overall is this ability to do better risk management around credit, and then based on that, to start offering products that we've never seen before."

Shares of Affirm opened at $90.90 after pricing at $49, and soared on the Nasdaq, trading at $96.07 as of 2:50 p.m. ET.

Affirm, which launched in 2012, is one of the large players in BNPL — as "buy now, pay later" is known. The system lets consumers make online purchases, such as a piece of furniture, a household appliance or an exercise machine, and pay in monthly installments.

Affirm offers interest-free and interest bearing loans, but says it doesn't charge late or hidden fees. BNPL has taken off mainly among middle-class consumers, including millennials, who are looking for an easier way to make purchases, especially for pricier items. Since the 2008 financial crisis, many millennials don't want to use credit cards, so they have looked at other options, Klarna U.S. head David Sykes said.

Affirm said more than 6.2 million consumers made roughly 17 million transactions on its platform with more than 6,500 merchants from July 2016 to September 2020. That represented total gross merchandise volume, or total sales transactions on the platform, of $10.7 billion.

The startup recorded revenue of about $510 million in its fiscal year that ended in June 2020, up 93% year-over-year.

One of its top rivals, Klarna, which is still private, reported gross merchandise volume of $35 billion for the first nine months of 2020, up 43% year-over-year. The Sweden-based company said it had 11 million U.S. customers and 2 million monthly active app users as of November 2020.

Silva said advances in technology, especially in AI and big data analytics, are driving the BNPL trend. These new tools are providing merchants and banks a faster, in-depth look at consumers' ability to pay their bills.

"What's expanding is credit, and we attribute that to the improved performance of AI-based risk models," he said. "When you think about it, credit all comes down to risk. How likely is this person to pay off whatever loan we're giving them?"

In fact, Affirm and Klarna target consumers with higher credit scores, so their credit risk is relatively low, said Fabrice Grinda, founding partner at FJ Labs, a Klarna investor. Neither company has been significantly affected by the pandemic downturn, he said.

"Affirm and Klarna are catering to people with high credit scores," he told Protocol. "Those people are doing relatively well — lawyers, doctors, bankers, consultants."

Affirm's relatively more affluent customer base was highlighted by one fact it disclosed in its IPO filing. The company said its top merchant partner is exercise bike maker Peloton, which comprised roughly 28% of its revenue in the fiscal year ending June 2020.

Grinda said that even if there were a longer recession that affected this higher-income group, he thinks companies like Affirm and Klarna will be relatively safe.

But the expansion of BNPL companies at a time of lingering uncertainty due to the pandemic is making some analysts and investors nervous.

"It's creating too much credit, which is always a big issue in consumer spending countries like the U.S.," said Kenn So, an investor with Shasta Ventures. He said Affirm appears to be doing a good job managing risks and delinquencies, "but with COVID decimating jobs and dragging the economy, I hope BNPL does not lead to excessive purchase behaviors."

Jonah Crane, a partner at investment firm Klaros Group, said "fraud and chargeback risks loom large" in BNPL.

"The ability of companies like Affirm to manage that risk appropriately is going to be absolutely critical to survive," he told Protocol. This is particularly important in a system in which customers typically are making a one-off transaction: "That's a challenging thing, from a fraud risk perspective, to deal with."

Klarna's Sykes said the company's credit risk is relatively low because Klarna's average order size in the U.S. is $150. "It's not like we target the subprime market," he said.

Joe Floyd, general partner at venture firm Emergence Capital, which isn't an investor in Affirm or Klarna, said investors should probably not be valuing Affirm and similar companies as software companies, but instead as lenders whose business is heavily dependent on transactions and risks.

Affirm, which raised its IPO price range from $33 to $38 to between $41 and $44, is looking to raise roughly $1.1 billion when it begins trading under the ticker AFRM on the Nasdaq Global Market. It's reportedly eyeing a valuation of more than $10 billion.

"There's always risk if you're lending," Floyd said. "If I were a public market investor, I would not want to apply the same multiples as I do to pure software companies."

Update: This article was updated at 8:15 a.m. PT to clarify the types of loans Affirm offers, and again at 11:52 a.m. PT to include its opening stock price.

Protocol | China

Beijing meets an unstoppable force: Chinese parents and their children

Live-in tutors disguised as nannies, weekday online tutoring classes and adult gaming accounts for rent. Here's how citizens are finding ways to skirt Beijing's diktats.

Citizens in China are experienced at cooking up countermeasures when Beijing or governments come down with rigid policies.

Photo: Liu Ying/Xinhua via Getty Images

During the summer break, Beijing handed down a parade of new regulations designed to intervene in youth education and entertainment, including a strike against private tutoring, a campaign to "cleanse" the internet and a strict limit on online game playing time for children. But so far, these seemingly iron-clad rules have met their match, with students and their parents quickly finding workarounds.

Grassroots citizens in China are experienced at cooking up countermeasures when Beijing or governments come down with rigid policies. Authorities then have to play defense, amending holes in their initial rules.

Keep Reading Show less
Shen Lu

Shen Lu is a reporter with Protocol | China. Her writing has appeared in Foreign Policy, The New York Times and POLITICO, among other publications. She can be reached at shenlu@protocol.com.


Keep Reading Show less
Nasdaq
A technology company reimagining global capital markets and economies.
Protocol | Policy

Google and Microsoft are at it again, now over government software

The on-again, off-again battle between the two companies flared up again when Google commissioned a study on how much the U.S. government relies on Microsoft software.

Google and Microsoft are in a long-running feud that has once again flared up in recent months.

Photo: Jens Tandler/EyeEm/Getty Images

According to a new report commissioned by Google, Microsoft has an overwhelming "share in the U.S. government office productivity software market," potentially leading to security risks for local, state and federal governments.

The five-page document, released Tuesday by a trade group that counts Google as a member, represents the latest escalation between the two companies in a long-running feud that has once again flared up in recent months.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

People

Facebook wants to kill the family iPad

Facebook has built the first portable smart display, and is introducing a new household mode that makes it easier to separate work from play.

Facebook's new Portal Go device will go on sale for $199 in October.

Photo: Facebook

Facebook is coming for the coffee table tablet: The company on Tuesday introduced a new portable version of its smart display called Portal Go, which promises to be a better communal device for video calls, media consumption and many of the other things families use iPads for.

Facebook also announced a revamped version of its Portal Pro device Tuesday, and introduced a new household mode to Portals that will make it easier to share these devices with everyone in a home without having to compromise on working-from-home habits. Taken together, these announcements show that there may be an opening for consumer electronics companies to meet this late-pandemic moment with new device categories.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Protocol | Policy

The techlash is threatening human rights around the world

Some 48 countries introduced laws to regulate tech last year. But researchers say many of those laws are just attempts at censorship and surveillance.

In its latest report, Freedom House President Michael Abramowitz said, "We really see free expression and privacy as under unprecedented strain."

Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Governments around the world are seizing on widespread frustrations with Big Tech as justification for a spate of increasingly restrictive laws governing online speech, a new report finds, a trend that researchers say puts both free expression and the fate of tech companies' overseas employees at risk.

Over the last year alone, some 48 countries worldwide introduced — and in some cases, passed — laws to regulate tech companies, according to the latest report by Freedom House, a nonprofit that publishes an annual survey on internet freedoms in 70 countries. While those laws have often been passed in the name of promoting competition, protecting people's data and moderating offensive content, the report's authors say that, in many cases, these laws are merely thinly veiled attempts to force companies into censorship and surveillance.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Latest Stories