A failed bank for former slaves should give crypto hucksters caution

Crypto hype has made racial and underserved communities vulnerable to scams and a volatile market. The White House wants to make sure history doesn’t repeat itself.

NEW YORK, NEW YORK - FEBRUARY 08: A bitcoin ATM is seen inside the Big Apple Tobacco Shop on February 08, 2021 in New York City. Tesla announced on Monday that it purchased $1.5 billion worth of bitcoin. The car company also announced that it will start accepting payments in bitcoin in exchange for its products which include their electric cars and solar panels. (Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

The appearance of bitcoin ATMs in lower-income communities is, to some critics, a sign of crypto's potential for exploitation of the financially vulnerable.

Photo: Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

In highlighting risks posed by crypto, the Biden administration drew particular attention to how the hype around digital currency could hurt underserved and minority communities.

The Treasury Department underlined that warning by citing a tragedy that happened nearly 150 years ago: the 1874 collapse of Freedman’s Savings Bank, which was set up to help formerly enslaved people but ended up devastating the Black community.

Crypto’s revolutionary set wants to overturn financial history, not learn from it. But the historical mention stood out for some critics who have grown increasingly concerned about the hype over crypto and welcome the Biden administration’s focus on its impact on poor and minority communities.

Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have drawn some evangelists from historically disadvantaged communities. As prices boomed before crypto winter set in, some saw an opportunity to rebuild generational wealth lost to decades of systematic discrimination. And crypto businesses saw opportunities to market their products to new audiences. Block and Jay-Z, who serves on the fintech company’s board, have backed bitcoin education programs meant to serve minority populations.

“The Freedman’s Bank comparison underscores a bit of the 'There's nothing new under the sun' perspective on financial products, regardless of their packaging,” Mark Hays, a senior policy analyst at the Americans for Financial Reform, told Protocol. “The current risks and harms that digital assets pose to consumers and investors — particularly low-income communities and communities of color — are many, serious and real.”

Brookings Institution fellow Tonantzin Carmona said the Biden administration’s special focus on poor communities “was very reaffirming” since the administration “is also seeing very similar risks.”

The risks are pronounced in the Black community.

The Freedman's Savings Bank on Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington, D.C. circa 1890 The Freedman's Savings Bank building on Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington, D.C. circa 1890. The bank failed after the Panic of 1873. Photo: Library of Congress; Wikimedia Commons

Black consumers are more likely than white consumers to own cryptocurrencies, a June Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City report said. This has raised worries that a significant number of Black households — with median wealth of around $24,000 — are dangerously exposed to a highly volatile market, the report said.

The Kansas Fed warned that crypto holders “could simply lose their investments if the exchange goes bankrupt or gets hacked: a 21st century version of Freedman’s Savings Bank.” This was an analogy the Treasury Department would echo in its report.

Founded in 1865 with the abolition of slavery, the Freedman’s Savings Bank was created by Congress to provide banking and financial services assistance to newly freed Black people. But the bank collapsed as a result of poor management and the impact of a battered economy.

The trauma of the Freedman’s Bank’s collapse had a huge impact on the Black community, said Brookings Institution’s Carmona. “If you talk to members of the Black community, they will tell you [something] like this happened,” she told Protocol. “Those stories get passed down across generations.”

But the story of the Freedman’s Bank collapse also made many in the Black community more receptive to crypto.

Crypto is viewed by many in the Black community as “more trustworthy than traditional assets,” the Kansas Fed report said. Many Black consumers also “see cryptocurrencies as a relatively quick way to close the wealth gap with other races, particularly white consumers,” the authors added.

Shawn Wilkinson became one of the most successful Black entrepreneurs in crypto, which he called an “open terrain” that offers a lot of opportunities “especially for people of color” and entrepreneurs like him “who didn't necessarily come from money or generational wealth."

In a 2021 interview with Protocol, Wilkinson, the founder of the storage blockchain startup Storj, cited another historical tragedy, the Tulsa Race Massacre, when an Oklahoma community of predominantly Black entrepreneurs known as Black Wall Street was destroyed in an anti-Black riot. The crypto and blockchain industries, Wilkinson said, open up opportunities to build “generational wealth” that cannot be "bombed away and stolen away.”

He acknowledged that crypto holders have taken hits in the market crash. “I’ve definitely seen that,” he told Protocol. “I definitely know people who have gone quite down.”

But downturns are part of crypto, Wilkinson argued. “I've been in this space for 10 years — this is normal to me,” he said. “... Over the long haul, crypto is probably one of the best-performing assets of all time.”

Another Black entrepreneur, Edwardo Jackson, creator of Blacks in Bitcoin, agreed, noting that crypto offers a way to raise capital for communities that have “historically, institutionally been shut out from mainstream financial access.”

But Jackson acknowledged a point that was also raised by the Biden administration: Some communities clearly are vulnerable to crypto scams. The Treasury Department report warned that “crypto-asset products may be marketed in ways that obscure their level of risk, which could exacerbate the impact of targeted marketing on vulnerable communities.”

Signage advertising short-term loans stands in front of stores in Birmingham, Alabama, U.S., on Tuesday, Feb. 10, 2015. In Alabama, the sixth-poorest state, with one of the highest concentrations of lenders, advocates are trying to curb payday and title loans, a confrontation that clergy cast as God versus greed. They have been stymied by an industry that metamorphoses to escape regulation, showers lawmakers with donations, packs hearings with lobbyists and has even fought a common database meant to enforce a $500 limit in loans. Photographer: Gary Tramontina/Bloomberg via Getty Images Signage advertising short-term loans stands in front of stores in Birmingham, Alabama, U.S. Photo: Gary Tramontina/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Jackson pointed to what he called “a disturbing trend” in the Black community.

“We're targets,” he told Protocol. “We’re targets of every MLM [multi-level marketing] scam, every scamcoin, shitcoin, whatever it is. A lot of them have recently come home to roost.”

Carmona said the crypto crash underscores key lessons for underserved communities, particularly Black and Latinx people.

While many minorities still grapple with access to capital and traditional banking services, she said, “that doesn't necessarily mean that crypto is automatically the solution.” Despite all the talk about decentralization, “the growing concentration of the wealthy in these spaces demonstrates that not all cryptocurrency holders are created equal.”

The crypto crash also serves as a powerful reminder of other past financial services trends that promised financial inclusion and access, such as payday lending and subprime mortgages, which turned out to be disastrous for these communities.

The Treasury Department report actually cited the “prevalence of crypto-asset ATMs in lower-income neighborhoods that lack bank branches,” which Hays said “very much reminds me of payday lending storefronts proliferating in low-income neighborhoods.”

Carmona also cited a point that she said “was brought up again and again” in the Treasury Department report: “While crypto may present new opportunities, it also may present a new set of risks.”


Steel decided World War II. Chips will decide whatever is next.

“Chip War: The Fight for the World’s Most Critical Technology” foreshadows the coming battle between nations over semiconductors.

“Chip War” outlines the nature of the coming battle over semiconductors, showing how the power to produce leading-edge chips fell into the hands of just five companies.

Image: Scribner; Protocol

“World War II was decided by steel and aluminum, and followed shortly thereafter by the Cold War, which was defined by atomic weapons,” Chris Miller, a professor at Tufts University’s Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, writes in the introduction to his latest book. So what’s next? According to Miller, the next era, including the rivalry between the U.S. and China, is all about computing power.

That tech rivalry and the story of how the chip industry got from four to 11.8 billion transistors are all part of Miller’s book, “Chip War: The Fight for the World’s Most Critical Technology,” which comes out Oct. 4. “Chip War” outlines the nature of the coming battle over semiconductors, showing how the power to produce leading-edge chips fell into the hands of just five companies: three from the U.S., one from Japan, and one from the Netherlands.

Keep Reading Show less
Hirsh Chitkara

Hirsh Chitkara ( @HirshChitkara) is a reporter at Protocol focused on the intersection of politics, technology and society. Before joining Protocol, he helped write a daily newsletter at Insider that covered all things Big Tech. He's based in New York and can be reached at

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Musk’s texts reveal what tech’s most powerful people really want

From Jack Dorsey to Joe Rogan, Musk’s texts are chock-full of überpowerful people, bending a knee to Twitter’s once and (still maybe?) future king.

“Maybe Oprah would be interested in joining the Twitter board if my bid succeeds,” one text reads.

Photo illustration: Patrick Pleul/picture alliance via Getty Images; Protocol

Elon Musk’s text inbox is a rarefied space. It’s a place where tech’s wealthiest casually commit to spending billions of dollars with little more than a thumbs-up emoji and trade tips on how to rewrite the rules for how hundreds of millions of people around the world communicate.

Now, Musk’s ongoing legal battle with Twitter is giving the rest of us a fleeting glimpse into that world. The collection of Musk’s private texts that was made public this week is chock-full of tech power brokers. While the messages are meant to reveal something about Musk’s motivations — and they do — they also say a lot about how things get done and deals get made among some of the most powerful people in the world.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.


Circle’s CEO: This is not the time to ‘go crazy’

Jeremy Allaire is leading the stablecoin powerhouse in a time of heightened regulation.

“It’s a complex environment. So every CEO and every board has to be a little bit cautious, because there’s a lot of uncertainty,” Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire told Protocol at Converge22.

Photo: Circle

Sitting solo on a San Francisco stage, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire asked tennis superstar Serena Williams what it’s like to face “unrelenting skepticism.”

“What do you do when someone says you can’t do this?” Allaire asked the athlete turned VC, who was beaming into Circle’s Converge22 convention by video.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


Is Salesforce still a growth company? Investors are skeptical

Salesforce is betting that customer data platform Genie and new Slack features can push the company to $50 billion in revenue by 2026. But investors are skeptical about the company’s ability to deliver.

Photo: Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Salesforce has long been enterprise tech’s golden child. The company said everything customers wanted to hear and did everything investors wanted to see: It produced robust, consistent growth from groundbreaking products combined with an aggressive M&A strategy and a cherished culture, all operating under the helm of a bombastic, but respected, CEO and team of well-coiffed executives.

Dreamforce is the embodiment of that success. Every year, alongside frustrating San Francisco residents, the over-the-top celebration serves as a battle cry to the enterprise software industry, reminding everyone that Marc Benioff’s mighty fiefdom is poised to expand even deeper into your corporate IT stack.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a writer-at-large at Protocol. He previously covered enterprise software for Protocol, Bloomberg and Business Insider. Joe can be reached at To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or

Latest Stories