Fintech’s CEO is playing the long game

Peter Smith founded his crypto startup before Coinbase or Binance existed. Will his go-slow approach win in the long run?

​ CEO Peter Smith CEO Peter Smith got an early start. Now he has to catch up.

Photo: had a solid head start in the world of crypto. It didn't hurt that it had a catchy domain name.

But while Blockchain, which launched in 2011, is considered a crypto pioneer, it's been overshadowed by younger, more richly-valued rivals like Coinbase and Binance.

CEO Peter Smith argues that that's a good thing. is a major player in the bitcoin blockchain. About one-third of transactions in the most popular cryptocurrency take place on the network. The company has created 76 million crypto wallets and has 35 million verified users in more than 200 countries.

The company was recently valued at $5.2 billion after raising $300 million in March in a series C round — GV is a backer — and there's speculation that it could follow the lead of Coinbase by going public.

But Smith is not in a hurry, embracing a slow and steady approach to a controversial industry that has roiled regulators worldwide and got major players in legal trouble.

Binance, the world's biggest cryptocurrency exchange, has been banned from any regulated activity in the U.K. by the Financial Conduct Authority. Regulators have also barred the company from operating in Japan, Canada and Italy. This week, Coinbase blasted the Securities and Exchange Commission for blocking its plan to roll out a crypto lending product.

Blockchain has generally avoided such skirmishes, which Smith attributes to a core company principle: Play the long game.

"When you have that sort of big lens, you're sitting there thinking, 'OK, how do we do what's best for the long term, not just what's best for this market cycle?'" he told Protocol. "That leads to a different strategy, a more principled, and at times, slower approach."

Smith elaborated on's game plan in an interview with Protocol. He also talked about the startup's recent decision to move its headquarters from New York City to Miami, his views on the clamor for more crypto regulation and rivals Coinbase and Binance.

This interview has been edited for clarity and brevity.

You recently moved your headquarters to Miami. Why?

We want to be where communities are really excited about crypto. And what we were seeing in Miami was a part of the U.S. that was really excited to be part of the crypto revolution over the next 10 years. We wanted to be there for that. And then from a simple, tactical side like there's just a lot of talent in Miami now in crypto. So you've seen a lot of crypto people move to Miami, as well as having a huge amount of interest in crypto from folks who are already living in Miami.

You launched an exchange in 2019 when there were already other marketplaces that were growing and well-established. What was that transition like?

We mostly launched the exchange to give our customers another way to trade crypto. We have a very large wallet in retail brokerage, 35 million verified accounts, likely the second-largest user base in crypto.

A lot of our customers, we could see them buy some crypto, start investing, and then a small subset of them would become active traders. And when they become active traders they would need to go to another company to get an active trading product. And so we wanted to build a product that would satisfy that customer's need to actively trade their crypto.

How has it impacted the other segments of your business?

The wallet has been the core of our business for a long time since we launched a product that made it easy for anyone in the world to custody their own bitcoin and later, purchase their first crypto, trade crypto between dozens of assets. We've added about 30 million customers to the verified side in the last three years. That's been really phenomenal to see.

The other way that you can publicly look into our business is our share of on-chain transactions. On-chain transactions are expensive, which means you can't really fake them. In 2014, we were about 14% of on-chain [bitcoin] transactions. Today, the consumer business accounts for about 30% of all on-chain transactions.

What are some of the trends in crypto investing that you're closely watching?

I'm watching the DeFi space very closely. We're a very large participant in the DeFi ecosystem. It's fascinating what's going on there. It represents a huge opportunity because we have the single largest user base of users with their own private key. You can't interact with DeFi at all without your own private key, and that's a really key differentiator for us that I think isn't well understood by the market.

At the same time, before we could really open up access to DeFi, we had to make sure that those networks would scale. What's really interesting that's happening now is the successful rollout of a lot of scaling solutions whether these are Gen 2 blockchains that have higher scaling at their core protocol level or scaling solutions for Ethereum which I think are probably the most exciting thing in the crypto market today.

Did you, like Coinbase, suspend trading in XRP when the SEC filed a lawsuit against Ripple in December?

We did. We suspended trading in XRP and off-boarded those assets.

Regulation seems to be a constant conversation in crypto now, not just in the U.S. but in the U.K., Europe and China.

The bulk of our business is in Europe. And so we're always much more engaged with EU regulators. And we've had a really long and productive dialogue with the FCA [in the U.K.] for many years now and BaFin [in Germany]. Those are the two regulators at the forefront of crypto in the EU. They are taking a very pragmatic approach to crypto and crypto regulation. Ourselves and other crypto firms are working through their new licensing frameworks.

I actually think it's probably a positive for the market from a stability and consumer protection standpoint. So we work really closely with them. I don't see this as a net bad thing.

The U.S. is more tricky. We have a business in the U.S. And while it's a minority of our business, it's still an important business to us. The thing that makes the U.S. complicated is the diversity of regulators. You have a lot of regulators in the U.S. There isn't a consensus between them about who should be regulating crypto and how they should be regulating crypto.

And it's not just regulation at the federal level. You also have to think about state regulators. Was that a factor for choosing Miami and Florida, for instance?

The regulatory environment in Florida is good for crypto companies. It's regulated. You need a license, which we have, but it's a positive, productive dialogue. And I think that's what you're hoping for with regulators.

How has the conversation related to crypto taxation — which has become prominent in the pending infrastructure bill — impacted your business? There's a lot of debate about language that would require blockchain coders and miners to report their transactions for taxation purposes.

Yeah, that's an interesting one. That's one where that clarity point I was making is relevant. We're very engaged as the bill goes to the House. It's a big industry effort. We're hoping to get that updated to be a bit more clear, and a bit more workable, particularly around protocol developers. You've seen both sides of the leadership on the Hill say that it's not intended to cover that.

Have you been beefing up your presence in Washington?

For sure. A few quarters ago we added Jim Messina as an independent board member. He was the campaign manager for Obama and was very senior in the Obama White House. And he's worked closely with Biden and his team for many years. He was a key part of our government affairs strategy, and we've recently begun to hire into a D.C. government affairs office as well.

Can you comment on your major competitors? Let's start with Binance, which has been facing a lot of pressure overseas, especially in the U.K. and Western Europe.

I think Binance has made a lot of business decisions that we wouldn't have made. You've never seen a regulator push back on us like that. Nor have we ever paid a fine or had an enforcement action. That's because we take a slower, very principled approach to rolling out products and protecting consumers as well as being very engaged with the regulators. In terms of how it will impact us, it's probably mostly positive.

Why positive?

The big split in crypto is the offshore versus the onshore. When you're onshore and regulated, it's tough to roll out as many products — as many risky products — as quickly because you are within that rules and regulatory framework, as well as your banking partners. These offshore venues don't have banking partners. When you have banking partners, that restricts some of your flexibility, because your banking partners are regulated as well.

As we see regulators gradually clamping down on offshore venues, it's mostly a positive for the folks that are onshore and have been pursuing a slower, more principled path.

Would you say you've taken a more cautious approach to expansion?

Yeah. One of our core six values is being long term. And what that means to us is, first and foremost, taking care of our customers. So just because you can make a bunch of money offering 100x leverage doesn't mean it's a good idea, because you're gonna end up taking most of your customers' accounts to zero.

Just because you can get a bunch of trading volume on a coin that may or may not be a scam and make fees on it, doesn't mean it's a good idea to roll it out to your customers. Just because going offshore can help you maybe temporarily evade regulation, doesn't mean it's good for your customers in the long term.

How did you react to the Coinbase IPO?

I'm really proud of them. Huge hats off to them. It's monumental to pull off an IPO for any company. But for a crypto company, it's even harder. They built a phenomenal business over there, and we have really good relations with the Coinbase team and have known the founders a long time. They've done a phenomenal job of advancing the whole industry.

In our case, we will go public someday. We're venture-backed, but we are minority investor-owned. We are very lucky to have investors that are focused on the long term. We're under no immediate pressure to go public. At the same time we're constantly asking ourselves: When is the right time? You know, from a financial metrics perspective, we can certainly go public today.

I'm assuming that one of your goals right now is to expand your footprint in the U.S.

Our goal in the U.S. is to serve inbound customer demand. But we don't plan an aggressive [expansion]. We're not trying to eat into anyone else's business in the U.S. We are very excited about a lot of other markets around the world. We're seeing huge growth in places like Eastern Europe and Latin America, and a lot of growth in the U.S. as well.

What is the biggest hurdle for you right now, the thing that you think about most?

Payment rails. Very unsexy answer for you. One of the most important things when you're running a very consumer-focused product is: How do you make it easy for people to get into crypto? And that is a much harder challenge than I think most people realize. You're dealing with different payment providers, state-level differences, fraud models. It's a fun and very multivariate challenge.

What are you most worried about?

Crypto is now at an awareness level. That gives us the chance to make crypto a daily part of life for hundreds of millions of humans around the world in the next five years. Today we're probably a daily part of life for maybe, at best, a million humans around the world, the whole industry. And we have this opportunity to become a daily part of life for hundreds of millions. That's only going to happen if we treat customers well. And if we build products that are useful to them on a daily basis.

And we've got to do that. If we don't do that, crypto doesn't really matter to the average person five years from now. And we won't have achieved our mission of building an open financial system for the internet. And so it's both a huge opportunity. Now's the time where we have to really make it back out. And that's what I think about a lot at night.


Musk’s texts reveal what tech’s most powerful people really want

From Jack Dorsey to Joe Rogan, Musk’s texts are chock-full of überpowerful people, bending a knee to Twitter’s once and (still maybe?) future king.

“Maybe Oprah would be interested in joining the Twitter board if my bid succeeds,” one text reads.

Photo illustration: Patrick Pleul/picture alliance via Getty Images; Protocol

Elon Musk’s text inbox is a rarefied space. It’s a place where tech’s wealthiest casually commit to spending billions of dollars with little more than a thumbs-up emoji and trade tips on how to rewrite the rules for how hundreds of millions of people around the world communicate.

Now, Musk’s ongoing legal battle with Twitter is giving the rest of us a fleeting glimpse into that world. The collection of Musk’s private texts that was made public this week is chock-full of tech power brokers. While the messages are meant to reveal something about Musk’s motivations — and they do — they also say a lot about how things get done and deals get made among some of the most powerful people in the world.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Circle’s CEO: This is not the time to ‘go crazy’

Jeremy Allaire is leading the stablecoin powerhouse in a time of heightened regulation.

“It’s a complex environment. So every CEO and every board has to be a little bit cautious, because there’s a lot of uncertainty,” Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire told Protocol at Converge22.

Photo: Circle

Sitting solo on a San Francisco stage, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire asked tennis superstar Serena Williams what it’s like to face “unrelenting skepticism.”

“What do you do when someone says you can’t do this?” Allaire asked the athlete turned VC, who was beaming into Circle’s Converge22 convention by video.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


Is Salesforce still a growth company? Investors are skeptical

Salesforce is betting that customer data platform Genie and new Slack features can push the company to $50 billion in revenue by 2026. But investors are skeptical about the company’s ability to deliver.

Photo: Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Salesforce has long been enterprise tech’s golden child. The company said everything customers wanted to hear and did everything investors wanted to see: It produced robust, consistent growth from groundbreaking products combined with an aggressive M&A strategy and a cherished culture, all operating under the helm of a bombastic, but respected, CEO and team of well-coiffed executives.

Dreamforce is the embodiment of that success. Every year, alongside frustrating San Francisco residents, the over-the-top celebration serves as a battle cry to the enterprise software industry, reminding everyone that Marc Benioff’s mighty fiefdom is poised to expand even deeper into your corporate IT stack.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a writer-at-large at Protocol. He previously covered enterprise software for Protocol, Bloomberg and Business Insider. Joe can be reached at To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or


The US and EU are splitting on tech policy. That’s putting the web at risk.

A conversation with Cédric O, the former French minister of state for digital.

“With the difficulty of the U.S. in finding political agreement or political basis to legislate more, we are facing a risk of decoupling in the long term between the EU and the U.S.”

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Cédric O, France’s former minister of state for digital, has been an advocate of Europe’s approach to tech and at the forefront of the continent’s relations with U.S. giants. Protocol caught up with O last week at a conference in New York focusing on social media’s negative effects on society and the possibilities of blockchain-based protocols for alternative networks.

O said watching the U.S. lag in tech policy — even as some states pass their own measures and federal bills gain momentum — has made him worry about the EU and U.S. decoupling. While not as drastic as a disentangling of economic fortunes between the West and China, such a divergence, as O describes it, could still make it functionally impossible for companies to serve users on both sides of the Atlantic with the same product.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Latest Stories