Fintech

Braintrust is putting the freelance job market on the blockchain

The decentralized network maintained by six different software companies matches employers and freelancers using cryptocurrency and a community-based review system.

Braintrust is putting the freelance job market on the blockchain

A network of people incentivized by tokens vets potential freelancers in the Braintrust system.

Protocol

Many companies are finding it hard to find technical talent, and when they do, they often have to pay high fees to recruiters or job sites. A new decentralized marketplace for talent thinks it can change the traditional recruiting model using blockchain technology and an incentivized community.

Braintrust is a blockchain-based system orchestrated by six separate software companies that takes the middleman out of online recruiting sites like Toptal or Upwork. While crypto and blockchain advocates have promised that decentralized networks can give more power to individual users, many applications that have launched so far have focused on finance, trading and speculation.

But Braintrust could be an example of how blockchain technology can be used to establish a trustworthy community of job seekers, employers and part-time HR personnel.

"It's a decentralized exchange, except for people to get work," said Adam Jackson, co-founder and CEO of Freelance Labs, one of the core teams building Braintrust. "It's not for hedge funds to trade derivatives with each other, it's for freelancers. In our case, we've started with designers, product managers, engineers, but it could work for any knowledge worker."

When companies post job listings on Braintrust — Nike, Porsche, NASA and Goldman Sachs have signed up — a community screening system evaluates programmers or designers who seek jobs. When a job is completed, the client pays the freelancer and also pays a 10% fee to the Braintrust community. Braintrust's treasury is held in BTRST tokens at Coinbase, Anchorage and other wallets.

Braintrust's software automatically verifies the invoices and pays Braintrust tokens to whoever referred the worker to the company. So far it's completed 8,300 jobs with an average project size of $67,000, and it has done $22 million in total volume since launching. The community review system incentivizes high-quality work, and 82,000 freelancers have signed up so far.

Zoe Rem, a freelance designer, used Braintrust to find a job last December. That contract has been renewed several times since then. She previously had sent out resumes through other sites and she would "never hear back," she told Protocol.

"One reason why [Braintrust] feels so great is it's going and doing half the work for me," Rem said. "They already filtered out the jobs that were good for me."

While companies can pay 20% to 40% in fees to hire a worker through Upwork, Toptal or Fiverr, Braintrust charges employers 10% of the contract value, which covers things like onboarding clients, insurance and other services. And freelancers get to keep 100% of their payment.

"So their money goes much further — every $100,000 a client spends, they know they're getting $90,000 of work," said Jackson, who's also the founder and former CEO of Doctor on Demand.

Braintrust can do that because there is no single for-profit company in the middle that is taking the fees. Braintrust's software runs the marketplace with smart contracts. There are six software development companies that work on the Braintrust technology — one of which Jackson runs — and those companies received about 19% of the Braintrust tokens. Investors received 22%, and 5% were sold in a token sale, with the rest going to the community.

That's one promise of crypto or Web3 products: Instead of enriching one company and its investors, the fee goes toward building the network.

"Braintrust was built for today's virtual-first work environment: a labor market that is extremely tight on talent and increasingly freelance and remote," said Scott Stanford of Acme Capital, a Braintrust investor.

Blockchain democracy?

Meanwhile, the decentralized nature of Braintrust means its governance is controlled by token holders — largely, the developers who work on the platform. Token holders can vote on changes to the network, such as adding new job types.

"Imagine if all the DoorDashers had a vote on how DoorDash was governed, or Uber, or Lyft. Those networks would look a lot different. They wouldn't have this massive extractionary corporation in the middle," Jackson said.

The protocol also uses its token to pay people who successfully refer candidates to jobs, community screeners — who verify that freelancers have certain skills — and a "jury" of community members who arbitrate disputes between companies and freelancers. So far only seven out of 1,200 invoices have been disputed.

Braintrust also pays tokens to anyone who refers a candidate for a job. Screeners have an incentive to keep the level of talent in the network high, which keeps prices high, Jackson said.

"You're rewarding the community with the token for doing what a recruiter would normally do," Jackson says.

Rem has recently become a community talent screener as well. While she's not a crypto enthusiast, the token was an incentive to become a screener, she said. She also likes the ability to vote on governance of the network.

"That's awesome that we get a say in that," Rem said. "It feels very empowering and also the existence of that makes me confident Braintrust will never turn into just other network."

The decentralized marketplace could work for other industries, particularly higher-end knowledge work, such as legal or accounting, where high prices encourage good behavior by the members of the network, Jackson said. However, for other types of more commoditized work — say, Uber drivers — it may be harder to make the model work.

Policy

Musk’s texts reveal what tech’s most powerful people really want

From Jack Dorsey to Joe Rogan, Musk’s texts are chock-full of überpowerful people, bending a knee to Twitter’s once and (still maybe?) future king.

“Maybe Oprah would be interested in joining the Twitter board if my bid succeeds,” one text reads.

Photo illustration: Patrick Pleul/picture alliance via Getty Images; Protocol

Elon Musk’s text inbox is a rarefied space. It’s a place where tech’s wealthiest casually commit to spending billions of dollars with little more than a thumbs-up emoji and trade tips on how to rewrite the rules for how hundreds of millions of people around the world communicate.

Now, Musk’s ongoing legal battle with Twitter is giving the rest of us a fleeting glimpse into that world. The collection of Musk’s private texts that was made public this week is chock-full of tech power brokers. While the messages are meant to reveal something about Musk’s motivations — and they do — they also say a lot about how things get done and deals get made among some of the most powerful people in the world.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.
Fintech

Circle’s CEO: This is not the time to ‘go crazy’

Jeremy Allaire is leading the stablecoin powerhouse in a time of heightened regulation.

“It’s a complex environment. So every CEO and every board has to be a little bit cautious, because there’s a lot of uncertainty,” Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire told Protocol at Converge22.

Photo: Circle

Sitting solo on a San Francisco stage, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire asked tennis superstar Serena Williams what it’s like to face “unrelenting skepticism.”

“What do you do when someone says you can’t do this?” Allaire asked the athlete turned VC, who was beaming into Circle’s Converge22 convention by video.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Enterprise

Is Salesforce still a growth company? Investors are skeptical

Salesforce is betting that customer data platform Genie and new Slack features can push the company to $50 billion in revenue by 2026. But investors are skeptical about the company’s ability to deliver.

Photo: Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Salesforce has long been enterprise tech’s golden child. The company said everything customers wanted to hear and did everything investors wanted to see: It produced robust, consistent growth from groundbreaking products combined with an aggressive M&A strategy and a cherished culture, all operating under the helm of a bombastic, but respected, CEO and team of well-coiffed executives.

Dreamforce is the embodiment of that success. Every year, alongside frustrating San Francisco residents, the over-the-top celebration serves as a battle cry to the enterprise software industry, reminding everyone that Marc Benioff’s mighty fiefdom is poised to expand even deeper into your corporate IT stack.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a writer-at-large at Protocol. He previously covered enterprise software for Protocol, Bloomberg and Business Insider. Joe can be reached at JoeWilliams@Protocol.com. To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or JPW53189@protonmail.com.

Policy

The US and EU are splitting on tech policy. That’s putting the web at risk.

A conversation with Cédric O, the former French minister of state for digital.

“With the difficulty of the U.S. in finding political agreement or political basis to legislate more, we are facing a risk of decoupling in the long term between the EU and the U.S.”

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Cédric O, France’s former minister of state for digital, has been an advocate of Europe’s approach to tech and at the forefront of the continent’s relations with U.S. giants. Protocol caught up with O last week at a conference in New York focusing on social media’s negative effects on society and the possibilities of blockchain-based protocols for alternative networks.

O said watching the U.S. lag in tech policy — even as some states pass their own measures and federal bills gain momentum — has made him worry about the EU and U.S. decoupling. While not as drastic as a disentangling of economic fortunes between the West and China, such a divergence, as O describes it, could still make it functionally impossible for companies to serve users on both sides of the Atlantic with the same product.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Latest Stories
Bulletins