Coinbase wants to be transparent. But crypto insider trading is cloudy.

Some think its attempt to provide more disclosure around its plans to list tokens is just damage control.


Speculators have long agitated for Coinbase and other big exchanges to list their favored cryptocurrencies.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

A push by Coinbase to become more transparent has just made things cloudier, with accusations of insider trading flying on Twitter.

Speculators have long agitated for Coinbase and other big exchanges to list their favored cryptocurrencies, with the belief that such support offers both legitimacy and liquidity, particularly for newer tokens. The crypto powerhouse announced Monday it would start posting a list of tokens being considered for listing, including three dozen this quarter.

Coinbase had previously kept its plans close to the vest, so the unexpected move provoked a lot of head-scratching. A well-known crypto podcaster, Jordan Fish, who goes by Cobie in the community, soon provided a theory.

Fish said Tuesday he had found an Ethereum wallet that had “bought hundreds of thousands of dollars” worth of tokens “exclusively featured” in the Coinbase list “about 24 hours before it was published.”

Coinbase said the “pilot” was “an effort to increase transparency by providing as much information symmetry as possible.” In addition to the list of tokens, it provided an explanation on how Coinbase makes listing decisions. The company “had nothing further to share” about the listing announcement, a spokesperson told Protocol.

The scheme described in Fish’s tweet is classic frontrunning. It’s a bet based on insider information: in this case, the listing of a cryptocurrency on a major exchange like Coinbase. Because of the liquidity Coinbase’s big customer base provides, the listing of a token usually sends its price up.

As a publicly traded company, Coinbase is required to report instances of insider trading in its shares. But crypto? With the U.S. government still unsure if tokens are securities or commodities, it’s not clear who could or would take action.

There’s a history of crypto exchanges having trouble with token listings. In 2019, there were allegations that employees had bought Bitcoin Cash ahead of its listing. In 2021, the CFTC investigated Binance for insider trading. (Binance said at the time that it had a “zero tolerance” policy against insider trading.)

“Insider trading doctrine clearly applies to most familiar crypto assets and their trader,” UCLA law professor Andrew Verstein wrote in the Iowa Law Review in 2019. “The legal requisites for insider trading regulation — jurisdiction, material non-public information, breach of duty — are frequently satisfied.”

But until legislators and regulators resolve some of the big questions around cryptocurrency, enforcement may continue to prove tricky.

It’s “hard to know” if the Coinbase announcement and Fish’s claims are related, Silicon Valley investor Rob Siegel, a Stanford Graduate School of Business lecturer, said.

But, he added, embracing a new policy for token disclosures makes sense for Coinbase “given that crypto is desperately trying for legitimacy.”

“In many instances, disclosure is good for conflicts of interest,” he told Protocol. “Perhaps this is just Coinbase doing good governance and pushing it now so as to ‘stay clean.’”

Michael Fasanello, chief compliance officer of LVL, speculated that “a catalyst” for the Coinbase announcement “could be to mitigate claims of insider trading.”

The timing of Coinbase’s announcement remained an oddity for some.

Alex Johnson, author of the Fintech Takes newsletter, said the Coinbase blog post “makes it seem an awful lot like Coinbase knew that someone had an information advantage and had already acted on it.”

“Publishing this blog post seems more like a weird attempt at damage control than an attempt to prevent this problem from happening again in the future,” he told Protocol.


Getting reproductive benefits at work could be a privacy nightmare

A growing number of tech companies are extending abortion-related travel benefits. Given privacy and legal fears, will employees be too scared to use them?

How employers can implement and discuss reproductive benefits in a way that puts employees at ease.

Photo: Sigrid Gombert via Getty Images

It’s about to be a lot harder to get an abortion in the United States. For many, it’s already hard. The result is that employers, including large companies, are being called upon to fill the abortion care gap. The likelihood of a Roe v. Wade reversal was the push some needed to extend benefits, with Microsoft and Tesla announcing abortion-related travel reimbursements in recent weeks. But the privacy and legal risks facing people in need of abortions loom large. If people have reason to fear texting friends for abortion resources, will they really want to confide in their company?

An employee doesn’t have “much to worry about” when it comes to health privacy, said employee benefits consultant Jessica Du Bois. “The HR director or whoever's in charge of the benefits program is not going to be sharing that information.” Employers have a duty to protect employee health data under HIPAA and a variety of state laws. Companies with self-funded health plans — in other words, most large companies — can see every prescription and service an employee receives. But the data is deidentified.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at

Sponsored Content

Foursquare data story: leveraging location data for site selection

We take a closer look at points of interest and foot traffic patterns to demonstrate how location data can be leveraged to inform better site selecti­on strategies.

Imagine: You’re the leader of a real estate team at a restaurant brand looking to open a new location in Manhattan. You have two options you’re evaluating: one site in SoHo, and another site in the Flatiron neighborhood. Which do you choose?

Keep Reading Show less

VMware CEO Raghu Raghuram: Edge computing is growing faster than the cloud

The now-standalone company is staking its immediate future on the multicloud era of IT and hybrid work, while anticipating increased demand for edge-computing software.

VMware CEO Raghu Raghuram spoke with Protocol about the company's future.

Photo: VMware

Nearly a year into his tenure as CEO, Raghu Raghuram believes VMware is well-positioned for the third phase of its evolution, but acknowledges its product transformation still needs some work.

The company, which pioneered the hypervisor and expanded to virtualized networking and storage with its vSphere operating environment, now is helping customers navigate a distributed, multicloud world and hybrid work with newfound freedom as an independent company after being spun off from Dell Technologies last November.

Keep Reading Show less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.


What’s wrong with current Big Tech HBCU partnerships?

Big Tech is still trying to crack the code on hiring more Black workers despite years of partnerships with HBCUs.

Pictured is the first cohort in Accenture's Level Up program.

Photo: Accenture

As a business major at Prairie View A&M University in Prairie View, Texas, Sean Johnson had been on track to work in finance after graduating. But then his adviser mentioned a program that the historically Black university had with Accenture and Microsoft that was meant to function as a direct pipeline from Prairie View into roles in tech. It changed his entire career course.

Johnson had always had an interest in tech, and the prospect of being able to get a glimpse into the industry, as well as gain real, hands-on experience, appealed to him. By the end of the program, he had a full-time job offer at Accenture.

Keep Reading Show less
Amber Burton

Amber Burton (@amberbburton) is a reporter at Protocol. Previously, she covered personal finance and diversity in business at The Wall Street Journal. She earned an M.S. in Strategic Communications from Columbia University and B.A. in English and Journalism from Wake Forest University. She lives in North Carolina.


We’ll be here again: How tech companies fail to prevent terrorism

Social media platforms are playing defense to stop mass shootings. Without cooperation and legislation, it’s not working.

The Buffalo attack showed that tech’s best defenses against online hate aren’t sophisticated enough to fight the algorithms designed by those same companies to promote content.

Photo: Kent Nishimura / Los Angeles Times via Getty Images

Tech platforms' patchwork approach to content moderation has made them a hotbed for hate speech that can turn deadly, as it did this weekend in Buffalo. The alleged shooter that killed 10 in a historically Black neighborhood used Discord to plan his rampage for months and livestreamed it on Twitch.

The move mirrors what happened in Christchurch, New Zealand, when a white supremacist murdered 51 people in a mosque in 2019. He viewed the killings as a meme. To disseminate that meme, he turned to the same place more than 1 billion other users do: Facebook. This pattern is destined to repeat itself as long as tech companies continue to play defense instead of offense against online hate and fail to work together.

Keep Reading Show less
Sarah Roach

Sarah Roach is a news writer at Protocol (@sarahroach_) and contributes to Source Code. She is a recent graduate of George Washington University, where she studied journalism and mass communication and criminal justice. She previously worked for two years as editor in chief of her school's independent newspaper, The GW Hatchet.

Latest Stories