States aren’t waiting for the federal government to regulate crypto

While the U.S. waits for a federal framework on crypto regulation, states are taking charge, Coinbase’s head of State and Local Public Policy David London says.

David London, Coinbase's head of State & Local Public Policy

"I think it's good that states are taking charge."

Photo: Coinbase

President Biden’s executive order on crypto punted the issue to agencies for further study. The SEC and CFTC are battling over regulatory turf. David London, Coinbase’s head of State and Local Public Policy, thinks that states aren’t going to wait for a federal framework.

Several states and cities have already put some kind of crypto regulation in place, and others are planning to. There’s New York’s expensive, restrictive BitLicense, Wyoming’s crypto-friendly laws and Miami’s proposal to pay city workers in bitcoin.

London elaborated on his experience working through multiple eras of the web to eventually land at Coinbase, the shape of the local regulatory landscape for crypto and what Biden’s executive order could mean for state legislation in an interview with Protocol.

This interview has been edited for brevity and clarity.

Can you talk a little bit about your prior experience before joining Coinbase, and why you chose to go into policy within tech companies?

I started in public policy in tech in the early 2000s. So literally, I've seen Web 1.0, to 2.0, to 3. I started my career at Cisco Systems and what motivated me getting into tech policy is when during the dot-com era everything was really hot in Silicon Valley. I was working in Maryland for a legislator, and I told him, “Boss, I love you. But I'm moving out to Silicon Valley.”

After that, I headed over to eBay and PayPal, and eventually managed all of eBay's and PayPal's state and local programs across the country. From there, I joined a couple more 2.0 companies, specifically a startup called Ofo, which was in the dockless bike-share space, after I left eBay. Most recently, I was at DoorDash where I headed up U.S. East and Canada, and also started its federal program as well.

So I've always been interested in fast-growing companies and companies that were sort of cutting edge, which brings me to my current position with Coinbase. So going from 1.0 to 3, this was like the best match for me moving forward. And I think the things that we're doing, and working with policymakers, I think it's going to be really life-changing, not just here in the U.S. but across the world.

What made you jump into the crypto industry from DoorDash?

There's the opportunity to really do economic empowerment. When I was first researching Coinbase, in the crypto space, maybe about six or seven months ago, I was really intrigued with the opportunities that lie before this industry, specifically around economic empowerment, by allowing individuals to be more empowered for themselves and for their communities, lifting up all boats.

So if you're thinking about something as simple as remittances, if you have relatives abroad, can crypto be that sort of new phase for you to get money to your relatives? Similarly, here, getting access to credit, getting access to capital, for some of the communities in the United States, I see crypto as also being one of those potential avenues for them as well.

It’s a lot of green space, which was really cool with DoorDash, we were doing some really cool stuff trying to educate policymakers. But after [California’s Prop. 22 was] out there, people's minds were kind of already made up about the industry. What I love here, people are so open-minded at this point, a lot of policymakers want to figure out what it is. What is this crypto thing? What is this blockchain thing? They're coming to us to educate them and trade ideas, so that's what's really exciting about this, is there's so much green space to work with policymakers across the country.

With DoorDash and the gig economy, labor is more regulated on the state and local levels. With crypto so far, federal legislation has taken the spotlight. What are your thoughts on the importance of state legislation within the crypto space right now?

I mean, we would love to have a solid federal framework that harmonizes, that's consistent and that makes sense for the industry moving forward.

But in lieu of that, what we have seen is that states are just going to do their own thing, and not just states, but also localities. We're literally tracking legislation all across the country, and seeing that states are putting policy proposals forward, in lieu of federal action.

So I think it's good that states are taking charge. What I really like and what I've seen from a lot of states is that they're really doing it in a very methodical way. That they're looking at the industry, they're looking at: How can crypto benefit their communities? What are some of the safeguards that they need to put up for their constituents? What are some of the things that the industry is looking for? And can industry be a partner with them?

So I think what I've liked, in my short time here, is that I've seen policymakers proactively come to us and ask me, “Hey, what is crypto? How do we get behind this? How do we protect our consumers? How do we make sure that the individuals that use it are successful?”

New York has its coveted BitLicense, and certain states are friendlier than others towards crypto. How do you think that affects the crypto industry and how Coinbase operates?

We're regulated, and we have money transmitter licenses in over 40 states in the United States. So we move forward to the states that we operate in, which is most of the states based upon that. And we're able to understand what the laws are, we work with our regulatory team in getting a good sense of sort of what is the regulatory landscape in an individual state, and we engage at that point. We have very close relationships with regulators in the states that we operate in.

Now, obviously, having multiple states with different licenses, one size doesn't fit all for every state, but one of the things that we have seen is most of them are pretty consistent, generally speaking. What we really love is that the regulators are really good to work with and we have good opportunities to engage with them.

Do you have any thoughts on Biden's executive order and how that might impact state legislation with a more federal framework down the line?

I think the executive order is, as we always have to remember, it's the first step in a much larger process. We applaud the administration for leaning into the issue and, and wanting to bring in industry and to go through the process and see what makes sense from a federal perspective on regulation of our industry.

But in lieu of that, as I mentioned before, the states aren't waiting. It wouldn't surprise me if you start seeing more states introduce things themselves to lean more into crypto in the coming months and years. So I think that's really positive.

There’s also tons of smaller cities that are looking to get into the crypto space. And so I think these are like incubators of innovation across the country.

Also, it's not like a red issue or a blue issue. A lot of times in our industry, people line up on one side of the aisle or the other side of the aisle. What I really love about this industry is it's really bipartisan; we have folks on both sides of the aisle, whether they be far to the left or far to the right, and tons in the middle, that like crypto and want to understand what it is and the benefits of it for their community.


Gavin Newsom shows crypto some California love

“A more flexible approach is needed,” Gov. Newsom said in rejecting a bill that would require crypto companies to get a state license.

Strong bipartisan support wasn’t enough to convince Newsom that requiring crypto companies to register with the state’s Department of Financial Protection and Innovation is the smart path for California.

Photo: Jerod Harris/Getty Images for Vox Media

The Digital Financial Assets Law seemed like a legislative slam dunk in California for critics of the crypto industry.

But strong bipartisan support — it passed 71-0 in the state assembly and 31-6 in the Senate — wasn’t enough to convince Gov. Gavin Newsom that requiring crypto companies to register with the state’s Department of Financial Protection and Innovation is the smart path for California.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Slack’s rallying cry at Dreamforce: No more meetings

It’s not all cartoon bears and therapy pigs — work conferences are a good place to talk about the future of work.

“We want people to be able to work in whatever way works for them with flexible schedules, in meetings and out of meetings,” Slack chief product officer Tamar Yehoshua told Protocol at Dreamforce 2022.

Photo: Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Dreamforce is primarily Salesforce’s show. But Slack wasn’t to be left out, especially as the primary connector between Salesforce and the mainstream working world.

The average knowledge worker spends more time using a communication tool like Slack than a CRM like Salesforce, positioning it as the best Salesforce product to concern itself with the future of work. In between meeting a therapy pig and meditating by the Dreamforce waterfall, Protocol sat down with several Slack execs and conference-goers to chat about the shifting future.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at

LA is a growing tech hub. But not everyone may fit.

LA has a housing crisis similar to Silicon Valley’s. And single-family-zoning laws are mostly to blame.

As the number of tech companies in the region grows, so does the number of tech workers, whose high salaries put them at an advantage in both LA's renting and buying markets.

Photo: Nat Rubio-Licht/Protocol

LA’s tech scene is on the rise. The number of unicorn companies in Los Angeles is growing, and the city has become the third-largest startup ecosystem nationally behind the Bay Area and New York with more than 4,000 VC-backed startups in industries ranging from aerospace to creators. As the number of tech companies in the region grows, so does the number of tech workers. The city is quickly becoming more and more like Silicon Valley — a new startup and a dozen tech workers on every corner and companies like Google, Netflix, and Twitter setting up offices there.

But with growth comes growing pains. Los Angeles, especially the burgeoning Silicon Beach area — which includes Santa Monica, Venice, and Marina del Rey — shares something in common with its namesake Silicon Valley: a severe lack of housing.

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.


SFPD can now surveil a private camera network funded by Ripple chair

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors approved a policy that the ACLU and EFF argue will further criminalize marginalized groups.

SFPD will be able to temporarily tap into private surveillance networks in certain circumstances.

Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Ripple chairman and co-founder Chris Larsen has been funding a network of security cameras throughout San Francisco for a decade. Now, the city has given its police department the green light to monitor the feeds from those cameras — and any other private surveillance devices in the city — in real time, whether or not a crime has been committed.

This week, San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors approved a controversial plan to allow SFPD to temporarily tap into private surveillance networks during life-threatening emergencies, large events, and in the course of criminal investigations, including investigations of misdemeanors. The decision came despite fervent opposition from groups, including the ACLU of Northern California and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which say the police department’s new authority will be misused against protesters and marginalized groups in a city that has been a bastion for both.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Latest Stories