The crypto-communists behind the Web3 revolution

The future of decentralized finance echoes a decidedly Marxist vision of the future. Why aren’t we talking about this?

Marc Andreessen, Brian Armstrong, Jack Dorsey and Elon Musk

The ideological wars ripping crypto apart have historical precedent.

Illustration: Bloomberg and Getty Images; Protocol

An end to the nation-state, the upending of modern finance and a new world order. What could go wrong?

As cryptocurrency swells in value, both financial and cultural, it’s easy to read the phenomenon as hypercapitalist: Bitcoin’s price swings get airtime on CNBC alongside the Dow and Nasdaq. But a recent dispute among some of the industry’s top figures have served as a reminder of digital currency’s libertarian-anarchist roots.

Alongside the hedge-fund cowboys arbitraging and leveraging their way to fresh fortunes, there’s a culture war being waged, with big implications for anyone thinking that the blockchain is just a cool way to lower the cost of cross-border remittances. Hidden in the army of moneymen is a fifth column of revolutionaries. Meet the new crypto-communists.

We’re stealing the term from Winston Churchill, who used it as a Cold War epithet. If you don’t dwell on the historic echoes, though, it’s a useful shorthand for the more extreme, sometimes radical views that undergird some crypto supporters’ enthusiasm for the idea of detaching the world’s financial architecture from its current moorings.

The ’90s internet had its share of utopian dreamers, as did Web 2.0. Web3, as some call the crypto revolution, is another exercise in grappling with what the future will look like and who will lead it. And as in past upheavals, there are heated debates over who’s the genuine crypto revolutionary — and who’s just faking it.

Block party

The crypto culture war exploded into a full-scale tech feud as 2021 was ending when Twitter co-founder and Block CEO Jack Dorsey lashed out at critics who suggested that he was a Web 2.0 remnant trying to reinvent himself as a Web3 pioneer. His now-famous tweet — “You don’t own ‘web3.’ The VCs and their LPs do.” — triggered a bitter tit-for-tat with Marc Andreessen of Andreessen Horowitz, who blocked Dorsey on Twitter, then taunted him for weeks.

Andreessen’s firm has backed Coinbase, OpenSea and other crypto firms that many view as centralizing the crypto world. Dorsey has made a fortune off of the VC-backed Block, but he’s also backed decentralized crypto projects that don’t seem to have any near-term payoff. One way of looking at crypto is the classic alchemy where Silicon Valley transmutes technological disruption into gold; the other prizes disruption as a goal in and of itself.

It’s easy to see the ideological fault lines between the two — even the historical resonances between the compromising Mensheviks, who were willing to work with less-purist parties to bring about change, and the hardline Bolsheviks.

“There are decades when nothing happens, and there are weeks when decades happen.” That’s a quote from the most famous Bolshevik, Vladimir Lenin, but it resonates in Silicon Valley today. (I heard it from a fintech executive who thought he was quoting John Lennon.)

Lenin’s maxim captures crypto’s astounding transformation from fringe movement to world-shaking trend. It has been embraced from San Francisco to New York and from Singapore to London, even as it draws heavy fire from governments, regulators and those who see it as a scam, environmental plague or both.

The question is whether crypto’s supporters are drawn to it because there’s money to be made — see Citadel Securities' recent VC-fueled move into the sector — or because of the prospect for more fundamental change. The line between revolutionary and opportunist is once again blurring.

The barrel of a blockchain

"The government is simply the biggest corporation, with a monopoly on violence and where you have no recourse.”

That one’s not Lenin. It’s recent crypto convert Elon Musk, who emerged last year as an unlikely dogecoin evangelist. But Musk and Lenin seem simpatico when it comes to the “ultimate aim of abolishing the state” (Lenin): “Just delete them all,” Musk recently said, of the government subsidies that have historically sustained his firms. (Perhaps he’s studied Mao Zedong’s essay “On Contradiction.”)

“So long as the state exists there is no freedom,” Lenin declared. “When there is freedom, there will be no state.”

That was the ideal. In reality, a whole lot of state emerged. As Signal founder Moxie Marlinspike recently noted, the decentralized dreams of Web3 are yielding to technical and market realities that call for centralization.

Still, a fair number of crypto supporters more or less openly cheer the idea, to borrow Friedrich Engels’ phrase, of “the withering away of the state.” At the very least, they’re hoping banks and regulators do some withering away.

“We don’t need the financial institutions that we have today,” Dorsey said in June at a bitcoin conference in Miami (if that’s not redundant).

Will that leave a financial system free from the clutches of the wolves of Wall Street — or just a new set of predators, funded by Sand Hill Road? Another Vladimir, this one with the surname Tenev, said he was inspired to start his online brokerage by Occupy Wall Street. We know how that turned out.

In the 2005 book “What the Dormouse Said,” John Markoff drew a line from the ’60s counterculture to the growth of the personal computer industry. That line could easily be extended forward and backwards, from the revolutionary ferment that Marx and Engels sowed to today’s crypto-communists.

That’s a connection Tom Goldenberg, a fintech startup founder who now works at McKinsey, explored in a 2018 essay detailing the similarities between Marx and bitcoin’s mysterious creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, who launched the crypto revolution.

“Marx advocated for a stateless system, where the worker controlled the means of production,” he said. “Satoshi sought to remove financial intermediaries — the banks and credit card companies that controlled the world's flow of value.”

But while Marx and Satoshi both “articulated a reasoned, well-thought-out vision of the future,” Goldenberg added, “neither had the power to predict how their ideas would influence others or be implemented. And neither could control their own creations.”

Visualize whirled peas

So inevitably there’s the squabbling over who should be at the vanguard of the revolution. The debates over whether this person or that company is Web3 enough call to mind other tests of ideological purity.

Pascal Gauthier, CEO of Ledger, the hardware crypto wallet company, spoke dismissively of “Web2 companies trying to become Web3 companies.” Gavin Wood, the Ethereum co-founder whose new company Polkadot is looking to build a blockchain of blockchains, dismissed Coinbase as just another “Web2 entity.” It might remind some of Lenin sorting his fellow communists into “hards” and “softs.”

In the Leninist version of the crypto culture war, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong would likely be branded a Web3 “soft.” Responding to Marlinspike’s essay, he defended centralized exchanges as a “proxy to decentralized data.” Armstrong also recently bought a home in Los Angeles for $133 million.

Can’t we just get along? Isn’t crypto all about solidarity?

Dorsey tried to make this argument at another bitcoin event over the summer, when he said what inspired him about bitcoin was “the community driving it,” which reminded him of “the early internet.”

“My hope is that it creates ... or helps create world peace,” he added.

So pick up your guitar, and picture Jack leading the crypto faithful — Elon, maybe even Marc if they can reconcile — in an updated version of the beloved Lennon anthem:

“All we are saying is

Give bitcoin a chance

All we are saying is

Give crypto a chance …”

It’s a nice vision. But we’ll leave the last word to Churchill.

What was his ultimate diss to the crypto-communists of that era? That they wouldn’t admit what kind of world they really sought. A crypto-communist, he said, was "one who has not the moral courage to explain the destination for which he is making.”


Why foundation models in AI need to be released responsibly

Foundation models like GPT-3 and DALL-E are changing AI forever. We urgently need to develop community norms that guarantee research access and help guide the future of AI responsibly.

Releasing new foundation models doesn’t have to be an all or nothing proposition.

Illustration: sorbetto/DigitalVision Vectors

Percy Liang is director of the Center for Research on Foundation Models, a faculty affiliate at the Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI and an associate professor of Computer Science at Stanford University.

Humans are not very good at forecasting the future, especially when it comes to technology.

Keep Reading Show less
Percy Liang
Percy Liang is Director of the Center for Research on Foundation Models, a Faculty Affiliate at the Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI, and an Associate Professor of Computer Science at Stanford University.

Every day, millions of us press the “order” button on our favorite coffee store's mobile application: Our chosen brew will be on the counter when we arrive. It’s a personalized, seamless experience that we have all come to expect. What we don’t know is what’s happening behind the scenes. The mobile application is sourcing data from a database that stores information about each customer and what their favorite coffee drinks are. It is also leveraging event-streaming data in real time to ensure the ingredients for your personal coffee are in supply at your local store.

Applications like this power our daily lives, and if they can’t access massive amounts of data stored in a database as well as stream data “in motion” instantaneously, you — and millions of customers — won’t have these in-the-moment experiences.

Keep Reading Show less
Jennifer Goforth Gregory
Jennifer Goforth Gregory has worked in the B2B technology industry for over 20 years. As a freelance writer she writes for top technology brands, including IBM, HPE, Adobe, AT&T, Verizon, Epson, Oracle, Intel and Square. She specializes in a wide range of technology, such as AI, IoT, cloud, cybersecurity, and CX. Jennifer also wrote a bestselling book The Freelance Content Marketing Writer to help other writers launch a high earning freelance business.

The West’s drought could bring about a data center reckoning

When it comes to water use, data centers are the tech industry’s secret water hogs — and they could soon come under increased scrutiny.

Lake Mead, North America's largest artificial reservoir, has dropped to about 1,052 feet above sea level, the lowest it's been since being filled in 1937.

Photo: Mario Tama/Getty Images

The West is parched, and getting more so by the day. Lake Mead — the country’s largest reservoir — is nearing “dead pool” levels, meaning it may soon be too low to flow downstream. The entirety of the Four Corners plus California is mired in megadrought.

Amid this desiccation, hundreds of the country’s data centers use vast amounts of water to hum along. Dozens cluster around major metro centers, including those with mandatory or voluntary water restrictions in place to curtail residential and agricultural use.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (


Indeed is hiring 4,000 workers despite industry layoffs

Indeed’s new CPO, Priscilla Koranteng, spoke to Protocol about her first 100 days in the role and the changing nature of HR.

"[Y]ou are serving the people. And everything that's happening around us in the world is … impacting their professional lives."

Image: Protocol

Priscilla Koranteng's plans are ambitious. Koranteng, who was appointed chief people officer of Indeed in June, has already enhanced the company’s abortion travel policies and reinforced its goal to hire 4,000 people in 2022.

She’s joined the HR tech company in a time when many other tech companies are enacting layoffs and cutbacks, but said she sees this precarious time as an opportunity for growth companies to really get ahead. Koranteng, who comes from an HR and diversity VP role at Kellogg, is working on embedding her hybrid set of expertise in her new role at Indeed.

Keep Reading Show less
Amber Burton

Amber Burton (@amberbburton) is a reporter at Protocol. Previously, she covered personal finance and diversity in business at The Wall Street Journal. She earned an M.S. in Strategic Communications from Columbia University and B.A. in English and Journalism from Wake Forest University. She lives in North Carolina.


New Jersey could become an ocean energy hub

A first-in-the-nation bill would support wave and tidal energy as a way to meet the Garden State's climate goals.

Technological challenges mean wave and tidal power remain generally more expensive than their other renewable counterparts. But government support could help spur more innovation that brings down cost.

Photo: Jeremy Bishop via Unsplash

Move over, solar and wind. There’s a new kid on the renewable energy block: waves and tides.

Harnessing the ocean’s power is still in its early stages, but the industry is poised for a big legislative boost, with the potential for real investment down the line.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (

Latest Stories