A group of crypto enthusiasts hatched a plan to buy the US Constitution

Members of ConstitutionDAO raised more than $5 million to bid for a first-edition printing of the U.S. Constitution. What happens if they win?

A printing of the United States Constitution on display

The ConstitutionDAO hopes to bid on the first-edition printing of the Constitution at a Sotheby's auction Thursday.

Photo: Alexi Rosenfeld/Getty Images

Last Thursday night, a band of friendly cryptocurrency enthusiasts hopped on Zoom and decided they wanted to buy a first edition printing of the United States Constitution. By Monday afternoon, more than 2,300 people had collectively donated more than $5 million worth of ether to a project that promises to bid on the document at auction and then let the donors vote to decide what happens if they win.

When Sotheby's offers one of the few privately held copies of the first printing of the U.S. Constitution at auction on Thursday, one of the bidders will be this group of people. They call themselves the ConstitutionDAO, and they see their effort as an example of participatory democracy. Others see it as something far grander. "What's more American than permissionlessly pulling together We the People to buy one of our nation's foundational documents and own it together?" Packy McCormick, a major backer of the project, wrote in his Substack.

Sotheby's estimates that the document will sell for somewhere between $15 and $20 million, though it's impossible to know what the final bid may be — and ConstitutionDAO wants to raise enough funds to win no matter what. By Wednesday night, the group had blown past its $20 million goal and set a new cap at $30 million.

The Founding Fathers never had it this easy. In just over four days, the idea that a decentralized autonomous organization could purchase precious historical art at a Sotheby's auction went from a funny Twitter meme to a hilariously serious reality of a group of people with a Discord server and a formal business organization fully prepared to spend tens of millions of dollars. If and when they do, the DAO promises, contributors will get to see the treasure map on the back. And maybe help get Nic Cage involved. Never mind that "National Treasure" is actually about the Declaration of Independence.

(A DAO, by the way, is a group governed by a contract written in software, with decisions made by the votes of its members. Member voting power is typically proportional to the amount of money each member contributes to the DAO in the form of a token purchase. If this is confusing to you, think of shareholders in a public company voting on a merger proposal.)

The creators of the group (led by Julian Weisser, the co-founder of On Deck, and Alice Ma, an advocate for decentralized communities) say they hope that the DAO's members will vote to put the Constitution on a traveling exhibit to places that might not usually get to see it in a museum, or temporarily preserve or host it someplace safe, like the Smithsonian. (The National Archives Museum in Washington already has a copy on display, by the way.)

"It's a much more participatory way to interact with history. We are going beyond museums. Everyone can choose where and how the Constitution is displayed," Will Papper, one of the DAO's founding members and the co-founder of Syndicate Protocol, told Protocol.

If there are DAO experts, the mid-twenties Papper is one of the few. His group, Syndicate, also helped another organization formally purchase a 40-acre tract of land in Wyoming earlier this month, in what is believed to be the first-ever land purchase by a DAO. Safe to say buying one of the last surviving copies of the Constitution would be a DAO first as well.

The DAO's constitutional questions

The DAO trend emerged from the dark recesses of the crypto community around the same time that mainstream tech leaders (and sometimes mainstream trolls) like Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg started talking publicly about cryptocurrency and the metaverse. The people who participate in them tend to be the same folks investing heavily in cryptocurrencies like bitcoin and evangelizing the idea that blockchain technology will wrest the power of the internet away from behemoths like Meta (formerly Facebook) and Google.

"The Metaverse is already here, and it's in things like ConstitutionDAO that you see it's just not neatly packaged and corporatized like Zuckerberg wants it to be. I don't ever think it really can be," said one ConstitutionDAO donor who goes by the username pseudotheos on the group's Discord chat.

Only two DAO groups have gone as far as publicly purchasing expensive physical objects, though. The CityDAO purchased those 40 acres in Wyoming last week and PleasrDAO purchased a rare Wu-Tang Clan album in late October.

ConstitutionDAO developed momentum as a real possibility all in the last 24 hours, according to Papper. "The originators of it called me and asked, 'Can you help us make this happen from a legal perspective? How do we make this happen from a tax perspective?" he said. "Over the past 24 hours, three things started happening simultaneously. There were like 200 people an hour joining the Discord last night. At Syndicate, we were setting up the legal entity and working with Sotheby's, and we realized we have everything in place to place this bid. Contributors were talking to a bunch of different crowdfunding tools, and we ultimately went to [crowdfunding site] Juicebox as the group to work with. Now we are at more than $3 million."

During the course of a 30-minute conversation with Papper, more than $100,000 worth of ether donations landed in the ConstitutionDAO's account. Hundreds of people joined the group's Discord server. The memes flowed faster in the general chat than any serious question, though an occasional donor would pop up to ask what happens to the donations if ConstitutionDAO doesn't win the bidding war (apparently the funds will be given back, though no one is making any legal promises), or how to participate without paying the high "gas" transaction fees that come with ether (there's no solution here). The serious questions would usually disappear in the flood of jokes about museums, people who don't get crypto, Barack Obama or chugging the Constitution (the Discord community feels very strongly that journalists must recognize the chugging jokes are, indeed, jokes).

The financial security questions are also quite real and not entirely resolved. Crypto project developers have taken token-sale money and run often enough that there's a name for it — "the rug pull" — and the Juicebox FAQ has a disclaimer that says that "due to their public nature, any exploits to the contracts may have irreversible consequences, including loss of funds. Please use Juicebox with caution."

But while the online energy radiates the vibes of a massive con, the value of the shared donor account has climbed to $5.1 million as of Tuesday morning. Sotheby's has agreed that the fund structure designed by Syndicate should allow the group to safely and legally participate in the auction. "Placing a competitive bid is at this point close to guaranteed," Papper said. As for the DAO's chances? "If you had asked me before we launched the fundraise, I would have said 30%. I would say it's probably more like 70% chance of winning it now."

And the donors participating in this project take it very seriously. "I've held ETH and been Web3 curious, but this project caused me to put it on a wallet and contribute," said Evan Branigan, a Colorado-based attorney who recently founded, which attempts to make the legal system more accessible and understandable. He called the group his "gateway DAO."

While there's no legally binding contract that will make the group's organizers abide by their promises, ConstitutionDAO does have

a sort of Google doc constitution. Branigan sees the commitments in these virtual principles — like storing the Constitution at a trustworthy institution and refunding ether if the group loses the auction bid — like they are an actual covenant. "It's a bet. No one knows. What convinced me was the one-pager FAQ that kicked this project off. In a way, that's sort of like a binding commitment. It is a clear statement of the purpose of this DAO. The bet is whether the DAO can stick to that," he said. "It's plausible that this project goes south, but the values behind it are strong enough that give me confidence."

Update: This story has been updated to reflect ConstitutionDAO's fundraising totals. Updated Nov. 17.


Musk’s texts reveal what tech’s most powerful people really want

From Jack Dorsey to Joe Rogan, Musk’s texts are chock-full of überpowerful people, bending a knee to Twitter’s once and (still maybe?) future king.

“Maybe Oprah would be interested in joining the Twitter board if my bid succeeds,” one text reads.

Photo illustration: Patrick Pleul/picture alliance via Getty Images; Protocol

Elon Musk’s text inbox is a rarefied space. It’s a place where tech’s wealthiest casually commit to spending billions of dollars with little more than a thumbs-up emoji and trade tips on how to rewrite the rules for how hundreds of millions of people around the world communicate.

Now, Musk’s ongoing legal battle with Twitter is giving the rest of us a fleeting glimpse into that world. The collection of Musk’s private texts that was made public this week is chock-full of tech power brokers. While the messages are meant to reveal something about Musk’s motivations — and they do — they also say a lot about how things get done and deals get made among some of the most powerful people in the world.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Sponsored Content

Great products are built on strong patents

Experts say robust intellectual property protection is essential to ensure the long-term R&D required to innovate and maintain America's technology leadership.

Every great tech product that you rely on each day, from the smartphone in your pocket to your music streaming service and navigational system in the car, shares one important thing: part of its innovative design is protected by intellectual property (IP) laws.

From 5G to artificial intelligence, IP protection offers a powerful incentive for researchers to create ground-breaking products, and governmental leaders say its protection is an essential part of maintaining US technology leadership. To quote Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo: "intellectual property protection is vital for American innovation and entrepreneurship.”

Keep Reading Show less
James Daly
James Daly has a deep knowledge of creating brand voice identity, including understanding various audiences and targeting messaging accordingly. He enjoys commissioning, editing, writing, and business development, particularly in launching new ventures and building passionate audiences. Daly has led teams large and small to multiple awards and quantifiable success through a strategy built on teamwork, passion, fact-checking, intelligence, analytics, and audience growth while meeting budget goals and production deadlines in fast-paced environments. Daly is the Editorial Director of 2030 Media and a contributor at Wired.

Circle’s CEO: This is not the time to ‘go crazy’

Jeremy Allaire is leading the stablecoin powerhouse in a time of heightened regulation.

“It’s a complex environment. So every CEO and every board has to be a little bit cautious, because there’s a lot of uncertainty,” Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire told Protocol at Converge22.

Photo: Circle

Sitting solo on a San Francisco stage, Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire asked tennis superstar Serena Williams what it’s like to face “unrelenting skepticism.”

“What do you do when someone says you can’t do this?” Allaire asked the athlete turned VC, who was beaming into Circle’s Converge22 convention by video.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.


Is Salesforce still a growth company? Investors are skeptical

Salesforce is betting that customer data platform Genie and new Slack features can push the company to $50 billion in revenue by 2026. But investors are skeptical about the company’s ability to deliver.

Photo: Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Salesforce has long been enterprise tech’s golden child. The company said everything customers wanted to hear and did everything investors wanted to see: It produced robust, consistent growth from groundbreaking products combined with an aggressive M&A strategy and a cherished culture, all operating under the helm of a bombastic, but respected, CEO and team of well-coiffed executives.

Dreamforce is the embodiment of that success. Every year, alongside frustrating San Francisco residents, the over-the-top celebration serves as a battle cry to the enterprise software industry, reminding everyone that Marc Benioff’s mighty fiefdom is poised to expand even deeper into your corporate IT stack.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a writer-at-large at Protocol. He previously covered enterprise software for Protocol, Bloomberg and Business Insider. Joe can be reached at To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or


The US and EU are splitting on tech policy. That’s putting the web at risk.

A conversation with Cédric O, the former French minister of state for digital.

“With the difficulty of the U.S. in finding political agreement or political basis to legislate more, we are facing a risk of decoupling in the long term between the EU and the U.S.”

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Cédric O, France’s former minister of state for digital, has been an advocate of Europe’s approach to tech and at the forefront of the continent’s relations with U.S. giants. Protocol caught up with O last week at a conference in New York focusing on social media’s negative effects on society and the possibilities of blockchain-based protocols for alternative networks.

O said watching the U.S. lag in tech policy — even as some states pass their own measures and federal bills gain momentum — has made him worry about the EU and U.S. decoupling. While not as drastic as a disentangling of economic fortunes between the West and China, such a divergence, as O describes it, could still make it functionally impossible for companies to serve users on both sides of the Atlantic with the same product.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Latest Stories