All of your crypto crash questions answered (except 'Wen Lambo?')

A chaotic market deserves chaotic explanations.


We're answering all your questions about the crypto crash.

Photo: Chris Liverani/Unsplash

People started talking about another crypto winter in January, when falling prices had wiped out $1 trillion in value from November’s peak. Prices rallied back in March, restoring some of the losses. Then crypto fell hard again, with bitcoin down more than 60% from its all-time high and other cryptocurrencies harder hit. The market’s message was clear: Crypto winter was no longer coming. It’s here.

If you’ve got questions about the crypto crash, the Protocol Fintech team has answers.

What triggered the crash?

The stock market is facing a general downturn, particularly in tech stocks. That was already having knock-on effects on the crypto markets. Central banks are hiking benchmark rates and selling assets they acquired over the past two years, leading other investors to sell riskier assets like crypto.

Amid that macroeconomic environment, UST, an algorithmic stablecoin, lost its peg to the dollar in early May. UST was tied to another cryptocurrency, luna: They’re both backed by Terraform Labs and operate on the Terra blockchain. In an attempt to stabilize the currencies, the nonprofit Luna Foundation Guard lent out $1.5 billion in bitcoin and UST.

It didn’t work, but the UST rescue attempt added to the selling pressure on bitcoin, which has hovered around $30,000, well below its November peak above $67,000 and 30% below its price in late April.

What’s the outlook for crypto investing?

Tech overall is in an unwinding now, and crypto is having its own version of that, said David Pakman, managing partner at CoinFund. “I think we have many more quarters of the unwinding to happen, irrespective of if the Fed gets dovish,” he said. Since the depth of the downturn is still unknown, CoinFund has for the past six months advised its startups to have enough cash to last at least two and a half years, he said.

At many startup board meetings, the conversation has changed dramatically. “Already the topic has changed at board meetings from, ‘Maybe we should slow our hiring,’ to, ‘Should we have reduction-in-force layoffs?’” Pakman said.

There could be much more carnage to come, Pakman said, but he’s optimistic that when the dust settles, crypto will have higher potential for growth than other sectors, based on new uses for crypto that might emerge even in dark economic times.

There’s some evidence to support Pakman’s optimism: Despite the collapse in bitcoin’s price, the bitcoin network’s hash rate, a measure of the computing power deployed to verify and record transactions, has hit new highs.

What exactly happened with UST and luna?

UST is an algorithmic stablecoin, meaning its peg to the dollar is meant to be supported by automated trading programs that mint or burn UST and luna to maintain its price. As UST lost its peg, those programs attempted to mint more luna. But the Terra blockchain wasn’t powerful enough to support the volume of transactions needed to maintain the peg — a fact that wasn’t lost on traders, who front-ran the process and drove luna down further.

The Terra blockchain shut down and restarted repeatedly in an attempt to cope with the situation, but ultimately couldn’t salvage the situation. Terraform Labs co-founder Do Kwon proposed restarting the project by handing over governance to UST and luna holders.

The crash underlined the risks of the equivalent of bank runs in crypto, especially on stablecoin. Regulators have been warning for a while that they could cause serious instability to the financial system, and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen mentioned the UST situation in a May Senate hearing.

As of May 16, UST was trading at about $0.11 and luna was all but worthless, according to CoinMarketCap.

Binance, which had invested in Terraform Labs and received luna tokens, saw a $1.6 billion paper loss on that investment, CEO Changpeng Zhao said on Twitter.

Are other stablecoins at risk?

Tether, the world’s biggest stablecoin by market value, wobbled a bit recently, briefly losing its peg before recovering. USDC, the second biggest stablecoin, has retained its $1 peg. Unlike UST, both stablecoins are backed by substantial reserves, largely commercial paper and U.S. Treasuries. The tether coin’s backers have been criticized for not providing enough disclosures about its reserves. Circle, which helped create USDC, has promised to include data about its reserves and SEC filings; it has a deal to go public through a SPAC merger.

What about all those DeFi hacks I’ve heard about?

There’s one more factor weighing on the crypto sector. Things haven’t been looking great for DeFi security for a while now, with the amount of crypto stolen in the first four months of 2022, estimated at $1.57 billion by PeckShield, already surpassing the amount stolen in all of 2021. The biggest attacks in 2022 have taken aim at systemic vulnerabilities like cross-chain bridges, which has allowed for bigger heists than the social engineering attacks that typified 2021.

The crash has exacerbated the problem in at least one case. Blizz Finance, an Avalanche-based liquidity protocol, said on May 12 that its protocol was drained through an attack that involved depositing near-worthless luna, taking advantage of a price-data discrepancy. The Venus protocol was similarly attacked.

Are regulators about to clamp down on crypto?

The rapid growth of crypto has led to heightened concerns from regulators led by the SEC, CFTC and Treasury Department, as well as from prominent political figures including Sens. Elizabeth Warren, Pat Toomey and Cynthia Lummis. The Biden administration issued an executive order on crypto in March which noted that it’s important for the U.S. to lead in blockchain and crypto technology while stressing the need to protect consumers, investors and businesses.

Major agencies like the SEC have begun imposing new rules for crypto companies and have even threatened legal action against companies. However, the drafting of new regulations and even laws related to crypto is expected to take years.

The U.K., EU and other jurisdictions around the world have also planned tighter regulation of the crypto sector.

Is the crypto market going to zero?

Even in the last notable crypto winter in 2018, bitcoin dropped to $5,000, not $0. Cryptocurrencies have seen several market cycles in the 13 years since the first bitcoin was mined in 2009. While crypto is expected to face more scrutiny from governments, even some of crypto’s harshest critics have offered praise for the blockchain technology that undergirds it. In a 2021 speech, SEC Chair Gary Gensler called cryptocurrency a “catalyst for change” in the financial markets. And most regulators and legislators have cautiously noted the need to preserve room for innovation while reining in crypto’s speculative excesses.

OK, we’ll bite. What was ‘Wen Lambo’ about?

In 2013, a 4chan habitué bought a 2014 Lamborghini Gallardo for approximately 217 bitcoin. Lamborghinis, or Lambos, subsequently became a status symbol for newly crowned crypto millionaires. The irony: Even with the recent crash, that Lambo cost the buyer $6 million at current prices.

Should I buy the dip?

If it’s guacamole, sure. Guacamole is delicious.


Sealed finds a market in home decarbonization

Sealed offers homeowners the chance to save money and help protect the planet.

Sealed is convincing homeowners to look at their HVAC systems and insulation in order to save energy and money.

Photo: Gabe Souza/Portland Portland Press Herald via Getty Images

Shiny silver panels hug the walls of Andy Frank’s attic; they vaguely remind me of a child’s robot Halloween costume. A sticky-looking foam lines both the gaps in the attic’s floorboards and the roof, plugging up holes where squirrels could have once taken shelter.

The space is positively sweat-inducing, even for the mere minute I have my head poking above the trapdoor.

Keep Reading Show less
Lisa Martine Jenkins

Lisa Martine Jenkins is a senior reporter at Protocol covering climate. Lisa previously wrote for Morning Consult, Chemical Watch and the Associated Press. Lisa is currently based in Brooklyn, and is originally from the Bay Area. Find her on Twitter ( @l_m_j_) or reach out via email (

Now that most organizations are returning to the office, there are varying extremes – some leaders demand that employees return to the office, with some employees revolting and some rejoicing to be together again. On the other hand, some companies have closed physical offices and made remote work permanent; creating a sigh of relief for some employees and creating frustration for others.

Most of us are somewhere in between, trying our best to take a measured approach at building the right hybrid strategy tailored to company culture. Some seemingly have begun to crack the code, while the majority are grappling with the when, how, why, and who of this new hybrid work reality.

Keep Reading Show less
Nathan Coutinho

Nathan Coutinho leads Logitech's global conferencing business strategy and analyst relations. A Swiss company focused on innovation and quality, Logitech designs products and experiences that have an everyday place in people's lives.Coutinho leads strategy and execution of Logitech's video conferencing solutions, from personal solutions to highly-scalable conference rooms.Coutinho has more than 25 years of experience in the IT industry with various roles in executive leadership, consulting, engineering, marketing and technical sales.


Experts say tech companies need to prepare for the next SCOTUS decision

HR experts said companies need to be proactive about protections for contraception, privacy and LGBTQ+ rights.

Experts say tech leaders need to start thinking about future Supreme Court rulings.

Photo: Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

Tech companies are still trying to prepare for a post-Roe world. But it might already be time to think about what the Supreme Court is planning next.

When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade Friday, Justice Clarence Thomas wrote in a concurring opinion that the court should also reconsider rulings protecting contraception and same-sex relationships, citing Griswold, Lawrence and Obergefell. If those decisions were ever overruled, it would have massive implications for everyone, but especially for employees living in states where same-sex marriage is at risk of becoming illegal without a federal shield.

Keep Reading Show less
Lizzy Lawrence

Lizzy Lawrence ( @LizzyLaw_) is a reporter at Protocol, covering tools and productivity in the workplace. She's a recent graduate of the University of Michigan, where she studied sociology and international studies. She served as editor in chief of The Michigan Daily, her school's independent newspaper. She's based in D.C., and can be reached at


What’s next for tech in a post-Roe world

From employee support to privacy concerns, tech companies play a critical role in what’s to come for abortion access in the U.S.

States banning abortion means that tech will play a critical role in what’s to come for abortion access in the U.S.

Photo: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images

The end of Roe v. Wade has sent the world of tech scrambling. Many companies are now trying to quickly figure out how to protect workers in states where abortion will be banned, while also facing potential privacy and legal ramifications.

Here’s a look at tech companies’ roles and responses to the ruling. We will update this page as news and events change.

Keep Reading Show less
Alex Eichenstein

Alex Eichenstein (@alexeichenstein) is Protocol's social media editor. Previously, she managed social media and audience engagement efforts at the Center for Public Integrity. She earned an B.A. in English, women and gender studies and political science from the University of Delaware. She lives in Washington, D.C.


You’re thinking about Apple Pay Later all wrong

Apple’s “buy now, pay later” product has a distinctly different distribution strategy that means it doesn’t directly threaten Affirm, Klarna and Afterpay.

Apple Pay Later emerges as a distinctly different product than what Klarna and Affirm offer.

Image: Apple; Protocol

Apple’s entry into the “buy now, pay later” market was one of its worst-kept secrets: Analysts had been predicting the company’s rollout of a pay-later service as early as 2020. The most common read on the move was predictable: Apple was here to smash the competition. The company has a track record of jumping into new sectors late and still managing to come out on top — the iPod came out when there were tons of MP3 players on the market.

But some analysts have a starkly different view. When you look at it under the hood, Apple Pay Later emerges as a distinctly different product than what Klarna and Affirm offer, they say — and one that isn’t much of a market predator.

Keep Reading Show less
Veronica Irwin

Veronica Irwin (@vronirwin) is a San Francisco-based reporter at Protocol covering fintech. Previously she was at the San Francisco Examiner, covering tech from a hyper-local angle. Before that, her byline was featured in SF Weekly, The Nation, Techworker, Ms. Magazine and The Frisc.

Latest Stories