How the Ukraine war jolted the crypto lobby

Russia’s invasion of its neighbor forced crypto to grapple with KYC questions like: How do you know if that wallet belongs to Vladimir Putin?


The crypto industry had already geared up for big battles over regulation this year.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

A few days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Jake Chervinsky, the Blockchain Association’s head of Policy, underlined one of crypto’s big concerns about the war in a tweet.

“Russia can't and won't use crypto to evade sanctions,” he wrote. “Concerns about crypto's use for sanctions evasion are totally unfounded.”

It’s not clear the right people heard his message. The next day, Senate Democrats led by Elizabeth Warren expressed fears in a letter to the Treasury Department that crypto had been used to “hide cross-border transactions for nefarious purposes” and that Vladimir Putin and his allies could use it to evade sanctions.

The crypto industry had already geared up for big battles over regulation this year. But the Ukraine war has led the industry to focus more attention on a new and thorny debate: crypto’s potential role in geopolitical conflict, and how it could be used by authoritarian rulers and their allies to thwart U.S. foreign policy.

Kristin Smith, executive director of the Blockchain Association, said the war was essentially a curveball. First, the group had to do “our due diligence” to “see what was actually going on so we could tell the right story.”

“We haven't, as an association, done much around sanctions policy,” she told Protocol. That prompted a cautious approach as the war got underway. “What we didn't want to do was sort of predict what was going to be happening without having some sort of evidence … We were just mindful to not get out ahead of our skis.”

The industry had already skirmished with regulators over whether cryptocurrencies are securities that should be more strictly regulated, or whether consumers and investors have enough protection.

But with the war, the debates over whether crypto offers enough protections against money laundering and other financial crimes has taken center stage.

The issue got “a crazy level of public awareness,” ComplyAdvantage CEO Charles Delingpole told Protocol. “There's never been a more complex time for companies to understand what's happening in terms of who the underlying clients are. It's never been more under the public eye.” He called it “a prime-time moment for crypto.”

Smith didn’t mention the Warren letter specifically, but she said one concern was that “there's a small number of senators that are posing questions around this … and trying to use this example to bring more regulation to this space.”

The crypto industry’s position got a boost after key government agencies, from FinCEN to the FBI, said they didn’t think it was practical for Russian oligarchs to use crypto to bypass sanctions because of the blockchain’s inherent transparency and traceability.

The crypto industry has also been sending strong signals that it takes anti-money laundering and other financial crimes seriously. Shortly before the war began, major companies like Coinbase and Circle unveiled initiatives for blockchain-based KYC and a system for complying with the Treasury Department’s Travel Rule.

The role of crypto in national security was already a big deal before the Ukraine invasion, Michael Philipp, a partner at Morgan Lewis & Bockius, said. The sanctions and the war “put a sharper point on it,” he told Protocol. “But I don't think it is going to substantively change the debate.”

In fact, the war could highlight a positive side of crypto. “Ukraine has been able to fundraise [with] crypto even though there's a foreign adversary trying to shut down their financial system,” Diogo Mónica, co-founder and president of Anchorage Digital, told Protocol.

He said the relief effort is a “recognition that crypto is a force for good. I think these socially uplifting use cases are really the glimpse into the future of the digital asset ecosystem,” more so than the negative aspect of sanctions evasion.

Fears of a coming government clampdown on crypto eased this week with President Joe Biden’s executive order affirming both the need to make sure protections are in place while endorsing the importance of the technology and the industry.

But for the crypto lobby, there are still reasons for worry.

The Biden order didn’t offer clear guidance on how federal regulators should approach the industry, critics said. And in a curious twist, the title of the order posted on the White House website was revised, replacing the word “innovation” with “development,” a last-minute change that some thought suggested a more cautious attitude toward crypto.

The industry is keeping an eye out for how the discussion evolves, Smith said. The big worry is that an idea or proposal “will get momentum and get jammed through or attached to some must-pass bill, or something like that,” she said, without vetting it with the Treasury Department or the industry.

She cited last year’s battle over the infrastructure bill, which ended up including tax-reporting requirements for crypto industry brokers that critics say are too broad and would cover miners, node operators and software developers who maintain the blockchain networks.

“We're trying to make sure that there aren't any quick moves,” she said. “I think the industry has a good story to tell.”


Gensler: Bitcoin may be a commodity

The SEC has been vague about crypto. But Gensler said bitcoin is a commodity, “maybe.” It’s the clearest glimpse of his views on digital assets yet.

“Bitcoin — maybe that’s a commodity token. That has a big market value, but that goes over there,” Gensler said, referring to another regulator, the CFTC.

Photoillustration: Al Drago/Bloomberg via Getty Images; Protocol

SEC Chair Gary Gensler has long argued that many cryptocurrencies are subject to regulation as securities.

But he recently clarified that this view wouldn’t apply to the best-known cryptocurrency, bitcoin.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Sponsored Content

Why the digital transformation of industries is creating a more sustainable future

Qualcomm’s chief sustainability officer Angela Baker on how companies can view going “digital” as a way not only toward growth, as laid out in a recent report, but also toward establishing and meeting environmental, social and governance goals.

Three letters dominate business practice at present: ESG, or environmental, social and governance goals. The number of mentions of the environment in financial earnings has doubled in the last five years, according to GlobalData: 600,000 companies mentioned the term in their annual or quarterly results last year.

But meeting those ESG goals can be a challenge — one that businesses can’t and shouldn’t take lightly. Ahead of an exclusive fireside chat at Davos, Angela Baker, chief sustainability officer at Qualcomm, sat down with Protocol to speak about how best to achieve those targets and how Qualcomm thinks about its own sustainability strategy, net zero commitment, other ESG targets and more.

Keep Reading Show less
Chris Stokel-Walker

Chris Stokel-Walker is a freelance technology and culture journalist and author of "YouTubers: How YouTube Shook Up TV and Created a New Generation of Stars." His work has been published in The New York Times, The Guardian and Wired.


What the economic downturn means for pay packages

The war for talent rages on, but dynamics are shifting back to the employers.

Compensation packages could start to look different as companies reshuffle the balance of cash and equity.

Illustration: Nuthawut Somsuk/Getty Images

The market is turning. Tech stocks are slumping — which is bad news for employees — and even industry powerhouses are slowing hiring and laying people off. Tech talent is still in high demand, but compensation packages could start to look different as companies recruit.

“It’s a little bit like whiplash,” compensation consultant Ashish Raina said of the downturn. Raina, who mainly works with startups that have 200 to 800 employees, previously worked as the director of Talent at Index Ventures and head of Compensation and Talent Analytics at Box. “I do think there’s going to be an interesting reckoning in terms of pay increases going forward, how that pay is delivered.”

Keep Reading Show less
Allison Levitsky
Allison Levitsky is a reporter at Protocol covering workplace issues in tech. She previously covered big tech companies and the tech workforce for the Silicon Valley Business Journal. Allison grew up in the Bay Area and graduated from UC Berkeley.

How 'Zuck Bucks' saved the 2020 election — and fueled the Big Lie

The true story of how Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan’s $419 million donation became the 2020 election’s most enduring conspiracy theory.

Mark Zuckerberg is smack in the center of one of the 2020 election’s multitudinous conspiracies.

Illustration: Mike McQuade; Photos: Getty Images

If Mark Zuckerberg could have imagined the worst possible outcome of his decision to insert himself into the 2020 election, it might have looked something like the scene that unfolded inside Mar-a-Lago on a steamy evening in early April.

There in a gilded ballroom-turned-theater, MAGA world icons including Kellyanne Conway, Corey Lewandowski, Hope Hicks and former president Donald Trump himself were gathered for the premiere of “Rigged: The Zuckerberg Funded Plot to Defeat Donald Trump.”

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.


From frenzy to fear: Trading apps grapple with anxious investors

After riding the stock-trading wave last year, trading apps like Robinhood have disenchanted customers and jittery investors.

Retail stock trading is still an attractive business, as shown by the news that crypto exchange FTX is dipping its toes in the market by letting some U.S. customers trade stocks.

Photo: Lam Yik/Bloomberg via Getty Images

For a brief moment, last year’s GameStop craze made buying and selling stocks cool, even exciting, for a new generation of young investors. Now, that frenzy has turned to fear.

Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev pointed to “a challenging macro environment” marked by rising prices and interest rates and a slumping market in a call with analysts explaining his company’s lackluster results. The downturn, he said, was something “most of our customers have never experienced in their lifetimes.”

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Latest Stories