Banks and fintechs agree: It’s time for screen scraping to go. So what’s next?

A nonprofit group is helping banks and fintechs exchange data without having to spoof web logins. But getting the entire industry to embrace APIs and permissioned data exchange will be tough.

Two bulls locking horns

Fintechs and banks are still locking horns over data.

Photo: Bull Photography/Unsplash

In the spring of 2017, a group of bank and fintech executives gathered in Park City to hash out their differences over one of the most contentious issues in financial services: data.

The meeting in Utah's ski country treaded on touchy territory: the companies' long-standing disputes over data. Banks have complained that startups were essentially hacking into their systems to grab their customers' data through screen scraping, while fintechs accused banks of selfishly restricting access to information that legally belongs to account holders.

The meeting led to the creation of Financial Data Exchange, or FDX, a nonprofit consortium of more than 200 banks, fintechs and financial institutions, including Chase, Citi, PayPal, Plaid, Finicity and Experian. Its goal: to come up with the technology standards for accessing and sharing consumer financial data.

It's tedious, technical work which has gained urgency as the financial services industry braces for new rules around consumer financial data.

"Either we're going to resolve it, or the regulators are going to resolve it," Finicity CEO Steve Smith, who initiated the 2017 meeting and is now FDX chairman, told Protocol. "If we can't get together in a way that actually drives innovation and full data access, then the regulators will just step in and regulate around this."

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is expected to begin deliberations soon on new rules for giving consumers access to their financial data, especially with last week's confirmation of Rohit Chopra as the agency's new head. The new rules will be based on Section 1033 of the Dodd-Frank Act, a 2010 law which said "very clearly that the user owns the data, and they can direct that data to be sent, wherever they want it to be sent," Smith said.

But Dodd-Frank 1033 did not spell out how this will be implemented. That's where regulators come in.

FDX is not trying to come up with regulatory proposals or to advocate for specific proposals for what has also been described as open banking or open finance.

"We're not a trade group, we don't lobby or do any advocacy on policy," Tom Carpenter, the group's public affairs director, told Protocol. "Open finance has a 'what' and a 'how.' The 'what' are the big policy questions. The 'how' is well, how does the data move? We're the 'how.' We stay truly in the technical space."

He compared what FDX is trying to do to the creation of a widely used wireless technology standard.

"We see ourselves in the Bluetooth role," he told Protocol, noting how the tech industry managed to agree on a common set of standards for short-range wireless. "You make the headset, and then we'll certify it will let you use the symbol to say, 'Yep, this is going to work.'"

FDX is focused on two key questions, he said: "How do we get consumer data moving in a secure API-based way? And how do we move beyond the old days of screen scraping?"

Screen scraping refers to one of the key ways fintech companies gain access to data. Consumers who want to sign up for an app or make an online transaction are asked to share their usernames and passwords to give the app or ecommerce site access to their financial information.

The technology, which was pioneered by companies like Yodlee (now owned by Envestnet), emerged in the late 1990s when API connectivity was not that widely used. Even though it involved consumers giving a third party access to a bank's systems, usually without the bank's permission or knowledge, it was initially tolerated and even accepted by many in the financial services industry.

"I'm not sure screen scraping was ever okay," Gareth Gaston, U.S. Bank's chief digital officer for platforms and capabilities, told Protocol. "It was never a good thing for customers to be giving out their usernames and passwords." But he said "screen scraping was just the way things were done in the '90s," in the early days of fintech.

Alex Johnson, director of fintech research at Cornerstone Advisors, said banks initially didn't see screen scraping as a threat. He said the attitude in the beginning was, "Yeah, 10% to 15% of our customers want to use an app to do all this budgeting and that's fine. It's not ever going to be a huge competitive threat. It's not going to be a huge drain in terms of people hitting our servers all the time logging in."

That changed after the 2007-2008 financial crisis. A fresh wave of fintech startups introduced new apps and services that led to a surge of consumers giving startups access to their bank accounts. Smith said the success of the new fintech apps, powered by more powerful data access technology, "eclipsed everybody's initial expectations."

Finicity CEO Steve Smith Finicity CEO Steve Smith says the industry needs to come together.Photo: Finicity

Banks subsequently started to push back harder on screen scraping. This was underscored by JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon's comments in a January analyst call when he criticized new players that he said were "examples of unfair competition." He even mentioned the name of a fintech powerhouse. Dimon blasted "people who improperly use data that's been given to them, like Plaid."

Plaid became a fintech powerhouse through data aggregation technology that gave many startups unprecedentedly easy tools to access consumer data. That led to a wave of new fintech innovation. John Pitts, Plaid's head of policy, said the company's services focus primarily on API access, but turn to screen scraping for the many banks that don't have public or even private APIs.

Things change fast. Six months after Dimon's remark, Pitts noted, JPMorgan Chase was an investor in Plaid's series D round.

Despite the combative posture suggested by Dimon's comment, major financial institutions have actually started finding ways to work with data aggregators and fintech companies, including improving the way customers give apps access to their data.

"At the end of the day, you know, nobody really had any success in switching it off," Gaston of U.S. Bank said. "It doesn't do the customer any good."

Instead of picking fights with fintechs, major banks have started developing their own API-based data access technology. In 2018, Fidelity Investments, a founding member of FDX, launched Akoya Data Access Network to "overcome the challenges of screen scraping," a spokesperson told Protocol. Last year, 11 major banks, including JPMorgan Chase and U.S. Bank, joined the network as equal owners of Akoya, which formally joined FDX on its own in 2020.

Banks and financial institutions have also partnered with fintechs through data access agreements. In May, U.S. Bank announced that it was working with Plaid to offer a more secure API-based access to customer data. Wells Fargo announced a similar agreement with Yodlee in September 2020.

Johnson of Cornerstone Advisors said banks are "moving more proactively" because most now accept the reality that fintech "is here to stay" and resistance could be bad for business: "If your bank account is the reason why all of these fintech apps that you really like using don't work, pretty soon you're gonna start asking yourself as a consumer, should I switch banks?"

There's also a strong consensus in the financial services industry that screen scraping has to go. "Sunsetting screen scraping completely is the primary concern," Gaston said. Pitts agreed: "We are in the API business and in the business of eliminating the need for screen scraping."

But Carpenter said agreeing on a common API standard is critical; otherwise they'll end up with "a million different plugins." Pitts said that could turn into an "unbelievably expensive" scenario for both banks and fintechs: "That idea of having to maintain 10,000 different connections, have 10,000 different data formats and then manage all of that for the remainder of time — that sounds terrible."

There's also the risk of creating "a digital divide," Pitts said. Major banks with their big IT budgets have been able to develop their own API access technology about three years ago, he said. But "smaller banks don't have multibillion-dollar technology budgets," and may not easily be able to deploy alternatives to screen scraping.

This is where FDX is expected to play a critical role. The nonprofit's API technology, while still a work in progress, is already accessible to financial institutions, including those which are not FDX members. Small banks and credit unions can use it for free even if they don't join FDX.

Last month, Carpenter told a House Committee on Financial Services task force that banks and fintechs using FDX's API are already making it possible for 22 million consumers to share their data. "Less than three years since its founding, FDX is a roaring success," he testified.

But there are many other contentious issues beyond just agreeing on a common API-based standard. Most of these will have to be resolved in the CFPB process, though they've also come up in FDX's work.

"We've had plenty of debates as we've gone along in building standards," Carpenter said. "We think we can solve a lot of problems, but we're not a silver bullet, so we're not going to be able to fix everything."

One contentious issue is what data should be considered proprietary. "That's been the million dollar question: Where does consumer data ownership end? And where does proprietary data begin?" Carpenter asked.

For example: Should the interest rate offered by a bank to a consumer be shared or considered proprietary? It's a difficult question that will likely be resolved by regulators, and on which the FDX "just has to remain agnostic on," Carpenter said.

Standing aside may be challenging. The FDX must also navigate conflicting interests within its ranks. After all, many of its members are fierce competitors. Finicity, a data aggregator acquired by Mastercard last year, is a Plaid rival.

"It's not kumbaya all the time," Carpenter said. "You've got probably one of the most competitive marketplaces in financial services where you've seen enormous disruption."

But it's critically important work, he added.

"Frankly, if the CFPB and other regulators aren't going to provide proper guidance and keep up with the innovation curve, then it's up to leadership and organizations that come together from fintechs, banks, asset managers, insurance and other market participants, to hold one another accountable by proxy," Logan Allin, managing general partner of Fin Venture Capital, told Protocol.

Smith of Finicity agreed that the smart path for fintechs and banks is to grapple these issues by the horns.

"I'm optimistic that industry will come together," he said. "We're optimistic that the industry will do a better job than regulation is able to because regulation doesn't move at the speed that technology moves, and it often creates great hurdles."


1Password's CEO is ready for a password-free future

Fresh off a $620 million raise, 1Password CEO Jeff Shiner talks about the future of passwords.

1Password is a password manager, but it has plans to be even more.

Business is booming for 1Password. The company just announced it has raised $620 million, at a valuation of $6.8 billion, from a roster of A-list celebrities and well-known venture capitalists.

But what does a password manager need with $620 million? Jeff Shiner, 1Password’s CEO, has some plans. He’s building the team fast — 1Password has tripled in size in the last two years, up to 500 employees, and plans to double again this year — while also expanding the vision of what a password manager can do. 1Password has long been a consumer-first product, but the biggest opportunity lies in bringing the company’s knowhow, its user experience, and its security chops into the business world. 1Password already has more than 100,000 business customers, and it plans to expand fast.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.

Sponsored Content

A CCO’s viewpoint on top enterprise priorities in 2022

The 2022 non-predictions guide to what your enterprise is working on starting this week

As Honeywell’s global chief commercial officer, I am privileged to have the vantage point of seeing the demands, challenges and dynamics that customers across the many sectors we cater to are experiencing and sharing.

This past year has brought upon all businesses and enterprises an unparalleled change and challenge. This was the case at Honeywell, for example, a company with a legacy in innovation and technology for over a century. When I joined the company just months before the pandemic hit we were already in the midst of an intense transformation under the leadership of CEO Darius Adamczyk. This transformation spanned our portfolio and business units. We were already actively working on products and solutions in advanced phases of rollouts that the world has shown a need and demand for pre-pandemic. Those included solutions in edge intelligence, remote operations, quantum computing, warehouse automation, building technologies, safety and health monitoring and of course ESG and climate tech which was based on our exceptional success over the previous decade.

Keep Reading Show less
Jeff Kimbell
Jeff Kimbell is Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer at Honeywell. In this role, he has broad responsibilities to drive organic growth by enhancing global sales and marketing capabilities. Jeff has nearly three decades of leadership experience. Prior to joining Honeywell in 2019, Jeff served as a Partner in the Transformation Practice at McKinsey & Company, where he worked with companies facing operational and financial challenges and undergoing “good to great” transformations. Before that, he was an Operating Partner at Silver Lake Partners, a global leader in technology and held a similar position at Cerberus Capital LP. Jeff started his career as a Manufacturing Team Manager and Engineering Project Manager at Procter & Gamble before becoming a strategy consultant at Bain & Company and holding executive roles at Dell EMC and Transamerica Corporation. Jeff earned a B.S. in electrical engineering at Kansas State University and an M.B.A. at Dartmouth College.

Biden wants to digitize the government. Can these techies deliver?

A December executive order requires federal agencies to overhaul clunky systems. Meet the team trying to make that happen.

The dramatic uptick in people relying on government services, combined with the move to remote work, rendered inconvenient government processes downright painful.

Photo: Joe Daniel Price/Getty Images

Early last year, top White House officials embarked on a fact-finding mission with technical leaders inside government agencies. They wanted to know the answer to a specific question: If there was anything federal agencies could do to improve the average American’s experience interacting with the government, what would it be?

The list, of course, was a long one.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Boost 2

Can Matt Mullenweg save the internet?

He's turning Automattic into a different kind of tech giant. But can he take on the trillion-dollar walled gardens and give the internet back to the people?

Matt Mullenweg, CEO of Automattic and founder of WordPress, poses for Protocol at his home in Houston, Texas.
Photo: Arturo Olmos for Protocol

In the early days of the pandemic, Matt Mullenweg didn't move to a compound in Hawaii, bug out to a bunker in New Zealand or head to Miami and start shilling for crypto. No, in the early days of the pandemic, Mullenweg bought an RV. He drove it all over the country, bouncing between Houston and San Francisco and Jackson Hole with plenty of stops in national parks. In between, he started doing some tinkering.

The tinkering is a part-time gig: Most of Mullenweg’s time is spent as CEO of Automattic, one of the web’s largest platforms. It’s best known as the company that runs, the hosted version of the blogging platform that powers about 43% of the websites on the internet. Since WordPress is open-source software, no company technically owns it, but Automattic provides tools and services and oversees most of the WordPress-powered internet. It’s also the owner of the booming ecommerce platform WooCommerce, Day One, the analytics tool and the podcast app Pocket Casts. Oh, and Tumblr. And Simplenote. And many others. That makes Mullenweg one of the most powerful CEOs in tech, and one of the most important voices in the debate over the future of the internet.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.


5 takeaways from Microsoft's Activision Blizzard acquisition

Microsoft just bought one of the world’s largest third-party game publishers. What now?

The nearly $70 billion acquisition gives Microsoft access to some of the most valuable brands in gaming.

Image: Microsoft Gaming

Just one week after Take-Two took the crown for biggest-ever industry acquisition, Microsoft strolled in Tuesday morning and dropped arguably the most monumental gaming news bombshell in years with its purchase of Activision Blizzard. The deal, at nearly $70 billion in all cash, dwarfs Take-Two’s purchase of Zynga, and it stands to reshape gaming as we know it.

The deal raises a number of pressing questions about the future of Activision Blizzard’s workplace culture issues, exclusivity in the game industry and whether such massive consolidation may trigger a regulatory response. None of these may be easily answered anytime soon, as the deal could take up to 18 months to close. But the question marks hanging over Activision Blizzard will loom large in the industry for the foreseeable future as Microsoft navigates its new role as one of the three largest game makers on the planet.

Keep Reading Show less
Nick Statt
Nick Statt is Protocol's video game reporter. Prior to joining Protocol, he was news editor at The Verge covering the gaming industry, mobile apps and antitrust out of San Francisco, in addition to managing coverage of Silicon Valley tech giants and startups. He now resides in Rochester, New York, home of the garbage plate and, completely coincidentally, the World Video Game Hall of Fame. He can be reached at

Why AMD is waiting for China to approve its $35B bid for Xilinx

There’s another big chip deal in regulatory limbo. AMD’s $35 billion bid for Xilinx, which would transform its data-center business, is being held up by China.

AMD announced a $35 billion bid to acquire Xilinx more than a year ago.

Photographer: Chris Ratcliffe/Bloomberg via Getty Images

AMD has spent its entire corporate life as a second-class citizen to Intel. That’s just one reason why CEO Lisa Su seized an opportunity with a $35 billion stock deal to snap up programmable chipmaker Xilinx more than a year ago at one of Intel’s weakest moments in decades.

The full extent of a manufacturing stumble that delayed Intel's next-generation chips six months became apparent in 2020, to Su and AMD's considerable advantage. AMD’s share price soared as it became clear the longtime also-ran stood to gain significant market share, granting Su a considerably more valuable currency for acquisitions such as Xilinx, which makes chips for data center networking, cars, military use and satellites.

Keep Reading Show less
Max A. Cherney

Max A. Cherney is a Technology Reporter at Protocol covering the semiconductor industry. He has worked for Barron's magazine as a Technology Reporter, and its sister site MarketWatch. He is based in San Francisco.

Latest Stories