Gary Gensler had a lot to say about crypto in 2021

The head of the SEC has been vocal on the need for more regulation.

SEC Chairman Gensler

Gary Gensler has a lot to say about Wall Street and crypto.

Photo: Melissa Lyttle/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Click banner image for more holiday coverage for 2021

In his short time heading the SEC, Gary Gensler has shaken up Wall Street and the crypto industry.

Most of this he’s done just with his words, before the agency under his leadership has taken substantial enforcement or regulatory actions.

He’s had a lot of say about the need for stronger regulatory control of Wall Street, crypto and Chinese companies, which has affected markets and drawn strong reactions from the industry.

Gensler, who was confirmed to head the SEC in April, was no stranger to Wall Street, having been a partner at Goldman Sachs. He had a background in cryptocurrency as well, having taught a course on the topic at MIT. That led to some hoping he would prove somewhat friendly to the crypto industry, or at least not hostile.

With his background running the CFTC where he helped reform credit default swaps after the 2008 financial crisis, he was expected to ramp up enforcement on Wall Street after the Trump years. At the time he was confirmed, regulators and politicians were focused on Robinhood and the meme-stock frenzy that took over Wall Street in January. Crypto was barely on Washington’s agenda.

Then Gensler started talking. Crypto said it wanted an informed regulator, but Gensler showed he knew the industry all too well. Here are some of his top moments this year.

“Inherent” conflicts

In early May, Gensler made his first major appearance in Congress as head of the SEC at a House Financial Services Committee hearing. He made it clear that payment for order flow, in which wholesalers pay retail brokers for handling retail orders, would be scrutinized by the SEC.

He noted that payment for order flow can be a “conflict of interest” and that these conflicts were “inherent” in the system. Gensler cited a case that Robinhood settled with the SEC in December 2020, noting that the Robinhood had been able to decide how much of the profit from trading spreads it would keep and how much it would pass on to investors.

Gensler also made it clear he wasn’t happy about the current regulatory environment for crypto.

China watch

In July, Gensler warned of the risks of Chinese companies listing in the U.S. He focused on variable interest entities or VIEs, which Chinese companies have long used to sidestep that country’s restrictions on foreign ownership. Gensler was seeking to provide greater transparency for investors in Chinese companies, which do not always make the same disclosures or receive the same auditing oversight as U.S. companies. Under pressure from both American and Chinese regulators, DiDi delisted its shares from the New York Stock Exchange in December.

“Wild West”

On Aug. 3, Gensler returned to crypto in a speech at the Aspen Security Forum: “Right now, we just don’t have enough investor protection in crypto. Frankly, at this time, it’s more like the Wild West."

“This asset class is rife with fraud, scams, and abuse in certain applications,” he said. “There’s a great deal of hype and spin about how crypto assets work. In many cases, investors aren’t able to get rigorous, balanced, and complete information.”

Two days later, Gensler called for legislation in a letter to Elizabeth Warren to address crypto trading, lending and decentralized finance. It was a recognition that there are some things Gensler can’t do himself at the SEC without federal legislation — which is a likely reason why he has been so public about talking about crypto but has yet to take substantial action.

“In my view, the legislative priority should center on crypto trading, lending, and DeFi platforms,” he wrote. “Regulators would benefit from additional plenary authority to write rules for and attach guardrails to crypto trading and lending.”

A reminder: Gary Gensler is not your daddy

In September, Gensler told the Senate Banking Committee that he wouldn’t rule out having the SEC regulate stablecoins since “they may well be securities.” While he didn’t come out and say they definitely are securities, he indicated that the SEC could regulate stablecoins — or at least is interested in doing so. Later, in November, the President’s Working Group called for bank-like regulation of the fiat-linked digital tokens.

He also pushed back on senators’ criticism that the SEC has been vague on when a crypto token is and isn’t a security. "I think that there's a fair amount of clarity over the years. I think at the heart of our securities laws [is] protecting investors against fraud. They get to decide. They get to take the risk. I'm not negative or minimalist about crypto. I just think it would be best if it's inside the investor protection regime that Congress laid out."

In perhaps the most memorable exchange of the hearing, he was grilled by a senator on his agency’s view on climate risk disclosure. "The people and the companies that you regulate as chairman of the SEC, do you consider yourself to be their daddy?" Sen. John Kennedy asked.

"No," Gensler said.

"Then why do you act like it?" Kennedy responded. "Why do you impose your personal preferences about cultural issues and social issues on companies. … I'm sure you have you have personal feelings about abortion. Do you have plans to implement or impose those values on companies?"

"Sir, I think I am not doing that," Gensler replied. "What I've been trying to do is say, if investors want information about climate risk, we at the SEC have a role to put something out to notice and comment, do the economic analysis and really see what investors are saying."

Poker face

Later in September, Gensler compared crypto to “poker chips” at a Washington Post event. He again noted that help from Congress would make regulation easier. Still, he said, the SEC already had plenty of room to regulate crypto. “But in terms of the SEC, I do think we have robust authority, but there are gaps as I’ve identified them,” he said.

Meanwhile, a number of major players in the crypto industry had begun responding to Gensler’s jabs. Their response has largely been looking to put someone other than Gensler in charge. Andreessen Horowitz said it was time to “look beyond the SEC,” while Coinbase made an even more direct critique of the agency, proposing a new regulator to oversee crypto. Coinbase was already unhappy about the SEC not approving its Coinbase Lend product.

Marking territory

In a November speech at the Securities Enforcement Forum, Gensler took up sports as a metaphor: “Think about a football game without referees. Teams, without fear of penalties, start to break the rules. The game isn’t fair, and maybe after a few minutes, it isn’t fun to watch.” He went on to defend the SEC’s role in protecting investors.

It was as if he was responding to some of the crypto industry’s proposals and marking the SEC’s territory. While there are many agencies that have oversight on parts of the crypto industry — such as the Office of the Comptroller of Currency and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission — Gensler made it clear he was not giving up the SEC’s role.

And he defended the SEC’s moves to rein in some boundary-pushing firms. “Some market participants may call this ‘regulation by enforcement,’” he said. “I just call it ‘enforcement.’”

Cleanup on aisle three

In December, Gensler talked up the need for proactive regulation, rather than swooping in after a crisis. “We're gonna have a spill on aisle three,” Gensler said at the DACOM Summit. “And the public's gonna say: 'Where was the official sector?'” But he struck a more conciliatory tone at a Wall Street Journal event that month, asking crypto exchanges to “come in, work with the SEC, get registered.” Crypto trading firms that hold customers’ tokens as well as executing orders became a focus of Gensler’s regulatory rhetoric late in 2021, with the SEC chair positioning them as a natural subject for his agency’s oversight.


Why does China's '996' overtime culture persist?

A Tencent worker’s open criticism shows why this work schedule is hard to change in Chinese tech.

Excessive overtime is one of the plights Chinese workers are grappling with across sectors.

Photo: VCG/VCG via Getty Images

Workers were skeptical when Chinese Big Tech called off its notorious and prevalent overtime policy: “996,” a 12-hour, six-day work schedule. They were right to be: A recent incident at gaming and social media giant Tencent proves that a deep-rooted overtime culture is hard to change, new policy or not.

Defiant Tencent worker Zhang Yifei, who openly challenged the company’s overtime culture, reignited wide discussion of the touchy topic this week. What triggered Zhang's criticism, according to his own account, was his team’s positive attitude toward overtime. His team, which falls under WeCom — a business communication and office collaboration tool similar to Slack — announced its in-house Breakthrough Awards. The judges’ comments to one winner highly praised them for logging “over 20 hours of intense work nonstop,” to help meet the deadline for launching a marketing page.

Keep Reading Show less
Shen Lu

Shen Lu covers China's tech industry.

Sponsored Content

A CCO’s viewpoint on top enterprise priorities in 2022

The 2022 non-predictions guide to what your enterprise is working on starting this week

As Honeywell’s global chief commercial officer, I am privileged to have the vantage point of seeing the demands, challenges and dynamics that customers across the many sectors we cater to are experiencing and sharing.

This past year has brought upon all businesses and enterprises an unparalleled change and challenge. This was the case at Honeywell, for example, a company with a legacy in innovation and technology for over a century. When I joined the company just months before the pandemic hit we were already in the midst of an intense transformation under the leadership of CEO Darius Adamczyk. This transformation spanned our portfolio and business units. We were already actively working on products and solutions in advanced phases of rollouts that the world has shown a need and demand for pre-pandemic. Those included solutions in edge intelligence, remote operations, quantum computing, warehouse automation, building technologies, safety and health monitoring and of course ESG and climate tech which was based on our exceptional success over the previous decade.

Keep Reading Show less
Jeff Kimbell
Jeff Kimbell is Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Officer at Honeywell. In this role, he has broad responsibilities to drive organic growth by enhancing global sales and marketing capabilities. Jeff has nearly three decades of leadership experience. Prior to joining Honeywell in 2019, Jeff served as a Partner in the Transformation Practice at McKinsey & Company, where he worked with companies facing operational and financial challenges and undergoing “good to great” transformations. Before that, he was an Operating Partner at Silver Lake Partners, a global leader in technology and held a similar position at Cerberus Capital LP. Jeff started his career as a Manufacturing Team Manager and Engineering Project Manager at Procter & Gamble before becoming a strategy consultant at Bain & Company and holding executive roles at Dell EMC and Transamerica Corporation. Jeff earned a B.S. in electrical engineering at Kansas State University and an M.B.A. at Dartmouth College.

Spoiler alert: We’re already in the beta-metaverse

300 million people use metaverse-like platforms — Fortnite, Roblox and Minecraft — every month. That equals the total user base of the internet in 1999.

A lot of us are using platforms that can be considered metaverse prototypes.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

What does it take to build the metaverse? What building blocks do we need, how can companies ensure that the metaverse is going to be inclusive, and how do we know that we have arrived in the 'verse?

This week, we convened a panel of experts for Protocol Entertainment’s first virtual live event, including Epic Games Unreal Engine VP and GM Marc Petit, Oasis Consortium co-founder and President Tiffany Xingyu Wang and Emerge co-founder and CEO Sly Lee.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Boost 2

Can Matt Mullenweg save the internet?

He's turning Automattic into a different kind of tech giant. But can he take on the trillion-dollar walled gardens and give the internet back to the people?

Matt Mullenweg, CEO of Automattic and founder of WordPress, poses for Protocol at his home in Houston, Texas.
Photo: Arturo Olmos for Protocol

In the early days of the pandemic, Matt Mullenweg didn't move to a compound in Hawaii, bug out to a bunker in New Zealand or head to Miami and start shilling for crypto. No, in the early days of the pandemic, Mullenweg bought an RV. He drove it all over the country, bouncing between Houston and San Francisco and Jackson Hole with plenty of stops in national parks. In between, he started doing some tinkering.

The tinkering is a part-time gig: Most of Mullenweg’s time is spent as CEO of Automattic, one of the web’s largest platforms. It’s best known as the company that runs, the hosted version of the blogging platform that powers about 43% of the websites on the internet. Since WordPress is open-source software, no company technically owns it, but Automattic provides tools and services and oversees most of the WordPress-powered internet. It’s also the owner of the booming ecommerce platform WooCommerce, Day One, the analytics tool and the podcast app Pocket Casts. Oh, and Tumblr. And Simplenote. And many others. That makes Mullenweg one of the most powerful CEOs in tech, and one of the most important voices in the debate over the future of the internet.

Keep Reading Show less
David Pierce

David Pierce ( @pierce) is Protocol's editorial director. Prior to joining Protocol, he was a columnist at The Wall Street Journal, a senior writer with Wired, and deputy editor at The Verge. He owns all the phones.


Lyin’ AI: OpenAI launches new language model despite toxic tendencies

Research company OpenAI says this year’s language model is less toxic than GPT-3. But the new default, InstructGPT, still has tendencies to make discriminatory comments and generate false information.

The new default, called InstructGPT, still has tendencies to make discriminatory comments and generate false information.

Illustration: Pixabay; Protocol

OpenAI knows its text generators have had their fair share of problems. Now the research company has shifted to a new deep-learning model it says works better to produce “fewer toxic outputs” than GPT-3, its flawed but widely-used system.

Starting Thursday, a new model called InstructGPT will be the default technology served up through OpenAI’s API, which delivers foundational AI into all sorts of chatbots, automatic writing tools and other text-based applications. Consider the new system, which has been in beta testing for the past year, to be a work in progress toward an automatic text generator that OpenAI hopes is closer to what humans actually want.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.


AI bias is rampant. Bug bounties could help catch it.

A Q&A with cybersecurity guru Camille François about her new research on bug bounties, and the hope that they could help rein in AI harms.

Developers of harmful AI need to know "how ugly their baby is," Camille François said.

Illustration: clarote

The 1990s might have a lot to teach us about how we should tackle harm from artificial intelligence in the 2020s.

Back then, some companies found they could actually make themselves safer by incentivizing the work of independent “white hat” security researchers who would hunt for issues and disclose them in a process that looked a lot like hacking with guardrails. That’s how the practice of bug bounties became a cornerstone of cybersecurity today.

Keep Reading Show less
Ben Brody

Ben Brody (@ BenBrodyDC) is a senior reporter at Protocol focusing on how Congress, courts and agencies affect the online world we live in. He formerly covered tech policy and lobbying (including antitrust, Section 230 and privacy) at Bloomberg News, where he previously reported on the influence industry, government ethics and the 2016 presidential election. Before that, Ben covered business news at CNNMoney and AdAge, and all manner of stories in and around New York. He still loves appearing on the New York news radio he grew up with.

Latest Stories