Fintech

SEC chair Gary Gensler: Conflict 'inherent' in payment for order flow

The newly appointed stock-market regulator criticized the practice that has made zero-commission stock trading possible, saying investors are paid in other ways.

​SEC chair Gary Gensler testifies at a House Financial Services Committee hearing on Thursday, May 6, 2021.

SEC chair Gary Gensler testifies at a House Financial Services Committee hearing.

Screenshot: House Financial Services Committee/YouTube

SEC Chairman Gary Gensler, only a few weeks on the job, told members of Congress on Thursday that he's looking closely at payment for order flow and market concentration with an eye toward whether retail traders are getting a fair shake.

Gensler highlighted his agency's increased scrutiny of the markets at a hearing of the House Financial Services Committee about January's wild gyrations in GameStop shares.

Payment for order flow was an area of particular interest to committee members. Some brokers like Robinhood use the now-widespread practice to get paid by market makers for sending trades to them. Critics question whether such payments set up a conflict of interest and deprive retail investors of the best possible price for shares; proponents say that market makers deliver considerable improvement in prices.

The House committee has a draft discussion proposal to ban payment for order flow. Canada and the United Kingdom don't allow it, and a U.K. study found that the country's elimination of the practice resulted in better prices for investors.

"I've asked staff to take a closer look at this in the context of overall market structure," Gensler said. Such payments, he said, can be a "conflict with the interest" of customers and such conflicts are an "inherent" part of the system.

Payment for order flow's supporters have argued that retail traders benefit from the elimination of commissions such payments make possible. Gensler seemed unpersuaded by those arguments.

"These are not free apps. They're just zero-commission apps," he said. "The cost is inside the order execution."

Gensler also cited the Robinhood case settled in December — though he didn't name the popular online brokerage — as an example of the ability of brokers to define for themselves how much of the profit from the spread they get and how much they pass on to investors as price improvement.

"We found conflict in various enforcement cases like one we filed where the wholesaler was literally saying, 'Well, you tell me. I can pay you more — the broker — or I can pay the customer more.' We know at least from that case this inherent conflict is there," he said.

In that settlement, the SEC wrote: "[C]ertain of the principal trading firms told Robinhood that there was a trade-off between payment for order flow on the one hand and price improvement on the other: If Robinhood negotiated for higher payment for order flow revenue, according to the principal trading firms, there would be less money available for the principal trading firms to provide price improvement to Robinhood's customers."

But payment for order flow is not the whole story when it comes to best execution, Gensler said. He noted that wholesalers — which are not regulated like "lit" exchanges — have 37% to 38% of the market. The SEC is also looking at exchange rebates that the exchanges pay to brokers, which function similarly to payment for order flow, Gensler said.

Several representatives asked about system risk and the concentration of power in trading, and some asked specifically about Citadel's role as the largest market maker.

The current market structure has also led to market concentration, which can mean higher costs for investors, Gensler said. While he didn't cite scrutiny of specific firms, that could mean a closer look at firms such as Citadel, which says it is the largest wholesaler, executing 47% of U.S.-listed retail trades.

Gensler said he had asked commission staff to review "how this market structure that's led to concentration — right now we have pretty highly concentrated and growing concentration in the retail order flow. Economics tells us competition lowers cost to investors."

Short of a ban on payment for order flow, regulators said that increased disclosure about payment for order flow is also a possibility. "Fundamentally the question is, is that conflict you're describing, is that adequately addressed through disclosure?" said Robert Cook, president and CEO of FINRA. "Many investors don't understand these aspects of the market."

One infrastructure issue that regulators are looking at is reducing the settlement time for trades from two days to one. The technology to do this is already available, Gensler said. This could lower certain margin and volatility costs as much as 40%, saving the industry $6 billion a day, and the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation is looking at different ways to do this along with industry partners, said Michael Bodson, CEO of DTCC.

Gensler also said he would look at gamification and its role in trading, noting that he's fine with a streaming service manipulating him to watch more movies — he's partial to romantic comedies, he noted — but that manipulating people to trade more isn't necessarily a good thing.

"If you use gamification features and folks are trading more actively and day trading, then all of a sudden that's their investment future," he said. "That's a challenge for their future and security. I think we have to take a look at this."

Fintech

The crypto crash's violence shocked Circle's CEO

Jeremy Allaire remains upbeat about stablecoins despite the UST wipeout, he told Protocol in an interview.

Allaire said what really caught him by surprise was “how fast the death spiral happened and how violent of a value destruction it was.”

Photo: Heidi Gutman/CNBC/NBCU Photo Bank/NBCUniversal via Getty Images

Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire said he saw the UST meltdown coming about six months ago, long before the stablecoin crash rocked the crypto world.

“This was a house of cards,” he told Protocol. “It was very clear that it was unsustainable and that there would be a very high risk of a death spiral.”

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at bpimentel@protocol.com or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Sponsored Content

Foursquare data story: leveraging location data for site selection

We take a closer look at points of interest and foot traffic patterns to demonstrate how location data can be leveraged to inform better site selecti­on strategies.

Imagine: You’re the leader of a real estate team at a restaurant brand looking to open a new location in Manhattan. You have two options you’re evaluating: one site in SoHo, and another site in the Flatiron neighborhood. Which do you choose?

Keep Reading Show less

A DTC baby formula startup is caught in the center of a supply chain crisis

After weeks of “unprecedented growth,” Bobbie co-founder Laura Modi made a hard decision: to not accept any more new customers.

Parents unable to track down formula in stores have been turning to Facebook groups, homemade formula recipes and Bobbie, a 4-year-old subscription baby formula company.

Photo: JIM WATSON/AFP via Getty Images

The ongoing baby formula shortage has taken a toll on parents throughout the U.S. Laura Modi, co-founder of formula startup Bobbie, said she’s been “wearing the hat of a mom way more than that of a CEO” in recent weeks.

“It's scary to be a parent right now, with the uncertainty of knowing you can’t find your formula,” Modi told Protocol.

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.

Enterprise

Celonis vows to stay independent despite offers from SAP, ServiceNow

Celonis is convinced standalone mining vendors can survive. But industry consolidation paints a different picture, and enterprise software giants are circling.

Celonis CEO Alex Rinke turned down offers from ServiceNow and SAP, according to sources.

Photo: Celonis

For the past decade, any software vendor that touted new levels of automation and data-driven insights appeared to have seemingly unrestricted access to capital. Now, as valuations drop and fundraising becomes more difficult, founders and company leaders are facing a difficult decision: look to be acquired or try to go it alone.

At Celonis — which, at an $11 billion valuation, is one of the buzzier software upstarts — that question appears to have already been decided. Enterprise software giants ServiceNow and SAP made offers in the past year to buy the process-mining firm, according to sources familiar with the deliberations, which were turned down because the Celonis leadership team wanted to remain independent.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a writer-at-large at Protocol. He previously covered enterprise software for Protocol, Bloomberg and Business Insider. Joe can be reached at JoeWilliams@Protocol.com. To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or JPW53189@protonmail.com.

Enterprise

SaaS valuations cratered in early 2022. But these startups thrived.

VCs were still bullish on supply chain, recruiting and data startups despite the economic environment that chopped the valuations of newly public companies and late-stage enterprise startups.

While private equity has been investing in enterprise tech for decades, the confluence of several trends in the sector is making it more competitive than ever before.
Image: Getty Images; Protocol

Despite a volatile tech stock market so far this year that has included delayed IPOs, lowered valuations and declining investor sentiment, a few enterprise tech categories managed to keep getting funding. Data platforms, supply chain management tech, workplace software and cybersecurity startups all dominated the funding cycle over the past quarter.

When it comes to enterprise SaaS, the number of mega-deals — VC funding rounds over $100 million — spiked last year, according to data from Pitchbook. Partially driven by the onset of a pandemic that accelerated the need for everything from contact centers to supply chains to move into the cloud, the number of large VC deals tripled between 2020 and 2021. That growth has extended into this year, where the number of mega-deals has already outpaced all of 2020.

Keep Reading Show less
Aisha Counts

Aisha Counts (@aishacounts) is a reporter at Protocol covering enterprise software. Formerly, she was a management consultant for EY. She's based in Los Angeles and can be reached at acounts@protocol.com.

Latest Stories
Bulletins