Protocol | Fintech

Hippo’s plan to reinvent insurance: Fix homes before they break

Hippo, which is going public via a SPAC Tuesday, is using tech to prevent claims from happening.

Hippo CEO Assaf Wand

Hippo CEO Assaf Wand wants to catch homeowners' losses before they happen.

Photo: Hippo

Home insurance, a $108 billion legacy industry that depends on troves of data, is a natural area for fintech companies to target.

That change is starting to happen — and one company is getting fresh capital to tackle the opportunity. Hippo, led by co-founder and CEO Assaf Wand, is going public today through a merger with a special purpose acquisition company Reinvest Technology Partners Z. The SPAC is run by LinkedIn co-founder and venture capitalist Reid Hoffman and Zynga founder Mark Pincus.

Hippo, now available in 37 states, looks to differentiate itself in the competitive field by focusing on one sector — the home. That includes individuals as well as homeowners' associations.

There are already several other upstarts in this sector, including Lemonade, which offers homeowners, renters, pet and life insurance and went public in July 2020.

Insurers have used the web to sign up new customers and manage billing for decades. But Hippo is going far beyond just having a user-friendly app. It uses technology to monitor data such as weather or other things in the home that could cause damage. Hippo gives customers smart sensors to detect smoke or leaks and hopefully prevent damage. It also uses machine learning to optimize pricing and offer fast quotes online. This is also a strategy to stay in regular contact with customers and offer more value than just when a customer needs to file a claim.

The company, which was backed by Felicis Ventures, Horizons Ventures, Lennar, Fifth Wall Ventures and Bond Capital, had $405 million in written premiums in its 2020 fiscal year, according to its investor presentation.

Hippo also is offering its technology as a platform to other insurance startups, in what it calls an AWS strategy.

We caught up with Wand to talk about how insurance is changing.

This interview has been edited for clarity and brevity.

What are insurance incumbents doing that you'd like to take on?

The current incumbents spent the last 100 years building a flawed process of insurance. It's hard to purchase. When you look at what your purchase is for, it's usually obsolete. It's things like fur coats and beautiful china or silverware. And then, when you have a claim it's almost always a horrible experience, and in between this horrible claim experience and the purchase experience, you have zero touch points with the insurance company.

How are you different from all of that?

So we took all of that experience and said we'll make it very easy for people to purchase. The coverage is focused on modern things, so instead of the fur coats, it's more about your home office and enhanced electronics or your bicycle, things that you actually have. When you have the claim experience, we have one person who's dedicated to you and a claims team that's available 24/7 handling the claim.

Is your strategy to provide more services for customers when they don't have a claim?

The best claim experience comes from avoiding a claim from happening in the first place. So what we're trying to do is be a proactive insurance company. We're doing it by constantly monitoring the home with different data and basically telling you, "We just found this discoloration on the roof. I think we should send a roofer." This is way before the winter when you're going to have a $20,000 water loss.

How do you monitor that?

We're giving smart sensors to all of our customers to help avoid losses from escalating because it's way better to catch it at the beginning. And then we have a service called Hippo Home Care that helps our customers take care of the home from installing a shelf and replacing leaky faucets to doing renovation in the bathroom. The idea is: How do we build this relationship with our customers?

Last year you bought Spinnaker, a property and casualty insurer you've worked with since 2017. How does that change your model to offer insurance directly now?

Yes but we also have most of the risk being shifted to reinsurers anyway. In short, we own our own path forward. It gives us a lot more flexibility. It also serves as a platform for other insurance startups as well. We call it the AWS of insurtech. So if you have a startup in, say, Denton, in travel, you also need to find a carrier to actually write (insurance). So we enable people to focus on what they do best, which is use the data to underwrite, and then do the marketing, and we're going to do the insurance platform for them.

So you're providing to other companies what you didn't have before?

Yes, this exact structure for other companies, that back-end part of it.

So how much risk are you taking on?

The carrier ... is one thing; where the risk is sitting is another thing. So in this framework our aim is to have 10 to 25% of our risk that we capture, and the rest is done by reinsurers.

Are you a tech company or an insurer?

We view insurtech as a mix of insurance and technology. It's finding the best technology people and the best insurance people. If you're an insurance company that is trying to do stuff in tech, you can't get the talent that you want, and you cannot implement enough innovation and growth. On the flip side, if you're a technology company who's dabbling in insurance, you're going to make too many mistakes on losses, because there's a risk component.

My job is to basically balance these two things and have the strongest technology backing to innovate as fast as possible, and bring back the focus on the customer to bring the tools to the insurance people but then have the insurance people do the filing, the underwriting and all that kind of stuff. I need to give them the latest and greatest in underwriting tools in data, in aerial imagery, in machine learning, so they can do a better job at a faster pace.

So you're trying to bring new approaches to this industry but not changing the underlying business.

We're not disrupting insurance. I'm not taking people that have a first name starting with a T and say I'm going to give you a 15% discount — it doesn't work like that. It's about modernizing. There has been an explosion of data sources and new technology that came in in a field that hasn't changed in 100 years, and we're just embedding it all and refocusing back on a customer.

How is your technology different?

It's very different than other insurance companies. They're also not wired as a technical company. So I have a CTO and chief product officer. They have a CIO and it's all outsourced. And they're dependent on them or an army of Accenture consultants. It's just not the same kind of architecture.

How does this change the agency insurance model?

Don't forget that this is an industry that for a hundred years ... , there was one customer and that customer was an agent. We're thinking of Tomio as a customer. We're enabling Tomio to purchase however you want, not however the agent wants. The average age of an agent is 61; they're retiring like crazy. So it's about refocusing back on the customers. The customers should be agnostic on what technology. Why do you care if I have alien technology on the back end, or a bunch of papers on my desk? You care about having the best experience when you want, the best customer touch point and being covered for what you should be covered. It's my problem how to enhance it and innovate in a pace that is adhering to the customer needs.

So what's happening to that agent model of selling insurance?

This is a model that started in the 1950s and 60s, when there was the move to the U.S. suburbs. And you needed to cover [customers] and you couldn't cover them otherwise. And now, the world is moving to digital and direct.

Look at what happened in the 1990s. The biggest carriers in automobiles were Allstate and State Farm. Well now it's Progressive and GEICO that dominate. What they've done is they went direct: 15 minutes could save you 15%. You go to to purchase. Home insurance is going to go through the same evolution. Same with SMB and life insurance. So we are building the next Progressive.

What has changed with COVID-19?

COVID happened and digitization moved everything five years forward. The place of the home in our lives changed significantly because it's where you sit, is your office, but it's also your gym, it's the school, your kitchen, it's everything.

So is your model cheaper with no agents?

What we realize is you can't be mono-channel. We're omnichannel, so you can go to, and you can go via an agent of another company or independent agents, and you can go via our partners. You can buy a house on Compass, and it's going to be embedded via an API with the policy. You're always going to get the same price. It's my problem if the margin is going to be different. The world is moving to direct, but it always moves slower than people think. So it's also moving to independent. I'm agnostic. I'll serve a customer however they want.

Protocol | Enterprise

Startups are pouncing as SaaS giants struggle in the intelligence race

Companies like Salesforce and Workday spent the last two decades building walled gardens around their systems. Now, it's a mad dash to make those ecosystems more open.

Companies want to predict the future, and "systems of intelligence" might be their best bet.

Image: Yuichiro Chino / Getty Images

Take a look at any software vendor's marketing materials and you're sure to see some variation of the word "intelligence" splattered everywhere.

It's part of a tectonic shift happening within enterprise technology. Companies spent the last several years moving their systems to the internet and, along the way, rapidly adopting new applications.

Keep Reading Show less
Joe Williams

Joe Williams is a senior reporter at Protocol covering enterprise software, including industry giants like Salesforce, Microsoft, IBM and Oracle. He previously covered emerging technology for Business Insider. Joe can be reached at To share information confidentially, he can also be contacted on a non-work device via Signal (+1-309-265-6120) or

Keep Reading Show less
A technology company reimagining global capital markets and economies.
Protocol | Workplace

The hottest new perk in tech: A week off for burnout recovery

In an industry where long hours are a "badge of honor," a week of rest may be the best way to retain talent.

Tech companies are giving their employees a week to rest and recover from burnout.

Photo: Kinga Cichewicz/Unsplash

In early May, the founder of Lessonly, a company that makes training software, sent out a companywide email issuing a mandate to all employees. But it wasn't the sort of mandate employees around the world have been receiving related to vaccines and masks. This mandate required that every worker take an entire week off in July.

The announcement took Lessonly's staff by surprise. "We had employees reach out and share that they were emotional, just thankful that they had the opportunity to do this," said Megan Jarvis, who leads the company's talent team and worked on planning the week off.

Keep Reading Show less
Aisha Counts
Aisha J. Counts is a reporting fellow at Protocol, based out of Los Angeles. Previously, she worked for Ernst & Young, where she researched and wrote about the future of work, the gig economy and startups. She is a graduate of the University of Southern California, where she studied business and philosophy.

Chip costs are rising. How will that affect gadget prices?

The global chip shortage is causing component costs to go up, so hardware makers are finding new ways to keep their prices low.

Chips are getting more expensive, but most consumer electronics companies have so far resisted price increases.

Photo: Chris Hondros/Getty Images

How do you get people to pay more for your products while avoiding sticker shock? That's a question consumer electronics companies are grappling with as worldwide chip shortages and component cost increases are squeezing their bottom lines.

One way to do it: Make more expensive and higher-margin products seem like a good deal to customers.

Keep Reading Show less
Janko Roettgers

Janko Roettgers (@jank0) is a senior reporter at Protocol, reporting on the shifting power dynamics between tech, media, and entertainment, including the impact of new technologies. Previously, Janko was Variety's first-ever technology writer in San Francisco, where he covered big tech and emerging technologies. He has reported for Gigaom, Frankfurter Rundschau, Berliner Zeitung, and ORF, among others. He has written three books on consumer cord-cutting and online music and co-edited an anthology on internet subcultures. He lives with his family in Oakland.

Protocol | Policy

Laws want humans to check biased AI. Research shows they can’t.

Policymakers want people to oversee — and override — biased AI. But research suggests there's no evidence to prove humans are up to the task.

The recent trend toward requiring human oversight of automated decision-making systems runs counter to mounting research about humans' inability to effectively override AI tools.

Photo: Jackal Pan/Getty Images

There was a time, not long ago, when a certain brand of technocrat could argue with a straight face that algorithms are less biased decision-makers than human beings — and not be laughed out of the room. That time has come and gone, as the perils of AI bias have entered mainstream awareness.

Awareness of bias hasn't stopped institutions from deploying algorithms to make life-altering decisions about, say, people's prison sentences or their health care coverage. But the fear of runaway AI has led to a spate of laws and policy guidance requiring or recommending that these systems have some sort of human oversight, so machines aren't making the final call all on their own. The problem is: These laws almost never stop to ask whether human beings are actually up to the job.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.

Latest Stories