Crypto CEOs and Congress share a worry: What happens to the U.S. dollar?

Crypto executives were supposed to discuss fraud and manipulation. Instead, members of Congress grilled them about the waning global dominance of the U.S. dollar.

House Financial Services Committee Chair Maxine Waters

The hearing called by committee Chair Maxine Waters was intended to help guide regulation to protect investors and preserve market integrity.

Photo: Stefani Reynolds/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Executives from several of the largest crypto exchanges testified before the House Financial Services Committee on Wednesday — ostensibly to discuss how digital assets could be vulnerable to fraud, manipulation and abuse. The hearing instead took a dramatic turn, as members of Congress focused on the waning role of the U.S. dollar.

The hearing called by committee Chair Maxine Waters was intended to help guide regulation to protect investors and preserve market integrity, concerns that have mounted as crypto markets have gyrated and scammers have made off with millions of dollars. But over the course of the four-hour hearing, a larger theme arose surrounding the threat decentralized cryptocurrencies pose to the dollar’s status as the global reserve currency.

Congressman Blaine Luetkemeyer of Missouri kicked off the discussion on this front. He cited the dominance of the U.S. dollar in foreign exchange markets as a key reason for its status as global reserve currency. Luetkemeyer went on to say that if the U.S. loses its status as the global reserve currency, “our economy, our whole country, our way of life is at risk.”

“I’ve said for a long time that the secular reduction in dollar holdings as a percentage of global central bank holdings is alarming, and this has been going on for more than 10 years at this point,” said Brian Brooks, CEO of Bitfury Group. The European Central Bank and Bank of Japan each reduced their holdings of U.S. dollars from around 80% to 60% of total reserves, according to Brooks, who was the acting comptroller of the Currency until January. IMF data from the end of 2020 showed that the share of U.S. dollar held by central banks had reached its lowest level in 25 years, at around 59%.

Jeremy Allaire, the CEO and co-founder of Circle, called maintaining the U.S. dollar’s global reserve status “not just a national economic priority, a national security priority.” Circle backs a dollar-linked stablecoin, the USD Coin or USDC.

While everyone at the hearing seemed to agree on the problem, coherent solutions didn’t emerge from the conversation. The cryptocurrency executives predictably suggested various fixes that involved the U.S. government embracing private companies in their sector.

“Partnering closely with private companies and using open internet technologies becomes a way for the United States to compete versus states that are seeking to nationalize that infrastructure [and] operate it themselves in a surveillance-oriented model,” Allaire said.

That was a reference to China, which has banned decentralized cryptocurrencies and introduced its own digital yuan. China wants its digital yuan, also known as the e-CNY, to become a global reserve currency, and is working with Thailand and the UAE on a project to lower cross-border central bank payment costs with central bank digital currencies. U.S. politicians have expressed concerns that a digital yuan would give China immense surveillance capabilities, though Chinese officials have insisted that the system affords some anonymity.

Bitfury’s Brooks took a slightly different angle, suggesting that competition from decentralized cryptocurrencies could help “shore up our monetary policy and keep the dollar where it rightfully ought to be, which is as the dominant reserve currency it’s been for all of our lives.”

Brooks also said the U.S. wouldn’t be able to take the primacy of the dollar for granted in the future, and that it would instead have to compete on utility and features — something a shift to internet-enabled dollars would allow.

“There will come a time — gradually, then suddenly — when the attractiveness of the dollar relative to other currencies could change,” he said.

This stance isn’t likely to win over those concerned about the threat posed by cryptocurrencies toward the dollar: Why compete on a “free market” of digital currencies when the U.S. dollar still reigns supreme?

Crypto enthusiasts insist the cat is already out of the bag. They argue the U.S. would be better off embracing innovation rather than unsuccessfully trying to stifle it. The popularity of dollar-linked stablecoins could well cement the dollar’s role instead of eroding it, for example.

Another school of thought, however, would say this is a naive view — that the U.S. dollar doesn’t reign supreme because of technology and “features,” but because of all the other ways the U.S. exerts power over the rest of the world.

Every day, millions of us press the “order” button on our favorite coffee store's mobile application: Our chosen brew will be on the counter when we arrive. It’s a personalized, seamless experience that we have all come to expect. What we don’t know is what’s happening behind the scenes. The mobile application is sourcing data from a database that stores information about each customer and what their favorite coffee drinks are. It is also leveraging event-streaming data in real time to ensure the ingredients for your personal coffee are in supply at your local store.

Applications like this power our daily lives, and if they can’t access massive amounts of data stored in a database as well as stream data “in motion” instantaneously, you — and millions of customers — won’t have these in-the-moment experiences.

Keep Reading Show less
Jennifer Goforth Gregory
Jennifer Goforth Gregory has worked in the B2B technology industry for over 20 years. As a freelance writer she writes for top technology brands, including IBM, HPE, Adobe, AT&T, Verizon, Epson, Oracle, Intel and Square. She specializes in a wide range of technology, such as AI, IoT, cloud, cybersecurity, and CX. Jennifer also wrote a bestselling book The Freelance Content Marketing Writer to help other writers launch a high earning freelance business.

How the internet got privatized and how the government could fix it

Author Ben Tarnoff discusses municipal broadband, Web3 and why closing the “digital divide” isn’t enough.

The Biden administration’s Internet for All initiative, which kicked off in May, will roll out grant programs to expand and improve broadband infrastructure, teach digital skills and improve internet access for “everyone in America by the end of the decade.”

Decisions about who is eligible for these grants will be made based on the Federal Communications Commission’s broken, outdated and incorrect broadband maps — maps the FCC plans to update only after funding has been allocated. Inaccurate broadband maps are just one of many barriers to getting everyone in the country successfully online. Internet service providers that use government funds to connect rural and low-income areas have historically provided those regions with slow speeds and poor service, forcing community residents to find reliable internet outside of their homes.

Keep Reading Show less
Aditi Mukund
Aditi Mukund is Protocol’s Data Analyst. Prior to joining Protocol, she was an analyst at The Daily Beast and NPR where she wrangled data into actionable insights for editorial, audience, commerce, subscription, and product teams. She holds a B.S in Cognitive Science, Human Computer Interaction from The University of California, San Diego.

How I decided to exit my startup’s original business

Bluevine got its start in factoring invoices for small businesses. CEO Eyal Lifshitz explains why it dropped that business in favor of “end-to-end banking.”

"[I]t was a realization that we can't be successful at both at the same time: You've got to choose."

Photo: Bluevine

Click banner image for more How I decided series

Bluevine got its start in fintech by offering a modern version of invoice factoring, the centuries-old practice where businesses sell off their accounts receivable for up-front cash. It’s raised $240 million in venture capital and about $700 million in total financing since its founding in 2013 by serving small businesses. But along the way, it realized it was better to focus on the checking accounts and lines of credit it provided customers than its original product. It now manages some $500 million in checking-account deposits.

Keep Reading Show less
Ryan Deffenbaugh
Ryan Deffenbaugh is a reporter at Protocol focused on fintech. Before joining Protocol, he reported on New York's technology industry for Crain's New York Business. He is based in New York and can be reached at

The Roe decision could change how advertisers use location data

Over the years, the digital ad industry has been resistant to restricting use of location data. But that may be changing.

Over the years, the digital ad industry has been resistant to restrictions on the use of location data. But that may be changing.

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

When the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade on Friday, the likelihood for location data to be used against people suddenly shifted from a mostly hypothetical scenario to a realistic threat. Although location data has a variety of purposes — from helping municipalities assess how people move around cities to giving reliable driving directions — it’s the voracious appetite of digital advertisers for location information that has fueled the creation and growth of a sector selling data showing who visited specific points on the map, when, what places they came from and where they went afterwards.

Over the years, the digital ad industry has been resistant to restrictions on the use of location data. But that may be changing. The overturning of Roe not only puts the wide availability of location data for advertising in the spotlight, it could serve as a turning point compelling the digital ad industry to take action to limit data associated with sensitive places before the government does.

Keep Reading Show less
Kate Kaye

Kate Kaye is an award-winning multimedia reporter digging deep and telling print, digital and audio stories. She covers AI and data for Protocol. Her reporting on AI and tech ethics issues has been published in OneZero, Fast Company, MIT Technology Review, CityLab, Ad Age and Digiday and heard on NPR. Kate is the creator of and is the author of "Campaign '08: A Turning Point for Digital Media," a book about how the 2008 presidential campaigns used digital media and data.

Latest Stories