The battle to 'win Ethereum' is on

The key to fast, cheap crypto transactions is "rolling up." The question is how.


Will developers and users flock to the most advanced technology, or will they just go with what works when they need it?

Illustration: Christopher T. Fong/Protocol

Ethereum, the second-most-valuable cryptocurrency blockchain after bitcoin, has been hailed for its programmable smart contracts and greater flexibility. But it faces challenges in scaling up: Transaction speeds are slow and costs high.

Layer 2 networks that sit on top of Ethereum are designed to address these challenges. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has said that the future of Ethereum will depend on Layer 2 networks for scaling, even after Ethereum moves to a faster, more environmentally friendly system known as proof of stake.

This intense competition to "win Ethereum" boils down to this question: Will developers and users flock to the most advanced technology, or will they just go with what works when they need it? Convenience often wins, unless the technology is so much better or some other incentive drives them to try something new.

Scaling Ethereum is still its biggest problem. The company that can solve this will be in the driver’s seat to power a range of services on Ethereum, including decentralized finance, NFTs, gaming and more. Because Ethereum is the largest smart-contract protocol and is popular with developers, whoever becomes the dominant Layer 2 on Ethereum could end up handling a sizable portion of crypto transactions. The debate over which option will prevail is as fierce as any in crypto.

Layer 2 networks are still relatively small compared to other Layer 1 blockchains — the primary ledger and protocol associated with a specific token, like bitcoin or litecoin. "That will change over time" as more users shift to Layer 2 applications, said Haseeb Qureshi, managing partner at Dragonfly Capital.

A key Layer 2 strategy is the rollup, or bundling of transactions off the main chain for faster processing. The two main approaches are optimistic rollups and zero knowledge, or ZK, rollups. Both approaches reduce congestion on the Ethereum blockchain, speed transactions and lower costs.

Optimistic rollups are live. Arbitrum is the largest player with $2.9 billion in total value locked, or deposited, in the network. Crypto entities using Arbitrum include decentralized exchanges SushiSwap and Uniswap and NFT project Treasure.

Optimistic rollups validate and execute transactions and send them to Ethereum, and only run a computation fraud proof if a transaction is challenged — thus the moniker "optimistic." These transactions can be challenged after they’re sent back to the Ethereum chain for up to seven days.

ZK rollups, on the other hand, always run an advanced cryptographic proof called "zero knowledge" and then submit it back to Ethereum. ZK is designed to be foolproof since transactions are all verified and thus can’t be challenged. The newer technology is still just emerging in the wild.

But the technology is much better, and sure to improve, supporters say. "It’s really hard to do" zero-knowledge proofs, said Qureshi, whose firm invested in Matter Labs, a ZK rollup startup. “Only in the last year and a half have they come up with ways that were thought to be theoretically impossible.”

Optimistic supporters like Steven Goldfeder, CEO of Offchain Labs, which created Arbitrum, says ZK rollups are "orders of magnitude" more expensive than optimistic ones, because of the intensive calculations required. Some ZK systems that have launched are not including the costs of the proofs that they run off-chain for customers, which obscures their true costs, he said.

"We think optimistic systems are more practical and much cheaper to operate than ZK systems," said Ed Felten, co-founder of Offchain Labs.

ZK supporters say optimistic rollups take too long to be fully completed, since they can be challenged up to seven days after they are executed. This means that someone seeking to get their ETH tokens out of a Layer 2 such as Arbitrum to the Ethereum network would have to wait seven days. That’s not viable in crypto, where people want fast access to capital, Qureshi said. One week is "worse than a wire transfer," he said.

There are several services, however, that will pay users instantly, minus a small fee, and take on the risk of being challenged. And this type of challenge is rare and actually hasn’t happened yet, due to the financial penalties for posting a rollup that is wrong or making an unsuccessful challenge to a correct rollup, Felten said.

Even though there is a delay with withdrawing funds to Ethereum, these optimistic transactions actually have already been fully verified on Layer 2. The reason for the delay is Ethereum doesn’t see the transactions and has not validated those transactions yet.

Firms like Andreessen Horowitz are betting on ZK rollups as the future, and NFT-focused Immutable X uses StarkWare’s ZK rollup technology. But the best technology doesn’t necessarily win.

Even Arbitrum’s Goldfeder admits that ZK rollups are technologically impressive and doesn’t rule out supporting ZK rollups in the future.

But he says it’s unfair to compare optimistic rollups in their current state to ZK rollups in the future, since optimistic technology will improve in the future as well.

This isn’t the first time Ethereum has pushed for an off-chain scaling solution: Plasma was a previous effort that didn’t work out. But Buterin and others believe a new system based on rollups will work, even if it takes years to become mainstream.

Both technologies will coexist for a while, said Jake Brukhman, founder and CEO at CoinFund, which has made some Layer 2 investments. Over the longer term, ZK rollups have a technology advantage, he said. Meanwhile, he said, other Layer 1 blockchains could eventually be an even bigger threat in terms of speed, scalability and security.

That’s part of what’s at stake as Layer 2 networks develop: If Ethereum can’t scale to handle the demand for transactions, it could drive developers to other blockchains. And the software industry has proven that developers are key to winning.

LA is a growing tech hub. But not everyone may fit.

LA has a housing crisis similar to Silicon Valley’s. And single-family-zoning laws are mostly to blame.

As the number of tech companies in the region grows, so does the number of tech workers, whose high salaries put them at an advantage in both LA's renting and buying markets.

Photo: Nat Rubio-Licht/Protocol

LA’s tech scene is on the rise. The number of unicorn companies in Los Angeles is growing, and the city has become the third-largest startup ecosystem nationally behind the Bay Area and New York with more than 4,000 VC-backed startups in industries ranging from aerospace to creators. As the number of tech companies in the region grows, so does the number of tech workers. The city is quickly becoming more and more like Silicon Valley — a new startup and a dozen tech workers on every corner and companies like Google, Netflix, and Twitter setting up offices there.

But with growth comes growing pains. Los Angeles, especially the burgeoning Silicon Beach area — which includes Santa Monica, Venice, and Marina del Rey — shares something in common with its namesake Silicon Valley: a severe lack of housing.

Keep Reading Show less
Nat Rubio-Licht

Nat Rubio-Licht is a Los Angeles-based news writer at Protocol. They graduated from Syracuse University with a degree in newspaper and online journalism in May 2020. Prior to joining the team, they worked at the Los Angeles Business Journal as a technology and aerospace reporter.

While there remains debate among economists about whether we are officially in a full-blown recession, the signs are certainly there. Like most executives right now, the outlook concerns me.

In any case, businesses aren’t waiting for the official pronouncement. They’re already bracing for impact as U.S. inflation and interest rates soar. Inflation peaked at 9.1% in June 2022 — the highest increase since November 1981 — and the Federal Reserve is targeting an interest rate of 3% by the end of this year.

Keep Reading Show less
Nancy Sansom

Nancy Sansom is the Chief Marketing Officer for Versapay, the leader in Collaborative AR. In this role, she leads marketing, demand generation, product marketing, partner marketing, events, brand, content marketing and communications. She has more than 20 years of experience running successful product and marketing organizations in high-growth software companies focused on HCM and financial technology. Prior to joining Versapay, Nancy served on the senior leadership teams at PlanSource, Benefitfocus and PeopleMatter.


SFPD can now surveil a private camera network funded by Ripple chair

The San Francisco Board of Supervisors approved a policy that the ACLU and EFF argue will further criminalize marginalized groups.

SFPD will be able to temporarily tap into private surveillance networks in certain circumstances.

Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

Ripple chairman and co-founder Chris Larsen has been funding a network of security cameras throughout San Francisco for a decade. Now, the city has given its police department the green light to monitor the feeds from those cameras — and any other private surveillance devices in the city — in real time, whether or not a crime has been committed.

This week, San Francisco’s Board of Supervisors approved a controversial plan to allow SFPD to temporarily tap into private surveillance networks during life-threatening emergencies, large events, and in the course of criminal investigations, including investigations of misdemeanors. The decision came despite fervent opposition from groups, including the ACLU of Northern California and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which say the police department’s new authority will be misused against protesters and marginalized groups in a city that has been a bastion for both.

Keep Reading Show less
Issie Lapowsky

Issie Lapowsky ( @issielapowsky) is Protocol's chief correspondent, covering the intersection of technology, politics, and national affairs. She also oversees Protocol's fellowship program. Previously, she was a senior writer at Wired, where she covered the 2016 election and the Facebook beat in its aftermath. Prior to that, Issie worked as a staff writer for Inc. magazine, writing about small business and entrepreneurship. She has also worked as an on-air contributor for CBS News and taught a graduate-level course at New York University's Center for Publishing on how tech giants have affected publishing.


These two AWS vets think they can finally solve enterprise blockchain

Vendia, founded by Tim Wagner and Shruthi Rao, wants to help companies build real-time, decentralized data applications. Its product allows enterprises to more easily share code and data across clouds, regions, companies, accounts, and technology stacks.

“We have this thesis here: Cloud was always the missing ingredient in blockchain, and Vendia added it in,” Wagner (right) told Protocol of his and Shruthi Rao's company.

Photo: Vendia

The promise of an enterprise blockchain was not lost on CIOs — the idea that a database or an API could keep corporate data consistent with their business partners, be it their upstream supply chains, downstream logistics, or financial partners.

But while it was one of the most anticipated and hyped technologies in recent memory, blockchain also has been one of the most failed technologies in terms of enterprise pilots and implementations, according to Vendia CEO Tim Wagner.

Keep Reading Show less
Donna Goodison

Donna Goodison (@dgoodison) is Protocol's senior reporter focusing on enterprise infrastructure technology, from the 'Big 3' cloud computing providers to data centers. She previously covered the public cloud at CRN after 15 years as a business reporter for the Boston Herald. Based in Massachusetts, she also has worked as a Boston Globe freelancer, business reporter at the Boston Business Journal and real estate reporter at Banker & Tradesman after toiling at weekly newspapers.


Kraken's CEO got tired of being in finance

Jesse Powell tells Protocol the bureaucratic obligations of running a financial services business contributed to his decision to step back from his role as CEO of one of the world’s largest crypto exchanges.

Photo: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images

Kraken is going through a major leadership change after what has been a tough year for the crypto powerhouse, and for departing CEO Jesse Powell.

The crypto market is still struggling to recover from a major crash, although Kraken appears to have navigated the crisis better than other rivals. Despite his exchange’s apparent success, Powell found himself in the hot seat over allegations published in The New York Times that he made insensitive comments on gender and race that sparked heated conversations within the company.

Keep Reading Show less
Benjamin Pimentel

Benjamin Pimentel ( @benpimentel) covers crypto and fintech from San Francisco. He has reported on many of the biggest tech stories over the past 20 years for the San Francisco Chronicle, Dow Jones MarketWatch and Business Insider, from the dot-com crash, the rise of cloud computing, social networking and AI to the impact of the Great Recession and the COVID crisis on Silicon Valley and beyond. He can be reached at or via Google Voice at (925) 307-9342.

Latest Stories